On Brokers, Biases and Leaving the Veranda: Working with Research Brokers in Political Science Based Field Research

References

• Barley, N., 1983. The innocent anthropologist: notes from a Mud Hut. Long Grove: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bayart, J.-F., 2009. The State in Africa: the Politics of the Belly. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bliesemann de Guevara, B. and Kostić, R., 2017. Knowledge production in/about conflict and intervention: finding ‘Facts’, telling ‘Truth’. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 11 (1), 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2017.1287635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S., Everett, M., and Johnson, J., 2018. Analyzing social networks. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin-Furman, K. and Lake, M., 2018. Ethics abroad: fieldwork in fragile and violent contexts. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51 (3), 607–614. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096518000379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, C.A., 2002. Reflexive ethnography: a guide to researching selves and others. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson Baaz, M., 2019. Who’s at risk? Reflections on in/security when working with/through military brokers in conflict settings. Civil Wars, 21 (2), 286–295. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2019.1631428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson Baaz, M. and Utas, M., 2019. Exploring the backstage: methodological and ethical issues surrounding the role of research brokers in insecure zones. Civil Wars, 21 (2), 157–178. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2019.1656357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannerz, U., 1980. Exploring the city: inquiries toward an urban anthropology. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Head, E., 2009. The ethics and implications of paying participants in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12 (4), 335–344. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570802246724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, K., 2014. Caught between apprehension and comprehension: dilemmas of immersion in a conflict setting. DIIS Working Paper, 9: 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, S.A., 2018. Assistants, guides, collaborators, friends: the concealed figures of conflict research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 47 (2), 143–170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241615619993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, K.M., 2020. Sex workers and sugar babies: empathetic engagement with vulnerable sources. In: B.B. De Guevara and M. Bøås, eds. Doing fieldwork in areas of international intervention: a guide to research in violent and closed contexts. Bristol: Bristol University Press, 215–227.
   Google Scholar
• Jezewski, M.A. and Sotnik, P., 2001. Culture brokering: providing culturally competent rehabilitation services to foreign-born persons. Buffalo: Center for International Rehabilitation Research Information and Exchange.
   Google Scholar
• King, Gary, Robert Keohane and Sidney Verba, 1994. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knott, E., 2019. Beyond the field ethics after fieldwork in politically dynamic contexts. Perspectives on Politics, 17 (1), 140–153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592718002116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovats-Bernat, C., 2002. Negotiating dangerous fields: pragmatic strategies for fieldwork amid violence and terror. American Anthropologist, 104 (1), 208–222. doi:https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2002.104.1.208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., 1996. Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, London & New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Malejacq, R. and Mukhopadhyay, D., 2016. The ‘Tribal Politics’ of field research: a reflection on power and partiality in 21st-century warzones. American Political Science Association, 14 (4), 1011–1028.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, T. and Cons, J., 2014. Coming to terms: reinserting research assistants into ethnography’s past and present. Ethnography, 15 (3), 279–290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138114533466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molony, T. and Hammett, D., 2007. The friendly financier: talking money with the silenced assistant. Human Organization, 66 (3), 292–300. doi:https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.66.3.74n7x53x7r40332h.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myrttinen, H. and Mastonshoeva, S., 2019. From remote control to collaboration: conducting NGO research at a distance in Tajikistan. Civil Wars, 21 (2), 228–248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2019.1630594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, J., 2009. Got trust? The challenge of gaining access in conflict zones. In: C.L. Sriram, et al., eds. Surviving field research: working in violent and difficult situations. London: Routledge, 71–90.
   Google Scholar
• Parashar, S., 2019. Research brokers, researcher identities and affective performances: the insider/outsider conundrum. Civil Wars, 21 (2), 249–270. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2019.1634304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puljek-Shank, R. and Verkoren, W., 2017. Civil society in a divided society. Cooperation and Conflict, 52 (2), 184–202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836716673088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robben, A., 1995. The politics of truth and emotion among victims and perpetrators of violence. In: C. Nordstrom and A. Robben, eds. Fieldwork under fire: contemporary studies of violence and survival. Berkley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press, 81–103.
   Google Scholar
• Schlitz, J. and Büscher, K., 2018. Brokering research with war-affected people: the tense relationship between opportunities and ethics. Ethnography, 19 (1), 124–146. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138116664542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theidon, K., 2009. Reconstructing masculinities: the disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration of former combatants in Columbia. Human Rights Quarterly, 31 (1), 1–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.0.0053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Themnér, A., 2012. Former mid-level commanders in big man networks. In: M. Utas, ed. African conflicts and informal power: big men and networks. London: Zed Publishing, 205–223.
   Google Scholar
• Themnér, A. and Karlén, N., 2020. Building a safety net: explaining the strength of Ex-Military networks. Security Studies, 29 (2), 268–300. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2020.1722851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, S., 2010. The silenced assistant: reflections of invisible interpreters and research assistants. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 51 (2), 206–219. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8373.2010.01425.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utas, M., 2019. Research brokers we use and abuse while researching civil wars and their aftermaths: methodological concerns. Civil Wars, 21 (2), 271–285. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2019.1654325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utas, M. and Christensen, M.M., 2016. The gift of violence: ex-Militias and ambiguous debt relations during post-war elections in Sierra Leone. African Conflict and Peacebuilding Review, 6 (2), 23–47l. doi:https://doi.org/10.2979/africonfpeacrevi.6.2.02.
   Google Scholar
• Vlassenroot, K., 2006. War and social research: the limits of empirical methodologies in war-torn environments. Civilisations, 54 (1/2), 191–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.4000/civilisations.442.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, E.J., 2006. The ethical challenges of field research in conflict zones. Qualitative Sociology, 29 (3), 373–386. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-006-9027-8.
   Google Scholar