Teachers’ descriptions of classroom communication after an SLP-led in-service training

References

• Hattie J. Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 Meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kogut G, Silver R. Teacher talk, pedagogical talk and classroom activities. Paper presented at 3rd Redesigning Pedagogy International Conference; 2009. June 1–3; Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hair MJ, Wright R. Application of communication strategies in alleviating teacher stress. In: O’Hair D, Kreps GL, editors. Applied communication theory and research [internet]. New York: Routledge; 1990. p. 141–162. Available from: https://books.google.se/books?id=TWsAAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT96&dq=Application+of+Communication+Strategies+in+Alleviating+Teacher+Stress&hl=sv&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjXjuaI0MfsAhVshosKHVk_CP4Q6AEwAHoECAYQAg#v=onepage&q=Application%20of%20C
   Google Scholar
• Yusof FM, Halim H. Understanding teacher communication skills. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2014;155:471–476.
   Google Scholar
• Haake M, Hansson K, Gulz A, et al. The slower the better? Does the speaker’s speech rate influence children’s performance on a language comprehension test? Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;16(2):181–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyberg Åhlander V, Haake M, Brännstrom J, et al. Does the speaker’s voice quality influence children’s performance on a language comprehension test? Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;17(1):63–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlén B, Haake M, von Lochow H, et al. Is children’s listening effort in background noise influenced by the speaker’s voice quality? Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2018;43(2):47–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Lochow H, Lyberg Åhlander V, Sahlén B, et al. The effect of voice quality and competing speakers in a passage comprehension task: perceived effort in relation to cognitive functioning and performance in children with normal hearing. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2018;43(1):32–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evitts PM, Starmer H, Teets K, et al. The impact of dysphonic voices on healthy listeners: Listener reaction times, speech intelligibility, and listener comprehension. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016;25(4):561–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leite LO, Go W, Havu-Nuutinen S. Exploring the learning process of experienced teachers focused on building positive interactions with pupils. Scand J Educ Res. 2022;66(1):28–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karjalainen S, Sahlén B, Falck A, et al. Implementation and evaluation of a teacher intervention program on classroom communication. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2019;22:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Dockrell JE, Bakopoulou I, Law J, et al. Capturing communication supporting classrooms: the development of a tool and feasibility study. Child Lang Teach Ther. 2015;31(3):271–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law J, Tulip J, Stringer H, et al. Teachers observing classroom communication: an application of the communicating supporting classroom observation tool for children aged 4–7 years. Child Lang Teach Ther. 2019;35(3):203–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starling J, Munro N, Togher L, et al. Training secondary school teachers in instructional language modification techniques to support adolescents with language impairment: a randomized controlled trial. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2012;43(4):474–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson A, Halvarsson C. Struktur, relation och kommunikation. Om lärares ledarskap i klassrummet. [Structure, relationship and communication. On classroom management]. University West; 2019. Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Feiman-Nemser S. From preparation to practice: designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record. 2001;103(6):1013–1055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheetham G, Chivers G. How professionals learn in practice: an investigation of informal learning amongst people working in professions. J Eur Ind Train. 2001;25(5):247–292.
   Google Scholar
• Zlatić L, Bjekić D, Marinković S, et al. Development of teacher communication competence. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2014;116:606–610.
   Google Scholar
• Dockrell JE, Bakopoulou I, Law J, et al. Developing a communication supporting classrooms observation tool. London: Department for Education; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Castleberry A, Nolen A. Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: is it as easy as it sounds? Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018;10(6):807–815. Jun
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman A. Samhällsvetenskapliga metoder [Social research methods]. Upplaga 3 ed. Nilsson B, translator; Stockholm: Liber; 2018. Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Halkier B. Fokusgrupper [Focus groups]. Malmö: Liber; 2010. Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• SiRiS [Internet]. Stockholm: The Swedish National Agency for Education; [cited 2021 Feb 6]. Available from: https://www.skolverket.se/skolutveckling/statistik.
   Google Scholar
• Brunskog J, Lyberg Åhlander V, Löfqvist A, et al. Final report of the project Speakers Comfort and Voice Disorders in Classrooms. Sound Environment Center at Lund University; 2011. Available from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat07147a&AN=lub.2152155&site=eds-live&scope=site.
   Google Scholar
• Jedeskog G. Klassrummets scenografi [Classroom scenography]. In: Granström K, editor. Forskning om lärares arbete i klassrummet [Research on teacher’s work in the classroom]. Stockholm: Myndigheten för skolutveckling; 2007. Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Borg S. The impact of in-service teacher education on language teachers’ beliefs. System. 2011;39(3):370–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade RK. What makes a difference in inservice teacher education? A meta-analysis of research. Educ Leadersh. 1985;42:4854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girardet C. Why do some teachers change and others don’t? A review of studies about factors influencing in-service and pre-service teachers’ change in classroom management. Rev Educ. 2018;6(1):3–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sala E, Hellgren U–M, Ketola R, et al. Röstergonomisk bedömning av arbetsmiljön. Handbok i röstergonomisk utredning. [Voice ergonomic assessment in work environment – handbook and checklist]. Sjöholm M, Sjöholm B, translators; Metanen V, editor. Helsinki: The Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; 2012. Swedish and Finnish.
   Google Scholar