The role of students’ epistemic beliefs for their argumentation performance in higher education

References

• Aghaee, N., & Hansson, H. (2013). Peer portal: Quality enhancement in thesis writing using self-managed peer review on a mass scale. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 186–203. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baytelman, A., Iordanou, K., & Constantinou, C. P. (2020). Epistemic beliefs and prior knowledge as predictors of the construction of different types of arguments on socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(8), 1199–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Brandmo, C., & Kammerer, Y. (2019). A validation study of the internet-specific epistemic justification inventory with Norwegian preservice teachers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(4), 877–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118769438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C. H., Bråten, I., Yang, F. Y., & Brandmo, C. (2021). Investigating structural relationships among upper‐secondary school students’ beliefs about knowledge, justification for knowing, and Internet‐specific justification in the domain of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(7), 980–1009. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. M., Anderson, R. C., Kuo, L. J., Kim, I. H., Archodidou, A., & Nguyen-Jahiel, K. (2003). Collaborative reasoning: Expanding ways for children to talk and think in school. Educational Psychology Review, 15(2), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023429215151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., Vekiri, I., & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coté, R. A. (2014). Peer feedback in anonymous peer review in an EFL writing class in Spain. GIST Education and Learning Research Journal, 9, 67–87. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.144.
   Google Scholar
• Ferretti, R. P., & Graham, S. (2019). Argumentative writing: Theory, assessment, and instruction. Reading and Writing, 32(6), 1345–1357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09950-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisman, B., Saab, N., Van Driel, J., & Van Den Broek, P. (2018). Peer feedback on academic writing: Undergraduate students’ peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(6), 955–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kammerer, Y., Gottschling, S., & Bråten, I. (2021). The role of internet-specific justification beliefs in source evaluation and corroboration during web search on an unsettled socio-scientific issue. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 342–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120952731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(00)00030-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Talaee, E. (2020). Worked example or scripting? Fostering students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing and learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1799032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Talaee, E. (2021). Peer feedback or peer feedforward? Enhancing students’ argumentative peer learning processes and outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 768–784. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latifi, S., & Noroozi, O. (2021). Supporting argumentative essay writing through an online supported peer-review script. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(5), 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1961097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, E. Z. F., & Lin, S. S. (2007). Relationship between peer feedback, cognitive and metacognitive strategies and achievement in networked peer assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6), 1122–1125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00702.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. C., & Huang, Y. A. (2017). Factors influence intention to adopt internet medical information on bulletin boards: A heuristic-systematic perspective. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC), 29(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.2017010102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liunokas, Y. (2020). Assessing students’ ability in writing argumentative essay at an Indonesian Senior High School. IDEAS. Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 8(1), 184–196. http://dx.doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v8i1.1344
   Google Scholar
• Lu, L., & Yuan, Y. C. (2011). Shall I Google it or ask the competent villain down the hall? The moderating role of information need in information source selection. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R., Bendixen, L. D., & Haerle, F. C. (2006). Domain-generality and domain-specificity in personal epistemology research: Philosophical and empirical reflections in the development of a theoretical framework. Educational Psychology Review, 18(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9003-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science, 37(4), 375–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9053-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2016a). Relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., McAlister, S., & Mulder, M. (2016b). Impacts of a digital dialogue game and epistemic beliefs on argumentative discourse and willingness to argue. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 208–230. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O. (2018). Considering students’ epistemic beliefs to facilitate their argumentative discourse and attitudinal change with a digital dialogue game. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(3), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1208112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., & Hatami, J. (2019). The effects of online peer feedback and epistemic beliefs on students’ argumentation-based learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(5), 548–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2018.1431143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, E. M., Sinatra, G. M., & Poliquin, A. (2008). Role of epistemic beliefs and scientific argumentation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 30(15), 1977–1999. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701545919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., & Alqassab, M. (2019). An empirical review of anonymity effects in peer assessment, peer feedback, peer review, peer evaluation and peer grading. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), 1253–1278. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1600186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patchan, M. M., Schunn, C. D., & Correnti, R. J. (2016). The nature of feedback: How peer feedback features affect students’ implementation rate and quality of revisions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(8), 1098–1120. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000103.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V., & Sugden, S. J. B. (1984). Relativism and absolutism. The Monist, 67(3), 293–296. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist198467318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valero Haro, A., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2022). Argumentation competence: Students’ argumentation knowledge, behavior and attitude and their relationships with domain-specific knowledge acquisition. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 35(1), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2020.1734995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2020). From feedback to revisions: Effects of feedback features and perceptions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar