‘Tell us what, but not how’ – understanding intra-organisational trust among principals and LEA officials in a decentralised school system

References

• Bennich-Björkman, L. 1997. Organising Innovative Research: The Inner Life of University Departments (Vol. 1). Oxford: Published for the IAU Press [by] Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, R., H. Gintis, and S. Bowles. 2010. “Coordinated Punishment of Defectors Sustains Cooperation and Can Proliferate When Rare.” Science 328 (5978): 617–620. doi:10.1126/science.1183665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brower, H. H., F. D. Schoorman, and H. H. Tan. 2000. “A Model of Relational Leadership: The Integration of Trust and Leader–Member Exchange.” The Leadership Quarterly 11 (2): 227–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S., P. B. Sebring, E. Allensworth, J. Q. Easton, and S. Luppescu. 2010. Organizing Schools for Improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, C. S., D. E. Sims, E. H. Lazzara, and E. Salas. 2007. “Trust in Leadership: A Multi-Level Review and Integration.” The Leadership Quarterly 18 (6): 606–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, A. J., and L. Chrispeels. 2008. “A Question of Trust: Predictive Conditions for Adaptive and Technical Leadership in Educational Contexts.” Leadership and Policy in Schools 71 (1): 30–63.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C. 2009. “Building and Sustaining Successful Principalship in England: The Importance of Trust.” Journal of Educational Administration 47 (6): 719–730. doi:10.1108/09578230910993104.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, G., and D. N. D. Hartog. 2006. “Measuring Trust Inside Organisations.” Personnel Review 35 (5): 557–588. doi:10.1108/00483480610682299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr, E., and S. Gächter. 1998. “Reciprocity and Economics: The Economic Implications of Homo Reciprocans.” European Economic Review 42 (3–5): 845–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, D. 2016a. “Introduction.” In Trust and Verify. The Real Keys to School Improvement, edited by D. Fink, 1–10. London: UCL Institute of Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fink, D. 2016b. “Trust and Verify.” In Trust and Verify. The Real Keys to School Improvement, edited by D. Fink, 24–45. London: UCL Institute of Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2001. Making Social Science Matter: why Social Inquiry Fails and how it can Succeed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. R. 2007. Analyzing Qualitative Data. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, J. L. 2017. “Trust Relationships in Schools: Supporting or Subverting Implementation of School-Wide Initiatives.” School Leadership & Management 37 (1–2): 141–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy, A. W., W. K. Hoy, and N. M. Kurz. 2008. “Teacher’s Academic Optimism: The Development and Test of a new Construct.” Teaching and Teacher Education 24 (4): 821–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy, W., and M. Tschannen-Moran. 1999. “Five Faces of Trust: An Empirical Confirmation in Urban Elementary Schools.” Journal of School Leadership 9 (3): 184–208.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, G. R., and J. M. George. 1998. “The Experience and Evolution of Trust: Implications for Cooperation and Teamwork.” Academy of Management Review 23 (3): 531–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, R. M., and T. R. Tayler. 1996. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kutsyuruba, B., and K. Walker. 2014. “The Lifecycle of Trust in Educational Leadership: An Ecological Perspective.” International Journal of Leadership in Education 18 (1): 106–121. doi:10.1080/13603124.2014.915061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutsyuruba, B., K. Walker, and B. Noonan. 2016. “The Trust Imperative in the School Principalship: The Canadian Perspective.” Leadership and Policy in Schools 15 (3): 343–372. doi:10.1080/15700763.2016.1164866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. 2010. “Characteristics of School Districts That Are Exceptionally Effective in Closing the Achievement Gap.” Leadership and Policy in Schools 9 (3): 245–291.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., and V. N. Azah. 2017. “Characteristics of High-Performing School Districts.” Leadership and Policy in Schools 16 (1): 27–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liljenberg, M., and K. Andersson. 2020. “Relations Between an Improving Swedish LEA and School Principals with Joint Quality and Improvement Responsibilities.” Education Inquiry. doi: 10.1080/20004508.2020.1802851.
   Google Scholar
• Louis, K. 2007. “Trust and Improvement in Schools.” Journal of Educational Change 8 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1007/s10833-006-9015-5.
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, L., and N. Alexiadou. 2016. “Reforming Swedish Education Through New Public Management and Quasi-Markets.” In New Public Management and the Reform of Education: European Lessons for Policy and Practice, edited by H. M. Gunter, E. Grimaldi, D. Hall, and R. Serpieri, 66–80. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., and J. P. Olsen. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. 2000. “Rational Choice and Dysfunctional Institutions.” Governance 13 (4): 535–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paulsen, J. M., and H. C. Høyer. 2015. “External Control and Professinal Trust in Norwegian School Governing. Synthesis Form a Nordic Research Project.” Nordic Studies in Education 36 (2): 86–102.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, R., and M. Clark. 2003. “Dispositional and Situational Determinants of Trust in Two Types of Managers.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management 14 (1): 128–138. doi:10.1080/09585190210158556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt, J. 1973. “Social Traps.” American Psychologist 28 (8): 641–651. doi:10.1037/h0035723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, H. E. 2012. “Principal–Teacher Interactions: How Affective Relationships Shape Principal and Teacher Attitudes.” Educational Administration Quarterly 48 (1): 39–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, L. 2014. “Justifying the Need for Control: Motives for Swedish National School Inspection During Two Governments.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 58 (4): 385–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. 2013. “Corruption and Social Trust: Why the Fish Rots from the Head Down.” Social Research 80 (4): 1009–1032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B., and D. Stolle. 2008. “The State and Social Capital: An Institutional Theory of Generalized Trust.” Comparative Politics 40 (4): 441–459. doi:10.5129/001041508X12911362383354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. 2008. “Approaching Adulthood: The Maturing of Institutional Theory.” Theory and Society 37 (5): 427–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M. 2004. Trust Matters: Leadership for Successful Schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M. 2009. “Fostering Teacher Professionalism in Schools – the Role of Leadership Orientation and Trust.” Educational Administration Quarterly 45 (2): 217–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., and C. R. Gareis. 2015. “Faculty Trust in the Principal: An Essential Ingredient in High-Performing Schools.” Journal of Educational Administration 53 (1): 66–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, K., B. Kutsyuruba, and B. Noonan. 2011. “The Fragility of Trust in the World of School Principals.” Journal of Educational Administration 49 (5): 471–494.
   Google Scholar
• Weibel, A. 2003. “Trust Within and Between Organizations. Conceptual Issues and Empirical Applications.” Personnel Review 32 (5): 667–671. doi:10.1108/00483480310488405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. 2001. “In Whom We Trust: Group Membership as an Affective Context for Trust Development.” Academy of Management Review 26 (3): 377–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar