The role of teacher educators and university supervisors to help student teachers reflect: from monological reflection toward dialogical conversation

References

• Anderson, H. (1997). Conversation, language and possibilities. A postmodern approach to therapy. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, H., & Burney, J. P. (1997). Collaborative inquiry: A postmodern approach to organizational consultation. Human Systems: the Journal of Systemic Consultation and Management, 7(2–3), 177–188.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, H., & Gehart, D. (Eds.). (2007). Collaborative therapy: Relationships and conversations that make a difference. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. (2017). Standards for preparing teachers of mathematics. Retrieved from https://amte.net/sptm
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (M. Holquist, ed. and C. Emerson & M. Holquist, trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, C. (2015). Reflection in teacher education: Issues emerging from a review of current literature. Reflective Practice, 16(1), 123–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 8–21. doi:10.1177/003172170408600105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1994, Winter). Telling teaching stories. Teacher Education Quarterly, 21, 145–158.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Teacher learning that supports student learning. Educational Leadership, 55(5), 6–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2012). Soaring systems. Education Review, 24(1), 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. (1994). The art and politics of interpretation. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 500–515). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation to the educative process. Boston: Heath.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, J. L. (1998). Teaching from understanding: Teacher as interpretive inquirer. New York, NY: Garland Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fosnot, C. T., & Dolk, M. (2002). Young mathematicians at work: Constructing fractions, decimals, and percents. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Galea, S. (2012). Reflecting reflective practice. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44, 234–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gearhart, M., & Saxe, G. B. (2004). When teachers know what students know: Integrating mathematics assessment. Theory into Practice, 43(4), 304–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaye, T. (2007). Is reflective practice ethical? The case of the reflective portfolio. Reflective Practice International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 8, 151–162.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (2005). Reform of the social sciences and of universities through action research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 43–64). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, V. (2007). Faking it hating it: Can reflective practice be forced? Reflective Practice International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 8, 405–417.
   Google Scholar
• Holquist, M. (2002). Dialogism: Bakhtin and his world. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lui, K. (2017). Creating a dialogic space for prospective teacher critical reflection and transformative learning. Reflective Practice, 18(6), 805–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDuffie, A. R. (2004). Mathematics teaching as a deliberate practice: An investigation of elementary pre-service teachers’ reflective thinking during student teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(1), 33–61.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, A. K. (2006). Assessing pre-service teachers’ skills for analyzing teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 471–505.
   Google Scholar
• Nagle, J. F. (2009). Becoming a reflective practitioner in the age of accountability. The Educational Forum, 73, 76–86.
   Google Scholar
• Noftke, S., & Brennan, M. (2005). The dimensions of reflection: A conceptual and contextual analysis. International Journal of Progressive Education, 1, 58–78.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, M., & Stephenson, M. (2005). Developing reflective practice in student teachers: Collaboration and critical partnerships. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(1), 95–116.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2010). Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: Myths and strategies. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47, 1451–1458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posamentier, A. S., Jaye, D., & Krulik, S. (2007). Exemplary practices for secondary math teachers. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, S. J. (2010). Making thinking public: Reflection in elementary teacher education. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 11, 205–216.
   Google Scholar
• Romagnano, L. (2006). Mathematics assessment literacy: Concepts and terms in large-scale assessment. Reston, VA: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, T. (2013). Has reflective practice done more harm than good in teacher education? Phronesis, 12(3), 80–88.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2009). Educational change in Finland. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (pp. 323–348). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1991). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1992). The theory of inquiry: Dewey’s legacy to education. Curriculum Inquiry, 22(2), 119–139. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1180029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuck, S., & Russell, T. (2005). Self-study, critical friendship, and the complexities of teacher education. Studying Teacher Education, 1(2), 107–121.
   Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulzer, M. A., & Dunn, M. B. (2019). Disrupting the neoliberal discourse of teacher reflection through dialogical-phenomenological texts. Reflective Practice, 20, 604–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Manen, M. (1990). Researching our lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westheimer, J. (2015). What kind of citizen? Educating our children for the common good. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2007). Keeping learning on track: Classroom assessment and the regulation of learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of teaching and learning mathematics (pp. 1053–1098). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D., & Leahy, S. (2015). Embedding formative assessment. West Palm Beach, FL: Learning Sciences International.
   Google Scholar