School leaders’ vision is the strongest predictor of their attitudes towards inclusive education practice

References

• Ainscow, M., and A. Sandill. 2010. “Developing Inclusive Education Systems: The Role of Organisational Cultures and Leadership.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 14 (4): 401–416. doi:10.1080/13603110802504903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Mahdy, Y. F. H., and M. M. Emam. 2017. “Much ado About Something’ how School Leaders Affect Attitudes Towards Inclusive Education: the Case of Oman.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 22 (11): 1154–1172. doi:10.1080/13603116.2017.1417500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcidiacono, F., and A. Baucal. 2020. “Towards Teacher Professionalization for Inclusive Education: Reflections from the Perspective of a Socio-Cultural Approach.” Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri 8 (1): 26–47. doi:10.12697/eha.2020.8.1.02b.
   Google Scholar
• Avramidis, E., and B. Norwich. 2002. “Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Integration/Inclusion: A Review of the Literature.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 17 (2): 129–147. doi:10.1080/08856250210129056.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, J. 2004. “The Validation of Scale to Measure School Principals’ Attitudes Toward the Inclusion of Students with Disabilities in Regular Schools.” Australian Psychologist 39 (1): 76–87. doi:10.1080/00050060410001660371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balti Uuringute Instituut. 2015. Õpetajate täiendusõppe vajadused. Lõpparuanne. http://dspace.ut.ee/bitstream/handle/10062/45196/Opetaja_taiendoppe%20vajadus.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
   Google Scholar
• Basic Schools and Upper Secondary Schools Act. 2010. Riigi Teataja I, 2010,41,240. http://riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/ee/530102013042/consolide.
   Google Scholar
• Basic Schools and Upper Secondary Schools Act. 2019. Riigi Teataja I, 2019,120. http://riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/ee/Riigikogu/act/503062019007/consolide.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., M. Priestley, and S. Robinson. 2015. “The Role of Beliefs in Teacher Agency.” Teachers and Teaching 21 (6): 624–640. doi:10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billett, S. 2006. “Relational Interdependence Between Social and Individual Agency in Work and Working Life.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 13 (1): 53–69. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca1301_5.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, N. K., and S. Guo. 2012. Structural Equation Modelling. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. D., and C. C. Mogharberran. 2007. “The gap Between Beliefs and Practices: Early Childhood Practitioners’ Perceptions About Inclusion.” Journal of Research in Childhood Education 21 (3): 229–241. doi:10.1080/02568540709594591.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J., L. Gilmore, and M. Cuskelly. 2003. “Changing Student Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Disability and Inclusion.” Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 28 (4): 369–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grogan, M. 2013. The Jossey-Bass Reader on Educational Leadership. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Häidkind, P., and K. Oras. 2016. “Kaasava Hariduse Mõiste Ning õpetaja ees Seisvad ülesanded Lasteaedades ja Esimeses Kooliastmes. [The Notion of Inclusive Education and Challenges for the Teacher in Kindergartens and the First Stage of School].” Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri 4 (2): 60–88. doi:10.12697/eha.2016.4.2.04.
   Google Scholar
• Idol, L. 2006. “Toward Inclusion of Special Education Students in General Education: A Program Evaluation of Eight Schools.” Remedial and Special Education 27 (2): 77–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juutilainen, M., Metsäpelto, R. L., and A. M. Poikkeus 2018. "Becoming Agentic Teachers: Experiences of the Home Group Approach as a Resource for Supporting Teacher Students' Agency." Teaching and Teacher Education 76: 116–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kielblock, S. 2018. “Inclusive Education for All: Development of an Instrument to Measure the Teachers’ Attitudes.” Doctoral Dissertation, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany. Macquarie University Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Kivirand, T., Ä Leijen, L. Lepp, and L. Malva. 2020. “Kaasava Hariduse Tähendus ja Tõhusa Rakendamise Tegurid Eesti Kontekstis: õpetajaid Koolitavate või Nõustavate Spetsialistide Vaade [The Meaning of Inclusive Education and Factors for Effective Implementation in the Estonian Context: a View of Specialists who Train or Advise Teachers].” Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri 8 (1): 48–71. doi:10.12697/eha.2020.8.1.03.
   Google Scholar
• Kivirand, T., Ä Leijen, L. Lepp, and T. Tammemäe. 2021. “Designing and Implementing an In-Service Training Course for School Teams on Inclusive Education: Reflections from Participants.” Education Sciences 11 (4): 166. doi:10.3390/educsci11040166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. 1998. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling. NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larrivee, B. 1985. Effective Teaching for Successful Mainstreaming. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Larrivee, B., and M. D. Horne. 1991. “Social Status: A Comparison of Mainstreamed Students with Peers of Different Ability Levels.” Journal of Special Education 25: 90–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leijen, Ä, M. Pedaste, and L. Lepp. 2020. “Teacher Agency Following the Ecological Model: How it is Achieved and how it Could be Strengthened by Different Types of Reflection.” British Journal of Educational Studies 68 (3): 295–310. doi:10.1080/00071005.2019.1672855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahat, M. 2008. “The Development of a Psychometrically-Sound Instrument to Measure Teachers’ Multidimensional Attitudes Toward Inclusive Education.” International Journal of Special Education 23 (1): 82–92.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, S., and N. Singal. 2010. “The Education for All and Inclusive Education Debate: Conflict, Contradiction or Opportunity?” International Journal of Inclusive Education 14 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1080/13603110802265125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A. L., C. L. Wilt, H. C. Allcock, J. A. Kurth, M. E. Morningstar, and A. L. Ruppar. 2020. “Teacher Agency for Inclusive Education: an International Scoping Review.” International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1–19. doi:10.1080/13603116.2020.1789766.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., and B. O. Muthén. 2016. Mplus. Version 7.4 [Computer Software]. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nelis, P., and M. Pedaste. 2020. “Kaasava Hariduse Mudel Alushariduse Kontekstis: Süstemaatiline Kirjandusülevaade [A Model for Applying Inclusive Education in the Context of Estonian Preschool Education: Systematic Literature Review].” Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri 8 (2): 138–163. doi:10.12697/eha.2020.8.2.06.
   Google Scholar
• O'Rorke-Trigiani, J. 2003. “Attidues (ie Attitudes) Toward Inclusive Education of Elementary and Middle School Administrators, School Counselors, Special Education Teachers, Fifth Grade Regular Education Teachers, and Eight Grade English Teachers” Doctoral Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Odom, S. L. 2000. “Preschool Inclusion: What we Know and Where We Go from Here.” Topics in Early Childhood Special Education 20 (1): 20–27. doi:10.1177/027112140002000104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2020. TALIS 2018 Results (Volume II): Teachers and School Leaders as Valued Professionals. TALIS, OECD. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19cf08df-en.
   Google Scholar
• O’Laughlin, L., and J. C. Lindle. 2015. “Principals as Political Agents in the Implementation of IDEA’s Least Restrictive Environment Mandate.” Educational Policy 29 (1): 140–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, S. J. 2004. Inclusive Education: An EFA Strategy for all Children. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., G. J. J. Biesta, and S. Robinson. 2015. Teacher Agency: An Ecological Approach. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Räis, M.-L., M. Kallaste, and S.-L. Sandre. 2016. Haridusliku erivajadusega õpilaste kaasava hariduskorralduse ja sellega seotud meetmete tõhusus. Uuringu lõppraport. Eesti Rakendusuuringute Keskus CENTAR.
   Google Scholar
• Räis, M.-L., and M. Sõmer. 2016. Haridusliku erivajadusega õpilaste kaasava hariduskorralduse ja sellega seotud meetmete tõhusus. Temaatiline raport: kaasamise tähenduslikkus. Eesti Rakendusuuringute Keskus CENTAR.
   Google Scholar
• Ricci, L. A., S. B. Scheier-Dolberg, and B. K. Perkins. 2020. “Transforming Triads for Inclusion: Understanding Frames of Reference of Special Educators, General Educators, and Administrators Engaging in Collaboration for Inclusion of all Learners.” International Journal of Inclusive Education.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shade, R. A., and R. Stewart. 2001. “General Education and Special Education pre-Service Teachers Attitude Toward Inclusion.” Preventing School Failure 46 (1): 37–41. doi:10.1080/10459880109603342.
   Google Scholar
• Soukakou, E. 2012. “Measuring Quality in Inclusive Preschool Classrooms: Development and Validation of the Inclusive Classroom Profile (ICP).” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 27: 478–488. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spratt, J., and L. Florian. 2015. “Inclusive Pedagogy: From Learning to Action. Supporting Each Individual in the Context of Everybody.” Teaching and Teacher Education 49: 89–96. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumbera, M. J., B. L. Pazey, and C. Lashley. 2014. “How Building Principals Made Sense of Free and Appropriate Public Education in the Least Restrictive Environment.” Leadership & Policy in Schools 13 (3): 297–333. doi:10.1080/15700763.2014.922995.
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, J. B. 2001. “Structural Equation Modeling.” In Using Multivariate Statistics, edited by B. G. Tabachnick, and L. S. Fidell, 4th ed, 653–771. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 1994. Final Report: World Conference on Special Needs Education: Access and Quality. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Van Mieghem, A., K. Verschueren, V. Donche, and E. Struyf. 2020. “Leadership as a Lever for Inclusive Education in Flanders: A Multiple Case Study Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 1741143220953608.
   Google Scholar
• Van Reusen, A. K., A. R. Shoho, and K. S. Barker. 2001. “High School Teacher Attitudes Toward Inclusion.” The High School Journal 84 (2): 7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Vlachou, A., and A. Fyssa. 2016. “Inclusion in Practice: Programme Practices in Mainstream Preschool Classrooms and Associations with Context and Teacher Characteristics.” International Journal of Disability, Development and Education 63 (5): 529–544. doi:10.1080/1034912X.2016.1145629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilczenski, F. L. 1995. “Development of a Scale to Measure Attitudes Toward Inclusive Education.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 55 (2): 291–299. doi:10.1177/0013164495055002013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, Z., and K. F. Sin. 2015. “Exploring the Intentions and Practices of Principals Regarding Inclusive Education: an Application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour.” Cambridge Journal of Education 45 (2): 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2014.934203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, C. Y. 2002. “Evaluating Cutoff Criteria of Model Fit Indices for Latent Variable Models with Binary and Continuous Outcomes (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation).” University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar