Traveling through the liminal: mixed reality simulations in educational leadership preparation

References

• Akerlind, G., Carr-Gregg, S., Field, R., Houston, L., Jones, J., Lupton, M., McKenzie, J., & Treloar, C. (2010). A threshold concepts focus to first year law curriculum design: Supporting student learning using variation theory. Thirteenth Pacific Rim First Year in Higher Education (FYHE) Conference, Adelaide, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Andreasen, J. B., & Haciomeroglu, E. S. (2009). Teacher training in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 31st annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 1317–1324). Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University.
   Google Scholar
• Bautista, N. U., & Boone, W. J. (2015). Exploring the impact of TeachME™ lab virtual classroom teaching simulation on early childhood education majors’ self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(3), 237–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Bower, M., Howe, C., McCredie, N., Robinson, A., & Grover, D. (2014). Augmented Reality in education–Cases, places and potentials. Educational Media International, 51(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, E. G., & Kendall, B. (2014). A review of computer simulations in teacher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 43(1), 3–12. Retrieved from ERIC database. (EJ1125911).
   Google Scholar
• Bronack, S. C. (2011). The role of immersive media in online education. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 59(2), 113–117.
   Google Scholar
• Chiang, Y. T., Lin, S. S. J., Cheng, C. Y., & Liu, E. Z. F. (2011). Exploring online game players’ flow experiences and positive affect. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1), 106–114.
   Google Scholar
• Chini, J. J., Straub, C. L., & Thomas, K. H. (2016). Learning from avatars: Learning assistants practice physics pedagogy in a classroom simulator. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1). doi:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousin, G. (2006). An introduction to threshold concepts. Planet, 17, 4–5. Retrieved from http://gees.ac.uk/planet/p17/gc.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cousin, G. (2008a). Transactional curriculum inquiry: Researching threshold concepts. In G. Cousin (Ed.), Researching learning in higher education: An introduction to contemporary methods and approaches (pp. 201–212). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (Eds.). (1999). Doing qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety (Vol. 721). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Dalgarno, B., Gregory, S., Knox, V., & Reiners, T. (2016). Practising teaching using virtual classroom role plays. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1). doi:10.14221/ajte.2016v41n1.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, J., Kellehear, A., & Gliksman, M. (1997). The public health researcher: A methodological guide. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M., Meyerson, D., Orr. M. T., & Cohen, C. (2007). Preparing school leaders for a changing world: Lessons from exemplary leadership development programs. Stanford, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• DeSantis, W. (2018). The effect of data driven coaching using a mixed reality simulation in a pre-service teacher education program. Doctoral dissertation. Danbury, CT: Western Connecticut State University Digital Commons. Retrieved from https://repository.wcsu.edu/educationdis/79/
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books. (Original work published 1910).
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1944). Democracy and education. New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1910).
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1949). Knowing and the known. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiCicco-Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), 314–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieker, L. A., Kennedy, M. J., Smith, S., Vasquez, E., Rock, M., & Thomas, C. (2014a). Use of technology in the preparation of pre-service teachers.
   Google Scholar
• Dieker, L. A., Kennedy, M. J., Smith, S., Vasquez, E., Rock, M., & Thomas, C. N. (2014b). Use of technology in the preparation of pre-service teachers (Document No. IC-11).
   Google Scholar
• Dieker, L. A., Rodriguez, J. A., Lignugaris, B., Hynes, M. C., & Hughes, C. E. (2014). The potential of simulated environments in teacher education: Current and future possibilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(1), 21–33. Retrieved from ERIC database. (EJ1020586) Retrieved from University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Centerwebsite. http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configurations/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieker, L. A., Straub, C. L., Hughes, C. E., Hynes, M. C., & Hardin, S. (2014). Learning from VIRTUAL STUDENTS. Educational Leadership, Retrieved from ERIC database. (EJ1043765). 71(8), . 54–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doll, J. W. E. (1993). Curriculum possibilities in a’ post’-future. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 8(4), 277–292.
   Google Scholar
• Dotger, B. H. (2015). Core pedagogy: Individual uncertainty, shared practice, formative ethos. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(3), 215–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, E. (1997). Teaching positions: Difference pedagogy and the power of address. New York, NY: Teachers College Press 297–324.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(10), 454–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology., 59, 255–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, B., Nestel, D., & Joseph, M. (2004). Making patient safety the focus: Crisis resource management in the undergraduate curriculum. Medical Education, 38(1), 56–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). New York, USA: Longman Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). New York, USA: Longman Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, K. A. (2017a). Investigating the use and design of immersive simulation to improve self-efficacy for aspiring principals. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 16, 127–169. Retrieved from http://www.informingscience.org/Publications/3726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, K. A. (2017b). Innovative leadership preparation: Enhancing legal literacy to create 21st century ready principals. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 21, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Gott, R., Duggan, S., Roberts, R., & Hussain, A. (n.d.) Research into understanding scientific evidence. Retrieved from http://www.dur.ac.uk/rosalyn.roberts/Evidence/cofev.htm
   Google Scholar
• Gundel, E. (2018). Understanding the effects of mixed reality simulation on pre-service teacher self-efficacy. Doctoral dissertation. Danbury, CT: Western Connecticut State University Digital Commons. Retrieved from https://repository.wcsu.edu/educationdis/85/
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, B., & Edwards, G. (2017). Facing the monsters: Embracing liminality in leadershipdevelopment. In S. Kempster, A. Turner, & G. Edwards (Eds.), Field guide to leadership development (pp. 203–218). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Holdhus, K., Høisæter, S., Mæland, K., Vangsnes, V., Engelsen, K. S., Espeland, M., & Espeland, Å. (2016). Improvisation in teaching and education—Roots and applications. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1204142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, C. E. (2014, November). Human surrogates: Remote presence for collaboration and education in smart cities. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Emerging Multimedia Applications and Services for Smart Cities (pp. 1–2). ACM, Orlando, FL. Retrieved from http://nmsl.cs.nthu.edu.tw/dropbox/MM14/emasc/p1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, S., & Mapes, P. (2013). Designing digital puppetry systems: Guidelines and best practices. In ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). Extended Abstract (pp. 2821–2822). Paris: France: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative interviewing. London, England: Sage Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Land, R. (2016). Toil and trouble: Threshold concepts as a pedagogy of uncertainty. In R. Land, J. Meyer, & M. Flanagan (Eds.), Threshold concepts in practice. Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Land, R., & Rattray, J. (2017). Threshold concepts and conceptual difficulty. Practice and Evidence of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Special Issue: Threshold Concepts and Conceptual Difficulty, 12, 63–80.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., Wenger, E., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (Vol. 521423740). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, R., & Johnson-Glenberg, M. (2013). Emboldened by embodiment six precepts for research on embodied learning and mixed reality. Educational Researcher, 42(8), 445–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludlow, B. L., (2015). Virtual reality: Emerging applications and future directions. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 34(3), 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mapes, D. P., Tonner, P., & Hughes, C. E. (2011). An environment for the efficient control and transmission of digital puppetry. In International Conference on Virtual and Mixed Reality Systems and Applications. Berlin-Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 270–278.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2009a). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2009b). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49(3), 373–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (1): Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. In Originally published as ETL Occasional Report 4. C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning: Ten years on (pp. 1–16). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.etl.tla.ed.ac.uk/publications.html
   Google Scholar
• Milgram, P., & Colquhoun, J. H. (2014). A taxonomy of real and virtual world display integration. Research Gate. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263085124_ISMRpaper
   Google Scholar
• Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, 77(12), 1321–1329.
   Google Scholar
• Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., & Kishino, F. (1994). Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, 2351, 282–292.
   Google Scholar
• Mursion. (2018a). Administrator/Parent conference picture. San Francisco, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Mursion. (2018b). Administrator/parent scenario. San Francisco, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Nagendran, A., Pillat, R., Kavanaugh, A., Welch, G., & Hughes, C. (2013). AMITIES: Avatar-mediated interactive training and individualized experience system. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (pp. 143–152). Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Nagendran, A., Pillat, R., Kavanaugh, A., Welch, G., & Hughes, C. (2014). A unified framework for individualized avatar-based interactions. Presence, 23(2), 109–132.
   Google Scholar
• O’Callaghan, C., & Piro, J. (2016a). Virtual simulations in a practice-based teacher education. Retrieved from https://works.bepress.com/jody_piro/33/
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. B. (2014). Pre-service special education teachers’ frequency of opportunities to respond in the TeachLivE™ virtual classroom. Denton, TX: Texas Woman’s University.
   Google Scholar
• Piro, J., & O’Callaghan, C. (2017). Rubric for ED 660/665 Educational leader conference with a parent or teacher at Western Connecticut State University. Unpublished document.
   Google Scholar
• Piro, J., & O’Callaghan, C. (2018). Liminal learning with avatars: Journeying toward the profession with educational leadership candidates. In Dieker, L., Hughes, C., Hynes. M. (Eds.), Paper presented at the 6th Annual TeachLive Conference, Virtual Human Interactive Performance Proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• Piro, J., & O’Callaghan, C. (2019). Journeying towards the profession: Exploring liminal learning within mixed reality simulations. Action in Teacher Education, 41(1), 79–95.
   Google Scholar
• Rattray, J. (2016). Affective dimensions of liminality. In R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer, & M. Flanagan (Eds.), Threshold concepts in practice (pp. 67–77). Rotterdam, Boston & Taipei: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, R. (2017). Understanding evidence in scientific disciplines: Identifying and mapping ‘the thinking behind the doing’ and its importance in curriculum development. Practice and Evidence of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Special Issue: Threshold Concepts and Conceptual Difficulty, 12, 411–429.
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. The Teachers College Record, 104(4), 842–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sauvé, L., Renaud, L., Kaufman, D., & Marquis, J. S. (2007). Distinguishing between games and simulations: A systematic review. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 247–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schon, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 108–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soderlund, J., & Borg, E. (2017). Liminality in management and organization studies: Process, position and place. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(4), 880–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 645–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey, V., & Cox, T. (2015). Utilizing TeachLivE™ (TLE) to build educational leadership capacity: The development and application of virtual simulations. Journal of Education and Human Development, 4(2), 41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Straub, C., Dieker, L., Hynes, M., & Hughes, C. (2015, June). Using virtual rehearsal in TLE TeachLivE™ mixed reality classroom simulator to determine the effects on the performance of science teachers: A follow-up study (Year 2). In T. Bousfield, M. Hynes, C. Hughes, C. Straub, L. Dieker, & K. Ingrahm (Eds.), Proceedings of 3rd National TLE TeachLivETM Conference 2015: Dissecting Education (pp. 49–109)Orlando, FL: University of Central Florida. Retrieved from http://teachlive.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/TLE-Proceedings-2015.pd
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, L., Brunetti, K. l., & Hofer, A. (2011). Threshold concepts and information literacy. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(3), 853–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, M., Lafleur, A., Leppink, J., & Dolmans, D. (2017). The simulated clinical environment: Cognitive and emotional impact among undergraduates. Medical Teacher, 39, 181–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, V. M., Weedman, J., Bruce, C. S., & Edwards, S. L. (2014). Learning portals: Analyzing threshold concept theory for LIS education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 55(2), 150.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, V. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, V. (1979). Dramatic ritual/ritual drama: Performative and reflexive anthropology. The Kenyon Review, 1(3), 80–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, V. (1987). Betwixt and between: The liminal period in rites of passage. In L. C. Mahdi, S. Foster, & M. Little (Eds.), Betwixt and between: Patterns of masculine and feminine initiation (pp. 3–23). Chicago, IL: Open Court Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gennep, A. (1960). The rites of passage. Routledge: London: England.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J., & Legg, A. (2017). Simulations as apprenticeship in teacher education: Designing parent teacher conference simulations that involve delivering unwelcome news about a student’s academic performance. In T. Bousfield, L. Dieker, C. Hughes, & M. Hynes eds. Paper presented at the 5thh Annual TeachLive Conference, Virtual Human Interactive Performance Proceedings 5(1), 5–16. Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Wolcott, H. F. (2009). Writing up qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Yazan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar