The impact of second- and third-language learning on language aptitude and working memory

References

• Abrahamsson, N., and K. Hyltenstam. 2008. “The Robustness of Aptitude Effects in Near-Native Second Language Acquisition.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30 (4): 481–509. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310808073X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artieda, G., and C. Muñoz. 2016. “The LLAMA Tests and the Underlying Structure of Language Aptitude at Two Levels of Foreign Language Proficiency.” Learning and Individual Differences 50: 42–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins, P. W. B., and A. D. Baddeley. 1998. “Working Memory and Distributed Vocabulary Learning.” Applied Psycholinguistics 19 (4): 537–552. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400010353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. 1992. “Working Memory.” Science 255 (5044): 556–559. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1736359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. 2000. “The Episodic Buffer: A New Component of Working Memory?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (11): 417–423. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. 2003. “Working Memory and Language: An Overview.” Journal of Communication Disorders 36 (3): 189–208. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00019-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. 2015. “Working Memory in Second Language Learning.” In Working Memory in Second Language Acquisition and Processing, edited by Z. Wen, B. M. Mailce, and M. Arthur, 17–28. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A., S. Gathercole, and C. Papagno. 1998. “The Phonological Loop as a Language Learning Device.” Psychological Review 105 (1): 158–173. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D., and G. J. Hitch. 1974. “Working Memory.” In Recent Advances in Learning and Motivation, edited by G. A. Bower, 47–90. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergsleithner, J. M. 2010. “Working Memory Capacity and L2 Writing Performance.” Ciências & Cognição 15 (2): 002–020.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, L., and D. Larsen-Freeman. 2007. “Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 17 (2): 226–240. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00148.x
   Google Scholar
• Carretti, B., E. Borella, M. Zavagnin, and R. De Beni. 2013. “Gains in Language Comprehension Relating to Working Memory Training in Healthy Older Adults.” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 28 (5): 539–546. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.3859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. B. 1965. “The Prediction of Success in Foreign Language Training.” In Training, Research, and Education, edited by R. Glaser, 87–136. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. B. 1981. “Twenty-Five Years of Research on Foreign Language Aptitude.” In Individual Differences and Universals in Language Learning Aptitude, edited by K. C. Diller, 83–118. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. B., and S. M. Sapon. 1959. Modern Language Aptitude Test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• de Bot, K. 2012. “Rethinking Multilingual Processing: From a Static to a Dynamic Approach.” In Third Language Acquisition in Adulthood, edited by J. C. Amaro, S. Flynn, and J. Rothman, 79–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• de Bot, K., and D. Larsen-Freeman. 2011. “Researching Second Language Development from a Dynamic System Theory Perspective.” In A Dynamic Approach to Second Language Development: Methods and Techniques, edited by Marjolijn H. Verspoor, Kees de Bot, and Wander Lowie, 5–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• de Bot, K., W. Lowie, and M. H. Verspoor. 2007. “A Dynamic Systems Theory Approach to Second Language Acquisition.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10 (1): 7–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z., and P. Skehan. 2003. “Individual Differences in Second Language Learning.” In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, edited by C. J. Doughty and M. H. Long, 589–630. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Doughty, C. J., S. G. Campbell, M. A. Mislevy, M. F. Bunting, A. R. Bowles, and J. T. Koeth. 2010. “Predicting Near-Native Ability : The Factor Structure and Reliability of Hi-LAB.” In Selected Proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum, edited by M. T. Prior, Y. Watanabe, and S.-K. Lee, 10–31. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstein, M. 1980. “Childhood Bilingualism and Adult Language Learning Aptitude.” Applied Psychology 29 (1–2): 159–172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1980.tb00888.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granena, G. 2013. “Cognitive Aptitudes for Second Language Learning and the LLAMA Language Aptitude Test.” In Sensitive Periods, Language Aptitude, and Ultimate L2 Attainment, edited by Gisela Granena and Michael H. Long, 105–129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Granena, G., and M. H. Long. 2012. “Age of Onset, Length of Residence, Language Aptitude, and Ultimate L2 Attainment in Three Linguistic Domains.” Second Language Research 29 (3): 311–343. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312461497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, D. W., and J. Abutalebi. 2013. “Language Control in Bilinguals: The Adaptive Control Hypothesis.” Journal of Cognitive Psychology 25 (5): 515–530. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.796377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigorenko, E. L., R. J. Sternberg, and M. E. Ehrman. 2000. “A Theory-Based Approach to the Measurement of Foreign Language Learning Ability: The Canal-F Theory and Test.” The Modern Language Journal 84 (3): 390–405. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundy, J. G., and K. Timmer. 2017. “Bilingualism and Working Memory Capacity: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis.” Second Language Research 33 (3): 325–340. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316678286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harley, B., and D. Hart. 1997. “Language Aptitude and Second Language Proficiency in Classroom Learners of Different Starting Ages.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19 (3): 379–400. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197003045
