Towards a reconceptualisation of the Cantonese lexicon in contemporary Hong Kong: classificatory possibilities and their implications for the local Chinese-as-an-additional-language curriculum

References

• Bakalla, M. H. 1984. Arabic Culture Through Its Language and Literature. London: Kegan Paul International.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, R. S. 1984. The Hong Kong Cantonese Speech Community. Hong Kong: Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, R. S. 1996. “Identifying the Tai Substratum in Cantonese.” In The Fourth International Symposium on Language and Linguistics, Thailand, 1806–1844. Bangkok: Institute of Language and Culture for Rural Development. Mahidol University.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, R. S. 2015. “The Hong Kong Speech Community’s Cantonese and Other Languages.” Global Chinese 1 (1): 27–55. doi:10.1515/glochi-2015-1002.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, R. S. 2018. “Cantonese as Written Language in Hong Kong.” Global Chinese 4 (1): 103–142. doi:10.1515/glochi-2018-0006.
   Google Scholar
• BBC. 2017. Cantonese vs Mandarin: The politics of languages in Hong Kong. https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/chinese-news-40439847.
   Google Scholar
• Bhabha, Homi. 1994. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatt, R. M. 2008. “In Other Words: Language Mixing, Identity Representations, and Third Space.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 12 (2): 177–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, K., J. Bacon-Shone, and K. K. Luke. 2020. “Hong Kong English.” In The Handbook of Asian English, edited by K. Bolton, W. Botha, and A. Kirkpatrick, 449–478. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, K., and C. Hutton. 1995. “Bad and Banned Language: Triad Secret Societies, the Censorship of the Cantonese Vernacular, and Colonial Language Policy in Hong Kong.” Language in Society 24: 159–186. doi:10.1017/S0047404500018571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruche-Schulz, G. 1997. “Fuzzy’ Chinese: The Status of Cantonese in Hong Kong.” Journal of Pragmatics 27: 292–314. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(95)00048-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Census and Statistics Department of Hong Kong. 2017. 2016 Population By-Census. Hong Kong: Census and Statistics Department.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, S. D. 2019. “From Oracy to Literacy: The Role of Cantonese in the Learning of Chinese Reading and Writing.” In Cantonese as a Second Language: Issues, Experience and Suggestions for Teaching and Learning, edited by J. C. Wakefield, 209–231. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chappell, M. 2016. “Linguistic Areas in China for Differential Object Marking, Passive, and Comparative Constructions.” In Diversity in Sinitic Languages, edited by M. Chappell, 13–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, P. T. M. 2016. “Exploring the Use of Japanese Loanwords in Hong Kong.” Han-Character and Classical Written Language Education 41 (1): 197–216. doi:10.15670/HACE.2016.40.1.197.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, A. C.-o. 2021. “The Language of Fandom.” Resonate: Cantonese Literary Periodical 15: 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A. S. 2019. “The Problematic Definition of ‘Chinese’ in Hong Kong.” Language & Communication 67: 55–68. doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2019.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council, Curriculum Development. 2008. Supplementary Guide to the Chinese Language Curriculum for Non-Chinese Speaking Students. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Education Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Council, Legislative. 2014. Official Record of Proceedings. Wednesday, 19, March, 2014. Retrieved from https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr13-14/english/counmtg/hansard/cm0319-translate-e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Council, Legislative. 2018. Official Record of Proceedings. Wednesday, 4 July, 2018. https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr17-18/english/counmtg/hansard/cm20180704-translate-e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, X. 2009. “Variation and Change in Hong Kong Written Cantonese: An Investigation of Language Use in Hong Kong Newspapers and Magazines.” In Proceedings of the 21st North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-21). 2009. Volume 2, edited by Yun Xiao, 256–270. Smithfield, RI: Bryant University.
   Google Scholar
• Diao, Y. 2012. “Hong Kong-Style Chinese and Early Modern Chinese.” Journal of Shanxi University (Philosophy & Social Science) 35 (1): 49–53.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, P. S. 2016. Southern Min (Hokkien) as a Migrating Language: A Comparative Study of Language Shift and Maintenance Across National Borders. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Education Bureau. 2007. Hong Kong Chinese lexical lists for primary learning. https://www.edbchinese.hk/lexlist/.
   Google Scholar
• Education Bureau. 2021a. Legislative council panel on education – Review report of the task force on review of school curriculum. LC Paper No. CB(4)365/20- 21(01). https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr20-21/english/panels/ed/papers/ed20210119cb4-365-1-e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Education Bureau. 2021b. Optimising the four senior secondary core subjects to create space for students and cater for learner diversity: School questionnaire survey and school briefing session. Education Bureau Circular Memorandum No. 20/2021. https://applications.edb.gov.hk/circular/upload/EDBCM/EDBCM21020E.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Education Department. 1997. Medium of instruction guidance for secondary schools. https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr97-98/english/panels/ed/papers/ed1508-6.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Ethnologue. 2020. Chinese, Yue. http://www.ethnologue.com/language/yue.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S. 2010. “Language in Transitional Hong Kong: Perspectives from the Public and Private Sectors.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 31 (4): 347–363. doi:10.1080/01434632.2010.497218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, S., and C. Green. 2001. “Language in Post-Colonial Hong Kong: The Roles of English and Chinese in the Public and Private Sectors.” English World-Wide 22 (2): 247–268. doi:10.1075/eww.22.2.04eva.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, J. 2005. “Vernacular Normal School for Men (1920–1940): An Important Cradle of Chinese Teachers in Early 20th Century Hong Kong.” Educational Research Journal 20 (1): 121–139.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C. A. 1959. “Diglossia.” Word 15: 325–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, N. 2016. “Language and Dialect in China.” Chinese Language and Discourse 7 (1): 136–149. doi:10.1075/cld.7.1.05fra.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, F. 2011. “Linguistic Capital: Continuity and Change in Educational Language Policies for South Asians in Hong Kong Primary Schools.” Current Issues in Language Planning 12 (2): 251–263. doi:10.1080/14664208.2011.609687.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, X. 2012. “Cantonese is not a Dialect’: Chinese Netizens’ Defence of Cantonese as a Regional Lingua Franca.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 33 (5): 449–464. doi:10.1080/01434632.2012.680461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, J. 2010. “Language or Dialect—or Topolect? A Comparison of the Attitudes of Hong Kongers and Mainland Chinese Towards the Status of Cantonese.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 31 (6): 531–551. doi:10.1080/01434632.2010.509507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GZNF. 羊城网. 2017. On the real-name whistleblow of the school-based Cantonese language materials: A restatement of common-senses in three points. https://www.gznf.net/column/19806.html.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 2005. “Some Lexiogrammatical Features of the Dialects of the Pearl River Delta.” In Studies in Chinese Language: Volume 8, edited by J. Webster, 249–269. London & New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• HK01. 2016. Ben Sir: ‘My hand writes what my heart thinks’ for writing a tenancy agreement in Cantonese. https://www.hk01.com/%E7%86%B1%E7%88%86%E8%A9%B1%E9%A1%8C/13503/.
   Google Scholar
• HK01. 2021. The top six common mistakes made by students in Hong Kong DSE Chinese writing paper. https://www.hk01.com/%E7%A4%BE%E6%9C%83%E6%96%B0%E8%81%9E/696939.
   Google Scholar
• Kageyama, T., and M. Saito. 2016. “Vocabulary Strata and Word Formation Processes.” In Handbook of Japanese Lexicon and Word Formation, edited by T. Kageyama and H. Kishimoto, 11–50. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Kapai, P. 2015. Status of Ethnic Minorities in Hong Kong 1997–2014. Centre for Comparative and Public Law: The University of Hong Kong. https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CERD/Shared%20Documents/HKG/INT_CERD_NGO_CHN_31912_E.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Keeler, L. 2008. “Linguistic Reconstruction and the Construction of Nationalist-era Chinese Linguistics.” Language & Communication 28: 344–362. doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2008.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiaer, Jieun. 2019. Translingual Words: An East Asian Lexical Encounter with English. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kiaer, Jieun. 2020. Delicious Words: East Asian Food Words in English. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• King, R. 2005. “Ditching ‘Diglossia’: Describing Ecologies of the Spoken and Inscribed in pre-Modern Korea.” Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies 15 (1): 1–19. doi:10.21866/esjeas.2015.15.1.001.
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, H., K. Yamashita, and T. Kageyama. 2016. “Sino-Japanese Words.” In Handbook of Japanese Lexicon and Word Formation, edited by T. Kageyama, and H. Kishimoto, 93–132. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Kwan-Terry, A., and K. K. Luke. 1997. “Tradition, Trial, and Error: Standard and Vernacular Literacy in China, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Malaysia.” In Vernacular Literacy: A Re-evaluation, edited by A. Tabouret-Keller, R. Le Page, P. Gardner-Chloros, and G. Varro, 271–315. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kwok, B-c., B. T’sou, and A. Chin. 2018. Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics, edited by R. Sybesma. Amsterdam: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, C. F. 2005. “The Derogatory Loanwords in Hong Kong Cantonese.” Chinese Language Review (Hong Kong) 81: 55–58.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, C.-M. 2019. “Building Cantonese Dictionaries Using Crowdsourcing Strategies: The Words.hk Project: Challenges and Developments in a Globalized Asia.” In Digital Humanities and New Ways of Teaching, edited by W.-B. A. Tso, 89–107. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, W. 2015. “Lexicon.” In Handbook of Ryukyuan Languages: History, Structure, and Use, edited by P. Heinrich, S. Miyara, and M. Shimoji, 157–174. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. S., and W. M. Leung. 2012. “The Status of Cantonese in the Education Policy of Hong Kong.” Multilingual Education 2 (2): 1–22. doi:10.1186/10.1186/2191-5059-2-2.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K.-M., and S. R. Ramsey. 2011. A History of the Korean Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, G., Y. Uchioshi, and R. Tong. 2018. “Learning Cantonese Will Help us”: Elementary School Students’ Perceptions of Dual Language Education.” Bilingual Research Journal 41 (3): 238–252. doi:10.1080/15235882.2018.1483978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D. C. S. 1999. “The Functions and Status of English in Hong Kong: A Post-1997 Update.” English World-Wide 20 (1): 67–110. doi:10.1075/eww.20.1.03li.
   Google Scholar
• Li, D. C. S. 2006. “Chinese as a Lingua Franca in Greater China.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 26: 149–176. doi:10.1017/S0267190506000080.
   Google Scholar
• Li, D. 2009. “Towards “Biliteracy and Trilingualism” in Hong Kong (SAR): Problems, Dilemmas and Stakeholders’ Views.” AILA Review 22 (1): 72–84. doi:10.1075/aila.22.06li.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y.-M. F. 2017. Written Cantonese in the Late Qing and Early Republican Periods. Hong Kong: Joint Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Li, W. 2018. “Translanguaging as a Practical Theory of Language.” Applied Linguistics 39 (1): 9–30. doi:10.1093/applin/amx039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D. C. S. 2018. “Two Decades of Decolonization and Renationalization: The Evolutionary Dynamics of Hong Kong English and an Update of its Functions and Status.” Asian Englishes 20 (1): 2–14. doi:10.1080/13488678.2017.1415517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D. C.-S., and J. Y.-P. Chuk. 2015. “South Asian Students’ Needs for Cantonese and Written Chinese in Hong Kong: A Linguistic Study.” International Journal of Multilingualism 12 (2): 210–224. doi:10.1080/14790718.2015.1009375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C., and S. A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, W., A. Tsang, N. Wong, and P. Lok. 2020. “Kongish Daily: Researching Translanguaging Creativity and Subversiveness.” International Journal of Multilingualism 17 (3): 309–335. doi:10.1080/14790718.2020.1766465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., and M. Ma. 2020. “Grammaticalization of Yinying in Hong Kong Chinese.” Journal of Beihua University (Social Science) 21 (6): 18–24.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, W. Y. 2015. Schools in Rural New Territories. Hong Kong: Joint Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, R. 1987. “Language Policy and Planning in Hong Kong: Past, Present and (Especially) Future.” In Language Education in Hong Kong, edited by R. Lord and H. N. L. Cheng, 3–24. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loveday, L. 1996. Language Contact in Japan: A Socio-Linguistic History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, P. M. 2018. “Cantonese is the Official Spoken Chinese in Hong Kong.” Current Research in Chinese Linguistics 97 (1): 121–131.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, V. H. 2013. “The Classification of Sinitic Languages: What is “Chinese”.” In In Breaking Down the Barriers: Interdisciplinary Studies in Chinese Linguistics and Beyond, edited by G. Cao, H. Chappell, R. Djamouri, and T. Wiebusch, 735–754. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, S. 2006. “Cantonese Grammar in Areal Perspective.” In Grammars in Contact: A Cross-Linguistic Typology, edited by A. Y. Aikhenvald, and R. M. W. Dixon, 220–236. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, S. 2010. “Language Contact and Chinese.” In The Handbook of Language Contact, edited by R. Hickey, 757–769. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Myers-Scotton, C. 2005. Multiple Voices: An Introduction to Bilingualism. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, S. H. 1989. A Study of Cantonese Wooden fish books. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong PhD thesis. https://repository.lib.cuhk.edu.hk/en/item/cuhk-317938.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, J. 1998. Chinese – Cambridge Language Surveys. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson Edexcel. 2018. GCSE (9-1) Chinese (spoken Mandarin/spoken Cantonese): Specification. https://qualifications.pearson.com/content/dam/pdf/GCSE/Chinese/2017/specification-and-sample-assessments/Specification_GCSE_L1-L2_in_Chinese.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• SCOLAR. 2003. Action Plan to Raise Language Standards in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Standing Committee on Language Education and Research, Hong Kong SAR Government.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, A., and J. Chan. 2016. “Hong Kong English, but not as we Know it: Kongish and Language in Late Modernity.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 27 (3): 596–607. doi:10.1111/ijal.12163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao, J., and D. Shi. 2006. “Variations of Hong Kong Written Chinese and its Mechanism.” In Linguistic Studies in Chinese and Neighboring Languages: Festschrift in Honor of Professor Pang-Hsin Ting on his 70th Birthday, edited by D. He, H.-N. Cheung, W. Pan, and F. Wu, 625–644. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, D. 2006. “Hong Kong Written Chinese: Language Change Induced by Language Contact.” Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 16 (2): 299–318. doi:10.1075/japc.16.2.09shi.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, D., C. Wang, and Z. Zhu. 2002. “Hong Kong Written Chinese: Residues of Classis Chinese, Transfer of Cantonese and Others.” Applied Linguistics 3: 23–32.
   Google Scholar
• Si, C. M. 1997. “The Present Situation and Future Development of the Chinese Language Teaching in Hong Kong.” Applied Linguistics 22 (2): 37–42.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. 2004. Cantonese as Written Language: The Growth of a Written Chinese Vernacular. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. 2008. “Cantonese as Written Standard?” Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 18 (2): 190–208. doi:10.1075/japc.18.2.05sno.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. 2010. “Hong Kong and Modern Diglossia.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 206: 155–179. doi:10.1515/ijsl.2010.052.
   Google Scholar
• Sohn, H.-M., and A. Grant. 2020. “Language Contact in Korean.” In The Oxford Handbook of Language Contact, edited by A. P. Grant, 540–555. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199945092.013.25.
   Google Scholar
• South China Morning Post. 2014. Education Bureau Rapped Over Cantonese ‘not an official language’ Gaffe. https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1419237/education-bureau-rapped-over-cantonese-not-official-language-gaffe.
   Google Scholar
• South China Morning Post. 2018a. Cantonese a dialect, not a mother tongue, says Hong Kong Education Bureau Supporting material on Mandarin. https://hongkongfp.com/2018/05/02/cantonese-dialect-not-mother-tongue-says-hong-kong-education-bureau-supporting-material-mandarin/.
   Google Scholar
• South China Morning Post. 2018b. Hong Kong education chief forced to clarify controversial comments about teaching Chinese language in Cantonese. https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/education/article/2167382/hong-kong-education-chief-forced-clarify-controversial.
   Google Scholar
• Spolsky, B. 2009. Language Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeting, A. 1990. Education in Hong Kong pre-1841 to 1941: Fact and Opinion (Materials for a History of Education in Hong Kong). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tai, K. W. H., and W. Li. 2021. “Constructing Playful Talk Through Translanguaging in English Medium Instruction Mathematics Classrooms.” Applied Linguistics 42 (4): 607–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam, G. A. 2020. Dialect and Nationalism in China, 1860-1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tam, H. W.-Y. 2021a. “Development of the Cantonese Grammar Profile: Reconsidering Pedagogical Sequence of Grammar Items in Cantonese as a Second Language.” Chinese as a Second Language 56 (3): 209–228. doi:10.1075/csl.21009.tam.
   Google Scholar
• Tam, H. W.-Y. 2021b. “The Emergence of a Beneficial Reception Marker: The Discourse-Pragmatic Functions of Doze in Hong Kong Cantonese.” Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 51 (3): 539–585. doi:10.6503/THJCS.202109_51(3).0004.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, C., and V. J. van Heuven. 2009. “Mutual Intelligibility of Chinese Dialects Experimentally Tested.” Lingua 119: 709–732. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2008.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, I., and M. M. Taylor. 1995. Writing and Literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Tin, S. L. 2008. “Hong Kong Chinese and its Characteristics.” Journal of College of Chinese Language and Culture of Jinan University 3: 68–79.
   Google Scholar
• Tsang, S. C. S. 2020. “An Exploratory Study of Chinese-as-an-Additional-Language Teachers’ Agency in Post-1997 Hong Kong: An Ecological Perspective.” Current Issues in Language Planning 22 (1-2): 19–40. doi:10.1080/14664208.2020.1725331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. B. M. 2004. “Medium of Instruction in Hong Kong: One Country, two Systems, Whose Language?” In Medium of Instruction Policies: Which Agenda, Whose Agenda?, edited by J. W. Tollefson and A. B. M. Tsui, 97–116. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, A. D. 2019. “Authenticity, Belonging, and Charter Myths of Cantonese.” Language & Communication 68: 37–45. doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2018.10.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip, V., and L. Catedral. 2021. “Perceiving (Non)Standardness and the Indexicality of New Immigrant Cantonese in Hong Kong.” Language & Communication 79: 81–94. doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2021.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip, V., and S. Matthews. 2005. Basic Cantonese: A Grammar and Workbook. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshikawa, M. 2020. “Hong Kong Cantonese and Taiwanese Southern Min Written Language Trends Since the mid-1990s.” Current Research in Chinese Linguistics 9 (1): 195–213.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, H. 2011. “The Intermittent Rhythms of the Cantonese Pacific.” In Connecting Seas and Connected Ocean Rims Indian, Atlantic, and Pacific Oceans and China Seas Migrations from the 1830s to the 1930s, edited by D. R. Gabaccía and D. Hoerder, 393–414. Amsterdam: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, H. 2012. “Mountains of Gold: Canada, North America, and the Cantonese Pacific.” In Routledge Handbook of the Chinese Diaspora, edited by C.-B. Tan, 108–121. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W. 2005. “Code-Choice in Bidialectal Interaction: The Choice Between Putonghua and Cantonese in a Radio Phone-in Program in Shenzhen.” Journal of Pragmatics 37 (3): 355–374. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2004.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., and C. McBride-Chang. 2011. “Diversity in Chinese Literacy Acquisition.” Writing System Research 3 (1): 87–102. doi:10.1093/wsr/wsr011.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, D. 2019. “Modern Chinese Nationalism and the Awakening of Self-Consciousness of the Chinese Nation.” International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology 3 (11): 1–25. doi:10.1186/s41257-019-0026-6.
   Google Scholar