767
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Belonging, achievement and student satisfaction with learning: The role of case-based Socratic Circles

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Aamodt, A., & Plaza, E. (1994). Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Communications, 7, 39–59.
  • Acim, R. (2018). The Socratic method of instruction: An experience with a reading comprehension course. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 8, 41–53.
  • Almaliki, M. Q. (2017). The role of Socratic questioning in promoting students’ critical thinking in EFL classrooms at the University of Basra: A qualitative-based study. Iraqi Academic Scientific Journals, 1, 163–248.
  • Balıkcıoğlu, G., & Efe, T. (2016). The role of metacognitive activities on university level preparatory class EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 294–299.
  • Braxton, J. M., Milem, J. F., & Shaw Sullivan, S. (2000). The influence of active learning on the college student departure process. The Journal of Higher Education, 71, 569–590.
  • Brown, A. C. (2016). Classroom community and discourse: How argumentation emerges during a Socratic Circle. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 4. doi:10.5195/dpj.2016.160
  • Bureau, S. (2018). Learning fictions or facts? Moving from case sudies to the impact-based method. In A. Fayolle (Ed.), A research agenda for entrepreneurship education (pp. 243–261). Cheltenham: Elgar Research Agendas.
  • Cheng, G., & Chau, J. (2016). Exploring the relationships between learning styles, online participation, learning achievement and course satisfaction: An empirical study of a blended learning course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47, 257–278.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Copeland, M. (2005). Socratic Circles: Fostering critical and creative thinking in middle and high school. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
  • Davies, M., & Sinclair, A. (2014). Socratic questioning in the Paideia Method to encourage dialogical discussions. Research Papers in Education, 29, 20–43.
  • Deloitte Access Economics. (2017). Soft skills for business success. Sydney: D. A. Economics. Retrived from https://www2.deloitte.com/au/en/pages/economics/articles/soft-skills-business-success.html
  • Diep, A.-N., Zhu, C., Struyven, K., & Blieck, Y. (2017). Who or what contributes to student satisfaction in different blended learning modalities? British Journal of Educational Technology, 48, 473–489.
  • Dobbins, K., Brooks, S., Scott, J. J. A., Rawlinson, M., & Norman, R. I. (2016). Understanding and enacting learning outcomes: The academic’s perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 41, 1217–1235.
  • England, B. J., Brigati, J. R., & Schussler, E. E. (2017). Student anxiety in introductory biology classrooms: Perceptions about active learning and persistence in the major. PLOS One, 12, 1–17.
  • Erskine, J. A., Leenders, M. R., & Mauffette-Leenders, L. A. (2003). Teaching with cases (3rd ed.). London, ON: Richard Ivey CBSChool of Business.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 139–151.
  • Griswold, J., Shaw, L., & Munn, M. (2017). Socratic seminar with data: A strategy to support student discourse and understanding. The American Biology Teacher, 79, 492–495.
  • Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. (2004). A beginner’s guide to partial least squares analysis. Understanding Statistics, 3, 283–297.
  • Hair, J., Hult, G., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles: Sage Publishers.
  • Hair, J., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19, 139–152.
  • Hair, J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26, 106–121.
  • Hake, R. R. (1992). Socratic pedagogy in the introductory physics laboratory. The Physics Teacher, 30, 546–552.
  • Harman, T., Bertrand, B., Greer, A., Pettus, A., Jennings, J., Wall-Bassett, E., & Babatunde, O. T. (2015). Case-based learning facilitates critical thinking in undergraduate nutrition education: Students describe the big picture.. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 115, 378–388.
  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235–266.
  • Jehangir, R. (2010). Stories as knowledge: Bringing the lived experience of first-generation college students into the academy. Urban Education, 45, 533–553.
  • Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 758–773.
  • Kreber, C. (2007). What’s it really all about? The scholarship of teaching and learning as an authentic practice. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1, 1–4.
  • Krupat, E., Richards, J. B., Sullivan, A. M., Fleenor, T. J., & Schwartzstein, R. M. (2016). Assessing the effectiveness of case-based collaborative learning via randomized controlled trial. Academic Medicine, 91, 723–729.
  • Kulak, V., & Newton, G. (2015). An investigation of the pedagogical impact of using case-based learning in a undergraduate biochemistry course. International Journal of Higher Education, 4, 13–24.
  • Liu, Y.-H., & Yu, F.-Y. (2018). Supporting active learning and formative evaluation via teaching-by-questioning in classrooms: Design, development, and preliminary evaluation of an online learning system. Interactive Learning Environments. doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1489858
  • Masika, R., & Jones, J. (2016). Building student belonging and engagement: Insights into higher education students’ experiences of participating and learning together. Teaching in Higher Education, 21, 138–150.
  • McLean, S. F. (2016). Case-based learning and its application in medical and health-care fields: A review of worldwide literature. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 3, 39–49.
  • Praslova, L. (2010). Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s four level model of training criteria to assessment of learning outcomes and program evaluation in higher education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 22, 215–225.
  • Prince, M. J. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 223–231.
  • Renshaw, P. D. (2004). Dialogic learning teaching and instruction: Theoretic roots and analytical frameworks. In J. van de Linden & P. Renshaw (Eds.), Dialogic learning: Shifting perspectives to learning, instruction, and teaching (pp. 1–15). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Rezaee, R., & Mosalanejad, L. (2015). The effects of case-based team learning on students’ learning, self regulation and self direction. Global Journal of Health Science, 7, 295–306.
  • Sanders-Smith, S. C., Smith-Bonahue, T. M., & Soutullo, O. R. (2016). Practicing teachers’ responses to case method of instruction in an online graduate course. Teaching and Teacher Education, 54, 1–11.
  • Sandstrom, G. M., & Rawn, C. D. (2015). Embrace chattering students: They may be building community and interest in your class. Teaching of Psychology, 42, 227–233.
  • Sassmannshausen, S., & Gladbach, S. (2013). Strengthening case study based teaching in Entrepreneurship education in Germany: Theoretical reflections and explorative research. Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 9, 57–94.
  • Sin, C. (2014). Lost in translation: The meaning of learning outcomes across national and institutional policy contexts. Studies in Higher Education, 39, 1823–1837.
  • Skinner, E., & Belmont, M. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year.. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571–581.
  • Snyder, P., & McWilliam, P. J. (1999). Evaluating the efficacy of case method instruction: Findings from preservice training in family-centered care. Journal of Early Intervention, 22, 114–125.
  • Strayhorn, T. L. (2012). Insights from the literature and research. New York: Routledge.
  • Styslinger, M., Pollock, T., Lowery, R., & Fink, L. (2010). The chicken and the egg: Inviting response and talk through Socratic Circles. Voices from the Middle, 18, 36–45.
  • Surzmak, J., & Thuna, M. (2013, April). Tell me a story: The use of narrative as a tool for instruction. Paper presented at the ACRL 2013 Imagine, Innovate, Inspire, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Thomas, C., & Goering, C. Z. (2018). Socratic Circles in world history: Reflections on a year in dialogue. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 91, 103–110.
  • Torabizadeh, C., Homayuni, L., & Moattari, M. (2018). Impacts of Socratic questioning on moral reasoning of nursing students. Nursing Ethics, 25, 174–185.
  • Trigwell, K. (2013). Evidence of the impact of scholarship of teaching and learning purposes. Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 1, 95–105.
  • Vygotsky, L. S., Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., & Souberman, E. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cumberland, MD: Harvard University Press.
  • Yoo, M.-S., & Park, H.-R. (2015). Effects of case-based learning on communication skills, problem-solving ability, and learning motivation in nursing students. Nursing & Health Sciences, 17, 166–172.
  • Young, D. J. (1990). An investigation of students’ perspectives on anxiety and speaking. Foreign Language Annals, 23, 539–553.
  • Zepke, N., & Leach, L. (2010). Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11, 167–177.
  • Zhao, C.-M., & Kuh, G. D. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45, 115–138.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.