Using formal and informal formative assessment to support bilingual argument mapping in university bilingual science courses

References

• Airey, J., and C. Linder. 2011. “Bilingual Scientific Literacy.” In Exploring the Landscape of Scientific Literacy, edited by C. Linder, L. Östman, D. A. Roberts, P.-O. Wickman, G. Erickson, and A. MacKinnon, 106–124. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Airey, J., and C. Linder. 2019. “Bilingual Scientific Literacy? The Use of English in Swedish University Science Courses.” Nordic Journal of English Studies 7 (3): 145–161.
   Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A. 2013. “La argumentación y sus aportes a la enseñanza bilingüe de las ciencias” [Argumentation and Its Contributions to Bilingual Science Teaching]. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias 10 (3): 406–423.
   Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A., G. Danies, A.-M. Truscott de Mejía, and S. Restrepo. 2021. “Instructor Practices and Espoused Beliefs About Bilingual Courses: The Case of a Colombian University.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. doi:10.1080/13670050.2021.1947184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A., J. Molina, G. Danies, A.-M. Truscott de Mejía, and S. Restrepo. 2022. “Using Formal Formative Assessment (FFA) to Promote Undergraduates’ Bilingual Written Scientific Argumentation (BWSA).” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. doi:10.1080/13670050.2021.2021386.
   Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A., J. Molina, and A.-M. Truscott de Mejía. 2018. “Using Formative Assessment to Promote Argumentation in a University Bilingual Science Course.” International Journal of Science Education 40 (13): 1669–1695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A., J. Molina, and A.-M. Truscott de Mejía. 2020a. “Enriching University Students’ Use of Logical Connectors (LCs) in Bilingual Written Scientific Argumentation (BWSA).” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. doi:10.1080/13670050.2020.1800586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A., J. Molina, and A.-M. Truscott de Mejía. 2020b. “Using Historical Scientific Controversies to Promote Undergraduates’ Argumentation.” Science & Education 29 (3): 647–671.
   Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A., J. Molina, and A.-M. Truscott de Mejía. 2021a. “Fostering Bilingual Written Scientific Argumentation (BWSA) through Collaborative Learning (CL): Evidence from a University Bilingual Science Course.” International Journal of Science Education 43 (1): 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A., J. Molina, and A.-M. Truscott de Mejía. 2021b. “Using Bilingual Written Argumentation to Promote Undergraduates’ Bilingual Scientific Literacy: Socrative® as an Immersive Participation Tool.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 24 (6): 868–891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A., J. Molina, and A.-M. Truscott de Mejía. 2021c. “Fostering Bilingual Scientific Writing through a Systematic and Purposeful Code-Switching Pedagogical Strategy.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 24 (6): 785–803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A., and A.-M. Truscott de Mejía. 2020a. “Bilingual University Science Courses: A Questionnaire on Professors’ Practices and Espoused Beliefs.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 23 (2): 132–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A., and A.-M. Truscott de Mejía. 2020b. “Bilingual Teaching Practices in University Science Courses: How Do Biology and Microbiology Students Perceive Them?” Journal of Language, Identity & Education 19 (3): 163–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, C. 2001. Foundations of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism (3rd ed.). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Bringula, R. P., M. Y. C. Batalla, S. D. Moraga, L. D. R. Ochengco, K. N. Ohagan, and R. R. Lansigan. 2012. “School Choice of Computing Students: A Comparative Perspective from Two Universities.” Creative Education 3: 1070–1078.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Y., J. Hill, and M. Hannafin. 2021. “Emerging Trends to Foster Student-Centered Learning in the Disciplines: Science, Engineering, Computing and Medicine.” In The Routledge International Handbook of Student-Centered Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, edited by S. Hoidn, and M. Klemenčič, 221–234. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cowie, B. 2012. “Focusing on the Classroom: Assessment for Learning.” In Second International Handbook of Science Education, edited by B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, and C. J. McRobbie, 679–690. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. 2001. Negotiating Identities: Education for Empowerment in a Diverse Society (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: California Association for Bilingual Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. 2017. “Teaching for Transfer in Multilingual School Contexts.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Education: Vol. 5. Bilingual and Multilingual Education, edited by O. García, A. M. Y. Lin, and S. May, 3rd ed., 103–115. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M. 2009. “Computer-Assisted Argument Mapping: A Rationale Approach.” Higher Education 58 (6): 799–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M. 2011. “Concept Mapping, Mind Mapping and Argument Mapping: What Are the Differences and Do They Matter?” Higher Education 62 (3): 279–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M., A. Barnett, and T. van Gelder. 2021. “Using Computer-Aided Argument Mapping to Teach Reasoning.” In Studies in Critical Thinking, edited by J. A. Blair, 2nd ed., 115–151. Windsor: Windsor Studies in Argumentation.
   Google Scholar
• Dori, Y. J., and S. Avargil. 2015. “Embedded Assessment.” In Encyclopedia of Science Education, edited by R. Gunstone, 364–366. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Duss, K. 2020. Formative Assessment and Feedback Tool. Basel: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, C. P., M. J. Hogan, and I. Stewart. 2013. “An Examination of the Effects of Argument Mapping on Students’ Memory and Comprehension Performance.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 8: 11–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, C. B. 2011. “Critical Thinking in a Second Language.” Higher Education Research & Development 30 (3): 289–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, D., and P. Mallery. 2020. IBM SPSS Statistics 26 Step by Step. 16th ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Genesee, F., K. Lindholm-Leary, W. M. Saunders, and D. Christian (Eds.). 2006. Educating English Language Learners: A Synthesis of Research Evidence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grob, R., M. Holmeier, and P. Labudde. 2021. “Analysing Formal Formative Assessment Activities in the Context of Inquiry at Primary and Upper Secondary School in Switzerland.” International Journal of Science Education 43 (3): 407–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrell, M. 2008. “No Computer Program Required: Even Pencil-and-Paper Argument Mapping Improves Critical-Thinking Skills.” Teaching Philosophy 31 (4): 351–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, G. M., W. A. Renandya, and M. Power. 2016. Simple, Powerful Strategies for Student Centered Learning. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson, A., and U. Eriksson. 2019. “Formative Assessment in Higher Education.” In Handbook of Formative Assessment in the Disciplines, edited by H. Andrade, G. Cizek, and R. E. Bennett, 146–169. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mazak, C. M., and C. Herbas-Donoso. 2015. “Translanguaging Practices at a Bilingual University: A Case Study of a Science Classroom.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 18 (6): 698–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K. A. 2009. “Reliability for Content Analysis.” In Media Messages and Public Health: A Decisions Approach to Content Analysis, edited by A. B. Jordan, D. Kunkel, J. Manganello, and M. Fishbein, 67–87. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pavón Vázquez, V. 2021. “The Role of Languages in the Internationalization of Higher Education: Institutional Challenges.” In Developing and Evaluating Quality Bilingual Practices in Higher Education, edited by F. D. Rubio-Alcalá, and D. Coyle, 96–114. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Rached, E., and M. Grangeat. 2021. “French Teachers’ Informal Formative Assessment in the Context of Inquiry-Based Learning.” International Journal of Science Education 43 (3): 385–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapanta, C., and D. Walton. 2016. “The Use of Argument Maps as an Assessment Tool in Higher Education.” International Journal of Educational Research 79: 211–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. 2013. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Salminen, T., M. Marttunen, and L. Laurinen. 2010. “Visualising Knowledge from Chat Debates in Argument Diagrams.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26 (5): 379–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, B. B., and A. Glassner. 2003. “The Blind and the Paralytic: Supporting Argumentation in Everyday and Scientific Issues.” In Arguing to Learn, edited by J. Andriessen, M. Baker, and D. Suthers, 227–260. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shirazi, M. A., and S. M. Mousavi Nadoushani. 2017. “The Locus of Adversative Conjunctions in the Research Articles: Have They Niched or Vanished?” SAGE Open 7 (1): 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Y., and J. R. Sparks. 2019. “Building a Game-Enhanced Formative Assessment to Gather Evidence about Middle School Students’ Argumentation Skills.” Educational Technology Research and Development 67 (5): 1175–1196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Y., J. R. Sparks, and D. Guzman-Orth. 2021. “Investigating Student Performance on an Assessment Tool to Support the Development of English Learners’ Argumentation Skills.” Computer Assisted Language Learning. doi:10.1080/09588221.2021.1879160.
   Google Scholar
• Twardy, C. R. 2004. “Argument Maps Improve Critical Thinking.” Teaching Philosophy 27 (2): 95–116.
   Google Scholar
• Uçar, B., and Y. Demiraslan Çevik. 2021. “The Effect of Argument Mapping Supported with Peer Feedback on Pre-Service Teachers’ Argumentation Skills.” Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education 37 (1): 6–29.
   Google Scholar
• van Amelsvoort, M., and J. Schilperoord. 2018. “How Number and Size of Text Boxes in Argument Diagrams Affect Opinions.” Learning and Instruction 57: 57–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Egmond, S., and M. P. Hekkert. 2012. “Argument Map for Carbon Capture and Storage.” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 11: S148–S159.
   Google Scholar
• Wieman, C. 2017. Improving how Universities Teach Science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar