The rise of non-dissertation track master’s programmes: An academic literacies approach

References

• Agar, M. (1996). The professional stranger: An informal introduction to ethnography. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, D., Cooley, L., Lewkowics, J., & Nunad, D. (1998). Dissertation writing in action: The development of a dissertation writing support program for ESL graduate research students. English for Specific Purposes, 17, 199–217.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivanic, R. (2000). Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Bristol: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belcher, D. (1994). The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: Graduate students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Belcher, D., & Hirvela, A. (2005). Writing the qualitative dissertation: What motivates and sustains commitment to a fuzzy genre? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4, 187–205.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. (G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine domination. (R. Nice, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canagarajah, A. S. (1996). “Nondiscursive” requirements in academic publishing: Material resources of periphery scholars, and the politics of knowledge production. Written Communication, 13, 435–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casanave, C. P. (2003). Looking ahead to more sociopolitically-oriented case study research in L2 writing scholarship: (But should it be called “post-process”?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 85–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Y. (1996). Learning how to use citations for knowledge transformation: Non-native doctoral students’ dissertation writing in science. Research in the Teaching of English, 30, 428–457.
   Google Scholar
• Dysthe, O. (2002). Professors as mediators of academic text cultures: An interview study with advisors and master’s degree students in three disciplines in a Norwegian university. Written Communication, 19, 493–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freebody, P., & Luke, A. (1990). ‘Literacies’ programs: Debates and demands in cultural context. Prospect, 5, 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1970). Cultural action for freedom. Cambridge: Harvard Educational Review.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2015). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (5th ed.). London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grenfell, M., & James, D. (1998). Bourdieu and education (pp. 7–26). London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hasrati, M. (2013a). Material and credentialing incentives as symbolic violence: Local engagement and global participation through joint publication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 27, 154–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasrati, M. (2013b). Why bother about writing a master’s dissertation: Assumptions of faculty and master’s students in an Iranian setting. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14, 455–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasrati, M., & Tavakoli, P. (2015). Globalisation and MA TESOL programmes in the UK. Higher Education, 69, 547–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrooke, A., Bourke, S., Lovat, T., & Fairbaim, H. (2008). Consistency and inconsistencies in PhD thesis examination. Australian Journal of Education, 52, 36–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, S., Jordan, M. K., & Weiland, P. O. (1993). The role of writing in the graduate engineering education: A survey of faculty beliefs and practices. English for Specific Purposes, 12, 51–67.
   Google Scholar
• Kiley, M., & Mullins, G. (2004). Examining the examiner: How inexperienced examiners approach the assessment of research theses. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 121–135.
   Google Scholar
• Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, S. (2015). What works for doctoral students in completing their thesis? Teaching in Higher Education, 20, 183–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. (1984). Case studies. In R. Ellen (Ed.), Ethnographic research: A guide to general conduct (pp. 237–241). London, England: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nightingale, P. (1984). Examination of research theses. Higher Education Research and Development, 3, 137–150.
   Google Scholar
• Ohashi, J., Ohashi, H., & Paltridge, B. (2008). Finishing the dissertation while on tenure track: Enlisting support from inside and outside the academy. In C. Casanave & X. Li (Eds.), Learning the literacy practices of graduate school: Insiders reflections on academic enculturation (pp. 218–229). Ann Arbor, USA: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paltridge, B. (2002). Thesis and dissertations writing: An examination of published advice and actual practice. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 125–143.
   Google Scholar
• Powers, J. (1994, March). What faculty say about working with graduate ESL writers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of Teaching English as a Second Language, Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Sinkonvic, R., Richardson, C., & Lew, Y. (2016). Enhancing student competency and employability in international business through master’s dissertations. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 26, 293–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton, P., & Shao, Q. (2018). A worldwide survey of MATESOL programs in 2014: Patterns and perspectives. Language Teaching Research, 22, 10–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stracke, E., & Kumar, V. (2010). Feedback and self-regulated learning: Insights from supervisors’ and PhD examiners’ reports. Reflective Practice, 11, 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tinkler, P., & Jackson, C. (2000). Examining the doctorate: Institutional policy and the PhD examination process in Britain. Studies in Higher Education, 25, 167–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, I. (1974). The rise and future demise of the world capitalist system: Concepts for comparative analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16, 387–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, J., Schirato, T., & Danaher, G. (2002). Understanding Bourdieu. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar