4,033
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Living in Tier 2: educators’ perceptions of MTSS in urban schools

, , , , &
Pages 1114-1128 | Received 22 Dec 2017, Accepted 07 Aug 2018, Published online: 16 Aug 2018

References

  • Abbott, M., and H. Wills. 2012. “Improving the Upside-Down Response-To-Intervention Triangle with a Systematic, Effective Elementary School Reading Team.” Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth 56 (1): 37–46. doi: 10.1080/1045988X.2011.555793
  • Berkeley, S., W. N. Bender, L. G. Peaster, and L. Saunders. 2009. “Implementation of Response to Intervention: A Snapshot of Progress.” Journal of Learning Disabilities 42: 85–95. doi: 10.1177/0022219408326214
  • Boeije, H. 2002. “A Purposeful Approach to the Constant Comparison Method in the Analysis of Qualitative Interviews.” Quality and Quantity 36: 391–409. doi:10.1023/A:1020909529486.
  • Burns, M. K., S. M. Pulles, L. Helman, and J. McComas. 2016. “Assessment-Based Intervention Frameworks: An Example of a Tier 1 Reading Intervention in an Urban School.” In Psychoeducational Assessment and Intervention for Ethnic Minority Children: Evidence-Based Practices, edited by S. L. Graves and J. J. Blake, 165–182. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Castro-Villarreal, F., B. J. Rodriguez, and S. Moore. 2014. “Teachers’ Perceptions and Attitudes about Response to Intervention (RTI) in Their Schools: A Qualitative Analysis.” Teaching and Teacher Education 40: 104–112. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.02.004.
  • Charmaz, K. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Creswell, J. W. 2013. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cusumano, D. L., K. Algozzine, and B. Algozzine. 2014. “Multi-Tiered Systems of Support for Effective Inclusion in Elementary Schools.” In Handbook of Effective Inclusive Schools: Research and Practice, edited by J. McLeskey, N. L. Waldron, F. Spooner, and B. Algozzine, 197–209. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Denzin, N. K., and Y. S. Lincoln. 2011. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114-95 § 114 Stat. 1177 (2015).
  • Fuchs, D., and L. S. Fuchs. 2006. “Introduction to Response to Intervention: What, Why, and How Valid Is It?” Reading Research Quarterly 41 (1): 93–99. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4
  • Fuchs, D., D. Mock, P. L. Morgan, and C. L. Young. 2003. “Responsiveness-To-Intervention: Definitions, Evidence, and Implications for the Learning Disabilities Construct.” Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 18 (3): 157–171. doi: 10.1111/1540-5826.00072
  • Glaser, B. G. 1965. “The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis.” Social Problems 12 (4): 436–445. doi: 10.2307/798843
  • Graczyk, P. A., C. E. Domitrovich, M. Small, and J. E. Zins. 2006. “Serving all Children: An Implementation Model Framework.” School Psychology Review 35 (2): 266–274.
  • Greenfield, R., C. Rinaldi, C. P. Proctor, and A. Cardarelli. 2010. “Teachers’ Perceptions of a Response to Intervention (RTI) Reform Effort in an Urban Elementary School: A Consensual Qualitative Analysis.” Journal of Disability Policy Studies 21 (1): 47–63. doi:10.1177/1044207310365499.
  • Haager, D., and J. Mahdavi. 2007. “Teacher Roles in Implementing Interventions.” In Evidence-Based Reading Practices for Response to Intervention, edited by D. Haager, J. Klinger, and S. Vaughn, 245–264. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Harlacher, J. E., T. L. Sakelaris, and N. M. Kattelman. 2014. Practitioner’s Guide to Curriculum-Based Evaluation in Reading. New York: Springer.
  • Harlacher, J. E., and C. E. Siler. 2011. “Factors Related to Successful RTI Implementation.” Communiqué 39 (6): 20–22.
  • Johnson, E. S., and D. F. Mellard. 2014. “Multi-Tiered System of Supports for Effective Inclusion in Secondary Schools.” In Handbook of Effective Inclusive School Research and Practice, 216–228. New York: Routledge.
  • Kraft, M. A., J. P. Papay, S. M. Johnson, M. Charner-Laird, M. Ng, and S. Reinhorn. 2015. “Educating Amid Uncertainty: The Organizational Supports Teachers Need to Serve Students in High-Poverty, Urban Schools.” Educational Administration Quarterly 51 (5): 753–790. doi: 10.1177/0013161X15607617
  • Maier, M. P., J. L. Pate, N. M. Gibson, L. Hilgert, K. Hull, and P. C. Campbell. 2016. “A Quantitative Examination of School Leadership and Response to Intervention.” Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 31 (2): 103–112. doi: 10.1111/ldrp.12100
  • Maxwell, J. A. 2012. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Meyer, M., and L. Behar-Horenstein. 2015. “When Leadership Matters: Perspectives from a Teacher Team Implementing Response to Intervention.” Education and Treatment of Children 38 (3): 383–402. doi:10.1353/etc.2015.0022.
  • Mitchell, B. B., D. D. Deshler, and B. K. B. Lenz. 2012. “Examining the Role of the Special Educator in a Response to Intervention Model.” Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal 10 (2): 53.
  • National Center for Intensive Interventions. 2015. “Mathematics Strategies to Support Intensifying Interventions.” https://intensiveintervention.org/intervention-resources/mathematics-strategies-support-intensifying-interventions#fluency.
  • Orosco, M. J., and J. Klingner. 2010. “One School’s Implementation of RTI with English Language Learners: “Referring Into RTI”.” Journal of Learning Disabilities 43 (3): 269–288. doi:10.1177/0022219409355474.
  • Reinke, W. M., M. Stormont, K. C. Herman, R. Puri, and N. Goel. 2011. “Supporting Children’s Mental Health in Schools: Teacher Perceptions of Needs, Roles, and Barriers.” School Psychology Quarterly 26 (1): 1–13. doi: 10.1037/a0022714
  • Steinberg, S. R. 2010. 19 Urban Questions: Teaching in the City. Second Edition. Counterpoints: Studies in Postmodern Theory of Education, Vol. 215. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Sugai, G., and R. H. Horner. 2009. “Responsiveness-To-Intervention and School-Wide Positive Behavior Supports: Integration of Multi-Tiered System Approaches.” Exceptionality 17 (4): 223–237. doi: 10.1080/09362830903235375
  • Torlaković, E. 2011. “Academy of MATH® Efficacy Report – Westwood Elementary School.” https://charts.intensiveintervention.org/chart/academic-intervention-chart/13677.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.