References
- Bell, A., & Treleaven, L. (2011). Looking for Professor Right: Mentee selection of mentors in a formal mentoring program. Higher Education, 61, 545–561. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9348-010.1007/s10734-010-9348-0
- Boyce, T. E., & Hineline, P. N. (2002). Interteaching: A strategy for enhancing the user-friendliness of behavioral arrangements in the college classroom. The Behavior Analyst, 25, 215–226.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Catterall, J. (2008). Beyond the classroom: The effect of institutional factors on scholary teaching and learning innovations. Studies in Learning, Evaluation Innovation and Development, 5, 55–66.
- Chang, S. (2007, December). Academic perceptions of the use of Lectopia: A University of Melbourne example. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning (pp. 135–144). Singapore: Proceedings ASCILITE. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/chang.pdf
- Dempster, J. A., Benfield, G., & Francis, R. (2012). An academic development model for fostering innovation and sharing in curriculum design. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49, 135–147. doi:10.1080/147083297.2012.67759510.1080/14703297.2012.677595
- Gregory, S., Clarke, F., & Bridgestock, M. (2009, September). Motivated and engaged students via co-operative problem-based learning. Paper presented at UniServe Science Proceedings, Motivating science undergraduates: Ideas and interventions, Sydney. Abstract retrieved from http://sydney.edu.au/science/uniserve_science/images/content/2009_papers/ideas.pdf
- Griffin, M. M., & Griffin, B. W. (1998). An investigation of the effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on achievement, self-efficacy, and test anxiety. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 298–311.10.1006/ceps.1998.0971
- Hellsten, L., & Prytula, M. P. (2011). Why teaching? Motivation influencing beginning teachers’ choice of profession and teaching practice. Research in Higher Education Journal, 13, 1–19.
- Kienhuis, M., & Chester, A. (in press). Interteaching: A model to enhance student engagement. In M. Gosper & D. Ifenthaler (Eds.), Teaching models for the 21st Century. Using technologies in Higher Education. New York, NY: Springer.
- Kienhuis, M., Chester, A., & Wilson, P. (2010, June). An investigation of the effects of interteaching on student engagement, academic self-efficacy, and academic achievement. International Conference on Psychology Education (ICOPE), Sydney, Australia.
- McCann, A. L. (2008). The identification of factors influencing the diffusion of an assessment innovation on a university campus (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Proquest Dissertations and Theses database. ( UMI 3278011).
- McCormack, R., & Dixon, J. (2007, July). Rovers at the border: The double framing of student rovers in learning commons in Enhancing Higher Education, Theory and Scholarship. Proceedings of the 30th HERDSA Annual Conference, Adelaide.
- Moody, K. (2009). Teacher perceptions of moving toward technology innovation: Does an enhancing education through technology grant lead to innovation and change? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Proquest Dissertations and Theses database. ( UMI 3409043).
- Outhred, T., & Chester, A. (2010). The experience of class tutors in a peer tutoring programme: A novel theoretical framework. Australasian Journal of Peer Learning, 3, 12–23.
- Saville, B. K., Cox, T., O’Brien, S., & Vanderveldt, A. (2011). Interteaching: The impact of lectures on student performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 937–941.10.1901/jaba.2011.44-937
- Saville, B. K., Zinn, T. E., & Elliott, M. P. (2005). Interteaching vs. traditional methods of instruction: A preliminary analysis. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 161–163.10.1207/s15328023top3203_6
- Saville, B. K., Zinn, T. E., Neef, N. A., Van Norman, R., & Ferreri, S. J. (2006). A comparison of interteaching and lecture in the college classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 49–61.10.1901/jaba.2006.42-05