An Approach for Doctoral Students Conducting Context-Specific Review of Literature in IT, ICT, and Educational Technology

References

• ACARA. (2015). Digital technologies: Curriculum. Retrieved November 20, 2015, from <http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/technologies/digital-technologies/curriculum/f-10?layout=1>
   Google Scholar
• Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approaches. Australian Journal of Educational Technology (AJET), 30(4), 440–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albion, P. (2002). Seeking A Balance Between Learner Freedom and Comparability of Outcomes In An Online Course. Paper presented at the Australian Computers in Education Conference (ACEC), Hobart, Tasmania.
   Google Scholar
• Arntzen, J., Krug, D., & Wen, Z. (2008). ICT literacies and the curricular conundrum of calling all complex digital technologies “Tools.” International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 4(4), 6–14.
   Google Scholar
• Balacheff, N., Ludvigsen, S., de Jong, T., Lazonder, A., & Barnes, S. (Eds.). 2009. Technology-enhanced learning: Principles and products. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science and Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. (2000). Who's wired and who's not: Children's access and use of computer technology. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 44–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berge, Z. L., & Muilenburg, L. Y. (2013). Handbook of Mobile Learning. Florence, KY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boell, S. K., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2010). Literature reviews and the hermeneutic circle. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 41(2), 129–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2005). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• British Library and JISC. (2012). Researchers of Tomorrow: The research behaviour of Generation Y doctoral students, British Library and the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) of the Higher Education Funding Council (HEFCE), London. Retrieved July 6, 2016, from <http://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20140614205429/http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/reports/2012/Researchers-of-Tomorrow.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, B. (2002). ABCs of e-learning: Reaping the benefits and avoiding the PITFALLS. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Brusilovsky, P. (2003). Adaptive and intelligent web-based educational systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13(2–4), 159–172.
   Google Scholar
• Bundy, A. (2004). Australian and New Zealand Information Literacy Framework: Principles, standards and practice. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, Retrieved August 19, 2016, from <http://www.caul.edu.au/content/upload/files/info-literacy/InfoLiteracyFramework.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M. (2000). Five commentaries: Looking to the future. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 168–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dede, C. (2000). Five commentaries: Looking to the future. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 178–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denholm, C., & Evans, T. (Eds.). 2007. Supervising doctorates downunder: keys to effective supervision in Australia and New Zeland. Victoria, Australia: ACER Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denholm, C., & Evans, T. (Eds.). 2012. Doctorates Downunder: Keys to successful doctoral study in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand, 2nd ed. Victoria, Australia: ACER Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P. (2003). Authoring a PhD: How to plan, draft, write and finish a doctoral thesis or dissertation. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D., & Gruba, P. (2002). How to write a better thesis (2nd ed.). Carlton, Victoria, Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, I. W. (2001). At the intersection of technology and pedagogy: Considering styles of learning and teaching. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(1&2), 37–61.
   Google Scholar
• Gurung, R. A. R., Chick, N. L., & Haynie, A. (Eds.). 2009. Exploring signature pedagogies: Approaches to teaching disciplinary habits of mind. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, M. (2004). The peculiarities of teaching information and communication technology as a subject: A study of trainee and new ICT teachers in secondary schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(1), 160–185.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D., Peck, K., & Wilson, B. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kamler, B., & Thomson, P. (2014). Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, G., Krause, K.-L., Gray, K., Judd, T., Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2006). Questioning the net generation: A collaborative project in Australian Higher Education. Paper presented to 23rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE), University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, December 3–6, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P., & Davis, N. (2003). Pedagogic benchmarks for information communications technology in teacher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 12(1), 125–147.
   Google Scholar
• Koffel, J. B. (2015). Use of recommended search strategies in systematic reviews and the impact of librarian involvement: A cross-sectional survey of recent authors, PLoS ONE 10(5), 1-13. Retrieved from The Global Burden of Norovirus & Prospects for Vaccine Development website: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0125931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppi, T., & Naghdy, F. (2009). Managing educational change in the ICT discipline at the tertiary level. University of Wollongong, Monash University, Queensland University of Technology, University of Technology, Sydney for Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC), Wollongong, Australia. Retrieved rom <http://www.altc.edu.au/resource-managing-educational-change-ict-discipline-uow-2009>
   Google Scholar
• Leask, M. (Ed.) (2001). Issues in teaching using ICT. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Loveless, A. (2003). Technology, pedagogy and education - Widening the scope. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 12(2), 197–199.
   Google Scholar
• Markauskaite, L., & Wardak, D. (2015). Research students' conceptions of the role of information technology and communication technologies in educational technology research. Australian Journal of Educational Technology (AJET), 31(4), 421–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKibbon, K. A. (2006). Systematic reviews and librarians. Library Trends, 55(1), 202–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, K. C. (2000). Children's media culture in the new millennium: Mapping the digital landscape. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 145–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Gaylen, K. (2011). e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? Internet and Higher Education, 14, 129–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyle, K., & Owen, S. (2009). Listening to students' and educators' voices: Research findings. Canberra, Australia: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations, Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, S. A., & Boden, C. (2015). Benchmarking participation of Canadian university health sciences librarians in systematic reviews. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 103(2), 73–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, R. (2006). How to write a thesis (2nd ed.). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, P., & Wiburg, K. M. (2003). Teaching with technology: Designing opportunities to learn. London, UK: Hartcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, R. (2014). Smart Learning Programme transforms education in UAE's government schools. The National. Retrieved from <http://www.thenational.ae/uae/education/smart-learning-programme-transforms-education-in-uaes-government-schools>
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, R. (2002). A Constructivist Approach To Professional Development in ICT Leadership: Creating A Learning Community. Paper presented at the Australian Computers in Education Conference (ACEC), Hobart, Tasmania.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2011). From digital natives to digital wisdom: Hopeful essays for 21st century learning, D. Stollenwerk, Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin (A SAGE Company). Retrieved July 14, 2016, from <http://marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky-Intro_to_From_DN_to_DW.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Pretto, G. (2011). The pedagogy of IT teachers: An investigation into the pedagogical framework used in the teaching of Information Technology in the TAFE/VET sector. (Doctor of Education - Research Classified thesis). University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, M. (2000). Five commentaries: Looking to the future. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 173–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridley, D. (2012). The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students (2nd ed.). Sage Study Skills. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, M., Fluck, A., Webb, I., & Loechel, B. (2004). Classroom computer climate, teacher reflections and ‘re-envisioning’ pedagogy in Australian schools. Australian Journal of Educational Technology (AJET), 20(3), 351–370.
   Google Scholar
• Roschelle, J., Pea, R., Hoadley, C., Gordin, D., & Means, B. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 76–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoeny, Z. G. (2002). Leadership of information technology in education. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 11(3), 245–251.
   Google Scholar
• Schrader, P. G. (2008). Learning in technology: Reconceptualizing immersive environments. AACE Journal, 16(4), 457–475.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, M., & Behrman, R. (2000). Children and computer technology: Analysis and recommendations. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 4–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spezi, V. (2016). “Is information seeking behaviour of doctoral students changing?: A review of the literature (2010–2015). New Review of Academic Librarianship, 22(1), 78–106.
   Google Scholar
• Subrahmanyam, K., Kraut, R., Greenfield, P., & Gross, E. (2000). The Impact of home computer use on children's activities and development. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 123–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Exploration and application. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J., & Feak, C. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students (3rd ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P. (2006). Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for doctoral supervision. Hoboken, NJ: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Tomei, L. A. (2005). Taxonomy for the Technology Domain. Hershey, PA: Information Science.
   Google Scholar
• Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, J. (2004). Research into information and communications technologies: Where now? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(2), 135–145.
   Google Scholar
• Voogt, J., & Knezek, G. (Eds.) (2008). International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education: Part One, (vol. 1; 2 vols.). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, G. (2016). Digital Literacy (DL): Establishing the boundaries and identifying the partners. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 22(1), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Wartella, E., & Jennings, N. (2000). Children and computers: New technology - Old concerns. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 31–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, M., & Cox, M. (2004). A review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 235–286.
   Google Scholar
• Younie, S., & Leask, M. (2013). Teaching with technologies. New York, NY: Open University Press (McGraw-Hill Maidenhead).
   Google Scholar