Separating arguments from conclusions: the mistaken role of effect size in educational policy research

References

• Baguley, T. (2009). Standardized or simple effect size: What should be reported? British Journal of Psychology, 100(3), 603–617. doi: 10.1348/000712608X377117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergeron, P. (2017). How to engage in pseudoscience with real data: A criticism of John Hattie’s argument in Visible Learning from the perspective of a statistician. McGill Journal of Education, 52(1), 237–246. Retrieved from http://mje.mcgill.ca/article/view/9475/7229 doi: 10.7202/1040816ar
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berk, R. (2007). Statistical inference and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3(3), 247–270. doi: 10.1007/s11292-007-9036-y
   Google Scholar
• Berk, R. (2011). Evidence-based versus junk-based evaluation research: Some lessons from 35 years of the evaluation review. Evaluation Review, 35(3), 191–203. doi: 10.1177/0193841X11419281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2016). How methodological features affect effect sizes in education. Educational Researcher, 45(5), 283–292. doi: 10.3102/0013189X16656615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2016). Educational excellence everywhere. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Eacott, S. (2017). School leadership and the cult of the guru: The neo-Taylorism of Hattie. School Leadership & Management, 37(4), 413–426. doi: 10.1080/13632434.2017.1327428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Education Endowment Foundation. (2016). The EEF at five. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. (2012, September 14). He’s not the messiah. Times Educational Supplement. Retrieved from https://www.tes.com/news/hes-not-messiah
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J. (1984). Meta-analysis: An abuse of research integration. The Journal of Special Education, 18(1), 41–59. doi: 10.1177/002246698401800106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, D. A. (2009). Statistical models: Theory and practice (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gorard, S., Siddiqui, N., & See, B. H. (2017). What works and what fails? Evidence from seven popular literacy “catch-up” schemes for the transition to secondary school in England. Research Papers in Education, 32(5), 626–648. doi: 10.1080/02671522.2016.1225811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2017). Educators are not uncritical believers of a cult figure. School Leadership & Management, 37(4), 427–430. doi: 10.1080/13632434.2017.1343655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, S., & Katsipataki, M. (2016). Communicating comparative findings from meta-analysis in educational research: Some examples and suggestions. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 39(3), 237–254. doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2016.1166486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, S., & Simpson, A. (2011). [Review of the book Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement, by J. A. C. Hattie]. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(2), 197–201. doi: 10.1080/00071005.2011.584660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J. (1998). A theory-based meta-analysis of research on instruction. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Merrell, C., & Kasim, A. (2015). Butterfly phonics: Evaluation report and executive summary. London: Education Endowment Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 565–600. doi: 10.1037/bul0000098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibieta, L. (2016). REACH: Evaluation report and executive summary. London: Education Endowment Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Sibieta, L., Kotecha, M., & Skipp, A. (2016). Nuffield Early Language Intervention: Evaluation report and executive summary. London: Education Endowment Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, A. (2017). The misdirection of public policy: Comparing and combining standardised effect sizes. Journal of Education Policy, 32(4), 450–466. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2017.1280183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar