Bilingual and monolingual children's acquisition of Spanish dative alternation structures: order of acquisition and adult input effects

References

• Álvarez de la Fuente, E. 2007. “Análisis lingüístico de la traducción natural: datos de producción de dos niños gemelos bilingües inglés/español.” PhD dissertation, University of Valladolid.
   Google Scholar
• Anagnostopoulou, E. 2003. The Syntax of Ditransitives: Evidence from Clitics. Berlin and Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Anagnostopoulou, E. 2006. “Clitic Doubling.” In The Blackwell Bompanion to Syntax, edited by M. Everaert, and H. van Riemsdijk, 519–581. Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Aoun, J., and Y. Li. 1989. “Scope and Constituency.” Linguistic Inquiry 20 (2): 141–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aranovich, R. 2011. “Optional Agreement and Grammatical Functions: A Corpus Study of Dative Clitic Doubling in Spanish.” PhD dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Beavers, J., and C. Nishida. 2009. “The Spanish Dative Alternation Revisited.” In Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the 39th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), edited by S. Colina, A. Olarrea, and A. M. Carvalho, 217–230. Tucson: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, S., and K. Johnson. 2004. “Double Objects Again.” Linguistic Inquiry 35 (1): 97–123. doi: 10.1162/002438904322793356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, C. R. 1976. “Interference vs. Independent Development in Infant Bilingualism.” In Bilingualism in the Bicentennial and Beyond, edited by G. D. Keller, R. V. Teschner, and S. Viera, 86–95. New York: Bilingual Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, L. 1993. The Transition From Infancy to Language: Acquiring the Power of Expression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borer, H. 1984. Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Borer, H., and K. Wexler. 1987. “The Maturation of Syntax: the Role of Maturation at the Explanation of Linguistic Development.” In Parameter Setting, edited by T. Roeper, and E. Williams, 123–172. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. 1973. A First Language: the Early Stages. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruhn de Garavito, J. L. S. 2000. “The Syntax of Spanish Multifunctional Clitics and Near-Native Competence.” PhD dissertation, McGill University.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, A. L., and M. Tomasello. 2001. “The Acquisition of English Dative Constructions.” Applied Psycholinguistics 22 (2): 253–267. doi: 10.1017/S0142716401002065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. 1969. Lingüística Cartesiana. Madrid: Gredos.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, E. E. 2009. First Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuervo, M. C. 2003a. “Datives at Large.” PhD dissertation, MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Cuervo, M. C. 2003b. “Structural Asymmetries but Same Word Order: the Dative Alternation in Spanish.” In Asymmetry in Grammar. Volume I: Syntax and Semantics, edited by A. M. Di Sciullo, 117–144. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Cuervo, M. C. 2007. “Double Objects in Spanish as a Second Language: Acquisition of Morpho-Syntax and Semantics.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29 (4): 583–615. doi: 10.1017/S0272263107070441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czepluch, H. 1982. “Case Theory and the Dative Construction.” The Linguistic Review 2 (1): 1–38. doi: 10.1515/tlir.1982.2.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer. 1996. “Bilingual Language Acquisition.” In The Handbook of Child Language, edited by P. Fletcher, and B. MacWhinney, 219–250. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• De Houwer, A. 2005. “Early Bilingual Acquisition: Focus on Morphosyntax and the Separate Development Hypothesis.” In The Handbook of Bilingualism, edited by J. F. Kroll, and A. M. B. De Groot, 30–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demonte, V. 1994. “Datives in Spanish.” Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (1): 71–96.
   Google Scholar
• Demonte, V. 1995. “Dative Alternation in Spanish.” Probus 7 (1): 5–30. doi: 10.1515/prbs.1995.7.1.5
   Google Scholar
• Den Dikken, M. 1995. “Particles: on the Syntax of Verb-Particle, Triadic and Causative Constructions.” In Functions of Language, edited by E. Koktová 4 (2): 294–299. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Dryer, M. S. 1986. “Primary Objects, Secondary Objects and Antidative.” Language 62 (4): 808–845. doi: 10.2307/415173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C. 2002. “Frequency Effects in Language Processing.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 143–188. doi: 10.1017/S0272263102002024
   Google Scholar
• Fernández Fuertes, R., and E. Álvarez de la Fuente. 2017. “The Acquisition of Spanish and English as Two First Languages Through the Analysis of Natural Interpreting in Bilingual Children.” Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada (RESLA) 30 (1): 142–165. doi: 10.1075/resla.30.1.06fer
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández Fuertes, R., and J. M. Liceras. 2010. “Copula Omission in the English Developing Grammar of English/Spanish Children.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 26: 252–551.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández Fuertes, R., and S. Sánchez Calderón. Under review. “The Status of English Dative Alternation Structures in Bilingual and in Monolingual Acquisition Data.” Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism.
   Google Scholar
• Genesee, F. 2002. “Rethinking Bilingual Acquisition.” In Bilingualism: Challenges and Directions for Future Research, edited by J.-M. Dewaele, A. Housen, and L. Wei, 158–182. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Genesee, F., E. Nicoladis, and J. Paradis. 1995. “Language Differentiation in Early Bilingual Development.” Journal of Child Language 22 (3): 611–631. doi: 10.1017/S0305000900009971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleitman, L., and E. L. Newport. 1995. “The Invention of Language by Children: Environmental and Biological Influences on the Acquisition of Language.” In Invitation to Cognitive Science, edited by L. Gleitman, and M. Liberman, 1–24. Cambridge & London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gropen, J., S. Pinker, M. Hollander, R. Goldberg, and R. Wilson. 1989. “The Learnability and Acquisition of the Dative Alternation in English.” Language 65: 203–257. doi: 10.2307/415332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, C. C. 2010. “Cross-linguistic Influence in two Directions: the Acquisition of Dative Constructions in Cantonese-English Bilingual Children.” International Journal of Bilingualism 17 (1): 87–103.
   Google Scholar
• Haspelmath, M. 2006. “Ditransitive Constructions in RRG and Some Other Approaches.” Paper presented at the international conference on role and reference grammar. University of Leipzig, September 28-October 1.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R. 2001. “The Theoretical Significance of Universal Grammar in Second Language Acquisition.” Second Language Research 17: 345–367. doi: 10.1177/026765830101700404
   Google Scholar
• Hornstein, N., and D. Lightfoot. 1981. Explanation in Linguistics: the Logical Problem of Language Acquisition. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Hurtado, A. 1984. “On the Properties of LF.” Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 121–150.
   Google Scholar
• Hyams, N. 1996. “The Underspecification of Functional Categories in Early Grammar.” In Generative Perspectives on Language Acquisition, edited by H. Clahsen, 91–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hyams, N., and K. Wexler. 1993. “On the Grammatical Basis of Null Subjects in Child Language.” Linguistic Inquiry 24: 421–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayne, R. 1981. Morphological Theory. Oxford Theory: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kempchinsky, P. 2004. “Romance SE as an Aspectual Element.” In Contemporary Approaches to Romance Linguistics, edited by J. Auger, J. C. Clements, and B. Vance, 239–256. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Koizumi, M. 1994. “Nominative Objects: the Role of TP in Japanese.” In Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics. Vol. 1., edited by M. Koizumi and H. Ura, 211–230. Massachusetts: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, R. K. 1988. “On the Double Object Construction.” Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, R. K. 1990. “Double Objects Revisited: Reply to Jackendoff.” Linguistic Inquiry 21 (4): 589–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, R. K. 2014. On Shell Structure. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Legate, J. A., and C. D. Yang. 2002. “Empirical Re-Assessment of Stimulus Poverty Arguments.” The Linguistic Review 19: 151–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lust, B. 2006. Child Language: Acquisition and Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. 3rd ed. Hillsdale: Erlbaum. Accessed December 10, 2018. http://childes.talkbank.org.
   Google Scholar
• Marantz, A. 1991. “Case and Licensing.” In Argument and Case: Explaining Burzio’s Generalization, edited by E. J. Reuland, 11–30. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Marantz, A. 1993. “Implications of Asymmetries in Double Object Constructions.” In theoretical Aspects of Bantu Grammar, edited by S. A. Mchombo, 113–150. Stanford: Leland Stanford Junior University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meisel, M. 1989. “Early Differentiation of Languages in Bilingual Children.” In Bilingualism Across the Lifespan: Aspects of Acquisition, Maturity and Loss, edited by K. Hyltenstam, and L. K. Obler, 13–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meisel, J. M. 2001. “The Simultaneous Acquisition of Two First Languages: Early Differentiation and Subsequent Development of Grammars.” In Trends in Bilingual Acquisition, edited by J. Cenoz, and F. Genesee, 11–41. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Meisel, J. M. 2004. “The Bilingual Child.” In The Handbook of Bilingualism, edited by T. K. Bathia, and William C. Ritchie, 91–113. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, R. 1992. The Aspectual Nature of Syntactic Complementation. Holland: Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• O’Grady, W. 2008. “Innateness, Universal Grammar, and Emergentism.” Lingua. International Review of General Linguistics. Revue internationale De Linguistique Generale 118: 620–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paradis, J. 2001. “Do Bilingual Two-Year-Olds Have Separate Phonological Systems?” International Journal of Bilingualism 5 (1): 19–38. doi: 10.1177/13670069010050010201
   Google Scholar
• Paradis, J., and F. Genesee. 1996. “Syntactic Acquisition in Bilingual Children: Autonomous or Interdependent?” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 1–25. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100014662
   Google Scholar
• Paradis, J., and S. Navarro. 2003. “Subject Realization and Cross-Linguistic Interference in the Bilingual Acquisition of Spanish and English: What is the Role of the Input?” Journal of Child Language 30: 371–393. doi: 10.1017/S0305000903005609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, J. L., and B. Z. Pearson. 2004. “Bilingual Lexical Development: Influences, Contexts and Processes.” In Bilingual Language Development and Disorders in Spanish-English Speakers, edited by B. A. Goldstein, 77–104. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Perlmutter, D. M. 1980. “Relational Grammar.” In Syntax and Semantics: Current Approaches to Syntax, edited by E. Moravcsik, and J. R. Wirth 13: 195–229. Orlando: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poeppel, D., and K. Wexler. 1993. “The Full Competence Hypothesis of Clause Structure in Early German.” Language 69 (1): 1–33. doi: 10.2307/416414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polka, L., and M. Sundara. 2003. “Word Segmentation in Monolingual and Bilingual Infant Learners of English and French.” In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, edited by M. J. Solé, 1021–1024. Barcelona: Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Pullum, G. K., and B. C. Scholz. 2002. “Empirical Assessment of Stimulus Poverty Arguments.” The Linguistic Review 19: 9–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pylkkänen, L. 2002. “Introducing Arguments.” PhD dissertation, MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Reali, F., and M. Christiansen. 2005. “Uncovering the Richness of the Stimulus: Structure Dependence and Indirect Statistical Evidence.” Cognitive Science 29: 1007–1028. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, P., and N. C. Ellis. 2008. Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Romaine, S. 2004. “Bilingual Language Development.” In The Child Language Reader, edited by K. Trott, S. Dobbinson, and P. Griffiths, 287–303. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Romero Morales, C. 2008. Los dativos en español (cuadernos de lengua española). Madrid: Arco/Libros.
   Google Scholar
• Ronjat, J. 1913. Le développement du langage observé chez an enfant bilingue. Paris: Librairie Ancienne H. Champion.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, C. 2014. Understanding Child Language Acquisition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, G. 2002. “Exploring the Richness of the Stimulus.” The Linguistic Review 19: 73–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez Calderón, S. 2015. “Is There a Difference Between ‘she Gave a Book to her Daughter’ and ‘She Gave her Daughter a Book’? English-Spanish Bilingual Children’s Acquisition of Ditransitive Constructions.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 198: 409–416. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.460
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez Calderón, S. 2018. “The Acquisition of English and Spanish Dative Alternation Structures in the Longitudinal Spontaneous Production of Monolingual and Bilingual Children.” PhD dissertation, University of Valladolid.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez Calderón, S., and R. Fernández Fuertes. 2016. “Dativizable or Non-Dativizable: That is the Question? a Syntactic-Semantic Analysis of English (Non)-Dativizable Constructions in the Production of a set of 2L1 English/Spanish Simultaneous Bilingual Twins.” Xjenza Online-Journal of the Malta Chamber of Scientists 4: 44–58.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez Calderón, S., and F. Fernández Fuertes. 2018. “Which Came First: the Chicken of the Egg? Ditransitive and Passive Constructions in the English Production of Simultaneous Bilingual English Children.” ATLANTIS. A Journal of the Spanish Association for Anglo-American Studies 40 (1): 39–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder. 1995. “A Neo-Davidsonian Approach to Resultatives, Particles, and Datives.” In Proceedings of North East Linguistic Society 25, edited by J. Beckman, 457-472. Amherst: Graduate Linguistic Student Association of the University of Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, W. 2001. “On the Nature of Syntactic Variation: Evidence from Complex Predicates and Complex Word-Formation.” Language 77: 324–342. doi: 10.1353/lan.2001.0108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, W., and K. Stromswold. 1997. “The Structure and Acquisition of English Dative Constructions.” Linguistic Inquiry 28 (2): 281–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suñer, M. 1988. “The Role of Agreement in Clitic-Doubled Constructions.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 391–434. doi: 10.1007/BF00133904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. 2000. “The Item-Based Nature of Children’s Early Syntactic Development.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (4): 156–163. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01462-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrens, V., and K. Wexler. 2000. “The Acquisition of Clitic Doubling in Spanish.” In The Acquisition of Scrambling and Cliticzation. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, edited by S. M. Powers, and C. Hamann 26: 279–297. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ungureanu, M. L. 2017. “L1 Acquisition of Direct Object Clitic Doubling.” Linguistica Atlantica 36 (1): 15–29.
   Google Scholar
• Viau, J. 2007. “Possession and Spatial Motion in the Acquisition of Ditransitives.” PhD dissertation, Northwestern University.
   Google Scholar
• Vihman, M. M. 1996. Phonological Development. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C. D. 2002. Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C. D. 2011. “Computational Models of Syntactic Acquisition.” WIRES Cognitive Science. doi:10.1002/wcs.1154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C. D. 2016. The Price of Linguistic Productivity: How Children Learn to Break the Rules of Language. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yip, V., and S. Matthews. 2007. The Bilingual Child: Early Development and Language Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zyzik, E. 2009. “The Role of Input Revisited: Nativist Versus Usage-Based Models.” L2 Journal 1 (1): 42–61. doi: 10.5070/L2.V1I1.9056
   Google Scholar