References
- Andrew, M. (2012). Supervising doctorates at a distance: Three trans-Tasman stories. Quality Assurance in Education, 20(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881211198239
- Atkinson, T. J. (1999). Toward an understanding of instructor-student interactions: A study of videoconferencing in the postsecondary distance learning classroom. ERIC. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED457847
- Bailenson, J. N. (2021). Nonverbal overload: A theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue. Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000030
- Börgeson, E., Sotak, M., Kraft, J., Bagunu, G., Biörserud, C., & Lange, S. (2021). Challenges in PhD education due to COVID-19 - disrupted supervision or business as usual: A cross-sectional survey of Swedish biomedical sciences graduate students. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02727-3
- Boud, D., & Lee, A. (2009). Framing doctoral education as practice. In D. Boud & A. Lee (Eds.), Changing practices of doctoral education (pp. 10–26). Routledge.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Byrnes, D., Uribe-Florez, L. J., Trespalacios, J., & Chilson, J. (2019). Doctoral E-mentoring: Current practices and effective strategies. Online Learning Journal (OLJ), 23(1), 236. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1446
- Cantor, G. (2020). The loneliness of the long-distance (PhD) researcher. Psychodynamic Practice, 26(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14753634.2019.1645805
- Erichsen, E. A., Bolliger, D. U., & Halupa, C. (2014). Student satisfaction with graduate supervision in doctoral programs primarily delivered in distance education settings. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 321–338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.709496
- Evans, T., & Green, B.(1995). Dancing at a distance? Postgraduate studies, ‘supervision’ and distance education. 25th AARE Annual Conference, Hobart. Australian Association for Research in Education.
- Gardner, S. K. (2008). “What’s too much and what’s too little?”: The process of becoming an independent researcher in doctoral education. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 326–350. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0007
- Garrison, D. R. (2021). From Independence to collaboration: A personal retrospective on distance education. Understanding teaching and learning in a new Era. In M. F. Cleveland-Innes & D. R. Garrison (Eds.), An introduction to distance education (Second ed., pp. 13–24). Routledge.
- Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.
- Gray, M. A., & Crosta, L. (2019). New perspectives in online doctoral supervision: A systematic literature review. Studies in Continuing Education: Professional Doctorate Curriculum, Pedagogy and Achievements, 41(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1532405
- Haas, N., Gureghian, A., Jusino Díaz, C., & Williams, A. (2020). Through their own eyes: The implications of COVID-19 for PhD students. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2020.34
- Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures. How the sciences make knowledge. Harvard University Press.
- Kumar, S., & Johnson, M. (2017). Mentoring doctoral students online: Mentor strategies and challenges. Mentoring & Tutoring for Partnership in Learning, 25(2), 202–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2017.1326693
- Kumar, S., Kumar, V., & Taylor, S. (2020). A guide to online supervision. UK Council for Graduate Education. https://supervision.ukcge.ac.uk/cms/wp-content/uploads/A-Guide-to-Online-Supervision-Kumar-Kumar-Taylor-UK-Council-for-Graduate-Education.pdf
- Maor, D., Ensor, J. D., & Fraser, B. J. (2016). Doctoral supervision in virtual spaces: A review of research of web-based tools to develop collaborative supervision. Higher Education Research & Development: New Frontiers: Exploring the Space/s of Higher Education, 35(1), 172–188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1121206
- Mullen, C. A. (2021). Online doctoral mentoring in a pandemic: Help or hindrance to academic progress on dissertations? International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 10(2), 139–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-06-2020-0029
- Parry, S. (2007). Disciplines and doctorates. Springer.
- Peterson, E. P. (2019). Effect of videoconferencing on online doctoral students’ transactional distance, student satisfaction and intent-to-persist. Grand Canyon University. https://www.proquest.com/openview/b022d93f35d448270607ba30f3045fd0/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
- Rademaker, L. L., Duffy, J. O. C., Wetzler, E., & Zaikina-Montgomery, H. (2016). Chair perceptions of trust between mentor and mentee in online doctoral dissertation mentoring. Online Learning Journal (OLJ), 20(1), 57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i1.605
- Roumell, E. A. L., & Bolliger, D. U. (2017). Experiences of faculty with doctoral student supervision in programs delivered via distance. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 65(2), 82–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2017.1320179
- Sussex, R. (2008). Technological options in supervising remote research students. Higher Education, 55(1), 121–137. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9038-0
- Torka, M. (2018). Projectification of doctoral training? How research fields respond to a new funding regime. Minerva, 56(1), 59–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-018-9342-8
- Venter, K. (2003). Coping with isolation: The role of culture in adult distance learners’ use of surrogates. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 18(3), 271–287. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0268051032000131035
- Wernet, A. (2014). Hermeneutics and objective hermeneutics. In U. Flick (Ed.), The Sage handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 234–246). Sage.