Exploring the Backstage: Methodological and Ethical Issues Surrounding the Role of Research Brokers in Insecure Zones

References

• Ajwang, R.O. and Edmondson, L., 2003. Love in the time of dissertations: an ethnographic tale. Qualitative Inquiry, 9 (3), 466–480. doi:10.1177/1077800403009003008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avruch, K., 2001. Notes toward ethnographies of conflict and violence. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 30 (5), 637–648. doi:10.1177/089124101129024295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, F.H.J.A., et al., 1966. The role of the fieldworker in an explosive political situation [and comments and reply]. Current Anthropology, 7 (5), 552–559. doi:10.1086/200771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, T.K., 2012. The normality of civil war: armed groups and everyday life in Angola. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag Gmbh.
   Google Scholar
• Blaufuss, K., 2007. De-linking text from fieldwork. Narrative Inquiry, 17 (1), 13–26. doi:10.1075/ni.17.1.04bla
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleek, W., 1987. Lying informants - a fieldwork experience from Ghana. Population and Development Review, 13 (2), 314–322. doi:10.2307/1973196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloor, M., Fincham, B., and Sampson, H., 2010. Unprepared for the worst: risk of harm for qualitative researchers. Methodological Innovations Online, 5 (1), 45–55. doi:10.4256/mio.2010.0009
   Google Scholar
• Borchgrevink, A., 2003. Silencing language: of anthropologists and interpreters. Ethnography, 4 (1), 95–121. doi:10.1177/1466138103004001005
   Google Scholar
• Boshoff, N., 2009. Neo-colonialism and research collaboration in Central Africa. Scientometrics, 81 (1), 413–434. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2211-8
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, L.M., et al., 2006. Gatekeepers and keymasters: dynamic relationships of access in geographical fieldwork. Geographical Review, 96 (1), 97–121. doi:10.1111/j.1931-0846.2006.tb00389.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caretta, M.A., 2015. Situated knowledge in cross-cultural, cross-language research: a collaborative reflexive analysis of researcher, assistant and participant subjectivities. Qualitative Research, 15 (4), 489–505. doi:10.1177/1468794114543404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, D., 2000. Provincializing Europe: postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, T., 2008. `We’re over-researched here!’: exploringaccounts of research fatigue within qualitative research engagements. Sociology, 42 (5), 953–970. doi:10.1177/0038038508094573
   Google Scholar
• Cons, J., 2014. Field dependencies: mediation, addiction and anxious fieldwork at the India-Bangladesh border. Ethnography, 15 (3), 375–393. doi:10.1177/1466138114533457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin-Furman, K. and Lake, M., 2018. Ethics abroad: fieldwork in fragile and violent contexts. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Costa, B., 2011. Nation building, gender and war crimes in South Asia. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, S., 2018. Brokerage and transnationalism: present and past intermediaries, social mobility, and mixed loyalties. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 25, 610–628. doi:10.1080/1070289X.2018.1515778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deane, K. and Stevano, S., 2016. Towards a political economy of the use of research assistants: reflections from fieldwork in Tanzania and Mozambique. Qualitative Research, 16 (2), 213–228. doi:10.1177/1468794115578776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson Baaz, M., 2005. The paternalism of partnership: A postcolonial reading of identity in development aid. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson Baaz, M. and Stern, M., 2013. Sexual violence as a weapon of war?: Perceptions, prescriptions, problems in the Congo and beyond. London and New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson Baaz, M. and Verweijen, J., 2018. Confronting the colonial: the (re)production of ‘African’ exceptionalism in critical security and military studies. Security Dialogue, 49 (1–2), 57–69. doi:10.1177/0967010617730975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertz, C., 1983. From the native’s point of view: on the nature of anthropological understanding. In: C. Geertz, ed. Local knowledge: further essays in interpretative anthropology (pp. 55–72). New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Griaule, M., 1948. Dieu d’eau, entretiens avec Ogotemmeli. Paris: Editions du Chene.
   Google Scholar
• Grindal, B.T. and Salamone, F.A., 1995. Bridges to humanity: narratives on anthropology and friendship. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gullestad, M., 1996. Everyday philosophers: modernity, morality and autobiography in Norway. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., 2014. Authorship, research assistants and the ethnographic field. Ethnography, 15 (3), 394–400. doi:10.1177/1466138114533460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. and Richards, P., 2017. Sexual harassment and the construction of ethnographic knowledge. Sociological Forum, 32 (3), 587–609. doi:10.1111/socf.2017.32.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, M.G., 2003. Where are you really from?’: representation, identity and power in the fieldwork experiences of a South Asian diasporic. Qualitative Research, 3 (2), 229–242. doi:10.1177/14687941030032005
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, S., 2001. From spy to okay guy: trust and validity in fieldwork with the police. Geographical Review, 91 (1–2), 304–310. doi:10.2307/3250831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoel, N., 2013. Embodying the field: a researcher’s reflections on power dynamics, positionality and the nature of research relationships. Fieldwork in Religion, 8 (1), 27–49. doi:10.1558/firn.v8i1.1182
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, D. and Tarawalley, M., 2014. Frontline collaborations: the research relationship in unstable places. Ethnography, 15 (3), 291–310. doi:10.1177/1466138114533463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, K., 2014. Caught between apprehension and comprehension: dilemmas of immersion in a conflict setting. DIIS Working Paper Copenhagen, DIIS, 2014:09.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover Green, A. and Cohen, D.K., 2019. Qualities of quantities: ethical quandaries in quantitative conflict research. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M., 2004. Sierra Leone. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, S.A., 2015. Assistants, guides, collaborators, friends: the concealed figures of conflict research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 47 (2), 143–170. doi:10.1177/0891241615619993
   Google Scholar
• Käihkö, I., 2018. Conflict chatnography: instant messaging apps, social media and conflict ethnography in Ukraine. Ethnography, 1466138118781640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostic, R., 2017. Shadow peacebuilders and diplomatic counterinsurgencies: informal networks, knowledge production and the art of policy-shaping. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 11 (1), 120–139. doi:10.1080/17502977.2016.1272905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovats-Bernat, J.C., 2002. Negotiating dangerous fields: pragmatic strategies for fieldwork amid violence and terror. American Anthropologist, 104 (1), 208–222. doi:10.1525/aa.2002.104.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., 2016. Blowin’ up: rap dreams in South Central. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, R.M., 1995. Dangerous fieldwork. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Luning, S., 2013. Anthropologists in the company of gatekeepers. Leiden Anthropology Blog. Available from: http://www.leidenanthropologyblog.nl/articles/anthropologists-in-the-company-of-gatekeepers [Accessed 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Mandel, J.L., 2003. Negotiating expectations in the field: gatekeepers, research fatigue and cultural biases. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 24 (2), 198–210. doi:10.1111/sjtg.2003.24.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalf, P., 2002. They lie, we lie: getting on with anthropology. New York; London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, T. and Cons, J., 2014. Coming to terms: reinserting research assistants into ethnography’s past and present. Ethnography, 15 (3), 279–290. doi:10.1177/1466138114533466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton, T. and Pradhan, E., 2014. Dynamic duos: On partnership and the possibilities of postcolonial ethnography. Ethnography, 15 (3), 355–374. doi:10.1177/1466138114533451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molony, T. and Hammett, D., 2007. The friendly financier: talking money with the silenced assistant. Human Organization, 66 (3), 292–300. doi:10.17730/humo.66.3.74n7x53x7r40332h
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mügge, L.M., 2013. Sexually harassed by gatekeepers: reflections on fieldwork in Surinam and Turkey. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16 (6), 541–546. doi:10.1080/13645579.2013.823279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mwambari, D. and Owor, A., 2019. The black market of knowledge production” in governnance in conflict network. Available from https://www.gicnetwork.be/the-black-market-of-knowledge-production/ [Accessed 2 April 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Nordstrom, C., 1997. A different kind of war story. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nordstrom, C. and Martin., J., 1992. The paths to domination, resistance, and terror. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nordstrom, C. and Robben, A.C.G.M., 1995. Fieldwork under fire: contemporary studies of violence and survival. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, J., 2009. Got trust? The challenge of gaining access in conflict zones. In: J.C.K. Chandra Lekha Sriram, et al., eds. Surviving field research: working in violent and difficult situations. London: Routledge, 71–90.
   Google Scholar
• Olivier de Sardan, J.-P., 1995. La politique du terrain: sur la production des données en anthropologie. Archives de la revue Enquête, 1, 71–109. doi:10.4000/enquete.263
   Google Scholar
• Paluck, E.L., 2009. Methods and ethics with research teams and NGOs: comparing experiences across the border of rwanda and democratic republic of Congo. In: J.C.K. Chandra Lekha Sriram, et al., eds. Surviving field research: working in violent and difficult situations (pp. 28–56). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parashar, S., 2014. Women and militant wars: the politics of injury. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peter, M. and Strazzari, F., 2017. Securitisation of research: fieldwork under new restrictions in Darfur and Mali. Third World Quarterly, 38 (7), 1531–1550. doi:10.1080/01436597.2016.1256766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powdermaker, H., 1966. Stranger and friend; the way of an anthropologist. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P., 1977. Reflections on fieldwork in Morocco. Barkeley: University California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, P., ed., 2005. No peace, no war: an anthropology of contemporary armed conflicts. Oxford: James Currey.
   Google Scholar
• Salamone, F.A., 1977. The methodological significance of the lying informant. Anthropological Quarterly, 50 (3), 117–124. doi:10.2307/3317591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saliba, I., et al., forthcoming. Safer research in the social sciences: a systematic handbook for human and digital society. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sangarasivam, Y., 2001. Researcher, informant, “Assassin,” me. Geographical Review, 91 (1/2), 95–104. doi:10.2307/3250809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanjek, R., 1993. Anthropology’s hidden colonialism: assistants and their ethnographers. Anthropology Today, 9 (2), 13–18. doi:10.2307/2783170
   Google Scholar
• Schumaker, L., 2001. Africanizing anthropology: fieldwork, networks, and the making of cultural knowledge in Central Africa. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, G. and Kremer, E., 2006. The safety dance: confronting harassment, intimidation, and violence in the field. Sociological Methodology, 36 (1), 317–327. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9531.2006.00183.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sluka, J., 1990. Participant observation in violent social contexts. Human Organization, 49 (2), 114–126. doi:10.17730/humo.49.2.h033174683462676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sluka, J., 1995. Reflections on managing danger in fieldwork: dangerous anthropology in Belfast. In: C. Nordstrom and A.C.G.M. Robben, eds. Fieldwork under fire: contemporary studies of violence and survival. Berkeley: University of California Press, 276–294.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G.C., Nelson, C. and Grossberg, L., 1988. Can the subaltern speak? Marxism and the interpretation of cultures. Urbana: University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G.C., 2004. Righting wrongs. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 103 (2), 523–581. doi:10.1215/00382876-103-2-3-523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ströksnes, M.A., 2010. Et mord i Kongo. Trondheim: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Sukarieh, M. and Tannock, S., 2019. Subcontracting academia: alienation, exploitation and disillusionment in the UK overseas Syrian refugee research industry. Antipode, 51 (2), 664–680. doi:10.1111/anti.2019.51.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, S., 2010. Research note: the silenced assistant. Reflections of invisible interpreters and research assistants. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 51 (2), 206–219. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, S., 2013. The silenced research assistant speaks her mind. In: S. Turner, ed. Red stamps and gold stars: fieldwork dilemmas in upland socialist Asia (pp. 220–238). Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, V.W., 1967. The forest of symbols: aspects of Ndembu ritual. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Utas, M., 2012. Introduction: Bigmanity and network governance in African conflicts. In: M. Utas, ed. African conflicts and informal power: big men and networks. London: Zed books, 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, S.A., 2008. Gang leader for a day: a rogue sociologist takes to the streets. New York: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vlassenroot, K., 2006. War and social research: the limits of empirical methodologies in war-torn environments. Civilisations, 54 (2006), 191–198. doi:10.4000/civilisations.442
   Google Scholar
• Waterston, A., 2009. An anthropology of war: views from frontline. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar