Receptive knowledge of intensifying adjectival compounds: Belgian French-speaking CLIL and non-CLIL learners of Dutch and English

References

• Arnaud, Pierre J. L., and Sandra J. Savignon. 1997. “Rare Words, Complex Lexical Units and the Advanced Learner.” In Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A Rationale for Pedagogy, edited by James Coady, and Thomas Huckin, 157–173. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bahns, Jens, and Moira Eldaw. 1993. “Should We Teach EFL Students Collocations?” System 21 (1): 101–114. doi: 10.1016/0346-251X(93)90010-E
   Google Scholar
• Blondin, Christiane. 2003. “L’immersion linguistique dans l’enseignement fondamental en communauté française de Belgique: l’état de la question.” Journal de l’immersion 25 (2): 19–31.
   Google Scholar
• Bulon, Amélie, Isa Hendrikx, Fanny Meunier, and Kristel Van Goethem. 2017. “Using Global Complexity Measures to Assess Second Language Proficiency: Comparing CLIL and non-CLIL Learners of English and Dutch in French-Speaking Belgium.” Papers of the Linguistic Society of Belgium 11 (1): 1–25. https://sites.uclouvain.be/bkl-cbl/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Bulon_et_al_2017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bulon, Amélie, and Fanny Meunier. Forthcoming. “Comparing CLIL and Non-CLIL Learners’ Phrasicon in L2 Dutch: The (Expected) Winner Does Not Take it all.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopey-Paquet, Mary. 2008. “CLIL in French-Speaking Belgium: Transforming Paradox Into Potential.” In CLIL e l’Apprendimento delle Lingue. Le Sfide del Nuovo Ambiented di Apprendimento, edited by Carmel M. Coonan, 239–250. Venezia: Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, Do, Philip Hood, and David Marsh. 2010. CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. 2011. “Content-and-Language Integrated Learning: From Practice to Principles?” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31: 182–204. doi:10.1017/S0267190511000092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Smet, Audrey, Laurence Mettewie, Benoit Galand, Philippe Hiligsmann, and Luk Van Mensel. 2019. “Does CLIL Shape Attitudes and Motivations? Interactions with Target Languages and Instruction Levels.” International Journal of Bilingualism and Bilingual Education. doi:10.1080/13670050.2019.1671308.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, Loyd. M., and Douglas M. Dunn. 1997. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, Nick C. 2002. “Frequency Effects in Language Processing.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 143–188. doi: 10.1017/S0272263102002024
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, Nick C. 2008. “Usage-based and Form-Focused Language Acquisition: The Associative Learning of Constructions, Learned Attention, and the Limited L2 Endstate.” In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition, edited by Peter Robinson, and Nick Ellis, 372–405. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2016. “More than 80% of Primary School Pupils in the EU Were Studying a Foreign Language in 2014.” Last accessed 11-01-2019. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/7662394/3-23092016-AP-EN.pdf/57d3442c-7250-4aae-8844-c2130eba8e0e.
   Google Scholar
• Fiedler, Sabine. 2007. English Phraseology: A Coursebook. Tübingen, Germany: Gunther Narr.
   Google Scholar
• Golberg, Heather, Johanne Paradis, and Martha Crago. 2008. “Lexical Acquisition Over Time in Minority First Language Children Learning English as a Second Language.” Applied Psycholinguistics 29: 41–65. doi: 10.1017/S014271640808003X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorjian, B Bahman, and Nadia Hamidavi. 2017. “Using CLIL Method in Teaching Vocabulary to Intermediate Efl Learners.” Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods 7 (1): 131–140.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, Aarthur C., Danielle S. McNamara, Max M. Louwerse, and Zhiqiang Cai. 2004. “Coh-Metrix: Analysis of Text on Cohesion and Language.” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers 36 (2): 193–202. doi:10.3758/BF03195564.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gyllstad, Henrik. 2007. “Testing English Collocations: Developing Receptive Test for Use with Advanced Swedish Learners.” Published doctoral diss., Printed by Media-Tryck in Lund. ISBN: 978-91-628-7296-0.
   Google Scholar
• Hiligsmann, Philippe, and Luk Van Mensel. Forthcoming. “Assessing CLIL. Interdisciplinary Perspectives.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism.
   Google Scholar
• Hiligsmann, Philippe, Luk Van Mensel, Benoît Galand, Laurence Mettewie, Fanny Meunier, Arnaud Szmalec, Kristel Van Goethem, et al. 2017. “Assessing Content and Language Integrated Learning in the French-Speaking Community of Belgium: Linguistic, Cognitive and Educational Perspectives.” Cahiers du GIRSEF 109: 1–24. https://cdn.uclouvain.be/groups/cms-editors-girsef/demey/Cahier_109_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hoeksema, Jack. 2012. “Elative Compounds in Dutch: Properties and Developments.” In Intensivierungskonzepte bei Adjektiven und Adverben im Sprachenvergleich/Crosslinguistic Comparison of Intensified Adjectives and Adverbs, edited by G. Oebel, 97–142. Hamburg: Kovač Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, Thomas, and Graeme Trousdale. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jexenflicker, Silvia, and Christiane Dalton-Puffer. 2010. “The CLIL Differential: Comparing the Writing of CLIL and non-CLIL Students in Higher Colleges of Technology.” In Language use and Language Learning in CLIL Classroom, edited by Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Tanja Nikula, and Ute Smit, 169–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kinsella, Ciara. 2009. “An Investigation into the Proficiency of Successful Late Learners of French.” Unpublished doctoral diss., Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Koizumi, Rie. 2012. “Relationships Between Text Length and Lexical Diversity Measures: can we use Short Texts of Less Than 100 Tokens?” Vocabulary Learning and Instruction 1 (1): 60–69. doi:10.7820/vli.v01.1.koizumi.
   Google Scholar
• Koya, Taeko. 2005. “The Acquisition of Basic Collocations by Japanese Learners of English.” Unpublished doctoral diss., Graduate School of Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Lambelet, Amelia, and Raphael Berthele. 2015. Age and Foreign Language Learning in School. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Llanes, Àngels, and Carmen Muñoz. 2009. “A Short Stay Abroad: Does it Make a Difference?” System 37 (3): 353–365. doi:10.1016/j.system.2009.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo Yuen, -Y., and Victoria A. Murphy. 2010. “Vocabulary Knowledge and Growth in Immersion and Regular Language-Learning Programmes in Hong Kong.” Language and Education 24: 215–238. doi: 10.1080/09500780903576125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maljers, Anne. 2007. “The Netherlands.” In Windows on CLIL. Content and Language Integrated Learning in the European Spotlight, edited by Anne Maljers, David Marsh, and Dieter Wolff, 130–137. Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, Philippe. M., and Scott Jarvis. 2010. “MTLD, Vocd-D, and HD-D: A Validation Study of Sophisticated Approaches to Lexical Diversity Assessment.” Behavior Research Methods 42 (2): 381–392. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.2.381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merikivi, Riika, and Paivi Pietilä. 2014. “Vocabulary in CLIL and in Mainstream Education.” Journal of Language Teaching and Research 5 (3): 487–497. doi:10.4304/jltr.5.3
   Google Scholar
• Mettewie, Laurence, and Luk Van Mensel. 2009. “Multilingualism at all Costs. Language use and Language Needs in Business in Brussels.” Sociolinguistica 23: 131–149. doi: 10.1515/9783484605879.131
   Google Scholar
• Mettewie, Laurence, and Luk Van Mensel. Forthcoming. “Foreign Language Education and Bilingual Education in Belgium.” International Journal of Bilingualism and Bilingual Education.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meunier, Fanny. 2012. “Formulaic Language and Language Teaching.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32 (1): 111–129. doi:10.1017/S0267190512000128.
   Google Scholar
• Meunier, Fanny, Isa Hendrikx, Amélie Bulon, Kristel Van Goethem, and Hubert Naets. Forthcoming. “MulTINCo: Multilingual Traditional Immersion and Native Corpus.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moller, Verena. 2017. Language Acquisition in CLIL and Non-CLIL Settings: Learner Corpus and Experimental Evidence on Passive Constructions. Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 80. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Moyer, Alene. 2009. “Input as a Critical Means to an end: Quantity and Quality of Experience in L2 Phonological Attainment.” In Input Matters in SLA, edited by Thorsten Piske, and Martha Young-Scholten, 159–174. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, Carmen. 2011. “Input and Long-Term Effects of Starting age in Foreign Language Learning.” IRAL- International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 49 (2): 113–133. doi:10.1515/iral.2011.006.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, Carmen. 2014. “Contrasting Effects of Starting age and Input on the Oral Performance of Foreign Language Learners.” Applied Linguistics 35 (4): 463–482. doi:10.1093/applin/amu024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, Eva. 2011. “‘Everything I read on the Internet is in English’. On the Impact of Extramural English on Swedish 16-year-old pupils’ writing Proficiency.” Unpublished doctoral diss., University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Pander Maat, Henk, Rogier Kraf, Nick Dekker, Ko van der Sloot, Antal van den Bosch, Maarten van Gompel, and Suzanne Kleijn. 2014. “T-Scan: A New Tool for Analyzing Dutch Text.” Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Journal 4: 53–74.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Vidal, Carmen, and Maria Juan-Garau. 2011. “The Effect of Context and Input Conditions on Oral and Written Development: A Study Abroad Perspective.” VIAL- Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics 4: 157–185. doi:10.1515/iral.2011.008.
   Google Scholar
• Plonsky, Luke, and Hessameddin Ghanbar. 2018. “Multiple Regression in L2 Research: A Methodological Synthesis and Guide to Interpreting R2 Values.” The Modern Language Journal 102 (4): 713–731. doi:10.1111/modl.12509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainer, Franz. 2015. “Intensification.” In Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, edited by Peter. O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Suzan Olsen, and Franz Rainer, 1340–1351. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Zarobe, Yolanda. 2010. “Written Production and CLIL An Empirical Study.” In Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms, edited by Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Tanja Nikula, and Ute Smit, 191–212. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Zarobe, Yolanda. 2011. “Which Language Competencies Benefit from CLIL? An Insight into Applied Linguistics Research.” In Content and Foreign Language Integrated Learning. Contributions to Multilingualism in European Contexts, edited by Ruiz de Zarobe Yolanda, Juan Michel Sierra, and F. Gallardo del Puerto, 129–153. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Rumlich, Dominik. 2016. Evaluating Bilingual Education in Germany CLIL Students’ General English Proficiency, EFL Self-Concept and Interest. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. doi:10.3726/978-3-653-06460-5.
   Google Scholar
• Saladrigues, Gemma, and Àngels Llanes. 2014. “Examining the Impact of Amount of Exposure on L2 Development with CLIL and non-CLIL Teenage Students.” Sintagma 26: 133–147. Retrieved from http://www.raco.cat/index.php/Sintagma/article/view/293008/381457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlichting, L. 2005. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III-NL. Handleiding. Amsterdam: Harcourt Test Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Simonis, Morgane, Benoît Galand, Philippe Hiligsmann, and Arnaud Szmalec. Forthcoming a. “The Cognitive Profile of Pupils Enrolled in Content and Language Integrated Learning.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism.
   Google Scholar
• Simonis, Morgane, Benoît Galand, Philippe Hiligsmann, Lise Van der Linden, and Arnaud Szmalec. Forthcoming b. “No Measurable Evidence for a Clear Executive Control Advantage in Bilingual Immersion Education.” Journal of Cognitive Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, Pia. 2009. “Extramural English Matters: Out-of-School English and Its Impact on Swedish Ninth Graders’ Oral Proficiency and Vocabulary.” Unpublished doctoral diss., Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Surmont, Jill, Piet van de Craen, Esli Struys, and Thomas Somers. 2014. “Evaluating a CLIL-Student: Where to Find the CLIL Advantage.” In Integration of Theory and Practice in CLIL, edited by Ruth Breeze, Concepcion Pasamar, Carmen Saíz, and Cristina Sala, 55–72. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Sylvén, Liss K., and Sölve Ohlander. 2014. “The CLISS Project: Receptive Vocabulary in CLIL Versus non-CLIL Groups.” Moderna Språk 108 (2): 80–114. doi: 10.58221/mosp.v108i2.8002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylvén, Liss K., and Pia Sundqvist. 2012. “Gaming as Extramural English L2 Learning and L2 Proficiency among Young Learners.” ReCALL 24 (3): 302–321. doi: 10.1017/S095834401200016X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terrazas Gallego, Melania, and María del Pilar Agustín Llach. 2009. “Exploring the Increase of Receptive Vocabulary Knowledge in the Foreign Language: A Longitudinal Study.” International Journal of English Studies 9 (1): 113–133.
   Google Scholar
• Van Mensel, Luk, Amélie Bulon, Isa Hendrikx, Fanny Meunier, and Kristel Van Goethem. Forthcoming. “Effects of Input on L2 Writing Skills in English and Dutch CLIL and non-CLIL Learners in French-Speaking Belgium.” Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education.
   Google Scholar
• Van Mensel, Luk, Philippe Hiligsmann, Laurence Mettewie, and Benoît Galand. 2019. “CLIL, an Elitist Language Learning Approach? A Background Analysis of English and Dutch CLIL Pupils in French-Speaking Belgium.” Language, Culture and Curriculum, 1–14. doi:10.1080/07908318.2019.1571078.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, David. 2010. Formulaic Language and Second Language Speech Fluency: Background, Evidence and Classroom Applications. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Wray, Alison. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zydatiß, Wolfgang. 2007. Deutsch-Englische Züge in Berlin (DEZIBEL). Eine Evaluation des bilingualen Sachfachunterrichts in Gymnasien: Kontext, Kompetenzen, Konsequenzen. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar