Principals’ voices pertaining to shared sense-making processes within a generally-outlined pedagogical reform implementation

References

• Adams, C. M., & Forsyth, P. B. (2009). The nature and function of trust in schools. Journal of School Leadership, 19(2), 126–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460901900201
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. J. (2015). Dialogic pedagogy at scale: Oblique perspectives. In L. B. Resnick, C. Asterhan, & S. N. Clarke (Eds.), Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue (pp. 429–440). American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, C. D., & Penuel, W. R. (2015). Studying teachers’ sensemaking to investigate teachers’ responses to professional development focused on new standards. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(2), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114560646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allensworth, E. M., & Hart, H. (2018). How do principals influence student achievement? University of Chicago Consortium on School Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ancona, D. (2012). Sensemaking: Framing and acting in the unknown. In S. A. Snook, N. Nohria, & R. Khurana (Eds.), The handbook for teaching leadership: Knowing, doing, and being (pp. 3–19). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bascia, N., & Osmond, P. (2012). Teacher unions and educational reform: A research review. National Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• BenDavid-Hadar, I. (2016). School finance policy and social justice. International Journal of Educational Development, 46, 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoliel, P. (2017). Managing senior management team boundaries and school improvement: An investigation of the school leader role. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(1), 57–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2015.1053536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berebitsky, D., & Salloum, S. J. (2017). The relationship between collective efficacy and teachers’ social networks in urban middle schools. AERA Open, 3(4), 233285841774392. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417743927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkovich, I. (2011). No we won’t! Teachers’ resistance to educational reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(5), 563–578. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111159548
   Google Scholar
• Berkovich, I. (2018). Typology of trust relationships: Profiles of teachers’ trust in principal and their implications. Teachers and Teaching Theory and Practice, 24(7), 749–767. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1483914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkovich, I., & Eyal, O. (2017). Good cop, bad cop: Exploring school principals’ emotionally manipulative behaviours. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 45(6), 944958. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216659293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkland, T. A. (2010). An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts, and models of public policy making (3rd ed.). M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., Hill, H. C., & Spillane, J. P. (2016). Alignment and accountability in policy design and implementation: The common core state standards and implementation research. Educational Researcher, 45(4), 243–251. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16651080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., & Woulfin, S. L. (2012). Reading coaches and the relationship between policy and practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Ganon-Shilon, S., & Schechter, C. (2019). School principals’ sense-making of their leadership role during reform implementation. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 22(3), 279–300.
   Google Scholar
• Gawlik, M. A. (2018). Leadership knowledge and practices in the context of charter schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 17(4), 422–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2017.1326145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, R., Goddard, Y., Kim, E. S., & Miller, R. (2015). A theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles of instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and collective efficacy in support of student learning. American Journal of Education, 121(4), 501–530. https://doi.org/10.1086/681925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grice, C. (2019). Leading pedagogical reform. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 22(3), 354–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2018.1463462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Wang, W.-C. (2015). Assessing instructional leadership with the principal instructional management rating scale. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hensley, P. A., & Burmeister, L. (2009). Leadership connectors: Six keys to developing relationships in schools. Eye on Education.
   Google Scholar
• Honig, M. I., & Hatch, T. C. (2004). Crafting coherence: How schools strategically manage multiple, external demands. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008016
   Google Scholar
• Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics [CBS]. (2016). Statistical abstract of Israel 2016 NO. 67 (Hebrew). Author. https://www.cbs.gov.il/he/publications/doclib/2016/8.%20shnatoneduca tion/st08_23.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Israeli Ministry of Education. (2014a). CEO guidelines: Meaningful learning. Author (Hebrew). http://cms.education.gov.il/EducationCMS/Units/LemidaMashmautit/mashmautit/ AvneyDerech.htm
   Google Scholar
• Israeli Ministry of Education. (2014b, May). Adapting the curriculum of disciplines to the meaningfullearning policy: A document for officials in headquarters, districts and educational institutions. Author (Hebrew). http://meyda.education.gov.il/files/AgafA/hahinuch.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, L. S., & Owings, W. A. (2017). Organizational behavior for school leadership: Leveraging your school for success. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., & Kim, J.-N. (2016). Bridge or buffer: Two ideas of effective corporate governance and public engagement. Journal of Public Affairs, 16(2), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraatz, M. S. (2009). Leadership as institutional work: A bridge to the other side. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 59–91). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, J., & Holmström, I. (2007). Phenomenographic or phenomenological analysis: Does it matter? Examples from a study on anaesthesiologists’ work. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 2(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482620601068105
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y. Y. (2017). Processes and dynamics behind whole-school reform: Nine-year journeys of four primary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 54(2), 279–324. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216689591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liefferink, D., & Wurzel, R. K. W. (2017). Environmental leaders and pioneers: Agents of change? Journal of European Public Policy, 24(7), 951–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1161657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K., & Anderson, S. E. (2010). Learning from leadership: Investigating the links to improved student learning: Final report of research to the Wallace Foundation. University of Minnesota. https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/140885/1/Learning-from-Leadership_Final-Research-Report_July-2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.873177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• März, V., Kelchtermans, G., & Dumay, X. (2016). Stability and change of mentoring practices in a capricious policy environment: Opening the “black box of institutionalization”. American Journal of Education, 122(3), 303–336. https://doi.org/10.1086/685846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. A., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• National Authority for Evaluation and Measurement in Education [RAMA]. (2018). Meaningful learning: Perceptions of students, Teachers, and principals between the years 2014–2018. Author (Hebrew). http://meyda.education.gov.il/files/Rama/Meaningful_Learning_Report_2017_f.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nets, M. (2017). Professional development of school principals in the pilot program of ‘Pedagogical Flexibility’: The Israeli case. Economics and Culture, 14(2), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1515/jec-2017-0014
   Google Scholar
• Nir, A., Ben-David, A., Bogler, R., Inbar, D., & Zohar, A. (2016). School autonomy and 21st century skills in the Israeli educational system: Discrepancies between the declarative and operational levels. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(7), 1231–1246. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-11-2015-0149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2016a). OECD economic surveys - Israel. Author. www.oecd.org/eco/surveys/Israel-Overview-OECD-Economic-Survey-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2016b). Education at a glance 2016: OECD indicators. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J.-H., & Jeong, D. W. (2013). School reforms, principal leadership, and teacher resistance: Evidence from Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 33(1), 34–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2012.756392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietarinen, J., Pyhältö, K., & Soini, T. (2017). Large-scale curriculum reform in Finland: Exploring the interrelation between implementation strategy, the function of the reform, and curriculum coherence. The Curriculum Journal, 28(1), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2016.1179205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, L., & Morse, J. M. (2013). Readme first for a user’s guide to qualitative methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rigby, J. G., Corriell, R., & Kuhl, K. J. (2018). Leading for instructional improvement in the context of accountability: Central office leadership. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 21(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555458917722183
   Google Scholar
• Rigby, J. G., Woulfin, S. L., & März, V. (2016). Understanding how structure and agency influence education policy implementation and organizational change [Editorial]. American Journal of Education, 122(3), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1086/685849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2012). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2018). FinnishEd leadership: Four big inexpensive ideas to tranform education. Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Shea, P. (2006). Judging quality: Evaluative criteria and epistemic communities. In D. Yanow & P. Schwartz-Shea (Eds.), Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn (pp. 89–113). M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Shaari, I., & Hung, D. (2018). Partnership between a central agency and its schools: Towards fostering laterality. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 46(4), 578–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216682502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, S., Heck, D., Christie, M., & Farragher, Y. (2019). Leading pedagogical reform: Australian principals tell their stories. International Journal of Leadership in Education. Advance online publication.
   Google Scholar
• Smylie, M. A., & Wenzel, S. A. (2003). The Chicago Annenberg Challenge: Successes, failures, and lessons for the future: Final technical report of the Chicago Annenberg Research Project. Consortium on Chicago School Research.
   Google Scholar
• State Comptroller and Ombudsman of Israel. (2018). The Israeli ministry of education: Promoting meaningful learning in schools. In Annual Report No. 68c (pp. 753–818). Author ( Hebrew). https://www.mevaker.gov.il/he/reports/pages/627.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Stronge, J. H., Richard, H. B., & Catano, N. (2008). Qualities of effective principals. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Sullanmaa, J., Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2019). Differences in state- and district-level stakeholders’ perceptions of curriculum coherence and school impact in national curriculum reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(3), 210–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-08-2018-0153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, J., & Leithwood, K. (2017). Calculating the power of alternative choices by school leaders for improving student achievement. School Leadership & Management, 37(1–2), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2017.1293635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. L. (2016). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource (4th ed.). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Tichnor-Wagner, A., Harrison, C., & Cohen-Vogel, L. (2016). Cultures of learning in effective high schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(4), 602–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X16644957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versland, T. M., & Erickson, J. L. (2017). Leading by example: A case study of the influence of principal self-efficacy on collective efficacy. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1286765. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1286765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlstrom, K. L., & Louis, K. S. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 458–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, W. (2017). Education policy borrowing: Professional standards for school leaders in China. Chinese Education & Society, 50(3), 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611932.2017.1331012
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (2009). Making sense of the organization: Vol. 2. The impermanent organization. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007). Managing the unexpected: Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Weisblay, E., & Wininger, A. (2015). Israel’s education system - Selected issues in the field of action of the parliament committee on education, culture and sports. The Knesset Research and Information Center ( Hebrew). https://m.knesset.gov.il/Activity/Info/MMMSummaries19/Education.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Woulfin, S. L., Donaldson, M. L., & Gonzales, R. (2016). District leaders’ framing of educator evaluation policy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(1), 110–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youngs, P., Holdgreve-Resendez, R., & Qian, H. (2011). The role of instructional program coherence in beginning elementary teachers’ induction experiences. The Elementary School Journal, 111(3), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1086/657655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukl, G. A. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, A. (2013). It’s not all about test scores: Reviving pedagogical discourse. Bnei Brak. Sifriat Poalim ( Hebrew).
   Google Scholar