The status of the teaching profession in Turkey: a case study about the Teaching Profession Act

References

• Akkafa, Y. 2010. “Koy Egitmenleri Kanunu ve Türk Milli Egitiminde Uygulanmasi” [Village Trainers’ Law and its Implementation in Turkish National Education]. Master’s thesis, Selçuk University, Turkey. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/6523.
   Google Scholar
• Akyuz, Y. 2014. Türk Egitim Tarihi [History of Turkish Education]. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
   Google Scholar
• Albayrak, A. 2018. “Türkiye’de Oğretmen Aciginin Giderilmesinde Basvurulan Alternatif Uygulamaların Incelenmesi (1961–1996)” [A Study of Alternative Practices Used for Compensating Teacher Shortage in Turkey (1961–1996)]. Master’s thesis, Dumlupınar University, Turkey. https://openaccess.dpu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/20.500.12438/8044.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. K., K. L. Terras, and M. Dagfinrud. 2013. “Appraising Teacher Quality in Norwegian Schools.” International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology 3 (8): 16–42. http://www.ijbhtnet.com/journals/Vol_3_No_8_December_2013/3.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Atanur-Baskan, G., A. Aydin, and T. Madden. 2006. “A Comparative Overview of the Teacher Education System in Turkey.” ÇÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 15 (1): 35–42. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/50255.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Education Act. 2020. “Australian Education Regulation, 195.” https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2020C01037.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, M. 2005. “The Virtue of Accountability: System Redesign, Inspection, and Incentives in the Era of Informed Professionalism.” Journal of Education 185 (1): 7–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205740518500102.
   Google Scholar
• Bastian, K. C., K. M. Patterson, and D. Carpenter. 2020. “Placed for Success: Which Teachers Benefit from High-Quality Student Teaching Placements?” Educational Policy 36 (7): 1583–1611. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904820951126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, P., and S. Jack. 2008. “Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers.” The Qualitative Report 13 (4): 544–559. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR13-4/baxter.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bayar, A., A. Ustun, and A. Zengin. 2020. “Opinions of Educators on the Change of the Reputation of the Teaching Profession Over Time.” Academic Social Resources Journal 6 (19): 646–657. https://doi.org/10.31569/ASRJOURNAL.122.
   Google Scholar
• Bérci, M. E. 2006. “The Staircase of Teacher Development: A Perspective on the Process and Consequences of the Unity and Integration of Self.” Teacher Development 10 (1): 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530600587113.
   Google Scholar
• Block, A. A. 2009. Ethics and Teaching: A Religious Perspective on Revitalizing Education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Burbules, N. C., and K. Densmore. 1991. “The Limits of Making Teaching a Profession.” Educational Policy 5 (1): 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904891005001004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Call, K. 2018. “Professional Teaching Standards: A Comparative Analysis of Their History, Implementation, and Efficacy.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 43 (3): 92–108. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n3.6.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, H. J., and J. H. Park. 2016. “An Analysis of Critical Issues in Korean Teacher Evaluation Systems.” Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal 6 (2): 151–171. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.93.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen-Vogel, L., and C. D. Herrington. 2005. “Introduction: Teacher and Leadership Preparation and Development: No Strangers to Politics.” Educational Policy 19 (1): 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904804272432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 1990. “Teacher Professionalism: How and Why?” In Schools as Collaborative Cultures: Creating the Future Now, edited by A. Lieberman, 25–50. London: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, C. A. 1998. “Psychometrics of Praxis III: Classroom Performance Assessments.” Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 12 (2): 163–187. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008033111392.
   Google Scholar
• Egitim-Bir-Sen [Educators Trade Union]. 2018. “Ogretmenlik Meslek Kanunu: Ihtiyaclar ve Oneriler” [Teaching Profession Law: Needs and Suggestions]. Egitim-Bir-Sen. Accessed April 11, 2021. https://www.ebs.org.tr/ebs_files/files/yayinlarimiz/ogremenlik_meslek_kanunu_ihtiyac_oneriler.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Egitim-Sen [Education and Science Laborers Union]. 2018. “Ogretmenlik Meslek Kanunu Ogretmenlerin Iradesiyle Hazirlanmalidir!” [Teaching Profession Law Should Be Prepared by the Will of Teachers!] Egitim-Sen. Accessed May 24, 2022. http://egitimsen.org.tr/ogretmenlik-meslek-kanunu-ogretmenlerin-iradesiyle-hazirlanmalidir/.
   Google Scholar
• Egitim-Sen. 2022. “Ogretmenlik Meslek Kanunu Tasarisi Neye Hizmet Ediyor? Nasil Olmali?” [What Does the Draft Law on Teaching Profession Serve? How Should It Be?] Egitim-Sen. Accessed March 21, 2022. https://www.canakkaleegitimsen.org/ogretmenlik-meslek-kanunu-ogretmenlik-meslek-kanunu-tasarisi-neye-hizmet-ediyor-nasil-olmali/.
   Google Scholar
• Elcicek, Z., and M. Yasar. 2016. “The Teachers’ Professional Development in Turkey and World.” Electronic Journal of Education Sciences 5 (9): 12–19. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ejedus/issue/26455/278557.
   Google Scholar
• Elo, S., and H. Kyngäs. 2008. “The Qualitative Content Analysis Process.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 62 (1): 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo, S., M. Kääriäinen, O. Kanste, T. Pölkki, K. Utriainen, and H. Kyngäs. 2014. “Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness.” SAGE Open 4 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633.
   Google Scholar
• Erlingsson, C., and P. Brysiewicz. 2017. “A Hands-On Guide to Doing Content Analysis.” African Journal of Emergency Medicine 7 (3): 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, L. 2008. “Professionalism, Professionality, and the Development of Education Professionals.” British Journal of Educational Studies 56 (1): 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00392.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Even-Zahav, A., M. Widder, and O. Hazzan. 2022. “From Teacher Professional Development to Teacher Personal-Professional Growth: The Case of Expert STEM Teachers.” Teacher Development 26 (3): 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2022.2052947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glesne, C. 2016. Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Goker, S. D., and Y. Gunduz. 2017. “Teacher Status and Their Employee Personal Rights Across the World.” National Education 46 (213): 177–196. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/441217.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, K. L., and Y. Yong. 2013. “Policies and Practice of Professional Development in China: What Do Early Childhood Teachers Think?” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 38 (6): 88–102. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2013v38n6.4.
   Google Scholar
• Haertel, E. H. 1991. “New Forms of Teacher Assessment.” In Review of Research in Education, edited by G. Grant, 3–29. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. 2000. “Four Ages of Professionalism and Professional Learning.” Teachers & Teaching Theory & Practice 6 (2): 151–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/713698714.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, P. 2009. “How Can Preservice Teachers Be Measured Against Advocated Professional Teaching Standards?” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 34 (5): 65–73. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2009v34n5.6.
   Google Scholar
• ILO. 2016. The ILO/UNESCO Recommendation Concerning the Status of Teachers (1966) and the UNESCO Recommendation Concerning the Status of Higher-Education Teaching Personnel (1997). Paris, France: International Labour Office, Sectoral Policies Department. https://www.right-to-education.org/fr/node/841.
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, D. 2011. “Teacher Unionization in School Governance.” Education Policy 25 (5): 762–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904810374852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayler, M. A. 2009. “Teacher Development and Learner‐Centered Theory.” Teacher Development 13 (1): 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530902858501.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. W. 2004. “Education Reform Policies and Classroom Teaching in South Korea.” International Studies in Sociology of Education 14 (2): 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620210400200122.
   Google Scholar
• Koyuncu, F., and Y. Duskun. (2020). Egitim Izleme Raporu 2020: Ogretmenler [Education Monitoring Report 2020: Teachers]. https://www.egitimreformugirisimi.org/egitim-izleme-raporu-2020-ogretmenler/.
   Google Scholar
• Labaree, D. 1992. “Power, Knowledge, and the Rationalization of Teaching: A Genealogy of the Movement to Professionalize Teaching.” Harvard Educational Review 62 (2): 123–154. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.62.2.h73x7422v3166102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, W. D., and T. V. Young. 2013. “The Politics of Accountability.” Educational Policy 27 (2): 190–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904812472725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marasli, S. 2007. “Türkiye’de Egitimle ilgili Süreli Yayinlara Yansiyan Ogretmen Sorunlari (1970–2000 Yillari Arasi)” [Teacher Problems, Reflecting to Periodical Publications related to Education in Turkey (Between 1970–2000)]. Master’s thesis, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12575/29610.
   Google Scholar
• Marinell, W. H., and S. M. Johnson. 2014. “Midcareer Entrants to Teaching: Who They are and How They May, or May Not, Change Teaching.” Education Policy 28 (6): 743–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904813475709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, G. 2009. “Defining Standards for the 21st Century.” In Educational Assessment in the 21^st Century, edited by C. Wyatt-Smith and J. Cumming, 263–286. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. 2014. “Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution.” https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/39517.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. 2009. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Milli Egitim Temel Kanunu [Basic Law of National Education]. 1973. c.3 (Tr.). https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.1739.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, A. 2017. “Bridging the Divide: Examining Professional Unity and the Extended Teacher Union Role in Sweden.” Educational Policy 32 (2): 189–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904817741547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. 2017. “Ogretmenlik Meslegi Genel Yeterlikleri” [General Competencies of the Teaching Profession]. Ogretmen Yetistirme Genel Mudurlugu, Ankara, Turkey. Accessed March 20, 2022. https://oygm.meb.gov.tr/dosyalar/StPrg/Ogretmenlik_Meslegi_Genel_Yeterlikleri.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. 2019. “2023 Egitim Vizyonu” [2023 Education Vision]. Accessed March 26, 2021. https://www.gmka.gov.tr/dokumanlar/yayinlar/2023_E%C4%9Fitim%20Vizyonu.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. 2022. “Milli Egitim İstatistikleri: Örgün Egitim 2021/2022” [National Education Statistics: Formal Education 2021/2022]. https://sgb.meb.gov.tr/www/icerik_goruntule.php?KNO=460.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, L., T. Gupta, and A. Shree. 2022. “Faculty Induction Program for Newly Recruited Teachers of Higher Education: A Case Study.” Teacher Development 26 (1): 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2022.2027812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemi, H. 2015. “Teacher Professional Development in Finland: Towards a More Holistic Approach.” Psychology, Society, & Education 7 (3): 279–294. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v7i3.519.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2016. Education in China: A Snapshot. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/china/Education-in-China-a-snapshot.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ogretmenlik Meslek Kanunu [Teaching Profession Act]. 2022. c.6 (Tr.). https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.7354.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ozdemir, T. Y., and M. Orhan. 2019. “The Opinions of the Teachers on the Image of the Teaching Profession.” Trakya Journal of Education 9 (4): 824–846. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/893121.
   Google Scholar
• Ozoglu, M. 2010. Türkiye’de Ogretmen Yetistirme Sisteminin Sorunlari [The Problems of Teacher Education System in Turkey]. Ankara: SETA.
   Google Scholar
• Ozturk, M. 2018. “CHP’den Ogretmenler Icin Kanun Teklifi” [Law Proposal for Teachers from CHP]. Anadolu Ajansi. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/politika/chpden-ogretmenler-icin-kanun-teklifi/1318510.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2014. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, W. L. 1999. “Teachers’ Union Involvement in Educational Policy Making: Issues Raised by an In-Depth Case.” Education Policy 13 (5): 698–725. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904899013005005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postholm, M. B. 2012. “Teachers’ Professional Development: A Theoretical Review.” Educational Research 54 (4): 405–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2012.734725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, M. 1992. “What is Competent Beginning Teaching? A Review of the Literature.” Review of Educational Research 62 (1): 1–35. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062001001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson-Kraft, C., and R. S. Zhang. 2016. “Keeping Great Teachers: A Case Study on the Impact and Implementation of a Pilot Teacher Evaluation System.” Educational Policy 32 (3): 363–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904816637685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, E., and P. Sanders. 2007. “Towards a Framework for Assessing Teacher Competence.” European Journal of Vocational Training 40 (1): 123–139. https://typeset.io/pdf/towards-a-framework-for-assessing-teacher-competence-1w3qei2b2c.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rossman, G. B., and F. R. Sharon. 2017. An Introduction to Qualitative Research: Learning in the Field. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802694.
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T. A., and E. F. Gates. 2018. “Case Study Methodology.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 341–354. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Shuls, J. V., and J. R. Trivitt. 2015. “Teacher Effectiveness: An Analysis of Licensure Screens.” Educational Policy 29 (4): 645–675. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904813510777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sykes, G. 1989. “Teaching and Professionalism: A Cautionary Perspective.” In Crisis in Teaching: Perspective on Current Reforms, edited by L. Weis, P. G. Altbach, G. P. Kelly, H. G. Petrie, and S. Slaughter. 252–276. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, S. Y. F., and P. L. Choi. 2009. “Teachers’ Professional Lives and Continuing Professional Development in Changing Times.” Educational Review 61 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910802684748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TED (Turk Egitim Dernegi) [Turkish Education Association]. 2009. Ogretmen Yeterlikleri: Ozet Rapor [Teacher Competencies: Summary Report]. Ankara, Turkey: Okan Matbaacılık. http://portal.ted.org.tr/yayinlar/Ogretmen_Yeterlik_Kitap_Ozet_rapor.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• TED (Turk Egitim Dernegi) [Turkish Education Association]. 2018. “Ogretmenlik Meslek Kanunu Oneri Metni” [Teaching Profession Act Recommendation Text]. Turk Egitim Dernegi. Accessed March 23, 2021. https://tedmem.org/storage/publications/February2023/DoNtSzem111jmsp9cAq7.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tozlu, N. 2015. “Ogretmen Yetistirme Uzerine Dusunceler” [Thoughts on Teacher Training]” TYB Akademi Dil Edebiyat ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 5 (13): 123–135. https://openaccess.bayburt.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/20.500.12403/1437.
   Google Scholar
• Tuinamuana, K. 2011. “Teacher Professional Standards, Accountability, and Ideology: Alternative Discourses.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 36 (12): 72–82. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n12.8.
   Google Scholar
• Turk Egitim-Sen [Education Workforce Union of Turkey]. 2023. “Ogretmenlik Meslek Kanunu Calıstayi Yapildi” [Teaching Profession Law Workshop was Held]. Turk Egitim-Sen. Accessed February 12, 2023. https://turkegitimsen.org.tr/181637-2/.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2015). The Right to Education and the Teaching Profession: Overview of the Measures Supporting the Rights, Status and Working Conditions of the Teaching Profession Reported on by Member States. Paris, France: UNESCO Publications. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000234820.
   Google Scholar
• Unsal, S. 2018. “A Pareto Analysis of Status of Teaching Profession in Turkey.” Sakarya University Journal of Education 8 (2): 111–130. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.379040.
   Google Scholar
• Urbanski, A. 1998. “Teacher Professionalism and Teacher Accountability: Toward a More Genuine Teaching Profession.” Educational Policy 12 (4): 449–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904898012004006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, A. 2005. “Establishing Teaching as a Profession: The Essential Role of Professional Accreditation.” Journal of Teacher Education 56 (4): 318–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105279965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wronowski, M., and A. Urick. 2021. “Teacher and School Predictors of Teacher Deprofessionalization and Demoralization in the United States.” Educational Policy 35 (5): 679–720. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904819843598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim, I., and O. F. Vural. 2014. “Problems Related with Teacher Training and Pedagogical Formation in Turkey.” Journal of Teacher Education and Educators 3 (1): 73–90. http://jtee.org/document/issue5/MAK4.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2014. Case Study Research Design and Methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Youngs, P., A. Odden, and A. C. Porter. 2003. “State Policy Related to Teacher Licensure.” Educational Policy 17 (2): 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904803017002002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., and B. M. Wildemuth. 2016. “Qualitative Analysis of Content.” In Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science, edited by B. M. Wildemuth, 308–319. Exeter: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar