Teachers’ Reflection on their Agency for Change (TRAC): a tool for teacher development and professional inquiry

References

• Ainscow, M. 2005. “Developing Inclusive Education Systems: What Are the Levers for Change?” Journal of Educational Change 6 (2): 109–124. doi:10.1007/s10833-005-1298-4.
   Google Scholar
• Ainscow, M. 2015. Towards Self-Improving School Systems: Lessons from a City Challenge. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. 2000. Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Avis, J. 2009. “Transformation or Transformism: Engeström’s Version of Activity Theory?” Educational Review 61 (2): 151–165. doi:10.1080/00131910902844754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. 2002. “Comment: Educational Research: The Hardest Science of All.” Educational Researcher 31 (8): 18–20. doi:10.3102/0013189X031008018.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., M. Priestley, and S. Robinson. 2015. “The Role of Beliefs in Teacher Agency.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 21 (6): 624–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., and M. Tedder. 2007. “Agency and Learning in the Lifecourse: Towards an Ecological Perspective.” Studies in the Education of Adults 39 (2): 132–149. doi:10.1080/02660830.2007.11661545.
   Google Scholar
• Black‐Hawkins, K. 2010. “The Framework for Participation: A Research Tool for Exploring the Relationship between Achievement and Inclusion in Schools.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 33 (1): 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Black-Hawkins, K., and L. Florian. 2012. “Classroom Teachers’ Craft Knowledge of Their Inclusive Practice.” Teachers and Teaching 18 (5): 567–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boag‐Munroe, G. 2004. “Wrestling with Words and Meanings: Finding a Tool for Analysing Language in Activity Theory.” Educational Review 56 (2): 165–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourke, R., M. Mentis, and J. O’Neill. 2013. “Using Activity Theory to Evaluate a Professional Learning and Development Initiative in the Use of Narrative Assessment.” Cambridge Journal of Education 43 (1): 35–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. 2001. “Collective Sensemaking about Reading: How Teachers Mediate Reading Policy in Their Professional Communities.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 23 (2): 145–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. 2005. “Shaping Teacher Sensemaking: School Leaders and the Enactment of Reading Policy.” Educational Policy 19 (3): 476–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., and A. M. Villegas. 2014. “Framing Teacher Preparation Research: An Overview of the Field, Part 1.” Journal of Teacher Education 66 (1): 7–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, H. 2004. “Activity Theory, Discourse and Bernstein.” Educational Review 56 (2): 121–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson, A., and F. Gallannaugh. 2007. “National Policy and the Development of Inclusive School Practices: A Case Study.” Cambridge Journal of Education 37 (4): 473–488.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. 2007. “Relational Agency in Professional Practice: A CHAT Analysis.” Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, no. 1: 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. 2017. “The Dialectic of Person and Practice: How Cultural-Historic Accounts of Agency Can Inform Teacher Education.” In The SAGE Handbook of Research on Teacher Education, edited by D. J. Clandinin and J. Husu, 269–285. Vol. 2. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A., and H. Daniels. 2004. “Editorial. Using Sociocultural and Activity Theory in Educational Research.” Educational Review 56 (2): 107–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, A., and C. D’Arcy. 2004. “Relational Agency and Disposition in Sociocultural Accounts of Learning to Teach.” Educational Review 56 (2): 147–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 1987. Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 2001. “Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an Activity Theoretical Reconceptualization.” Journal of Education and Work 14 (1): 133–156.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 2005. “Development, Movement and Agency: Breaking Away into Mycorrhizae Activities. ” Paper presented at the International Symposium Artefacts and Collectives: Situated Action and Activity Theory (ARTCO), Lyon, July 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Eteläpelto, A., K. Vähäsantanen, P. Hökkä, and S. Paloniemi. 2013. “What Is Agency? Conceptualizing Professional Agency at Work.” Educational Research Review 10 (December): 45–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flecha, R., and M. Soler. 2013. “Turning Difficulties into Possibilities: Engaging Roma Families and Students in School through Dialogic Learning.” Cambridge Journal of Education 43 (4): 451–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florian, L. 2009. “Preparing Teachers to Work in ‘Schools for All’.” Teaching and Teacher Education 25 (4): 533–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florian, L., and K. Black-Hawkins. 2011. “Exploring Inclusive Pedagogy.” British Educational Research Journal 37 (5): 813–828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florian, L., K. Black-Hawkins, and M. Rouse. 2017. Achievement and Inclusion in Schools. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Florian, L., and N. Pantić. 2017. “Teacher Education for the Changing Demographics of Schooling: Policy, Practice and Research.” In Teacher Education for the Changing Demographics of Schooling, edited by L. Florian and N. Pantić, 1–5. Cham: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 2006. “The Future of Educational Change: System Thinkers in Action.” Journal of Educational Change 7 (3): 113–122.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 2007. The New Meaning of Educational Change. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S., A. Dixon, M. J. Drummond, and D. McIntyre. 2004. Learning without Limits. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. 2009. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hollenweger, J., N. Pantić, and L. Florian. 2015. Tool to Upgrade Teacher Education Practices for Inclusive Education. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Kugelmass, J. W. 2001. “Collaboration and Compromise in Creating and Sustaining an Inclusive School.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 5 (1): 47–65.
   Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., and H. M. Marks. 1998. “Does Professional Learning Community Affect the Classroom? Teachers’ Work and Student Experiences in Restructuring Schools.” American Journal of Education 106 (4): 532–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macpherson, I., R. Brooker, and P. Ainsworth. 2000. “Case Study in the Contemporary World of Research: Using Notions of Purpose, Place, Process and Product to Develop Some Principles for Practice.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 3 (1): 49–61.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, D., and N. Peim. 2009. “Critical Perspectives on Activity Theory.” Educational Review 61 (2): 131–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nind, M., S. Benjamin, K. Sheehy, J. Collins, and K. Hall. 2004. “Methodological Challenges in Researching Inclusive School Cultures.” Educational Review 56 (3): 259–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantić, N. 2015a. “A Model for Study of Teacher Agency for Social Justice.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 21 (6): 759–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantić, N. 2015b. “Reconciling Rigour and Impact by Collaborative Research Design: Study of Teacher Agency.” International Journal of Research Method in Education 40 (4): 329–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantić, N. 2017. “An Exploratory Study of Teacher Agency for Social Justice.” Teaching and Teacher Education 66 (August): 219–230.
   Google Scholar
• Pantić, N., and D. Carr. 2017. “Educating Teachers as Agents of Social Justice: A Virtue Ethical Perspective.” In Teacher Education for the Changing Demographics of Schooling, edited by L. Florian and N. Pantić, 55–65. Cham: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Pantić, N., and L. Florian. 2015. “Developing Teachers as Agents of Inclusion and Social Justice.” Education Inquiry 6 (3): 333–351.
   Google Scholar
• Pantić, N., T. Wubbels, and T. Mainhard. 2011. “Teacher Competence as a Basis for Teacher Education: Comparing Views of Teachers and Teacher Educators in Five Western Balkan Countries.” Comparative Education Review 55 (2): 165–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peim, N. 2009. “Activity Theory and Ontology.” Educational Review 61 (2): 167–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., G. Biesta, and S. Robinson. 2015. Teacher Agency: An Ecological Approach. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., R. Edwards, A. Priestley, and K. Miller. 2012. “Teacher Agency in Curriculum Making: Agents of Change and Spaces for Manoeuvre.” Curriculum Inquiry 42 (2): 191–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riveros, A., P. Newton, and D. Burgess. 2012. “A Situated Account of Teacher Agency and Learning: Critical Reflections on Professional Learning Communities.” Canadian Journal of Education 35 (1): 202–216.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, S. 2012. “Constructing Teacher Agency in Response to the Constraints of Education Policy: Adoption and Adaptation.” Curriculum Journal 23: 231–245.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. 2014. Getting It Right for Every Child. Scottish Government. http://www.gov.scot/Topics/People/Young-People/gettingitright
   Google Scholar
• Vescio, V., D. Ross, and A. Adams. 2008. “A Review of Research on the Impact of Professional Learning Communities on Teaching Practice and Student Learning.” Teaching and Teacher Education 24 (1): 80–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virkkunen, J. 2006. “Dilemmas in Building Shared Transformative Agency.” @ctivités 3 (1): 44–66. http://www.activites.org/v3n1/virkkunen-en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vongalis‐Macrow, A. 2007. “I, Teacher: Re‐territorialization of Teachers’ Multi‐Faceted Agency in Globalized Education.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 28 (4): 425–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1986. Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yamagata-Lynch, L. 2007. “Confronting Analytical Dilemmas for Understanding Complex Human Interactions in Design-Based Research from a Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) Framework.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 16 (4): 451–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamazumi, K. 2007. “Human Agency and Educational Research: A New Problem in Activity Theory.” Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory 1: 19–39.
   Google Scholar