Promoting agentive feedback engagement through dialogically minded approaches in doctoral writing supervision

References

• Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. (2017). Researching feedback dialogue: An interactional analysis approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(2), 252–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1102863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basturkmen, H., East, M., & Bitchener, J. (2014). Supervisors’ on-script feedback comments on drafts of dissertations: Socialising students into the academic discourse community. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(4), 432–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.752728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caffarella, R. S., & Barnett, B. G. (2000). Teaching doctoral students to become scholarly writers: The importance of giving and receiving critiques. Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/030750700116000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Can, G., & Walker, A. (2011). A model for doctoral students’ perceptions and attitudes toward written feedback for academic writing. Research in Higher Education, 52(5), 508–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-010-9204-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, S., & Kumar, V. (2017). ‘Ignoring me is part of learning’: Supervisory feedback on doctoral writing. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1123104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inouye, K. S., & McAlpine, L. (2017). Developing scholarly identity: Variation in agentive responses to supervisor feedback. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 14(2), 1–19. https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol14/iss2/3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamler, B., & Thomson, P. (2006). Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. M. (2018). Academic socialization of doctoral students through feedback networks: A qualitative understanding of the graduate feedback landscape. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(8), 963–980. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1449741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, V., & Stracke, E. (2007). An analysis of written feedback on a PhD thesis. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(4), 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510701415433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A., & Murray, R. (2015). Supervising writing: Helping postgraduate students develop as researchers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(5), 558–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.866329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, J., & Hu, G. (2019). Doctoral candidates’ dual role as student and expert scholarly writer: An activity theory perspective. English for Specific Purposes, 54, 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically. Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Information Age Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C. (2007). Supervision as mentoring: The role of power and boundary crossing. Studies in Continuing Education, 29(2), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370701424650
   Google Scholar
• Steen-Utheim, A., & Wittek, A. L. (2017). Dialogic feedback and potentialities for student learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 15, 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T., & Li, L. Y. (2011). ‘Tell me what to do’ vs. ‘guide me through it’: Feedback experiences of international doctoral students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787411402438
   Google Scholar
• Xu, L. (2017). Written feedback in intercultural doctoral supervision: A case study. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1237483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, L., & Grant, B. (2017). International doctoral students’ becoming: A dialogic perspective. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(6), 570–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1318711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M., & Carless, D. (2013). The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.719154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2013). Understanding supervisors’ commentary practices in doctoral research proposal writing: A Hong Kong study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0046-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., Yu, S., Wang, B., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Exploring student engagement with supervisor feedback on master’s thesis: Insights from a case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(2), 186–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1617181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar