Students’ perceptions on different sources of self-feedback

References

• Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. (2017). Researching feedback dialogue: An interactional analysis approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(2), 252–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1102863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. (2018). Feedback in the context of self-assessment. In A. A. Lipnevich & J. K. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of instructional feedback (pp. 376–408). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baneres, D., Rodríguez, M. E., Guerrero-Roldán, A. E., & Karadeniz, A. (2020). An early warning system to detect at-risk students in online higher education. Applied Sciences, 10(13), 4427. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10134427
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & William, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, M. H., Jager, J., & Putnick, D. L. (28 April 2017). Sampling in developmental science: Situations, shortcomings, solutions, and standards. Developmental Review, 33(4), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Brusilovsky, P., & Peylo, C. (2003). Adaptive and intelligent Web-based educational systems’. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13(2-4), 159–171.
   Google Scholar
• Butle, D. L., & Winnie, P. H. (1995). Feedback e apprendimento autoregolato: una sintesi teorica. Revisione della ricerca educativa, 6(3), 245-281. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170684
   Google Scholar
• Cortina, J. M. (1993). What Is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, T., Luxton-Reilly, A., & Wuensche, B. (2018). Intelligent tutoring systems for programming education: A systematic review. ACE ‘18: Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Computing Education Conference, January 30-February 2, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/3160489.3160492
   Google Scholar
• Crudele, F., & Raffaghelli, J. E. (2023). Argument maps as comparator for internal feedback: A Lab for undergraduate students. Education Sciences & Society - Open Access, 14(1), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.3280/ess1-2023oa15297
   Google Scholar
• Deeva, G., Bogdanova, D., Serral, E., Snoeck, M., & De Weerdt, J. (2021). A review of automated feedback systems for learners: Classification framework, challenges and opportunities. Computers & Education, 162, 104094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doody, O., & Bailey, M. E. (2016). Setting a research question, aim and objective. Nurse Researcher, 23(4).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doria, B. (2023). “OK I can do it!”: Emotions felt by university students with regard to different types of feedback. Pedagogia Oggi, 21(1), 244–250.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312474350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, C., & Waring, M. (2011). Student teacher assessment feedback preferences: The influence of cognitive styles and gender. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(3), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, A., & Santoso, A. (2008). Do students’ perceptions matter? A study of the effect of students’ perceptions on academic performance. Accounting and Finance, 48(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629x.2007.00239.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handley, K., Price, M., & Millar, J. (2011). Beyond “doing time”: Investigating the concept of student engagement with feedback. Oxford Review of Education, 37(4), 543–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2011.604951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. S. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y. (2016). Understanding China’s belt & road initiative: Motivation, framework and assessment. China Economic Review, 40, 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2016.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivancevich, J. M., & McMahon, M. T. (1982). The effects of goal settings, external feedback and self-generated feedback on outcome variables: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 25(2), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.5465/255997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson, A., & Panadero, E. (2018). Facilitating students’ active engagement with feedback. In A. Lipnevich & J. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of instructional feedback (Cambridge handbooks in psychology) (pp. 531–553). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316832134.026.
   Google Scholar
• Kangaslampi, R., Asikainen, H., & Virtanen, V. (2022). Students’ perceptions of self-assessment and their approaches to learning in university mathematics. LUMAT, 10(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.10.1.1604
   Google Scholar
• Ke, Z., & Ng, V. (2019). Automated essay scoring: A survey of the state of the Art. Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 10-16 August, 6300–6308. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2019/879. ISBN 978-0-9992411-4-1
   Google Scholar
• Keuning, H., Jeuring, J., & Heeren, B. (2018). A systematic literature review of automated feedback generation for programming exercises. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 19(1), 1–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koulouri, T., Lauria, S., & Macredie, R. D. (2017). The influence of visual feedback and gender dynamics on performance, perception and communication strategies in CSCW. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 97, 162–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., & Grion, V. (2019). The power of giving and receiving in peer assessment. AISHE Journal, 11(11), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., Liu, X., & Steckelberg, A. L. (2010). Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00968.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., Liu, X. Y., & Zhou, Y. C. (2012). Give and take: A Re-analysis of assessor and assessee’s roles in technology facilitated peer assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01180.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipnevich, A. A., Berg, D. A. G., & Smith, J. K. (2016). Toward a model of student response to feedback. In G. T. L. Brown & L. R. Harris (Eds.), The handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 169–185). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lipnevich, A. A., & Panadero, E. (2021, December). A review of feedback models and theories: Descriptions, definitions, and conclusions. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6, p. 720195). Frontiers.
   Google Scholar
• Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2009). Effects of differential feedback on students’ examination performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15(4), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín, E. G., Giordano, R., Pagano, A., Van Der Keur, P., & Costa, M. M. (2020). Using a system thinking approach to assess the contribution of nature based solutions to sustainable development goals. Science of the Total Environment, 738, 139693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molenaar, I. (2022). The concept of hybrid human-AI regulation: Exemplifying how to support young learners’ self-regulated learning. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3(April), 100070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100070
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, J., Sánchez-Hernández, G., Armisen, A., Agell, N., Rovira, X., & Angulo, C. (2018). A linguistic multi-criteria decision-aiding system to support university career services. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 67, 933–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.06.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003786559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. (2018). Unlocking generative feedback via peer reviewing. In V. Grion & A. Serbati (Eds.), Assessment of learning or assessment for learning? Towards a culture of sustainable assessment in HE (pp. 73–85). Pensa MultiMedia.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. (2020). The power of internal feedback: Exploiting natural comparator processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(5), 756–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1823314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. (2021). Guiding learning by activating students’ inner feedback. Times Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (2005). Biology students’ utilisation of tutors’ formative feedback: A qualitative interview study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500099177
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E. (2016). Is it safe? Social, interpersonal, and human effects of peer assessment: A review and future directions. Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment, 247–266.
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. (2018). Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment: A roadmap of where we are, how we got here, and where we are going. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45, 13–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Lipnevich, A., & Broadbent, J. (2019). Turning self-assessment into self-feedback. In D. Boud, M. D. Henderson, R. Ajjawi, & E. Molloy (Eds.), The impact of feedback in higher education: Improving assessment outcomes for learners (pp. 147–163). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2022). A review of feedback models and typologies: Towards an integrative model of feedback elements. Educational Research Review, 35, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedró, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. Working Papers on Education Policy. ED-2019/WS/8, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000366994.locale=en
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, D., Niklasson, L., & Assunção Flores, M. (2017). Students’ perceptions of assessment: A comparative analysis between Portugal and Sweden. Higher Education, 73(1), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0005-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pompili, G. (2010). Quality in search of meanings: The case of Italian universities. Quality in Higher Education, 16(3), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2010.506705
   Google Scholar
• Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raffaghelli, J. E., Doria, B., Grion, V., & Serbati, A. (2022). Students' perceptions on different sources of self-feedback [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7118728
   Google Scholar
• Raffaghelli, J. E., Rodríguez, M. E., Guerrero-Roldán, A. E., & Baneres, D. (2022). Applying the UTAUT model to explain the students’ acceptance of an early warning system in Higher Education. Computers & Education, 182, 104468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rienties, B., Herodotou, C., Olney, T., Schencks, M., & Boroowa, A. (2018). Making sense of learning analytics dashboards: A technology acceptance perspective of 95 teachers. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 19(5), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i5.3493
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, M. E., Guerrero-Roldán, A. E., Baneres, D., & Karadeniz, A. (2022). An intelligent nudging system to guide online learners. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 23(1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i4.5407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, T., Gašević, D., & Henderson, M. (2019). Identifying the impact of feedback over time and at scale: Opportunities for learning analytics. In A. Lipnevich & J. K. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of instructional feedback (pp. 207–223). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316832134.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, T., & Henderson, M. (2018). Feeling feedback: Students’ emotional responses to educator feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(6), 880–892. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1416456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambell, K., Sambell, A., Sexton, G., Brown, S., Bull, J., & Race, P. (2013). Student perceptions of the learning benefits of computer-assisted assessment: a case study in electronic engineering. Computer-Assisted Assessment of Students, 179–191.
   Google Scholar
• Santamaría Lancho, M., Hernández, M., Sánchez-Elvira Paniagua, Á., Luzón Encabo, J. M., & de Jorge-Botana, G. (2018). Using semantic technologies for formative assessment and scoring in large courses and MOOCs. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2018(1).
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, R., & Teo, T. (2019). Editorial to the special section—technology acceptance models: What we know and what we (still) do not know. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2387–2393. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serbati, A., Grion, V., Li, L., & Doria, B. (2022). Online assessment: Exemplars as the best sources for comparison processes?. In Learning with Technologies and Technologies in Learning: Experience, Trends and Challenges in Higher Education (pp. 419–434). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, G. M., & Artino, A. R. (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(4), 541–542. https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-5-4-18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swiecki, Z., Khosravi, H., Chen, G., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Lodge, J. M., Milligan, S., Selwyn, N., & Gašević, D. (2022). Assessment in the age of artificial intelligence. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100075
   Google Scholar
• Tomczak, M., & Tomczak, E. (2014). The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. Trends Sport Sci, 1, 19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Valle, N., Antonenko, P., Dawson, K., & Huggins-Manley, A. C. (2021). A systematic literature review on learner-facing learning analytics dashboards. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1724–1748. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Kleij, F. M., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2021). Studenti perceptions of assessment feedback: A critical scoping review and call for research. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 33(2), 345–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-02009331-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y., Gomez, S. C., & Van Den Brande, G. (2016). DigComp 2.0: The digital competence framework for citizens. Update phase 1: The conceptual reference model (No. JRC101254). Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
   Google Scholar
• Warne, R. T. (2014). A primer on multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) for behavioral scientists. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 19(17), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.7275/sm63-7h70
   Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, Y., Lee, H., Jo, I. H., & Park, Y. (2015). Educational dashboards for smart learning: Review of case studies. In G. Chen, V. Kumar, Kinshuk, R. Huang, & S. Kong (Eds.), Emerging issues in smart learning. Lecture notes in educational technology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44188-6_21
   Google Scholar
• Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar