1,566
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Responsive curriculum development: which factors support breaking through institutional barriers?

, , , , &
Received 03 Oct 2022, Accepted 06 Oct 2023, Published online: 15 Oct 2023

References

  • Alexander, I. K., and C. N. Hjortsø. 2019. “Sources of Complexity in Participatory Curriculum Development: An Activity System and Stakeholder Analysis Approach to the Analyses of Tensions and Contradictions.” Higher Education 77 (2): 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0274-x.
  • Allen, M. W., and R. Sites. 2012. Leaving ADDIE for SAM: An Agile Model for Developing the Best Learning Experiences. Alexandria, VA, USA: American Society for Training and Development.
  • Anakin, M., R. Spronken-Smith, M. Healey, and S. Vajoczki. 2018. “The Contextual Nature of University-Wide Curriculum Change.” International Journal for Academic Development 23 (3): 206–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2017.1385464.
  • Avis, J. 2020. Socio-Technical Imaginaries and the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Vocational Education in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Palgrave Pivot. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52032-8_2.
  • Bens, S., K. Kolomitro, and A. Han. 2020. “Curriculum Development: Enabling and Limiting Factors.” International Journal for Academic Development 26 (4): 481–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2020.1842744.
  • Bhat, D., K. Pushpalatha, and K. Praveen. 2017. “Study of Faculty Viewpoints on Challenges and Factors Influencing Curriculum Development/Revision.” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 11 (10): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/25697.10764.
  • Billett, S. 2000. “Defining the Demand Side of Vocational Education and Training: Industry, Enterprises, Individuals and Regions.” Journal of Vocational Education & Training 52 (1): 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820000200104.
  • Bouw, E., I. Zitter, and E. de Bruijn. 2021. “Multilevel Design Considerations for Vocational Curricula at the Boundary of School and Work.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 53 (6): 765–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2021.1899290.
  • Branson, R. K. 1978. “The Interservice Procedures for Instructional Systems Development.” Educational Technology 18 (3): 11–14. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44418942.
  • Cedefop. (2013). Renewing VET provision: Understanding feedback mechanisms between initial VET and the labour market. Publications Office of the European Union. Cedefop Research Paper, No.(37). https://doi.org/10.2801/32921
  • Cedefop. (2018). The Changing Nature and Role of Vocational Education and Training in Europe. Volume 3: The Responsiveness of European VET Systems to External Change (1995–2015). Publications Office of the European Union. Cedefop Research Paper, No. 67. http://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2801/621137.
  • Cedefop. (2021). Review and Renewal of Qualifications: Towards Methodologies for Analysing and Comparing Learning Outcomes. Publications References 107 Office of the European Union. Cedefop Research Paper, No. 82. http://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2801/615021.
  • Cedefop. (2022). The Future of Vocational Education and Training in Europe. Volume 1: The Changing Content and Profile of VET: Epistemological Challenges and Opportunities. Publications Office of the European Union. Cedefop Research Paper, No. 83. http://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2801/215705.
  • Coll, R. K., N. Taylor, and S. Nathan. 2003. “Using Work-Based Learning to Develop Education for Sustainability: A Proposal.” Journal of Vocational Education & Training 55 (2): 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820300200224.
  • Conrad, C. F., and A. M. Pratt. 1986. “Research on Academic Programs: An Inquiry into an Emerging Field.” In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, edited by G. K. Davies and J. C. Smart, 235–273. Vol. 2. New York, USA: Agathon Press.
  • Cornford, I. R. 1999. “Rediscovering the Importance of Learning and Curriculum in Vocational Education and Training in Australia.” Journal of Vocational Education & Training 51 (1): 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636829900200072.
  • Davis, J., T. Edgar, J. Porter, J. Bernadend, and M. Sarli. 2012. “Smart Manufacturing, Manufacturing Intelligence and Demand-Dynamic Performance.” Computers & Chemical Engineering 47 (20): 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.06.037.
  • De Vries, B. 2016. [Een Permeabel Curriculum A Permeable Curriculum]. http://wijmakenhetonderwijs.nl/actueel/een-permeabel-curriculum-door-bregje-de-vries.
  • Dutch Education Council [Onderwijsraad]. 2014. Een eigentijds curriculum [A contemporary curriculum]. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Excelsior.
  • European Commission. 2012. Rethinking Education: Investing in Skills for Better Socio-Economic Outcomes (669 Final). Strasbourg, France: European Commission.
  • Fraser, S. P. 2006. “Shaping the University Curriculum Through Partnerships and Critical Conversations.” International Journal for Academic Development 11 (1): 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440600578748.
  • Goodlad, J. I. 1979. Curriculum Inquiry: The Study of Curriculum Practice. New York, USA: McGraw Hill.
  • Goodlad, J. I. 1994. Educational Renewal: Better Teachers, Better Schools. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Graf, L., and A. P. Lohse. 2022. “Analyzing Vocational Education and Training Systems Through the Lens of Political Science.” In Internationales Handbuch der Berufsbildung. Vergleichende Berufsbildungsforschung–Ergebnisse Und Perspektiven Aus Theorie Und Empirie. Jubiläumsausgabe des Internationalen Handbuchs der Berufsbildung [Comparative Vocational Education Research–Results and Perspectives from Theory and Empirical Studies. Anniversary Edition of the International Handbook of Vocational Education and Training], 123–141. Bonn, Germany: Verlag Barbara Budrich.
  • Hager, P. 2011. “Refurbishing MacIntyre’s Account of Practice.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (3): 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2011.00810.x.
  • Halliburton, D. 1977. “Perspectives on the Curriculum.” In Developing the College Curriculum: A Handbook for Faculty and Administrators, edited by G. H. Quehl and M. Gee, 37–50, Washington, DC, USA: Council for the Advancement of Small Colleges.
  • Harris, R., and S. Graham. 2019. “Engaging with Curriculum Reform: Insights from English History teachers’ Willingness to Support Curriculum Change.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 51 (1): 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1513570.
  • Hawick, L., J. Cleland, and S. Kitto. 2017. “Getting off the Carousel: Exploring the Wicked Problem of Curriculum Reform.” Perspectives on Medical Education 6 (5): 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-017-0371-z.
  • Hoeve, A., A. Van Vlokhoven, and L. Nieuwenhuis. 2021. Het vizier op buiten: Leerplanontwikkeling voor een dynamisch beroep [Looking to the outside: Curriculum development for a dynamic profession]. NRO project 405-17-623. Arnhem/Nijmegen: HAN University of Applied Sciences. https://www.nro.nl/sites/nro/files/media-files/EindrapportageHetvizieropbuiten-leerplanontwikkelingvooreendynamischberoep.pdf.
  • Kane, M., and W. M. K. Trochim. 2007. Concept Mapping for Planning and Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Koeslag-Kreunen, M. G., M. R. Van der Klink, P. Van den Bossche, and W. H. Geijselaars. 2018. “Leadership for Team Learning: The Case of University Teacher Teams.” Higher Education 75 (2): 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0126-0.
  • Könings, K. D., C. Bovill, and P. Woolner 2017. “Towards an Interdisciplinary Model of Practice for Participatory Building Design in Education.” European Journal of Education 52 (3): 306–317.
  • Könings, K. D., S. Brand-Gruwel, and J. J. G. Van Merriënboer. 2007. “Teachers’ Perspectives on Innovations: Implications for Educational Design.” Teaching & Teacher Education 23 (6): 985–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.06.004.
  • Lattuca, L. R., and J. S. Stark. 2009. Shaping the College Curriculum: Academic Plans in Context. San Francisco, CA, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Leeman, Y., N. Nieveen, F. de Beer, and J. Van der Steen. 2020. “Teachers as Curriculum-Makers: The Case of Citizenship Education in Dutch Schools.” The Curriculum Journal 31 (3): 495–516. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.21.
  • Leibowitz, B., S. van Schalkwyk, J. Ruiters, J. Farmer, and H. Adendorf. 2012. ““It’s Been a Wonderful life”: Accounts of the Interplay Between Structure and Agency by “Good” University Teachers.” Higher Education 63 (3): 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9445-8.
  • Loumpourdi, M. 2021. “The Future of Employee Development in the Emerging Fourth Industrial Revolution: A Preferred Liberal Future.” Journal of Vocational Education & Training 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2021.1998793.
  • Marshall, S. J. 1998. “Professional Development and Quality in Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century.” Australian Journal of Education 42 (3): 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494419804200308.
  • McGrath, S. 2022. “Vocational Education in the Fourth Industrial Revolution.” Journal of Vocational Education & Training 74 (2): 352–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2021.2018227.
  • McKenney, S., Y. Kali, L. Markauskaite, and J. Voogt. 2015. “Teacher Design Knowledge for Technology Enhanced Learning: An Ecological Framework for Investigating Assets and Needs.” Instructional Science 43 (2): 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9337-2.
  • Myatt, M., and J. Tomsett. 2022. Huh: Curriculum Conversations Between Subject and Senior Leaders. Melton, Woodbridge: John Catt Educational.
  • Nieuwenhuis, L., H. Smulders, and R. Sessink. 2021. “Responsiviteit Als Opdracht [Responsiveness as a Mission.” In Handboek beroepsgerichte didactiek. Effectief opleiden in het mbo en hbo [Manual of vocational didactics. Effective training in MBO and HBO], edited by A. Hoeve, H. Van Vlokhoven, L. Nieuwenhuis, and P. Den Boer, 73–92. Huizen, The Netherlands: Pica.
  • Nieveen, N., J. van den Akker, and F. Resink. 2010. “Framing and Supporting School-Based Curriculum Development in the Netherlands.” In Schools as Curriculum Agencies, 273–283. Brill.
  • Nieveen, N., and M. van der Hoeven. 2011. Building the Curricular Capacity of Teachers: Insights from the Netherlands. Beginning Teachers: A Challenge for Educational Systems. Lyon, France: ENS de Lyon, Institut français de l’Éducation. CIDREE Yearbook 2011. https://www.cidree.org/fileadmin/files/pdf/publications/YB_11_Beginning_teachers.pdf
  • OECD. (2014). Skills Beyond School: Synthesis report. OECD Reviews of Vocational Education and Training. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/edu/skills-beyond-school/Skills-Beyond-School- Synthesis-Report.pdf
  • Pieters, J., J. Voogt, and N. Pareja Roblin. 2019. Collaborative Curriculum Design for Sustainable Innovation and Teacher Learning. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.
  • Priestley, M., G. J. J. Biesta, and S. Robinson. 2012. “Teachers as Agents of Change: An Exploration of the Concept of Teacher Agency.” Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC). https://www.stir.ac.uk/research/hub/publication/764037
  • Raffe, D. 2013. “Challenges and Reforms in Vocational Education: Aspects of Inclusion and Exclusion.” Journal of Vocational Education & Training 65 (2): 303–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2013.780330.
  • Rosas, S. R., and M. Kane. 2012. “Quality and Rigor of the Concept Mapping Methodology: A Pooled Study Analysis.” Evaluation and Program Planning 35 (2): 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.10.003.
  • Rusert, K., and M. Stein. 2023. “Chances and Discrimination in Dual Vocational Training of Refugees and Immigrants in Germany.” Journal of Vocational Education & Training 75 (1): 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2022.2148118.
  • Schein, E. 1992. Organizational Culture and Leadership. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Shalem, Y., and S. Allais. 2018. “When is Vocational Knowledge Educationally Valuable?” In Knowledge, Curriculum and Preparation for Work, edited by S. Allais and Y. Shalem, 13–29, Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill/Sense.
  • Thijs, A., and J. Van den Akker, edited by 2009. Leerplan in Ontwikkeling [Curriculum in Development]. Enschede: SLO.
  • Viennet, R., and B. Pont 2017. Education Policy Implementation: A Literature Review and Proposed Framework. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 162. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/fc467a64-en
  • Vreuls, J., M. Koeslag-Kreunen, M. van der Klink, L. Nieuwenhuis, and H. Boshuizen. 2022. “Responsive Curriculum Development for Professional Education: Different Teams, Different Tales.” The Curriculum Journal 0 (4): 636–659. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.155.
  • Waterman, R. H., and T. J. Peters. 1982. In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best-Run Companies. New York, USA: Harper & Row.
  • Wheelahan, L. 2007. “How Competency-Based Training Locks the Working Class Out of Powerful Knowledge: A Modified Bernsteinian Analysis.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 28 (5): 637–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690701505540.
  • Whitehead, C. R., B. D. Hodges, and Z. Austin. 2013. “Captive on a Carousel: Discourses of ‘New’ in Medical Education 1910–2010.” Advances in Health Sciences Education 18 (4): 755–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-012-9414-8.
  • Young, M. 2006. “Conceptualising Vocational Knowledge: Some Theoretical Considerations.” In Knowledge, Curriculum and Qualifications for South African Further Education, edited by M. Young and J. Gamble, 104–124, Cape Town, South Africa: HSRC Press.
  • Young, M., and J. Hordern. 2022. “Does the Vocational Curriculum Have a Future?” Journal of Vocational Education & Training 74 (1): 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2020.1833078.