Opportunities to learn scientific thinking in joint doctoral supervision

References

• Berge, M. (2011). Group work and physics – Characteristics, learning possibilities and patterns of interaction (PhD). Chalmers tekniska högskola, Institutionen för tillämpad informationsteknologi, Göteborg.
   Google Scholar
• Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2004). Does practice make perfect? In H. P. A. Boshuizen, R. Bromme, & H. Gruber (Eds.), Professional learning: Gaps and transitions on the way from novice to expert (pp. 73−95). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20, 43–63.10.1111/jtsb.1990.20.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dysthe, O. (2002). The learning potential of a web-mediated discussion in a university course. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 339–352.10.1080/03075070220000716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dysthe, O., Samara, A., & Westrheim, K. (2006). Multivoiced supervision of Master’s students: A case study of alternative supervision practices in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 299–318.10.1080/03075070600680562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, B. (2009). Challenging perspectives, changing practices: Doctoral education in transition. In D. Boud & A. Lee (Eds.), Changing practices of doctoral education (pp. 239–248). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guerin, C., & Green, I. (2013). ‘‘They’re the bosses’: Feedback in team supervision. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 1–16.10.1080/0309877X.2013.831039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerin, C., Green, I., & Bastalich, W. (2011). Big love: Managing a team of research supervisors. In V. Kumar & A. Lee (Eds.), Doctoral education in international context, connecting local, regional and global perspectives (pp. 138–153). Malaysia: Universiti Putra Malaysia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Handal, G., & Lauvås, P. (2006). Forskningsveilederen [The research supervisor]. Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Harré, R., & Moghaddam, F. M. (Eds.). (2003). The self and others: Positioning individuals and groups in personal, political, and cultural contexts. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (Eds.). (1999). Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (1st ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, S. (2014). Learning dynamics in doctoral supervision ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, S., Berge, M., Grout, B., & Rump, C. Ø. (2014). Experiencing variation–Learning opportunities in doctoral supervision. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, S., Grout, B., & Rump, C. Ø. (2013). Interaction and learning in PhD supervision–A qualitative study of supervision with multiple supervisors. Danish Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 8, 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A., & Green, B. (2009). Supervision as metaphor. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 615–630.10.1080/03075070802597168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C. (2005). Early warning signs in postgraduate research education: A different approach to ensuring timely completions. Teaching in Higher Education, 10, 219–233.10.1080/1356251042000337963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C. (2012). Supervisors watching supervisors: The deconstructive possibilities and tensions of team supervision. Australian Universities’ Review, 54, 29–37.
   Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C., & Goozée, J. (2007). Challenging the dual assumption of the ‘always/already’ autonomous student and effective supervisor. Teaching in Higher Education, 12, 309–322.10.1080/13562510701278658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2013). Meanings are acquired from experiencing differences against a background of sameness, rather than from experiencing sameness against a background of difference: Putting a conjecture to the test by embedding it in a pedagogical tool. Frontline Learning Research, 1, 24–41.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., Runesson, U., & Tsui, A. (2004). The space of learning. In F. Marton & A. Tsui(Eds.), Classroom discourse and the space of learning (pp. 3–40). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Packer, M. J., & Goicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 35, 227–241.10.1207/S15326985EP3504_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, M., Cowan, A., & Liston, A. (2009). PhD education in science. In D. Boud & A. Lee (Eds.), Changing practices of doctoral education (pp. 100–112). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pole, C. (1998). Joint Supervision and the PhD: Safety net or panacea? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23, 259–271.
   Google Scholar
• Spooner-Lane, R. S., Henderson, D. J., Price, R. A., & Hill, G. W. (2007). Practice to theory: Co-supervision stories. The International Journal of Research Supervision, 1, 39–51.
   Google Scholar
• van Langenhove, L., & Harré, R. (1999). Introducing positioning theory. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 14–31). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, J. H. (2010). Team supervision of the doctorate: Managing roles, relationships and contradictions. Teaching in Higher Education, 15, 335–339.10.1080/13562511003740908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellington, J. J. (2010). Making supervision work for you: A student’s guide. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar