Students learning as researchers of curriculum in an undergraduate programme

References

• Allin, L. (2014). Collaboration between staff and students in the scholarship of teaching and learning: The potential and the problems. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 2, 95–102.
   Google Scholar
• BERA. (2012). Ethical guidelines for educational research. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, C. (2014). An investigation of co-created curricula within higher education in the UK, Ireland and the USA. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51, 15–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16, 133–145. ISSN 1360-144X at. Retrieved from http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/54132/
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2015). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–Staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71, 195–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S., & Preskill, S. (1999). Discussion as a way of teaching: Tools and techniques for University teachers. Milton Keynes: Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Brooman, S., Darwent, S., & Pimor, A. (2015). The student voice in higher education curriculum design: Is there value in listening? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52, 663–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunce, L., Baird, A., & Jones, S. E. (2016). The student-as-consumer approach in higher education and its effects on academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 42, 1958–1978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher, J., & Maunder, R. (2014). Going URB@ N: Exploring the impact of undergraduate students as pedagogic researchers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51, 142–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. (2007). Who counts? The quiet revolution of participation and numbers. IDS Working Paper 296. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, H., Egan, B., Fletcher, L., & Ryan, C. (2006). Creating case studies of practice through appreciative inquiry. Educational Action Research, 14, 407–422.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, R. (2000). What is an effect size? A brief introduction. Durham: CEM.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, B. (2014). Students as partners: Embracing the new paradigm in mathematics. MSOR Connect. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Barrie_Cooper/publication/275106885_Students_as_Partners_Embracing_the_New_Paradigm_in_Mathematics/links/57862d3908ae3949cf554b14.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cuthbert, D., Arunachalam, D., & Licina, D. (2012). It feels more important than other classes I have done: An ‘authentic’ undergraduate research experience in sociology. Studies in Higher Education, 37, 129–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne, E., Zandstra, R., Brown, T., & Nurser, T. (2011). Students as change agents: New ways of engaging with learning and teaching in Higher Education. Exeter: University of Exeter/ESCalate/Higher Education Academy Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J., & Adelman, C. (n.d.). Developing hypotheses about informal learning. Norwich: CARE.
   Google Scholar
• Eraut, M. (2007). Learning from other people in the workplace. Oxford Review of Education, 33, 403–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eun, B. (2010). From learning to development: A sociocultural approach to instruction. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40, 401–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, C., Gbadamosi, G., & Richardson, M. (2014). Flexibility, compromise and opportunity: Students’ perceptions of balancing part-time work with a full-time business degree. The International Journal of Management Education, 12, 80–90.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T. (2012). Complexity science and professional learning for collaboration: A critical reconsideration of possibilities and limitations. Journal of Education and Work, 25, 141–162.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, M. (2011). Patterns of partnership: Student voice, intergenerational learning and democratic fellowship. In N. Mockler & J. Sachs (Eds.), Rethinking educational practice through reflexive inquiry (pp. 61–75). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Gawler, M. (2005). Useful tools for engaging young people in participatory evaluation. Geneva: UNICEF CEE/CIS.
   Google Scholar
• Grainger, P., & Weir, K. (2016). An alternative grading tool for enhancing assessment practice and quality assurance in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53, 73–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HEA. (2012). Dimensions of student engagement. York: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Hosein, A., & Rao, N. (2013). Sorting out the dolly mix of research methods assessments. Retrieved from http://www.hear.ac.uk/assets/documents/disciplines/social-sciences/Blog/249_10_Hosein.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, A., & Healey, M. (2009). Developing the student as a researcher through the curriculum. Innovations in Practice, 2, 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kadi-Hanifi, K., Dagman, O., Peters, J., Snell, E., Tutton, C., & Wright, T. (2014). Engaging students and staff with educational development through appreciative inquiry. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51, 584–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandiko Howson, C., & Buckley, A. (2017). Development of the UK engagement survey. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42, 1132–1144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S. (2002). Methods for community participation: A complete guide for practitioners. Rugby, UK: I.T.D.G. Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Little, S. (Ed.). (2011). Staff-student partnerships in higher education. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford University. 2018. Information about Part II Year. Oxford: Oxford Department of Chemistry. Retrieved from http://teaching.chem.ox.ac.uk/part-ii-year.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, T. C., & Wood, B. E. (2016). Education for transformation: An evaluative framework to guide student voice work in schools. Critical Studies in Education, 60, 113–130.
   Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA). (2014). The UK quality code for higher education. Gloucester: QAA.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, T. (2005). Can reflective practice be taught? Reflective Practice, 6, 199–204.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, C. (2014). Becoming teachers, becoming researchers: A case study. American Journal of Educational Research, 2, 585–591.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, M. N., & Betts, J. (2007). Crossing the threshold from description to deconstruction and reconstruction: Using self-assessment to deepen reflection. Reflective Practice, 8, 269–283.
   Google Scholar
• Seale, J. (2010). Doing student voice work in higher education: An exploration of the value of participatory methods. British Educational Research Journal, 36, 995–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeting, W., & Wise, G. (2009). Rethinking the values of higher education: Consumption, partnership, community? Gloucester: QAA.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., & Robinson, C. (2009). Student voice: Theorising power and participation. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 17, 161–175.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H., & Delbecq, A. L. (1974). The effectiveness of nominal, Delphi, and interacting group decision making processes. Academy of Management Journal, 17, 605–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K., Payne, K. A., & Brayko, K. (2015). Democratizing teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 66, 122–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar