Validation of a bilingual version of the vocabulary size test: comparison with the monolingual version

References

• Batista, R., and M. Horst. 2016. “A New Receptive Vocabulary Size Test for French.” Canadian Modern Language Review 72 (2): 211–233. doi:10.3138/cmlr.2820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beglar, D. 2010. “A Rasch-based Validation of the Vocabulary Size Test.” Language Testing 27 (1): 101–118. doi:10.1177/0265532209340194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beglar, D., and A. Hunt. 1999. “Revising and Validating the 2000 Word Level and University Word Level Vocabulary Tests.” Language Testing 16 (2): 131–162. doi:10.1177%2F026553229901600202 doi: 10.1177/026553229901600202
   Google Scholar
• Bonk, W. J. 2000. “Second Language Lexical Knowledge and Listening Comprehension.” International Journal of Listening 14 (1): 14–31. doi:10.1080/10904018.2000.10499033.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. D., and T. Hudson. 2002. Criterion-referenced Language Testing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Elgort, I. 2013. “Effects of L1 Definitions and Cognate Status of Test Items on the Vocabulary Size Test.” Language Testing 30 (2): 253–272. doi:10.1177/0265532212459028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. 2009. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fromkin, V., and R. Rodman. 1988. An Introduction to Language. 4th ed.London: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Gyllstad, H. 2012. “Validating the Vocabulary Size Test: A Classical Test Theory Approach.” Paper presented at the 9th annual EALTA conference, Innsbruck, May 31–June 3.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, M., and I. S. P. Nation. 2000. “Unknown Vocabulary Density and Reading Comprehension.” Reading in a Foreign Language 13 (1): 403–430.
   Google Scholar
• Karami, H. 2012a. “The Development and Validation of a Bilingual Version of the Vocabulary Size Test.” RELC Journal 43 (1): 53–67. doi:10.1177/0033688212439359.
   Google Scholar
• Karami, H. 2012b. “The Relative Impact of Persons, Items, Subtests, and Academic Background on Performance on a Language Proficiency Test.” Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling 54 (3): 211–226.
   Google Scholar
• Karami, H. 2013. “An Investigation of the Gender Differential Performance on a High-stakes Language Proficiency Test in Iran.” Asia Pacific Education Review 14 (3): 435–444. doi:10.1007/s12564-013-9272-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karami, H. 2015. “Exploratory Factor Analysis as a Construct Validation Tool: (Mis)applications in Applied Linguistics Research.” TESOL Journal 6 (3): 476–498. doi:10.1002/tesj.176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, B. 1992. “How Much Lexis is Necessary for Reading Comprehension?” In Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics, edited by P. J. L. Arnaud, and H. Béjoint, 126–132. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Laufer, B., and Z. Goldstein. 2004. “Testing Vocabulary Knowledge: Size, Strength, and Computer Adaptiveness.” Language Learning 54 (3): 399–436. doi:10.1111/j.0023-8333.2004.00260.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, B., and I. S. P. Nation. 1995. “Vocabulary Size and Use: Lexical Richness in L2 Written Production.” Applied Linguistics 16 (3): 307–322. doi:10.1093/applin/16.3.307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, B., and I. S. P. Nation. 1999. “A Vocabulary-Size Test of Controlled Productive Ability.” Language Testing 16 (1): 33–51. doi:10.1177/026553229901600103.
   Google Scholar
• Li, M., and J. R. Kirby. 2015. “The Effects of Vocabulary Breadth and Depth on English Reading.” Applied Linguistics 36 (5): 611–634. doi:10.1093/applin/amu007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meara, P. M., and G. Jones. 1990. The Eurocentres Vocabulary Size Test 10K. Zurich: Eurocentres.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. 1980. “Test Validity and the Ethics of Assessment.” American Psychologist 35 (11): 1012–1027. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.35.11.1012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, S. 1989. “Validity.” In Educational Measurement. 3rd ed., edited by R. L. Linn, 13–103. New York: American Council on Education.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. 1994. “The Interplay of Evidence and Consequences in the Validation of Performance Assessments.” Educational Researcher 23 (2): 13–23. doi:10.3102/0013189X023002013.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P. 1983. “Testing and Teaching Vocabulary.” Guidelines 5: 12–25.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P. 1990. Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P. 2006. “How Large a Vocabulary is Needed for Reading and Listening?” Canadian Modern Language Review 63 (1): 59–82. doi:10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P., and D. Beglar. 2007. “A Vocabulary Size Test.” The Language Teacher 31 (7): 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, L. T. C., and I. S. P. Nation. 2011. “A Bilingual Vocabulary Size Test of English for Vietnamese Learners.” RELC Journal 42 (1): 86–99. doi:10.1177/0033688210390264.
   Google Scholar
• Pallant, J. 2007. SPSS Survival Manual. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, D. D. 1999. “Assessing the Roles of Depth and Breadth of Vocabulary Knowledge in Reading Comprehension.” Canadian Modern Language Review 56 (2): 282–308. doi:10.3138/cmlr.56.2.282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, D. D. 2002. “Investigating the Relationship between Vocabulary Knowledge and Academic Reading Performance: An Assessment Perspective.” Language Learning 52 (3): 513–536. doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N., X. Jiang, and W. Grabe. 2011. “The Percentage of Words Known in a Text and Reading Comprehension.” The Modern Language Journal 95 (1): 26–43. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01146.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N., D. Schmitt, and C. Clapham. 2001. “Developing and Exploring the Behaviour of Two New Versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test.” Language Testing 18 (1): 55–88. doi: 10.1177/026553220101800103
   Google Scholar
• Stæhr, L. S. 2008. “Vocabulary Size and the Skills of Listening, Reading and Writing.” The Language Learning Journal 36 (2): 139–152. doi:10.1080/09571730802389975.
   Google Scholar
• Stæhr, L. S. 2009. “Vocabulary Knowledge and Advanced Listening Comprehension in English as a Foreign Language.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 31 (4): 577–607. doi:10.1017/S0272263109990039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. 2009. “A Comparison of Test Scores between Monolingual and Bilingual Versions of the Vocabulary Size Test: A Pilot Study.” In JALT 2008 Conference Proceedings, edited by A. M. Stoke, 1262–1269. Tokyo: JALT. http://jalt-publications.org/recentpdf/proceedings/2008/E116.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stoeckela, T., and P. Bennettb. 2015. “A Test of the New General Service List.” Vocabulary Learning and Instruction 4 (1): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., and L. S. Fidell. 2001. Using Multivariate Statistics. 4th ed. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, B. 2004. Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Understanding Concepts and Applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, E. W., and E. V. SmithJr. 2007a. “Instrument Development Tools and Activities for Measure Validation Using Rasch Models: Part I–Instrument Development Tools.” Journal of Applied Measurement 8 (1): 97–123.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolfe, E. W., and E. V. SmithJr. 2007b. “Instrument Development Tools and Activities for Measure Validation Using Rasch Models: Part II–Validation Activities.” Journal of Applied Measurement 8 (2): 204–234.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao, P., and X. Ji. 2016. “Validation of the Mandarin Version of the Vocabulary Size Test.” RELC Journal. doi:10.1177/0033688216639761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar