In whose interests? Former rebel parties and ex-combatant interest group mobilisation in Aceh and East Timor

References

• Allern, E. and Bale, T. 2012. Political parties and interest groups: Disentangling complex relationships. Party Politics, 18(1), pp. 7–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, M. E. 2005. The transformation from armed opposition to electoral opposition in Central America. Latin American Politics and Society, 48(4), pp. 137–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. 2013. Gangster, ideologue, martyr: The posthumous reinvention of Teungku Badruddin and the nature of the Free Aceh Movement. Conflict, Security and Development, 13(1), pp. 31–56.
   Google Scholar
• Aspinall, E. 2009. Combatants to contractors: The political economy of peace in Aceh. Indonesia, 87, pp. 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Barakat, S., Connolly, D. and Large, J. 2002. Winning and losing in Aceh: Five key dilemmas in third-party intervention. Civil Wars, 5(4), pp. 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, P. 2009. The limits of DDR: Reintegration lessons from Aceh. In: Small arms survey 2009: Shadows of war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 249–284.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, P. and Burke, A. 2008. Supporting peace in Aceh: Development agencies and international involvement. Policy Studies, 47, pp. 1–73.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, P., Rahmant, E. and Nugroho, K. 2013. The contested corners of Asia: Subnational conflict and international development assistance. The case of Aceh, Indonesia, The Asia Foundation. Available at http://asiafoundation.org/publications/pdf/1224
   Google Scholar
• Barter, S. J. 2015. The rebel state in society: Governance and accommodation in Aceh, Indonesia. In: A. Arjona, N. Kasfir and Z. Mampilly, eds. Rebel governance in civil war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 226–245.
   Google Scholar
• Basedau, M. and Stroh, A. 2008. Measuring party institutionalization in developing countries. In: Giga Working Papers, 69. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1119203
   Google Scholar
• Berdal, M. and Ucko, D. H. 2009a. Introduction: The political reintegration of armed groups after war. In: M. Berdal and D.H. Ucko, eds. Reintegrating armed groups after conflict. London: Routledge, pp. 10–46.
   Google Scholar
• Berdal, M. and Ucko, D. H., eds. 2009b. Reintegrating armed groups after conflict. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biezen, I. V. 2003. Political parties in new democracies: Party organization in Southern and East-Central Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Biezen, I. V. 2005. On the theory and practice of party formation and adaptation in new democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 44, pp. 147–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duverger, M. 1954. Political parties: Their organization and activity in the modern state. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Grisham, K. 2015. Transforming violent political movements: Rebels today, what tomorrow?. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, C. 2009. Dependent communities: Aid and politics in Cambodia and Timor-Leste. Ithaca: Cornell South East Asia Program Publications.
   Google Scholar
• ICG. 2006. Aceh’s local elections: The role of the free Aceh movement (GAM) (No. 57). Jakarta: Brussels International Crisis Group.
   Google Scholar
• ICG. 2011. Timor Leste’s veterans: An unfinished struggle? Asia Briefing 129. Jakarta: Brussels International Crisis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Ishiyama, J. and Batta, A. 2011. Swords into plowshares: The organizational transformation of rebel groups into political parties. Communist and post-communist studies, 44, pp. 369–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishiyama, J. and Marshall, M. 2015a. Candidate recruitment and former rebel parties. Party Politics, 21, pp. 591–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishiyama, J. and Marshall, M. 2015b. What explains former rebel party name changes after a civil conflict ends? External and internal factors and the transition to political competition. Party Politics, Online First, pp. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R. S. 1990. Party as linkage: A vestigial function? European Journal of Political Research, 28(1), pp. 143–61.
   Google Scholar
• Kingsbury, D. 2006. Peace in Aceh: A personal account of the Helsinki peace process. Jakarta: Equinox Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Kingsbury, D. 2007. The free Aceh movement : Islam and democratisation. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 37(2), pp. 166–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsbury, D. and McCulloch, L. 2006. Military business in Aceh. In: A. Reid, ed. Verandah of violence: The background to the Aceh problem. Singapore: Singapore University Press, pp. 199–224.
   Google Scholar
• Kriger, N. 2003. Guerrilla veterans in post-war Zimbabwe: Symbolic and violent politics, 1980–1987. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lichbach, M. I. 1995. The rebel’s dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, T. 2005. Demilitarizing politics. Elections on the uncertain road to peace. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, C. 2004. Armed opposition groups into political parties: Comparing Bosnia, Kosovo, and Mozambique. Studies in comparative international development, 39(1), pp. 54–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, C. 2007. Party building on the heels of war: El Salvador, Bosnia, Kosovo and Mosambuique. Democratization, 14, pp. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, J. 2002. The politics of disruption: War veterans and the local state in Zombabwe. African Affairs, 101(402), pp. 9–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMullin, J. 2013. Ex-combatants and the post-conflict state: Challenges of reintegration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Metsola, L. 2015. Reintegration as recognition: Ex-combatant and veteran politics in Namibia. Helsinki: Department of Political and Economic Studies (Development Studies), University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Metsola, L. and Melber, H. 2007. Namibia’s pariah heroes: Swapo ex-combatants between liberation gospel and security interests. In: L. Buur, S. Jensen and F. Stepputat, eds. The security-development nexus: Expressions of sovereignty and securitization in Southern Africa. Uppsala: Nordic Africa Institute, pp. 64–85.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan, C. 2012. Recognising Timor-Leste’s veterans, 10 years later: The contribution of social programs in teh construction of a welfare sate in Timor-Leste. Dili: International Crisis Group (ICG).
   Google Scholar
• Padgett, S. and Paterson, W. 1991. A history of social democracy in postwar Europe. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Panebianco, A. 1988. Political parties: Organization and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rees, E. 2004. Under pressure: Falintil Forcas Armadas de Timor-Leste. Three decades of defense development in Timor-Leste. Geneva: DCAF.
   Google Scholar
• Roll, K. 2013. Arguing for care: The explosive growth of reintegration programs in Timor-Leste. In: 2nd Nordic Conference in Development Studies. Helsinki, 14–15 November, 2013, pp. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Scambary, J. 2009. Anatomy of a conflict: The 2006–2007 communal violence in East Timor. Conflict, Security and Development, 9(2), pp. 265–88.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, J. 2007. Soldiers at peace: Veterans and society after the civil war in Mozambique. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P. 2001. Parties are not what they once were. In: L. Diamond and R. Gunther, eds. Political parties and democracy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 67–89.
   Google Scholar
• Sindre, G. M. 2014. Rebels and aid in the context of international peacebuilding and humanitarian disaster: A comparison of the Free Aceh Movement (GAM) and the Tamil Tigers (LTTE). Forum for Development Studies, 41(1), pp. 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Sindre, G. M. 2016. Internal party democracy in former rebel parties. Party Politics, 22(4), pp. 501–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares, B. 2003. Branching from the trunk: East Timorese perceptions of nationalism in transition. Canberra: ANU.
   Google Scholar
• Söderberg Kovacs, M. 2008. When rebels change their stripes: Armed insurgents in post-war politics. In: A. K. Jarstad and T. D. Sisk, eds. From war to democracy: Dilemmas of peacebuilding. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, pp. 134–56.
   Google Scholar
• Söderström, J. 2013. The political consequences of reintegration programmes in current peacebuilding: A framework for analysis. Conflict, Security and Development, 13(1), pp. 87–116.
   Google Scholar
• Söderström, J. 2015. Peacebuilding and ex-combatants: Political reintegration in Liberia. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stedman, S. J. 1997. Spoiler problems in peace processes. International Security, 22(2), pp. 5–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallensteen, P. 2002. Understanding conflict resolution: War, peace and the global system. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, L. and Pedahzur, A. 2003. Political parties and terrorist groups. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, L., Pedahzur, A. and Perliger, A. 2008. Political parties and terrorist groups. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, J. M. 2005. Resources and the information problem in rebel recruitment, 4(49), pp. 598–624.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, J. M. 2007. Inside rebellion: The politics of insurgent violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiegink, N. 2013. The forgotten sons of the state: The social and political positions of former government soldiers in post-war Mozambique. Colombia International, 77, pp. 43–72.
   Google Scholar
• De Zeeuw, J. ed. 2008. From soldiers to politicians: Transforming rebel movements after civil war. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar