Norwegian teachers’ perspectives on inclusive practices in the mathematics classroom

References

• Andrews, P. 2009. “Mathematics Teachers’ Didactic Strategies: Examining the Comparative Potential of low Inference Generic Descriptors.” Comparative Education Review 53 (4): 559–581. https://doi.org/10.1086/603583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskerville, D., and H. Goldblatt. 2009. “Learning to be a Critical Friend: From Professional Indifference Through Challenge to Unguarded Conversations.” Cambridge Journal of Education 39 (2): 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902902260.
   Google Scholar
• Bergem, O. K., and K. Klette. 2010. “Mathematical Tasks as Catalysts for Student Talk: Analysing Discourse in a Norwegian Mathematics Classroom.” In Mathematical Tasks in Classrooms Around the World, edited by Y. Shimizu, B. Kaur, R. Huang, and D. Clarke, 35–62. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bjørnsrud, H. 1999. Den inkluderende skole. Enhetsskolens idealer, dilemmaer og hverdag. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Bjørnsrud, H., and S. Nilsen. 2021. De uferdige utdanningsreformer og Fagfornyelsen (LK20). Oslo: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Chalkley, A. E., M. B. Mandelid, M. Thurston, A. Daly-Smith, A. Singh, I. Huiberts, and H. E. Tjomsland. 2022. ““Go Beyond Your Own Comfort Zone and Challenge Yourself”: A Comparison on the Use of Physically Active Learning in Norway, the Netherlands and the UK.” Teaching and Teacher Education 118: 103825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• d’Ambrósio, U. 2006. Ethnomathematics: Link Between Traditions and Modernity. Rotterdam: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• da Ponte, J. P. 1994. “Mathematics Teachers’ Professional Knowledge.” In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, edited by J. P. da Ponte, and J. F. Matos, 195–210. Lisbon: University of Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, E., Y. Solomon, A. H. Bjerke, J. Gray, and B. Kleve. 2022. “Making Decisions About Attainment Grouping in Mathematics: Teacher Agency and Autonomy in Norway.” Research Papers in Education 39 (3): 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2022.2135014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faldet, A. C., H. Knudsmoen, and K. Nes. 2022. “Inkluderingsbegrepet under utvikling? En analyse av de norske læreplanverkene L97, LK06 og LK20.” Nordisk Tidsskrift for Pedagogikk og Kritikk 8: 171–188. https://doi.org/10.23865/ntpk.v8.3434.
   Google Scholar
• Fasting, R. B. 2013. “Adapted Education: The Norwegian Pathway to Inclusive and Efficient Education.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 17 (3): 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2012.676083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florian, L. 2014. “What Counts as Evidence of Inclusive Education?” European Journal of Special Needs Education 29 (3): 286–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2014.933551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frostenson, M., and H. Englund. 2020. “Teachers, Performative Techniques and Professional Values: How Performativity Becomes Humanistic Through Interplay Mechanisms.” Cambridge Journal of Education 50 (6): 695–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2020.1761943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, J. T. 2010. “Collective Case Study.” In Encyclopedia of Case Study Research, edited by A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, and E. Wiebe, 164–166. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J., T. Foyn, S. Holmedal, and Y. Solomon. 2024. “On the Learning Train: Problematising the Good Lesson, submission to the Conference Proceedings of NORMA, The Tenth Nordic Conference on Mathematics Education, Copenhagen.”
   Google Scholar
• Hagman, J. E. 2021. “The Eighth Characteristic for Successful Calculus Programs: Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion Practices.” PRIMUS 31 (1): 70–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2019.1629555.
   Google Scholar
• Holmedal, S. 2023. The Purpose of Education? Exploring the Contradiction of Inclusion Through Attainment Grouping in Norwegian Mathematics Teaching. Unpublished PhD Thesis. OsloMet University.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, I., and B. Garner. 2022. Teacher Learning of Ambitious and Equitable Mathematics Instruction. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jaworski, B., and D. Phillips, eds. 1999. Comparing Standards Internationally: Research and Practice in Mathematics and Beyond. Oxford: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jenssen, E. S., and S. Lillejord. 2009. “Tilpasset Opplæring: Politisk Dragkamp om Pedagogisk Praksis.” Acta Didactica Norge 3 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.1040.
   Google Scholar
• Jortveit, M., and V. B. Kovač. 2022. “Co-Teaching That Works: Special and General Educators’ Perspectives on Collaboration.” Teaching Education 33 (3): 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2021.1895105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaasila, R. 2007. “Using Narrative Inquiry for Investigating the Becoming of a Mathematics Teacher.” ZDM – Mathematics Education 39 (3): 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0023-6.
   Google Scholar
• Knudsmoen, H., S. Mausethagen, and C. Dalland. 2022. “Ledelsesstrategier for utvikling av inkluderende undervisning.” Nordisk Tidsskrift for Pedagogikk og Kritikk 8: 189–203. https://doi.org/10.23865/ntpk.v8.3435.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., and S. Brinkmann. 2009. InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Interviewing. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lindner, K. T., and S. Schwab. 2020. “Differentiation and Individualisation in Inclusive Education: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.” International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1813450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mausethagen, S., H. Knudsmoen, and C. Dalland. 2022. “The Clustering of Public Values in Local Educational Governance: The Case of Inclusion.” Education Inquiry, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2022.2112013.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, G., and J. Bakke. 2019. “Schooling for Everyone: Norway’s Adapted Approach to Education for Everyone.” In Sustainable Development Working Group (Ed.), Including the North: A Comparative Study of the Policies on Inclusion and Equity in the Circumpolar North, 89–107. Arctic Council Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Mazenod, A., B. Francis, L. Archer, J. Hodgen, B. Taylor, A. Tereshchenko, and D. Pepper. 2019. “Nurturing Learning or Encouraging Dependency? Teacher Constructions of Students in Lower Attainment Groups in English Secondary Schools.” Cambridge Journal of Education 49 (1): 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2018.1441372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Research. 2017. Core Curriculum – Values and Principles for Primary and Secondary Education. Laid Down by Royal Decree. The National Curriculum for the Knowledge Promotion https://www.udir.no/lk20/overordnet-del/?lang=eng.
   Google Scholar
• Molbaek, M. 2018. “Inclusive Teaching Strategies–Dimensions and Agendas.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 22 (10): 1048–1061. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1414578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, C., T. Craig, M. Schütte, and D. Wagner. 2014. “Language and Communication in Mathematics Education: An Overview of Research in the Field.” ZDM – Mathematics Education 46 (6): 843–853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0624-9.
   Google Scholar
• National Centre for Science Education. 2015. Rapport fra ekspertgruppa for realfagene.[Report from the Expert Group of Science and Mathematics Education]. Nasjonalt senter for naturfag i opplæringa, Oslo. Norway. Accessed 4 March 2024. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/Rapport-fra-ekspertgruppa-for-relafagene/id2343488/.
   Google Scholar
• Nes, K., H. Demo, and D. Ianes. 2018. “Inclusion at Risk? Push-and Pull-Out Phenomena in Inclusive School Systems: The Italian and Norwegian Experiences.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 22 (2): 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1362045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwegian National Committees for Research Ethics. 2016. Guidelines for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences, Humanities, Law and Theology. https://www.etikkom.no/en/ethical-guidelines-for-research/guidelines-for-research-ethics-in-the-social-sciences–humanities-law-and-theology/.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Research Council. 2019. “Inclusive Mathematics Teaching: Understanding and Developing School and Classroom Strategies for Raising Attainment”. https://prosjektbanken.forskningsradet.no/project/FORISS/287132.
   Google Scholar
• Ollerton, M. 2009. “Inclusive Mathematics Classrooms.” Mathematics Teaching 216: 5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Prediger, S., and R. Buró. 2024. “Fifty Ways to Work with Students’ Diverse Abilities? A Video Study on Inclusive Teaching Practices in Secondary Mathematics Classrooms.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 28 (2): 124–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1925361.
   Google Scholar
• Roos, H. 2019. “Inclusion in Mathematics Education: An Ideology, a Way of Teaching, or Both?” Educational Studies in Mathematics 100 (1): 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9854-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandal, A. K., I. Helleve, K. Smith, and S. M. Gamlem. 2022. “Feedback practice in lower secondary school: Exploring development of perceptions of feedback practice among students and teachers.” Cogent Education 9 (1): 2101236. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2101236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slee, R. 2019. “Belonging in an Age of Exclusion.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 23 (9): 909–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1602366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solhaug, T. 2011. “New Public Management in Educational Reform in Norway.” Policy Futures in Education 9 (2): 267–279. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2011.9.2.267.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strømstad, M., K. Nes, and K. Skogen. 2004. Hva er inkludering?: rapport 1 fra evalueringsprosjektet ‘En vurdering av om innføringen av Reform 97’. Vallset: Oplandske bokforl og Norges forskningsråd.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, D. M., H. L. Yu, and S. Mouroutsou. 2017. “Inclusion as Ethics, Equity and/or Human Rights? Spotlighting School Mathematics Practices in Scotland and Globally.” Social Inclusion 5 (3): 172–182. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v5i3.984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. 2012. “Use and Exchange Value in Mathematics Education: Contemporary CHAT Meets Bourdieu’s Sociology.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 80 (1): 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9362-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xenofontos, C. 2018. “Greek-Cypriot Elementary Teachers’ Epistemological Beliefs About Mathematics.” Teaching and Teacher Education 70: 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xenofontos, C. 2019. “Primary Teachers’ Perspectives on Mathematics During Curriculum Reform: A Collective Case Study from Cyprus.” Issues in Educational Research 29 (3): 979–996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar