The practical legacy of the educational administration field: probing into authors’ implications for policy-makers, leaders and trainers

References

• Altheide, D. L. (1996). Qualitative media analysis. Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• *Arnold, N. W., & Crawford, E. R. (2014). Metaphors of leadership and spatialized practice. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 17(3), 257–285.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, R. (2002). The impact of educational research: Alternative methodologies and conclusions. Research Papers in Education, 17(4), 403–408.
   Google Scholar
• *Berkovich, I. (2011). No we won’t! Teachers’ resistance to educational reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(5), 563–578.
   Google Scholar
• *Cemaloğlu, N. (2011). Primary principals’ leadership styles, school organizational health and workplace bullying. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(5), 495–512.
   Google Scholar
• *Bevel, R. K., & Mitchell, R. M. (2012). The effects of academic optimism on elementary reading achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(6), 773–787.
   Google Scholar
• *Bouchamma, Y., & Michaud, C. (2014). Professional development of supervisors through professional learning communities. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 17(1), 62–82.
   Google Scholar
• *Browning, P. (2014). Why trust the head? Key practices for transformational school leaders to build a purposeful relationship of trust. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 17(4), 388–409.
   Google Scholar
• *Capper, C. A. (2015). The 20th-year anniversary of critical race theory in education: Implications for leading to eliminate racism. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(5), 791–833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. London: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bleiklie, I., & Byrkjeflot, H. (2002). Changing knowledge regimes: Universities in a new research environment. Higher Education, 44, 519–532. doi:10.1023/A:1019898407492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, E..L. (1982). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, N.J: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, T. (2000). Administration and management in education. In B. Moon, M. Ben-Peretz, & S. Brown (eds.), Routledge international companion to education (pp. 272–282). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C., & Stein, K. (2010). Research and practice in education. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• *Davis, B. W., Gooden, M. A., & Micheaux, D. J. (2015). Color-blind leadership: A critical race theory analysis of the ISLLC and ELCC standards. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(3), 335–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Dimopoulos, K., Dalkavouki, K., & Koulaidis, V. (2015). Job realities of primary school principals in Greece: Similarities and variations in a highly centralized system. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 18(2), 197–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbins, C. G., & Lee, C. B. T. (Eds.). (1968). Whose goals for american higher education? Washington, D.C: American Council of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Dredge, D. (2014). Does relevance matter in academic policy research? Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 7(2), 137–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunnette, M. D. (1990). Blending the science and practice of industrial and organisational psychology: where are we and where are we going? In M. D. Dunnette & I. M. Hough (eds.), Handbook of industrial and organisational psychology (pp. 1–27). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eacott, S. (2014). Educational leadership relationally: A theory and methodology for educational leadership, management and administration. Rotterdam: Sense Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• *Eckes, S. E., & McCall, S. D. (2014). The potential impact of social science research on legal issues surrounding single-sex classrooms and schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(2), 195–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, J. (2011). Educational research: What (a) to do about impact! British Educational Research Journal, 37(4), 543–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., Levitt, N., & Lewis, M. W. (Eds.). (1996). The flight from science and reason. New York: Academy of Sciences/Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press
   Google Scholar
• Gilad-Hai, S., & Somech, A. (2016). “The day after”: The organizational consequences of innovation implementation in experimental schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(1), 19–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• *Green, T. L. (2015). Leading for urban school reform and community development. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(5), 679–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, W. E. (1968). What is all this knowledge? In C. G. Dobbins & C. B. T. Lee (eds.), Whose goals for American higher education? (pp. 69–82) Washington, D.C: American Council of Education
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, H. M. (2002). Purposes and positions in the field of educational management. Educational Management & Administration, 30(1), 7–26.
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, H. M., & Ribbins, P. (2003). The field of educational leadership: Studying maps and mapping studies. British Journal Of Educational Studies, 51 (3), pp. 254–281. doi:10.1111/1467-8527.t01-1-00238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. (2013). A conceptual framework for systematic reviews of research in educational leadership and management. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 126–149.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P, & Bridges, E. M. (2017). A systematic review of research on the use of problem-based learning in the preparation and development of school leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(2), 255–288. doi:10.1177/0013161X16659347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, R. H. (2006). Scholarship in educational administration: At a crossroads or dead end. In D. E. Mitchell, (eds.), New foundations for knowledge in educational administration, policy, and politics (pp. 101–127). Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hemsley-Brown, J., & Oplatka, I. (2005). Bridging the research-practice gap: barriers and facilitators to research use among school principals from england and israel. International Journal Of Public Sector Management, 18(5), 424–446. doi:10.1108/09513550510608886
   Google Scholar
• Hills, J. (1967). The functions of research for educational administration. Journal of Educational Administration, 5(1), 26–35.
   Google Scholar
• Hills, J. (1978). Problems in the production and utilization of knowledge in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 14(1), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *McCharen, B., Song, J., & Martens, J. (2011). School innovation: The mutual impacts of organizational learning and creativity. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(6), 676–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lee, M., Walker, A., Chui, Y. L., & Seashore Louis, K. (2012). Contrasting effects of instructional leadership practices on student learning in a high accountability context. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(5), 586–611.
   Google Scholar
• *Kolbe, T., & Strunk, K. O. (2012). Economic incentives as a strategy for responding to teacher staffing problems: A typology of policies and practices. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(5), 779–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mattar, D. (2012). Instructional leadership in Lebanese public schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(4), 509–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Li, C. K., & Hung, C. H. (2012). The interactive effects of perceived parental involvement and personality on teacher satisfaction. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(4), 501–518.
   Google Scholar
• *Kimber, M., & Campbell, M. (2014). Exploring ethical dilemmas for principals arising from role conflict with school counselors. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(2), 207–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyle, J. R. (2003). Educational administration: Atlantis or phoenix. 11–14. winter: UCEA Review.
   Google Scholar
• Humes, W., & Bryce, T. (2001). Scholarship, research and the evidential basis of policy development in education. British Journal Of Educational Studies, 49(3), 323–352. doi:10.1111/1467-8527.t01-1-00179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. D. (2002). Foundations of marketing theory. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J.T. (1993). Blurring, cracking, and crossing permeation and the fracturing of discipline. In E. Messer-Davidow, D. R. Shumway & D. J. Sylvan (eds.), Knowledges: Historical and critical studies in disciplinarity (pp. 185–205). Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, G. (2017). Education: An applied multidisciplinary field? The English experience. In G. Whitty & J. Furlong (Eds.), Knowledge and the study of education: An international exploration (pp. 211–230). Oxford: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• *Shyman, E. (2011). Examining mutual elements of the job strain model and the effort–reward imbalance model among special education staff in the USA. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(3), 349–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Orr, M. T. (2011). Pipeline to preparation to advancement: Graduates’ experiences in, through, and beyond leadership preparation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(1), 114–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sheard, M., & Avis, J. (2011). Schools, governance and community: A next practice intervention. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(1), 84–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Price, H. E. (2012). Principal-teacher interactions: How affective relationships shape principal and teacher attitudes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(1), 39–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sun, M., Frank, K. A., Penuel, W. R., & Kim, C. M. (2013). How external institutions penetrate schools through formal and informal leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(4), 610–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Nash, S., & Bangert, A. (2014). Exploring the relationships between principals’ life experiences and transformational leadership behaviours. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 17(4), 462–480.
   Google Scholar
• *Schechter, C., & Atarchi, L. (2014). The meaning and measure of organizational learning mechanisms in secondary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(4), 577–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Shapira-Lishchinsky, O. (2016). The naturalist approach among future educational leaders: An Israeli case study. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 19(4), 417–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, J. (2005). What is educational research? Changing perspectives through the 20th century. Research Papers in Education, 20(1),25–44.
   Google Scholar
• Oplatka, I. (2010). The legacy of educational administration: a historical analysis of an academic field. Hamburg: Peter Lang Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Oplatka, I., & Hemsley-Brown, J. (2012). The research on school marketing: current issues and furture directions – an updated version. In I Oplatka & J. Hemsley-Brown (Eds.), The leadership and management of educational marketing: Research, practice and implications (pp.). London: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ribbins, P. (2006). History and the study of administration and leadership in education: Introduction to a special issue. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 38(2), 113–124. doi:10.1080/00220620600554942
   Google Scholar
• Rynes, S. L, Bartunek, J. M, & Daft, R. L. (2001). Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 340–355. doi:10.5465/3069460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stehr, N., & Meja, V. (Eds.). (2005). Society and knowledge: Contemporary perspectives in the sociology of knowledge and science. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. Introduction
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, R. A., & Chermack, T. J. (2013). Theory building in applied disciplines. San Francisco: BK Business Book.
   Google Scholar
• *Yeung, S. Y. S. (2012). A school evaluation policy with a dual character: Evaluating the school evaluation policy in Hong Kong from the perspective of curriculum leaders. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(1), 37–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2014). The problematic implementation of teacher evaluation policy: School failure or governmental pitfall? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(4S), 155–174.
   Google Scholar
• *Taliadorou, N., & Pashiardis, P. (2015). Examining the role of emotional intelligence and political skill to educational leadership and their effects to teachers’ job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(5), 642–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *You, S., & Conley, S. (2015). Workplace predictors of secondary school teachers’ intention to leave: An exploration of career stages. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(4), 561–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The * signals papers used for this review
   Google Scholar
• Willower, D.J. (1979). Ideology and science in organisation theory. Educational Administration Quarterly, 15(3), 20–42. doi:10.1177/0013131X7901500304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar