What design education tells us about design theory: a pedagogical genealogy

References

• Aicher, O. 2015. The World as Design. 2nd ed. Berlin: Ernst & Sohn.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, C. 1964. Notes on the Synthesis of Form ( Underlining edition). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, C., S. Ishikawa, and M. Silverstein. 1977. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, C., H. J. Neis, and M. M. Alexander. 2012. The Battle for the Life and Beauty of the Earth: A Struggle Between Two World-Systems. 1st ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J. S. 2002. The Romance of Commerce and Culture: Capitalism, Modernism, and the Chicago-Aspen Crusade for Cultural Reform. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, B. 1979. “Design as a Discipline.” Design Studies 1 (1): 17–20. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(79)90023-1.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, B. 1987. “Time for a Revolution in art and Design Education.” RCA Papers 6: 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, B., K. Baynes, and P. Roberts. 2005. A Framework for Design and Design Education. A Reader Containing Papers From 1970s and 80s. 1st ed. Warwickshire: The Design and Technology Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bardzell, J. 2009. “Interaction Criticism and Aesthetics.” Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2357–2366. doi: 10.1145/1518701.1519063
   Google Scholar
• Bardzell, S. 2010. “Feminist HCI: Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design.” Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1301–1310. doi: 10.1145/1753326.1753521
   Google Scholar
• Bardzell, J. 2011. “Interaction Criticism: An Introduction to the Practice.” Interacting with Computers 23 (6): 604–621. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2011.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardzell, J. 2019. “Design Researchers Need a Shared Program, Not a Divorce.” Interactions 26 (2): 22–23. doi:10.1145/3306464.
   Google Scholar
• Bardzell, J., S. Bardzell, and L. Koefoed Hansen. 2015. “Immodest Proposals: Research Through Design and Knowledge.” Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2093–2102. doi: 10.1145/2702123.2702400
   Google Scholar
• Binder, T., J. Löwgren, and L. Malmborg, eds. 2008. (Re)Searching the Digital Bauhaus. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Blevis, E. 2010. “Design Challenge Based Learning (DCBL) and Sustainable Pedagogical Practice.” Interactions 17 (3): 64–69. doi:10.1145/1744161.1744176.
   Google Scholar
• Blevis, E., I. K. Koskinen, K.-P. Lee, S. Bødker, L.-L. Chen, Y. Lim, H. Wei, and R. Wakkary. 2015. “Transdisciplinary Interaction Design in Design Education.” Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 833–838. doi:10.1145/2702613.2724726.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, P., and Art, C. U. for the A. of S. and. 1859. Charter, Trust Deed, and By-Laws of the Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art: With the Letter of Peter Cooper, Accompanying the Trust Deed. New York: Wm. C. Bryant & Company, printers.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, A. 1983. “The Educational Background to the Bauhaus.” Design Studies 4 (1): 43–52. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(83)90007-8.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. 2006. Designerly Ways of Knowing. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. 2011. Design Thinking: Understanding how Designers Think and Work. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Cunliffe-Charlesworth, H. 1991. “The Royal College of Art: Its influence on education, art and design 1900–1950.” PhD diss., Sheffield City Polytechnic.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. 2017. Teaching Design: A Guide to Curriculum and Pedagogy for College Design Faculty and Teachers Who Use Design in Their Classrooms. New York, NY: Allworth.
   Google Scholar
• Dearstyne, H. 1986. Inside the Bauhaus. London: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Fusco, R. 1985. Storia del Design / Renato De Fusco. Bari: Laterza.
   Google Scholar
• Donoso, S., P. Mirauda, and R. Jacob. 2018. “Some Ideological Considerations in the Bauhaus for the Development of Didactic Activities: The Influence of the Montessori Method, the Modernism and the Gothic.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 27: 167–176. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2018.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorst, K. 1997. Describing Design: A Comparison of Paradigms. Delft: Technische Universiteit Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K. 2015. Frame Innovation: Create new Thinking by Design. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Droste, M. 2006. Bauhaus ( Anniversary edition). Hong Kong: TASCHEN.
   Google Scholar
• Ehn, P. 1998. “Manifesto for a Digital Bauhaus.” Digital Creativity 9 (4): 207–217. doi:10.1080/14626269808567128.
   Google Scholar
• Ehn, P. 2017. Learning in Participatory Design as I Found It (1970–2015). doi:10.4324/9781315630830-3.
   Google Scholar
• Ehn, P., I. Farías, and T. S. Criado. 2018. “On the Possibility of Socialist-Democratic Design Things: Interview with Pelle Ehn. Interviewers: I. Farías & T. Sánchez Criado.” Diseña 12: 52–69. doi:10.7764/disena.12.52-69.
   Google Scholar
• Ehn, P., and L. Malmborg. 1998. “The Design Challenge.” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 10 (1), https://aisel.aisnet.org/sjis/vol10/iss1/6.
   Google Scholar
• Findeli, A. 1990. “Moholy-Nagy’s Design Pedagogy in Chicago (1937–46).” Design Issues 7 (1): 4–19. doi:10.2307/1511466.
   Google Scholar
• Findeli, A., and C. Benton. 1991. “Design Education and Industry: The Laborious Beginnings of the Institute of Design in Chicago in 1944.” Journal of Design History 4 (2): 97–113. doi: 10.1093/jdh/4.2.97
   Google Scholar
• Frayling, C. 1987. The Royal College of Art: One Hundred and Fifty Years of Art and Design. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Frayling, C. 1993. “Research in Art and Design.” Royal College of Arts Research Papers 1 (1): 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Gaver, W. 2012. “What Should We Expect from Research Through Design?” Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 937–946. doi:10.1145/2207676.2208538.
   Google Scholar
• Ghajargar, M., and J. Bardzell. 2019. “Synthesizing Opposites: Technical Rationality and Pragmatism in Design.” The Design Journal 22 (sup1): 2031–2044. doi:10.1080/14606925.2019.1594927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Interaction Design Institute Ivrea, The Masters Course. 2001. https://www.interaction-ivrea.com/association.asp.
   Google Scholar
• The Interaction Design IVREA Association. 2001. Accessed June 17, 2019, from Interaction-Ivrea website: https://www.interaction-ivrea.com/association.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, H. 1988. “HfG Ulm: A Personal View of an Experiment in Democracy and Design Education.” Journal of Design History 1 (3/4): 221–234. doi: 10.1093/jdh/1.3-4.221
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. C. 1992. Design Methods. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kolko, J. 2017. How I Teach: Reflecting on Fifteen Years in Design Education. Austin, TX: Brown Bear LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Lindinger, H., ed., Britt, D. (Trans.). 1991. Ulm Design: The Morality of Objects. 1st ed. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maldonado, T. 1974. Avanguardia e razionalità: Articoli, saggi, pamphlets, 1946–74 / Tomáa Maldonado. Torino: Einaudi.
   Google Scholar
• Moholy-Nagy, László. 1938. The New Vision: Fundamentals of Bauhaus Design, Painting, Sculpture, and Architecture. Translated by D. M. Hoffmann. Mineola: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Moholy-Nagy, Laszlo. 1947. Vision in Motion. 1st ed. Chicago, IL: Paul Theobald.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, H. G., and E. Stolterman. 2012. The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World. New York, NY: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• The New School for Social Research. 1920. The New School for Social Research Bulletin 1920–1921 (pp. 5–21). Retrieved from Digital Archive, The New School. (Box 16, Folder 3).
   Google Scholar
• Papanek, V. 2005. Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change. 2nd revised ed. Chicago: Academy Chicago Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, F. A. 1911. “Art in Advertising.” Art and Progress 2 (10): 291–294.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, F. A. 1913. Appreciation of Beauty Essential in Art. ProQuest Historical Newspapers: New York Tribune (1841–1922).
   Google Scholar
• The Parsons New School. 1970. New School Bulletin, Fall 1970, 1–332. New York: The New School.
   Google Scholar
• The Parsons New School. 1976. New School Bulletin, Spring 1977. Vol. 34, 1–198. New York: The New School.
   Google Scholar
• Redström, J. 2017. Making Design Theory. New York, NY: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. J., and M. M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4 (2): 155–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1996. The Sciences of the Artificial. Third. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. A. 1987. Human-machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walls, N. de A. 1994. “Educating Women for Art and Commerce: The Philadelphia School of Design, 1848–1932.” History of Education Quarterly 34 (3): 329–355. doi:10.2307/369956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walls, N. de A. 2001. Art, Industry, and Women’s Education in Philadelphia. Ann Arbor, MI: Bergin & Garvey.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, H., J. C. F. Ho, K. K. N. Chow, S. A. Blevis, and E. Blevis. 2019. “Should Do, Can Do, Can Know: Sustainability and Other Reflections on One Hundred and One Interaction Design Projects.” Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Computing Within Limits, 6:1–6:18. doi:10.1145/3338103.3338109.
   Google Scholar
• Wiberg, M. 2018. The Materiality of Interaction: Notes on the Materials of Interaction Design. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wingler, H. M. 1978. Bauhaus: Weimar, Dessau, Berlin, Chicago ( First Paperback Edition). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winograd, T. 1986. Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Norwood: Ablex Pub. Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Winograd, T., and F. Flores. 1987. Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design ( First Printing edition). Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional.
   Google Scholar