Adapting Evidence-Based Practices to Improve Library Instruction: Using Customized Tools to Support Peer Mentoring and Observation

References

• Adams, N. E. (2014). A comparison of evidence-based practice and the ACRL information literacy standards: Implications for information literacy practice. College & Research Libraries, 75(2), 232–248. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5860/crl12-417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, N. E., Gaffney, M. A., & Lynn, V. (2016). The role of evidence-based practice in collaborations between academic librarians and education faculty. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 16(4), 697–720. doi:10.1353/pla.2016.0048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alabi, J., Huisman, R., Lacy, M., Miller, W., Snajdr, E., Trinoskey, J., & Weare, W. H. Jr. (2012). By and for us: The development of a program for peer review of teaching by and for pre-tenure librarians. Collaborative Librarianship, 4(4), 165–174. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.du.edu/collaborativelibrarianship/vol4/iss4/4/
   Google Scholar
• Alabi, J., & Weare, W. Jr. (2014). Peer review of teaching: Best practices for a non-programmatic approach. Communications in Information Literacy, 8(2), 180–191. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2014.8.2.171.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold-Garza, S. (2014). The flipped classroom teaching model and its use for information literacy instruction. Communications in Information Literacy, 8(1), 7–22. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2014.8.1.161
   Google Scholar
• Bathgate, M. E., Aragón, O. R., Cavanagh, A. J., Waterhouse, J. K., Frederick, J., & Graham, M. J. (2019). Perceived supports and evidence-based teaching in college STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), Article 11. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0166-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles-Terry, M. (2012). Library instruction and academic success: A mixed–methods assessment of a library instruction program. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 7(1), 82–95. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.18438/B8PS4D
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, J. E., Asher, D., & Karshmer, E. D. (2018). Assessing librarians’ teaching of one-shot sessions: A new model for evaluating instructional performance. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 25(4), 350–371. doi:10.1080/10691316.2018.1527268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlozzi, M. (2018). Teaching in libraries: Not an elective part of the job. In J. Percell, L. C. Sarin, P. T. Jaeger, & J. C. Bertot (Eds.), Re-envisioning the MLS: Perspectives on the future of library and information science education (pp. 201–213). Advances in Librarianship, volume 44B. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing. doi:10.1108/S0065-28302018000044B011/
   Google Scholar
• Cuseo, J. (2009). Student success: Definition, outcomes, principles and practices. Retrieved from https://www2.indstate.edu/studentsuccess/pdf/Defining%20Student%20Success.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dabbour, K. S. (1997). Applying active learning methods to the design of library instruction for a freshman seminar. College & Research Libraries, 58(4), 299–308. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.58.4.299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teacher learning that supports student learning. In B. Z. Presseisen (Ed.), Teaching for intelligence (2nd ed., pp. 91–100). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies-Hoffman, K., Alvarez, B., Costello, M., & Emerson, D. (2013). Keeping pace with information literacy instruction for the real world: When will MLS programs wake up and smell the LILACs? Communications in Information Literacy, 7(1), 9–23. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2013.7.1.131
   Google Scholar
• Eddy, S. L., & Hogan, K. A. (2014). Getting under the hood: How and for whom does increasing course structure work? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 453–468. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-03-0050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, Z. (2018, April). Who succeeds in higher education? Questioning the connection between academic libraries & student success [Presentation transcript]. Plenary session presented at The academic library in times of change: CARL Conference, April 13–15, 2018, Redwood City, CA. Retrieved from https://quickaskzoe.com/2018/04/15/who-succeeds-in-higher-education/
   Google Scholar
• Franzen, S., & Bannon, C. (2016). Merging information literacy and evidence-based practice in an undergraduate health sciences curriculum map. Communications in Information Literacy, 10(2), 245–263. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2016.10.2.26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., Haak, D., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2011). Increased course structure improves performance in introductory biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 10(2), 175–186. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10/cbe.10-08-0105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaha, U., Hinnefeld, S., & Pellegrino, C. (2018). The academic library’s contribution to student success: Library instruction and GPA. College & Research Libraries, 79(6), 737–746. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.6.737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, D., Pietri, E. S., Anderson, G., Moyano-Camihort, K., Graham, M. J., & Ledbetter, M. L. (2015). Increased preclass preparation underlies student outcome improvement in the flipped classroom. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(4), Article 36. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-02-0040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haak, D. C., HilleRisLambers, J., Pitre, E., & Freeman, S. (2011). Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science, 332(6034), 1213–1216. doi:10.1126/science.1204820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haave, N. (2014). Teaching squares: A teaching development tool. The Teaching Professor, 28(10), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Handelsman, J., Miller, S., & Pfund, C. (2007). Scientific teaching. New York: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Hultman Özek, Y., Edgren, G., & Jandér, K. (2012). Implementing the critical friend method for peer feedback among teaching librarians in an academic setting. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 7(4), 68–80. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.18438/B81C8W
   Google Scholar
• Julien, H., & Genuis, S. K. (2011). Librarians’ experiences of the teaching role: A national survey of librarians. Library & Information Science Research, 33(2), 103–111. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2010.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgo, C. A., Ezell Sheets, J. K., & Pascarella, E. T. (2015). The link between high-impact practices and student learning: Some longitudinal evidence. Higher Education, 69(4), 509–525. doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9788-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, J. K., & Wood, W. B. (2005). Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biology Education, 4(4), 298–310. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1187/05-06-0082
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities. Retrieved from https://provost.tufts.edu/celt/files/High-Impact-Ed-Practices1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Levene, L.-A., & Frank, P. (1993). Peer coaching: Professional growth and development for instruction librarians. Reference Services Review, 21(3), 35–42. doi:10.1108/eb049192
   Google Scholar
• Martin, G. A., & Double, J. M. (1998). Developing higher education teaching skills through peer observation and collaborative reflection. Innovations in Education and Training International, 35(2), 161–170. doi:10.1080/1355800980350210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2008). Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. American Psychologist, 63(8), 760–769. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.8.760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton, C. (2002). Evolution of peer evaluation of library instruction at Oregon State University libraries. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 2(1), 69–78. doi:10.1353/pla.2002.0019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, R., & Schroeder, M. (2018). From seeing to doing: Examining the impact of non-evaluative classroom observation on teaching development. Innovative Higher Education, 43(5), 397–410. doi:10.1007/s10755-018-9436-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, A., Ireland, A., & Hackathorn, J. (2016). The value of academic libraries: Library services as a predictor of student retention. College & Research Libraries, 77(5), 631–641. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.77.5.631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Kelly, M. (2017). Academic libraries and student retention: The implications for higher education. Proceedings of the 2016 Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment, October 31-November 2, 2016, Arlington, VA (pp. 485–490). Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved from http://old.libraryassessment.org/bm∼doc/78-okelly-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oakleaf, M. (2010, September). The value of academic libraries: A comprehensive research review and report. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/issues/value/val_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pascarella, E. T., Salisbury, M. H., & Blaich, C. (2011). Exposure to effective instruction and college student persistence: A multi-institutional replication and extension. Journal of College Student Development, 52(1), 4–19. doi:10.1353/csd.2011.0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A. (1992). Teacher efficacy and the effects of coaching on student achievement. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue Canadienne de L’éducation, 17(1), 51–65. doi:10.2307/1495395
   Google Scholar
• Sackett, D. L. (2000). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM (2nd ed.) Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone.
   Google Scholar
• Samson, S., & McCrea, D. E. (2008). Using peer review to foster good teaching. Reference Services Review, 36(1), 61–70. doi:10.1108/00907320810852032
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, L. (2015). Education for instruction: A review of LIS instruction syllabi. The Reference Librarian, 56(1), 1–21. doi:10.1080/02763877.2014.969392
   Google Scholar
• Sinkinson, C. (2011). An assessment of peer coaching to drive professional development and reflective teaching. Communications in Information Literacy, 5(1), 9–20. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2011.5.1.99
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. K., Jones, F. H. M., Gilbert, S. L., & Wieman, C. E. (2013). The classroom observation protocol for undergraduate stem (COPUS): A new instrument to characterize university STEM classroom practices. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 618–627. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-08-0154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snavely, L., & Dewald, N. (2011). Developing and implementing peer review of academic librarians’ teaching: An overview and case report. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(4), 343–351. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2011.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soria, K. M., Fransen, J., & Nackerud, S. (2013). Library use and undergraduate student outcomes: New evidence for students’ retention and academic success. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 13(2), 147–164. doi:10.1353/pla.2013.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidmar, D. J. (2006). Reflective peer coaching: Crafting collaborative self-assessment in teaching. Research Strategies, 20(3), 135–148. doi:10.1016/j.resstr.2006.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Walker, K. W., & Pearce, M. (2014). Student engagement in one-shot library instruction. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(3-4), 281–290. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2014.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, S. (2005). Improving instruction: What librarians can learn from the study of college teaching. In H. A. Thompson (Ed.), Currents and convergence: Navigating the rivers of change; Proceedings of the twelfth National Conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries, April 7–10, 2005, Minneapolis, MN (pp. 363–379). Chicago: Association of College & Research Libraries. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/pdf/waltr05.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wieman, C., Gilbert, S., & Dolan, E. (2014). The teaching practices inventory: A new tool for characterizing college and university teaching in mathematics and science. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 552–569. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-02-0023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• William T. Grant Foundation, Spencer Foundation, & Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (2014). Measuring instruction in higher education: A summary of a convening held in Chicago, Illinois, November 17–18. Retrieved from https://wtgrantfoundation.org/library/uploads/2015/11/Measuring-Instruction-in-Higher-Education.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. (2001). Developing critical reflection for professional practice through problem-based learning. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34(1), 27–34. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.3411737.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, S. H. R., & Cmor, D. (2011). Measuring association between library instruction and graduation GPA. College & Research Libraries, 72(5), 464–472. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, S., & Maley, M. (2018). Using practitioner-engaged evidence synthesis to teach research and information literacy skills: A model and case study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(2), 231–237. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2018.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar