Walking the Line: Brokering Humanitarian Identities in Conflict Research

References

• Angotti, N. and Kaler, A., 2013. The more you learn the less you know? Demographic Research, 28 (33), 951–980. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2013.28.33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Angotti, N. and Sennott, C., 2015. Implementing ‘Insider’ ethnography: lessons from the public conversations about HIV/AIDS project in rural South Africa. Qualitative Research, 15 (4), 437–453. doi:10.1177/1468794114543402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baaz, M.E. and Stern, M., 2008. Making sense of violence: voices of soldiers in the Congo (DRC). The Journal of Modern African Studies : A Quarterly Survey of Politics, Economics and Related Topics in Contemporary Africa the Journal of Modern African Studies, 46 (1), 57–86. doi:10.1017/S0022278X07003072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behar, R., 1997. The vulnerable observer: anthropology that breaks your heart. New ed. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S., 2009. Dilemma of self-representation and conduct in the field. In: C.L. Sriram, et al., eds. Surviving field research: working in violent and difficult situations. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S.P., 2017. Ethics of research in conflict environments. Journal of Global Security Studies, 2 (1), 89–101. doi:10.1093/jogss/ogw024.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J.N., 2012. Fieldwork and its ethical challenges: reflections from research in Bosnia. Human Rights Quarterly, 34 (3), 823–839. doi:10.1353/hrq.2012.0052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin-Furman, K. and Lake, M., 2017. Ethics abroad: research and field methods in areas of limited statehood. Political Science & Politics, 51 (3), 607–614.
   Google Scholar
• Desposato, S., ed, 2015. Ethics and experiments: problems and solutions for social scientists and policy professionals. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, R.M., Fretz, R.I., and Shaw, L.L., 2011. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes, second edition. 2nd Revised ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enria, L., 2018. The Politics of Work in a Post-Conflict State: Youth, Labour & Violence in Sierra Leone. Woodbridge, Suffolk: James Currey.
   Google Scholar
• Falb, K., 2018. “The Ethical Contours of Research in Crisis Settings: Five Practical Considerations for Academic Institutional Review Boards and Researchers.” Disasters.
   Google Scholar
• Haar, G.V.D., Heijmans, A., and Hilhorst, D., 2013. Interactive research and the construction of knowledge in conflict-affected settings. Disasters, 37, S20–35. doi:10.1111/disa.12010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, M., Higate, P., and Sanghera, G., 2009. Positionality and power: the politics of peacekeeping research. International Peacekeeping, 16 (4), 467–482. doi:10.1080/13533310903184499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, M., 2014. How to make field experiments more ethical. The Monkey Cage: The Washington Post (blog), 2 November. Available from: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/11/02/how-to-make-field-experiments-more-ethical/
   Google Scholar
• Jerolmack, C. and Khan, S., 2014. Talk is cheap: ethnography and the attitudinal fallacy. Sociological Methods & Research, 43 (2), 178–209. doi:10.1177/0049124114523396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A., 2013. Escaping the ‘Field trap’: exploitation and the global politics of educational fieldwork in ‘Conflict zones.’. Third World Quarterly, 34 (7), 1247–1264. doi:10.1080/01436597.2013.824642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan, K., 1993. How native is a ‘Native’ anthropologist? American Anthropologist, 95 (3), 671–686. doi:10.1525/aa.1993.95.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pager, D. and Quillian, L., 2005. Walking the talk? What employers say versus what they do. American Sociological Review, 70 (3), 355–380. doi:10.1177/000312240507000301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter, M. and Strazzari, F., 2017. Securitisation of research: fieldwork under new restrictions in Darfur and Mali. Third World Quarterly, 38 (7), 1531–1550. doi:10.1080/01436597.2016.1256766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanghera, G.S. and Thapar-Björkert, S., 2008. Methodological dilemmas: gatekeepers and positionality in Bradford. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31 (3), 543–562. doi:10.1080/01419870701491952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatz, E., ed, 2009. Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. 1st ed. Chicago; London: University Of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatz, E., et al., 2015. Working with teams of ‘Insiders’: qualitative approaches to data collection in the global south. Demographic Research, 32, 369–396. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheper-Hughes, N., 1995. The primacy of the ethical: propositions for a militant anthropology. Current Anthropology, 36 (3), 409–440. doi:10.1086/204378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, M., 2005. Insider–outsider issues in researching violent and divided societies. In: E.J. Porter, ed.. Researching conflict in Africa: insights and experiences. United Nations University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sriram, C.L., et al., 2009. Surviving field research: working in violent and difficult situations. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thapa‐Björkert, S. and Henry, M., 2004. Reassessing the research relationship: location, position and power in fieldwork accounts. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 7 (5), 363–381. doi:10.1080/1364557092000045294.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, S.M., Ansoms, A., and Murison, J., eds, 2013. Emotional and ethical challenges for field research in Africa - The story behind the findings Palgrave Macmillan. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Verweijen, J., 2015. The ambiguity of militarization: the complex interaction between the Congolese armed forces and civilians in the Kivu Provinces, Eastern DR Congo. Centre for Conflict Studies Faculty of Humanities Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Voorst, R.V. and Hilhorst, D., 2019. Key points of interactive research: an ethnographic approach to risk. In: A. Olofsson and J.O. Zinn, eds. Researching risk and uncertainty: methodologies, methods and research strategies. Critical Studies in Risk and Uncertainty. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 53–76. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95852-1_3.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, S.C. and Swidler, A., 2009. Hearsay ethnography: conversational journals as a method for studying culture in action. Poetics (Hague, Netherlands), 37 (2), 162–184. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2009.03.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, E.J., 2006. The ethical challenges of field research in conflict zones. Qualitative Sociology, 29 (3), 373–386. doi:10.1007/s11133-006-9027-8.
   Google Scholar