818
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

An Approach for Doctoral Students Conducting Context-Specific Review of Literature in IT, ICT, and Educational Technology

& (Dr.)

References

  • ACARA. (2015). Digital technologies: Curriculum. Retrieved November 20, 2015, from <http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/technologies/digital-technologies/curriculum/f-10?layout=1>
  • Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approaches. Australian Journal of Educational Technology (AJET), 30(4), 440–454.
  • Albion, P. (2002). Seeking A Balance Between Learner Freedom and Comparability of Outcomes In An Online Course. Paper presented at the Australian Computers in Education Conference (ACEC), Hobart, Tasmania.
  • Arntzen, J., Krug, D., & Wen, Z. (2008). ICT literacies and the curricular conundrum of calling all complex digital technologies “Tools.” International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 4(4), 6–14.
  • Balacheff, N., Ludvigsen, S., de Jong, T., Lazonder, A., & Barnes, S. (Eds.). 2009. Technology-enhanced learning: Principles and products. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science and Business Media.
  • Becker, H. (2000). Who's wired and who's not: Children's access and use of computer technology. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 44–75.
  • Berge, Z. L., & Muilenburg, L. Y. (2013). Handbook of Mobile Learning. Florence, KY: Routledge.
  • Boell, S. K., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2010). Literature reviews and the hermeneutic circle. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 41(2), 129–144.
  • Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2005). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • British Library and JISC. (2012). Researchers of Tomorrow: The research behaviour of Generation Y doctoral students, British Library and the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) of the Higher Education Funding Council (HEFCE), London. Retrieved July 6, 2016, from <http://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20140614205429/http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/reports/2012/Researchers-of-Tomorrow.pdf>
  • Broadbent, B. (2002). ABCs of e-learning: Reaping the benefits and avoiding the PITFALLS. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
  • Brusilovsky, P. (2003). Adaptive and intelligent web-based educational systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13(2–4), 159–172.
  • Bundy, A. (2004). Australian and New Zealand Information Literacy Framework: Principles, standards and practice. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, Retrieved August 19, 2016, from <http://www.caul.edu.au/content/upload/files/info-literacy/InfoLiteracyFramework.pdf>
  • Chen, M. (2000). Five commentaries: Looking to the future. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 168–171.
  • Dede, C. (2000). Five commentaries: Looking to the future. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 178–180.
  • Denholm, C., & Evans, T. (Eds.). 2007. Supervising doctorates downunder: keys to effective supervision in Australia and New Zeland. Victoria, Australia: ACER Press.
  • Denholm, C., & Evans, T. (Eds.). 2012. Doctorates Downunder: Keys to successful doctoral study in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand, 2nd ed. Victoria, Australia: ACER Press.
  • Dunleavy, P. (2003). Authoring a PhD: How to plan, draft, write and finish a doctoral thesis or dissertation. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Evans, D., & Gruba, P. (2002). How to write a better thesis (2nd ed.). Carlton, Victoria, Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
  • Gibson, I. W. (2001). At the intersection of technology and pedagogy: Considering styles of learning and teaching. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(1&2), 37–61.
  • Gurung, R. A. R., Chick, N. L., & Haynie, A. (Eds.). 2009. Exploring signature pedagogies: Approaches to teaching disciplinary habits of mind. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
  • Hammond, M. (2004). The peculiarities of teaching information and communication technology as a subject: A study of trainee and new ICT teachers in secondary schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(1), 160–185.
  • Jonassen, D., Peck, K., & Wilson, B. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Kamler, B., & Thomson, P. (2014). Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
  • Kennedy, G., Krause, K.-L., Gray, K., Judd, T., Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2006). Questioning the net generation: A collaborative project in Australian Higher Education. Paper presented to 23rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE), University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, December 3–6, 2006.
  • Kirschner, P., & Davis, N. (2003). Pedagogic benchmarks for information communications technology in teacher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 12(1), 125–147.
  • Koffel, J. B. (2015). Use of recommended search strategies in systematic reviews and the impact of librarian involvement: A cross-sectional survey of recent authors, PLoS ONE 10(5), 1-13. Retrieved from The Global Burden of Norovirus & Prospects for Vaccine Development website: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0125931.
  • Koppi, T., & Naghdy, F. (2009). Managing educational change in the ICT discipline at the tertiary level. University of Wollongong, Monash University, Queensland University of Technology, University of Technology, Sydney for Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC), Wollongong, Australia. Retrieved rom <http://www.altc.edu.au/resource-managing-educational-change-ict-discipline-uow-2009>
  • Leask, M. (Ed.) (2001). Issues in teaching using ICT. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Loveless, A. (2003). Technology, pedagogy and education - Widening the scope. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 12(2), 197–199.
  • Markauskaite, L., & Wardak, D. (2015). Research students' conceptions of the role of information technology and communication technologies in educational technology research. Australian Journal of Educational Technology (AJET), 31(4), 421–438.
  • McKibbon, K. A. (2006). Systematic reviews and librarians. Library Trends, 55(1), 202–215.
  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
  • Montgomery, K. C. (2000). Children's media culture in the new millennium: Mapping the digital landscape. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 145–167.
  • Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Gaylen, K. (2011). e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? Internet and Higher Education, 14, 129–135.
  • Moyle, K., & Owen, S. (2009). Listening to students' and educators' voices: Research findings. Canberra, Australia: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations, Australian Government.
  • Murphy, S. A., & Boden, C. (2015). Benchmarking participation of Canadian university health sciences librarians in systematic reviews. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 103(2), 73–78.
  • Murray, R. (2006). How to write a thesis (2nd ed.). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
  • Norton, P., & Wiburg, K. M. (2003). Teaching with technology: Designing opportunities to learn. London, UK: Hartcourt Brace.
  • Pennington, R. (2014). Smart Learning Programme transforms education in UAE's government schools. The National. Retrieved from <http://www.thenational.ae/uae/education/smart-learning-programme-transforms-education-in-uaes-government-schools>
  • Phelps, R. (2002). A Constructivist Approach To Professional Development in ICT Leadership: Creating A Learning Community. Paper presented at the Australian Computers in Education Conference (ACEC), Hobart, Tasmania.
  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
  • Prensky, M. (2011). From digital natives to digital wisdom: Hopeful essays for 21st century learning, D. Stollenwerk, Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin (A SAGE Company). Retrieved July 14, 2016, from <http://marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky-Intro_to_From_DN_to_DW.pdf>
  • Pretto, G. (2011). The pedagogy of IT teachers: An investigation into the pedagogical framework used in the teaching of Information Technology in the TAFE/VET sector. (Doctor of Education - Research Classified thesis). University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Resnick, M. (2000). Five commentaries: Looking to the future. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 173–175.
  • Ridley, D. (2012). The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students (2nd ed.). Sage Study Skills. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Robertson, M., Fluck, A., Webb, I., & Loechel, B. (2004). Classroom computer climate, teacher reflections and ‘re-envisioning’ pedagogy in Australian schools. Australian Journal of Educational Technology (AJET), 20(3), 351–370.
  • Roschelle, J., Pea, R., Hoadley, C., Gordin, D., & Means, B. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 76–101.
  • Schoeny, Z. G. (2002). Leadership of information technology in education. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 11(3), 245–251.
  • Schrader, P. G. (2008). Learning in technology: Reconceptualizing immersive environments. AACE Journal, 16(4), 457–475.
  • Shields, M., & Behrman, R. (2000). Children and computer technology: Analysis and recommendations. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 4–30.
  • Spezi, V. (2016). “Is information seeking behaviour of doctoral students changing?: A review of the literature (2010–2015). New Review of Academic Librarianship, 22(1), 78–106.
  • Subrahmanyam, K., Kraut, R., Greenfield, P., & Gross, E. (2000). The Impact of home computer use on children's activities and development. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 123–144.
  • Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Exploration and application. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Swales, J., & Feak, C. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students (3rd ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
  • Thomson, P. (2006). Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for doctoral supervision. Hoboken, NJ: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Tomei, L. A. (2005). Taxonomy for the Technology Domain. Hershey, PA: Information Science.
  • Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367.
  • Underwood, J. (2004). Research into information and communications technologies: Where now? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(2), 135–145.
  • Voogt, J., & Knezek, G. (Eds.) (2008). International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education: Part One, (vol. 1; 2 vols.). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Walton, G. (2016). Digital Literacy (DL): Establishing the boundaries and identifying the partners. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 22(1), 1–4.
  • Wartella, E., & Jennings, N. (2000). Children and computers: New technology - Old concerns. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 31–43.
  • Webb, M., & Cox, M. (2004). A review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 235–286.
  • Younie, S., & Leask, M. (2013). Teaching with technologies. New York, NY: Open University Press (McGraw-Hill Maidenhead).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.