   Google Scholar
• Hayashi, Y., T. Kobayashi, and T. Toyoshige. 2016. “Investigating the Relative Contributions of Computerised Working Memory Training and English Language Teaching to Cognitive and Foreign Language Development.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 30 (2): 196–213. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, B., and U. Jessner. 2019. “Multilingualism at the Primary Level in South Tyrol: How Does Multilingual Education Affect Young Learners’ Metalinguistic Awareness and Proficiency in L1, L2 and L3?” Language Learning Journal 47 (1): 76–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1195865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, J., S. E. Gathercole, and D. L. Dunning. 2009. “Adaptive Training Leads to Sustained Enhancement of Poor Working Memory in Children.” Developmental Science 12 (4): 9–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00848.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, J., M. Verspoor, and H. Loerts. 2016. “An Exploratory Study into the Dynamics of Chinese L2 Writing Development.” Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 5 (1): 65–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.5.1.04loe
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaušovec, N., and K. Jaušovec. 2012. “Working Memory Training: Improving Intelligence - Changing Brain Activity.” Brain and Cognition 79 (2): 96–106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2012.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessner, U. 2014. “On Multilingual Awareness or Why the Multilingual Learner is a Specific Language Learner.” In Essential Topics in Applied Linguistics and Multilingualism, edited by Mirosław Pawlak and Larissa Aronin, 175–184. Wien, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, M. J., A. R. A. Conway, D. Z. Hambrick, and R. W. Engle. 2007. “Variation in Working Memory Capacity as Variation in Executive Attention and Control.” In Variation in Working Memory, edited by A. R. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake, and J. N. Towse, 21–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karbach, J., and P. Verhaeghen. 2014. “Making Working Memory Work: A Meta-Analysis of Executive-Control and Working Memory Training in Older Adults.” Psychological Science 25 (11): 2027–2037. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614548725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingberg, T. 2010. “Training and Plasticity of Working Memory.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (7): 317–324. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogetsidis, H. 2012. “Dopamine and Training-Related Working-Memory Improvement.” Journal of Transnational Management 17 (3): 189–204. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15475778.2012.706704
   Google Scholar
• Li, S. 2013. “The Interactions Between the Effects of Implicit and Explicit Feedback and Individual Differences in Language Analytic Ability and Working Memory.” Modern Language Journal 97 (3): 634–654. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12030.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S. 2015. “The Associations Between Language Aptitude and Second Language Grammar Acquisition: A Meta-Analytic Review of Five Decades of Research.” Applied Linguistics 36 (3): 385–408. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S. 2016. “The Construct Validity of Language Aptitude.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 38 (04): 801–842. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311500042X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linck, J. A., M. M. Hughes, S. G. Campbell, N. H. Silbert, M. Tare, S. R. Jackson, and C. J. Doughty. 2013. “Hi-LAB: A New Measure of Aptitude for High-Level Language Proficiency.” Language Learning 63 (3): 530–566. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linck, J. A., P. Osthus, J. T. Koeth, and M. F. Bunting. 2014. “Working Memory and Second Language Comprehension and Production: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 21 (1531–5320 (Electronic)): 861–883. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0565-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, D., T. Yao, and H. Zhang. 2018. “The Effect of Third Language Learning on Language Aptitude Among English-Major Students in China.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 39 (7): 590–601. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2017.1410162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey, A., R. Adams, and C. Stafford. 2010. “Exploring the Relationship Between Modified Output and Working Memory Capacity.” Language Learning 60 (3): 501–533. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00565.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meara, P. 2005. LLAMA Language Aptitude Tests: The Manual. Swansea: Lognostics. http://www.lognostics.co.uk/tools/llama/.
   Google Scholar
• Melby-Lervåg, M., and C. Hulme. 2013. “Is Working Memory Training Effective? A Meta-Analytic Review.” Developmental Psychology 49 (2): 270–291. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., and N. Friedman. 1998. “Individual Differences in Second Language Proficiency: Working Memory as Language Aptitude.” In Foreign Language Learning: Psyhcolinguistic Studies on Training and Retention, edited by A. F. Healy and L. E. J. Bourne, 339–364. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., and N. P. Friedman. 2012. “The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions: Four General Conclusions.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 21 (1): 8–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales, J., A. Calvo, and E. Bialystok. 2013. “Working Memory Development in Monolingual and Bilingual Children.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 114 (2): 187–202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, J. S., and B. M. Ross. 2005. “Synchronous CMC, Working Memory, and L2 Oral Proficiency Development.” Language Learning & Technology 19 (3): 35–54.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, P. 2001. “Individual Differences, Cognitive Abilities, Aptitude Complexes and Learning Conditions in Second Language Acquisition.” Second Language Research 17 (4): 368–392. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/026765830101700405
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, P. 2002. “Effects of Individual Differences in Intelligence, Aptitude and Working Memory on Adult Incidental SLA: A Replication and Extension of Reber, Walkenfield and Hernstadt.” In Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning, edited by P. Robinson, 211–266. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, P. 2005. “Aptitude and Second Language Acquisition.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 25: 46–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190505000036
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, V., P. Meara, T. Barnett-Legh, C. Curry, and E. Davie. 2017. “Examining the LLAMA Aptitude Tests.” Journal of the European Second Language Association 1: 49–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.22599/jesla.24
   Google Scholar
• Sáfár, A., and J. Kormos. 2008. “Revisiting Problems with Foreign Language Aptitude.” IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 46 (2): 113–136. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/IRAL.2008.005
   Google Scholar
• Sala, G., and F. Gobet. 2017. “Working Memory Training in Typically Developing Children: A Meta-Analysis of the Available Evidence.” Developmental Psychology 53 (4): 671–685. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, C. A., J. Wiley, T. K. Miura, G. J. H. Colflesh, T. R. Ricks, M. S. Jensen, and A. R. A. Conway. 2010. “Assessing Working Memory Capacity in a Non-Native Language.” Learning and Individual Differences 20 (5): 488–493. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., A. Eschman, and A. Zuccolotto. 2002. E-Prime User’s Guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Serafini, E. J. 2017. “Exploring the Dynamic Long-Term Interaction Between Cognitive and Psychosocial Resources in Adult Second Language Development at Varying Proficiency.” Modern Language Journal 101 (2): 369–390. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serafini, E. J., and C. Sanz. 2016. “Evidence for the Decreasing Impact of Cognitive Ability on Second Language Development as Proficiency Increases.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 38: 607–646. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Service, E. 1992. “Phonology, Working Memory, and Foreign-Language Learning.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (1): 21–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749208401314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singleton, D. 2014. “Apt to Change: The Problematic of Language Awareness and Language Aptitude in Age-Related Research.” Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 3 (3): 557–571. doi: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.3.9
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, D. 2017. “Language Aptitude: Desirable Trait or Acquirable Attribute?” Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 7 (1): 89. doi: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skehan, P. 1991. “Individual Differences in Second Language Learning.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13 (2): 275–298. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009979
   Google Scholar
• Skehan, P. 2002. “Theorising and Updating Aptitude.” In Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning. 2nd ed., edited by P. Robinson, 69–93. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Skehan, P. 2012. “Language Aptitude.” In The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, edited by S. M. Gass and A. Mackey, 381–395. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Skehan, P. 2015. “Foreign Language Aptitude and Its Relationship with Grammar: A Critical Overview.” Applied Linguistics 36 (3): 367–384. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soveri, A., J. Antfolk, L. Karlsson, B. Salo, and M. Laine. 2017. “Working Memory Training Revisited: A Multi-Level Meta-Analysis of n-Back Training Studies.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 24 (4): 1077–1096. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1217-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks, R. L., L. Ganschow, K. Fluhary, and S. Little. 1996. “An Exploratory Study on the Effects of Latin on the Native Language Skills and Foreign Language Aptitude of Students with and Without Learning Disabilities.” The Classical Journal 91 (2): 165–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks, R. L., J. Patton, L. Ganschow, and N. Humbach. 2009. “Long-Term Relationships Among Early First Language Skills, Second Language Aptitude, Second Language Affect, and Later Second Language Proficiency.” Applied Psycholinguistics 30 (4): 725–755. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716409990099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. S. 2013. “The Interface of Language Aptitude and Multilingualism: Reconsidering the Bilingual/Multilingual Dichotomy.” Modern Language Journal 97 (3): 685–701. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12034.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, E., M. Kenyon, and C. Rhodes. 2002. A Validation Study of the Student Oral Proficiency Assessment (SOPA). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics/Iowa State University National K-12 Foreign Language Resource Center Ames. Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED465287.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N., R. P. Heitz, J. C. Schrock, and R. W. Engle. 2005. “An Automated Version of the Operation Span Task.” Behavior Research Methods 37 (3): 498–505. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Bastian, C. C., and K. Oberauer. 2013. “Effects and Mechanisms of Working Memory Training: A Review.” Psychological Research 78 (6): 803–820. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0524-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, Z. 2015. “Working Memory in Second Language Acquisition and Processing: the Phonological/Executive Model.” In Working Memory in Second Language Acquisition and Processing, edited by Z. Wen, M. B. Mota, and A. Mcneill, 41–62. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, Z. 2016. Working Memory and Second Language Learning: Towards an Integrated Approach.. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, Z. 2019. “Working Memory as Language Aptitude: The Phonological/Executive Model.” In Language Aptitude: Advancing Theory, Testing, Research and Practice, edited by Z. Wen, P. Skehan, A. Biedroń, S. Li, and R. L. Sparks, 187–214. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, Z., and P. Skehan. 2011. “A New Perspective on Foreign Language Aptitude Research: Building and Supporting a Case for “Working Memory as Language Aptitude.” Ilha Do Desterro A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies 60 (October): 15–44.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. N. 2012. “Working Memory and SLA.” In The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, edited by S. M. Gass and A. Mackey, 427–441. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar