References
- Advance HE. (2019). Essential frameworks for enhancing student success. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2020-05/Enhancing%20Student%20Success%20in%20Higher%20Education%20Framework.pdf
- AHEAD. (2020). Students with disabilities engaged with support services in higher education in Ireland 2018/19. https://www.ahead.ie/userfiles/files/Participation/AHEAD_Research_Report_2020_-digital.pdf
- Armstrong, L. (2014). Barriers to innovation and change in higher education. TIAA-CREF Institute. https://www.tiaainstitute.org/sites/default/files/presentations/2017-03/Armstrong_Barriers%20to%20Innovation%20and%20Change%20in%20Higher%20Education.pdf
- Bevitt, S. (2015). Assessment innovation and student experience: A new assessment challenge and call for a multi-perspective approach to assessment research. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(1), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.890170
- CAST. (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2. CAST: Wakefield, MA, USA. http://udlguidelines.cast.org
- European University Association (EUA). (2020). Student assessment: Thematic peer group report: Learning & teaching paper # 10. https://eua.eu/resources/publications/921:student-assessment-thematic-peer-group-report.html
- Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage.
- Garside, J., Nhemachena, J. Z., Williams, J., & Topping, A. (2009). Repositioning assessment: Giving students the ‘choice’ of assessment methods. Nurse Education in Practice, 9(2), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2008.09.003
- Gibbs, G., & Dunbar-Goddet, H. (2009). Characterising programme-level assessment environments that support learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(4), 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930802071114
- Higher Education Authority (HEA). (2015) . National plan for equity of access to higher education, 2015–2019.
- Hounsell, D., Falchikov, N., Hounsell, J., Klampfleitner, M., Huxham, M., Thomson, K., & Blair, S. (2007). Innovative assessment across the disciplines: An analytical review of the literature. Final report. Higher Education Academy. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/teachingandresearch/Innovative_assessment_LR.pdf
- Jakovljevic, M. (2019). Criteria for empowering innovation in higher education. Africa Education Review, 16(4), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2017.1369855
- Jones, A. (2004). A review of the research literature on barriers to the uptake of ICT by teachers. Becta. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/1603/1/becta_2004_barrierstouptake_litrev.pdf
- Kapsalis, G., Ferrari, A., Punie, Y., Conrads, J., Collado, A., Hotulainen, R., Rämä, I., Nyman, L., Oinas, S., & Ilsley, P. (2019). Evidence of innovative assessment: Literature review and case studies. European Commission and EU Science Hub.
- Kirkland, K., & Sutch, D. (2009). Overcoming the barriers to educational innovation: A literature review. Futurelab. https://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/FUTL61/FUTL61.pdf
- Lok, B., McNaught, C., & Young, K. (2016). Criterion-referenced and norm-referenced assessments; Compatibility and complementarity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 450–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1022136
- Medland, E. (2016). Assessment in higher education: Drivers, barriers and directions for change in the UK. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.982072
- Mercer-Mapstone, L., & Bovill, C. (2019). Equity and diversity in institutional approaches to student–staff partnership schemes in higher education, Studies in Higher Education, (45)12, 2541-2557, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1620721
- Mogey, N., Purcell, M., Paterson, J. S., & Burk, J. (2019). Handwriting or typing exams – Can we give students the choice? (Version 1). Loughborough University. https://hdl.handle.net/2134/5555<img src=“” alt=“” class=“iCommentClass icp_sprite icp_add_comment chk-comment iCommentExist” data-username=“Geraldine O’neill” neill'=“” data-userid=“93627” data-content=“Mogey et al needs to be 2019 everywhere” data-time=“1612023143709” data-rejcontent=“” data-cid=“3” id=“Sat Jan 30 2021 16:12:23 GMT+0000 (Greenwich Mean Time)” corr_ord_id=“14” id0=“3” data-username0=“Geraldine O” data-userid0=“93627” data-content0=“Check Tagging” title=“Mogey et al needs to be 2019 everywhere” data-radio=“xmlradioYTS” data-userid-id2=“93627” data-username-user2=“Geraldine O’neill”>
- Murray, L., Moore, A., Hooper, L., Menzies, V., Cooper, B., Shaw, N., & Rueckert, C. (2019). Dimensions of student success: A framework for defining and evaluating support for learning in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(5), 954–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1615418
- National Forum. (2016). Profile of assessment practices in Irish higher education. National Forum for the Enhancement of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education. https://www.teachingandlearning.ie/publication/profile-of-assessment-practices-in-irish-higher-education/
- National Forum. (2019). Understanding and enabling student success in Irish higher education. National Forum for the Enhancement of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education. https://www.teachingandlearning.ie/publication/understanding-and-enabling-student-success-in-irish-higher-education/
- O’Neill, G. (Ed.). (2011). A practitioner’s guide to choice of assessment methods within a module. UCD Teaching and Learning. https://www.ucd.ie/teaching/t4media/choice_of_assessment.pdf
- O’Neill, G. (2017). It’s not fair! Students and educators views on the equity of the procedures and outcomes of students’ choice of assessment methods. Irish Educational Studies, 36(2), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2017.1324805
- Popham, J. W. (2014). Criterion-referenced measurement: Half a century wasted? Educational Leadership, 71(6), 62–68. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1043719
- Seldomridge, L. A., & Walsh, C. M. (2018). Waging the war on clinical grade inflation the ongoing quest. Nurse Educator, 43(4), 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000473
- Tannock, S. (2017). No grades in higher education now! Revisiting the place of graded assessment in the reimagination of the public university. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1345–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1092131
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2014) . International standard classification of education ISCED 2013.
- Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00170