Application of agile to distance-learning professional doctorate programmes: A conceptual model

References

• Awad, M. A. (2005). A comparison between agile and traditional software development methodologies. University of Western Australia, 30, 1–69. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.464.6090.
   Google Scholar
• Backlund, F. (2017). A project perspective on doctoral studies–a student point of view. International Journal of Educational Management, E(7), 908–921. https://www-emerald-com.prox.lib.ncsu.edu/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJEM-04-2016-0075/full/html.
   Google Scholar
• Brailsford, I. (2010). Doctoral completion: Can history teach us anything? New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 45(2), 61.
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, J., & Sieminski, S. (2006). The challenge of a distance learning professional doctorate in education. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 21(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680510500472239
   Google Scholar
• Cagan, M. (2017). Inspired: How to create tech products customers love (2nd ed.). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, M. (2010). Succeeding with agile: Software development using Scrum. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, J. A. (2005). Getting a PhD: An action plan to help manage your research, your supervisor and your project. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, M., & Highsmith, J. (2001). The agile manifesto. Software Development, 9(8), 28–35.
   Google Scholar
• Gustavsson, T. (2016, April 14-15). Benefits of Agile project management in a non-software development context: A literature review. In Fifth International Scientific Conference on Project Management in the Baltic Countries, Riga, University of Latvia, 114–124.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, E. (2018). Anticipating doctoral supervision: (Not) bridging the transition from supervisee to supervisor. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(4), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1382466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. (2018). 5 routes to getting a Doctorate. Prospects. https://www.prospects.ac.uk/postgraduate-study/phd-study/5-routes-to-getting-a-doctorate
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, H., Gardiner, M., & Marshall, K. (2008). Innovation in PhD completion: The hardy shall succeed (and be happy!)”. Higher Education Research and Development, 27(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701658781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, S. (2015). What works for doctoral students in completing their thesis? Teaching in Higher Education, 20(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.974025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linger, R., Goldrich, L., Bishop, M., & Dark, M. (2017, 4 January). Agile research for cybersecurity: Creating authoritative, actionable knowledge when speed matters. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Maréchal, G. (2010). Autoethnography. In A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 43–45). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., & Norton, J. (2006). Reframing our approach to doctoral programs: An integrative framework for action and research. Higher Education Research and Development, 25(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500453012
   Google Scholar
• Owens, T., & Fernandez, O. (2014). The lean enterprise. Wiley Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, C. (1994). A structured approach to presenting PhD theses: Notes for candidates and their supervisors [ANZ Doctoral Consortium]. University of Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, E., & Pugh, D. (2016). How to get a PhD: A handbook for students and their supervisors (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
   Google Scholar
• Salinas-Perez, J. A., Rodero-Cosano, M. L., Rigabert, A., & Motrico, E. (2019). Actions and techniques in supervision, mentorships and tutorial activities to foster doctoral study success: A scoping literature review. International Journal of Educational Research, 96, 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwaber, K. (2004). Agile project management with Scrum. Microsoft Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sverdlik, A., Hall, N. C., McAlpine, L., & Hubbard, K. (2018). The PhD experience: A review of the factors influencing doctoral students’ completion, achievement, and well-being”. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13(1), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.28945/4113
   Google Scholar
• The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAAHE). (2020). Characteristics statement, Doctoral degree. Retrieved September 13, 2020, from https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/quality-code/doctoral-degree-characteristics-statement-2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Totten, J. (2017). Critical success factors for Agile Project Management in non-software related product development teams [Doctoral thesis]. Western Michigan University.
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay, M. A. (1957). The key informant technique: A non-ethnographic application. American Anthropologist, 59(4), 688–701. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1957.59.4.02a00100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twidale, M., & Hansen, P. (2019). Agile research. First Monday, 24(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i1.9424.
   Google Scholar
• Vallon, R., Da Silva Estacio, B. J., Prikladnicki, R., & Grechenig, T. (2018). Systematic literature review on agile practices in global software development. Information and Software Technology, 96, 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2017.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, A. (2006). Planning and organising your research. In S. Potter (Ed.), Doing postgraduate research (2nd ed., pp. 92–113). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Way, T., Chandrasekhar, S., & Murthy, A., (2009, July 13- 16). The Agile research penultimatum. SERP 2009. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Software Engineering Research & Practice (pp. 530–536). Las Vegas, USA (SERP).
   Google Scholar
• Wingo, R., & Tanik, M. (2015, April 9). Using an agile software development methodology for a complex problem domain. In SoutheastCon 2015, (pp. 1–8), doi:10.1109/SECON.2015.7132890. Fort Lauderdale, FL (IEEE).
   Google Scholar
• Yamnitsky, E. (2020). Middle managers’ construing of exploratory and exploitative innovation projects in two large high-tech corporations [Doctoral thesis]. Heriot-Watt University.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (Kindle ed.). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar