Rebel politics and the state: between conflict and post-conflict, resistance and co-existence

References

• Agnew, J. 2005. Sovereignty regimes: Territoriality and state authority in contemporary world politics. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(2), pp.437–461.10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00468.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alagha, J. 2005. Hizballah after the Syrian withdrawal. Middle East Report 237.
   Google Scholar
• Alagha, J. E. 2007. The shifts in Hizbullah’s ideology. Religious ideology, political ideology, and political program. ISIM dissertation. Leiden: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alami, M. 2014. The Lebanese Army and the confessional trap. Sada. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, June 24, <http://carnegieendowment.org/sada/?fa=56014> [Accessed 25 September 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Allison, M. E. 2006. The transition from armed opposition to electoral opposition in Central America. Latin American Politics & Society, 48(4), pp.137–162.10.1353/lap.2006.0040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basedau, M. and Stroh, A. 2008. Measuring party institutionalization in developing countries: A new research instrument applied to 28 African political parties. GIGA-German Institute for Global and Area Studies. Working Paper No. 69. <http://www.giga-hamburg.de/en/system/files/publications/wp69_basedau-stroh.pdf> [Accessed 15 September 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Berti, B. 2011. Armed groups as political parties and their role in electoral politics: The case of Hizballah. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 34(12), pp.942–962.10.1080/1057610X.2011.621115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berti, B. 2013. Armed-political organizations: From conflict to integration. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berti, B. 2015. Non-state actors as providers of governance: The Hamas government in Gaza between effective sovereignty, centralized authority, and resistance. The Middle East Journal, 69(1), pp.9–31.10.3751/69.1.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A. 2010. Governance with/out government. False promises or flawed premises? Governance in areas of limited statehood – New modes of governance? Working Paper Series, No. 23. Berlin: Research Center (SFB) 700. http://www.sfb-governance.de/en/publikationen/working_papers/wp23/SFB-Governance-Working-Paper-23.pdf# [Accessed 15 September 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Brigades of Martyr Izz ad-Din al-Qassam website. 2015. <http://www.alqassam.ps/arabic/#!/من-نحن/> [Accessed 15 September 2015].
   Google Scholar
• van der Brug, W. and Mughan, A. 2007. Charisma, leader effects and support for right-wing populist parties. Party Politics, 13, pp.29–51.10.1177/1354068806071260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capoccia, G. 2002. Anti-system parties: A conceptual reassessment. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 14(1), pp.9–35.10.1177/095169280201400103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CNN, May 9 2008. <http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/05/09/beirut.violence/index.html> [Accessed 15 September 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Deonandan, K., Close, D. and Prevost, G. 2007. From revolutionary movements to political parties. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230609778
   Google Scholar
• van Engeland, A. and Rudolph, R. M. 2008. From terrorism to politics. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Fadlallah, H. 1994. Other choice: Hezbollah’s autobiography and stance (Arabic). Beirut: Dar al-Hadi.
   Google Scholar
• Flanigan, S. T. 2008. Nonprofit service provision by insurgent organizations: The cases of Hizballah and the Tamil Tigers. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 31(6), pp.499–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fregonese, S. 2012. Beyond the ‘weak state’: Hybrid sovereignties in Beirut. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30(4), pp.655–674.10.1068/d11410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunning, J. 2004. Peace with Hamas? The transforming potential of political participation. International Affairs, 80(2), pp.233–255.10.1111/inta.2004.80.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunning, J. 2008. Hamas in politics. Democracy, religion, violence. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haboub, W. J. 2012. Demystifying the rise of Hamas. Journal of Developing Societies, 28(1), pp.57–79.10.1177/0169796X1102800103
   Google Scholar
• Hamzeh, A. N. 2000. Lebanon’s Islamists and local politics: A new reality. Third World Quarterly, 21(5), pp.739–759.10.1080/713701078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamzeh, A. N. 2004. In the path of Hizbullah. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harb, M. and Leenders, R. 2005. Know thy enemy: Hizbullah, ‘terrorism’ and the politics of perception. Third World Quarterly, 26(1), pp.173–197.10.1080/0143659042000322973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbom, L., Hogbladh, S. and Wallensteen, P. 2006. Armed conflict and peace agreements. Journal of Peace Research, 43(5), pp.617–631.10.1177/0022343306067613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harik, J. P. 2006. Hezbollah. The changing face of terrorism. London: I.B Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Hartzell, C., Hoddie, M. and Rothchild, D. 2001. Stabilizing the peace after civil war: An investigation of some key variables. International Organization, 55(1), pp.183–208.10.1162/002081801551450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, M. 2006. Can Hamas be tamed? Foreign Affairs, March/April 2006. <https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/israel/2006-03-01/can-hamas-be-tamed>.
   Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, C. 2005. Engaging armed non-state actors in post-conflict settings. In: A. Bryden and H. Hänggi, eds. Security Governance in Post-Conflict Peacebuilding. Geneva: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF). <http://www.dcaf.ch/Publications/Security-Governance-in-Post-Conflict-Peacebuilding> [Accessed 2 July 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Hourani, N. B. 2013. Lebanon: Hybrid sovereignties and U.S. foreign policy. Middle East Policy, 20(1), pp.39–55.10.1111/mepo.2013.20.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hroub, K. 2000. Hamas, political thought and practice. Washington, DC: Institute for Palestine Studies.
   Google Scholar
• International Council on Human Rights Policy. 1995. Ends and means: Human rights approaches to armed groups. Versoix. <www.ichrp.org/files/reports/6/105_report_en.pdf> [ Accessed 2 July 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Ishiyama, J. and Batta, A. 2011. Swords into plowshares: The organizational transformation of rebel groups into political parties. Communist and post-communist studies, 44(4), pp.369–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamal, A. 2005. The Palestinian National Movement: Politics of contention, 1967–2005. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jamal, M. A. 2012. Democracy promotion, civil society building, and the primacy of politics. Comparative Political Studies, 45, pp.3–31.10.1177/0010414010365998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamal, M. A. 2013. Beyond Fateh corruption and mass discontent: Hamas, the Palestinian left and the 2006 legislative elections. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 40(3), pp.273–294.10.1080/13530194.2013.791135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, S. N. 2003. The ontology of “political violence”: Action and identity in civil wars. Perspectives on Politics, 1(3), pp.475–494.10.1017/S1537592703000355
   Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, S. N. 2006. The logic of violence in civil war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511818462
   Google Scholar
• Khashan, H. and Mousawi, I. 2007. Hizbullah’s Jihad concept. Journal of Religion and Society, 9. <http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2007/2007-19.html> [Accessed 15 September 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, A. 2005. Crescent and sword: The Hamas enigma. Third World Quarterly, 26(8), pp.1373–1388.10.1080/01436590500336898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mampilly, Z. 2011. Rebel rulers: Insurgent governance and civilian life during war. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, C. 2007. Party-building on the heels of war: El Salvador, Bosnia, Kosovo and Mozambique. Democratization, 14(2), pp.253–272.10.1080/13510340701245777
   Google Scholar
• Maqdsi, M. 1993. Charter of the Islamic resistance movement (Hamas) of Palestine. Journal of Palestine Studies, 22(4), pp.122–134.10.2307/2538093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metelits, C. M. 2008. The consequences of rivalry: Explaining insurgent violence using fuzzy sets. Political Research Quarterly, 62(4), pp.673–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishal, S. 2003. The pragmatic dimension of the Palestinian Hamas: A network perspective. Armed Forces & Society, 29(4), pp.569–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishal, S. and Sela, A. 2000. The Palestinian Hamas. Vision, violence and coexistence. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Najib, M. and Friedrich, R. 2007. Non-statutory armed groups and security sector governance. In: R. Friedrich and A. Luethold, eds. Entry-points to Palestinian security sector reform. Geneva: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, pp.103–131.
   Google Scholar
• Pearlman, W. and Cunningham, K. G. 2012. Nonstate actors, fragmentation, and conflict processes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56(1), pp.3–15.10.1177/0022002711429669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podder, S. 2014. Mainstreaming the non-state in bottom-up state-building: Linkages between Rebel governance and post-conflict legitimacy. Conflict, Security & Development, 14(2), pp.213–243.
   Google Scholar
• Political platform of the reform and change movement. Palestinian Information Centre, January 14, 2005; LexisNexis.
   Google Scholar
• Qassem, N. 2005. Hizbullah. The story from within. London: Saqi.
   Google Scholar
• Rabbani, M. 2008. The making of a Palestinian Islamist leader: Interview with Khalid Mishal: Part II. Journal of Palestine Studies, 37(4), pp.59–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranstorp, M. 1994. Hizbollah’s command leadership: Its structure, decision‐making and relationship with Iranian clergy and institution. Terrorism and Political Violence, 6(3), pp.303–339.10.1080/09546559408427263
   Google Scholar
• Roy, S. 2003. Hamas and the transformation(s) of political Islam in Palestine. Current History, 102(660), pp.13–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, S. 2011. Hamas and civil society in Gaza: Engaging the Islamist social sector. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saad-Gorayeb, A. 2002. Hizbu’llah. Politics and Religion. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saouli, A. 2011. Hizbullah in the civilising process: Anarchy, self-restraint and violence. Third World Quarterly, 32(5), pp.925–942.10.1080/01436597.2011.578966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saouli, A. 2014. Intellectuals and political power in social movements: The parallel paths of Fadlallah and Hizbullah. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 41(1), pp.97–116.10.1080/13530194.2014.878509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkees, M. R., Wayman, F. W. and Singer, J. D. 2003. Inter-state, intra-state, and extra-state wars: A comprehensive look at their distribution over time, 1816–1997. International Studies Quarterly, 47(1), pp.49–70.10.1111/isqu.2003.47.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. 1976. Parties and party systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sayigh, Y. 2010. Hamas rule in Gaza: Three years on. Crown Center for Middle East Studies. Middle East Brief No. 41. <http://www.brandeis.edu/crown/publications/meb/meb41.html> [Accessed 2 July 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Sayigh, Y. 2011. Policing the people, building the state: Authoritarian transformation in the West Bank and Gaza. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Middle East Papers, February 2011. <http://carnegieendowment.org/2011/02/28/policing-people-building-state-authoritarian-transformation-in-west-bank-and-gaza/jke> [Accessed 15 September 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Schneckener, U. 2009. Spoilers or governance actors? Engaging armed non-state groups in areas of limited statehood governance in areas of limited statehood – New modes of governance. Working Paper Series, No. 21. Berlin: Research Center (SFB) 700. 2015. http://www.sfb-governance.de/en/publikationen/working_papers/wp21/SFB-Governance-Working-Paper-21.pdf [Accessed 2 July 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Shultz, R., Farah, D. and Lochard, I. 2004. Armed groups: A tier-one security priority. INSS Occasional Papers 157.
   Google Scholar
• Siqueira, K. 2005. Political and militant wings within dissident movements and organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(2), pp.218–236.10.1177/0022002704272865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjoberg, L. 2014. Queering the “territorial peace”? Queer theory conversing with mainstream international relations. International Studies Review, 16(4). 10.1111/misr.12186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderberg Kovacsa, M. and Hatza, S. 2016. Rebel-to-party transformations in civil war peace processes 1975–2011. Democratization, doi:10.1080/13510347.2016.1159558.
   Google Scholar
• Staniland, P. 2012. States, insurgents, and wartime political orders. Perspectives on Politics, 10(2), pp.243–264.10.1017/S1537592712000655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szekely, O. 2015. Doing well by doing good: Understanding Hamas’s social services as political advertising. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 38(4), pp.275–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Taif Agreement (signed on October 22, 1989 and ratified on November 4, 1989). <http://www.mideastinfo.com/documents/taif.htm> [Accessed 15 September 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Usher, G. 1997. Hizballah, Syria, and the Lebanese elections. Journal of Palestine Studies, 26(2), pp.59–67.10.2307/2537783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, J. M. 2003. Inside Rebellion: The Political Economy of Rebel Organization. Doctoral Thesis, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Wiegand, K. E. 2009. Reformation of a terrorist group: Hezbollah as a Lebanese political party. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 32(8), pp.669–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahhar, M. and Hijazi, H. 1995. Hamas: Waiting for secular nationalism to self-destruct. An interview with Mahmud Zahhar. Journal of Palestine Studies, 24(3), pp.81–88.10.2307/2537882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar