Acceptance of virtual worlds as learning space

References

• Agarwal, R. & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24, 665–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, M., Herold, D. K., Choo, T., & Chan, K. (2012). Extending the technology acceptance model to explore the intention to use second life for enhancing healthcare education. Computers & Education, 59, 1136–1144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courville, T. & Thompson, B. (2001). Use of structure coefficients in published multiple regression articles: Is no enough. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 229–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York, NY: Irvington.
   Google Scholar
• Dalgarno, B. & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 10–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use interface and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1111–1132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey, M. D. (2005). Three-dimensional virtual worlds and distance learning: Two case studies of active worlds as a medium for distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 439–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetscherin, M. & Lattemann, C. (2008). User acceptance of virtual worlds. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 9, 231–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, D. & Straub, D. W. (2000). The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hua, G., Haughton, D. M., & Sun, Y. (2009). Virtual worlds adoption: A research framework and empirical study. Online Information Review, 33, 889–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igbaria, M., Iivari, J., & Maragahh, H. (1995). Why do individuals use computer technology? A finnish case study. Information & Management, 29, 227–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, W. R. & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43, 740–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D., Chau, P. Y. K., & Lou, H. (2005). Understanding individual adoption of instant messaging: An empirical investigation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6, 102–129.
   Google Scholar
• Linden Research. (2013). Second life grid survey region database. Retrieved March 15, 2013, from http://www.gridsurvey.com/
   Google Scholar
• Moon, J. W. & Kim, Y. G. (2001). Extending the TAM for the World-Wide-Web context. Information and Management, 38, 217–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeed, N., Yang, Y., & Sinnappan, S. (2008). Media richness and user acceptance of second life. Proceedings of the Ascilite’s 25th Annual Conference (pp. 851–860) Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, J. H. (2007). Development, extension, and application: A review of the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Education Journal, 5, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, J. & Eder, L. B. (2009). Intentions to use virtual worlds for education. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20, 225–233.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, D. H. (2009). The evaluation of user experience of the virtual world in relation to extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 25, 530–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, H. & Zhang, P. (2006). Causal relationships between perceived enjoyment and perceived ease of use: An alternative approach. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7, 618–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, B. & Borrello, G. M. (1985). The importance of structure coefficients in regression research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 203–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Heijden, H. (2003). Factors influencing the usage of websites: The case of a generic portal in the Netherlands. Information & Management, 40, 541–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28, 695–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Raaij, E. M. & Schepers, J. J. L. (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers & Education, 50, 838–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11, 342–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39, 273–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 186–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Speier, C., & Morris, M. G. (2002). User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: Toward an integrated model. Decision Sciences, 33, 297–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warshaw, P. R. & Davis, F. D. (1985). Disentangling behavioral intention and behavioral expectation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 213–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, M. Y. & Hwang, Y. (2003). Predicting the use of web-based information systems: Self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 431–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar