Relationship between doctoral supervisors’ competencies, engagement in supervisory development and experienced support from research community

References

• Amundsen, C., & McAlpine, L. (2009). ’Learning supervision’: Trial by fire. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(3), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290903068805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andres, L., Bengtsen, S. S. E., Gallego Castaño, L. D. P., Crossouard, B., Keefer, J., & Pyhältö, K. (2015). Drivers and interpretations of doctoral education today: National comparisons. Frontline Learning Research, 3(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v3i3.177
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, T. D., & Beaulieu, E. (2017). Engaging women: Addressing the gender gap in women’s networking and productivity. PS: Political Science & Politics, 50(2), 461–466 doi:10.1017/S1049096516003000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, C., & Stoodley, I. (2013). Experiencing higher degree research supervision as teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 38(2), 226–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.576338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornér, S., Löfström, E., & Pyhältö, K. (2017). The relationship between doctoral students’ perceptions of supervision and burnout. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12, 91–106. https://doi.org/10.28945/3754
   Google Scholar
• Delany, D. (2009). A review of the literature on effective PhD supervision. University of Dublin. https://www.tcd.ie/CAPSL/assets/pdf/Academic%20Practice%20Resources/Effective_Supervision_Literature_Review.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Denis, C., Colet, N. R., & Lison, C. (2019). Doctoral supervision in North America: Perception and challenges of supervisor and supervisee. Higher Education Studies, 9(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v9n1p30
   Google Scholar
• Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. (2019). The ethical principles of research with human participants and ethical review in the human sciences in Finland. https://tenk.fi/en/ethical-review
   Google Scholar
• Fulgence, K. (2019). A theoretical perspective on how doctoral supervisors develop supervision skills. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 721–739. https://doi.org/10.28945/4446
   Google Scholar
• Gatfield, T. (2005). An investigation into PhD supervisory management styles: Development of a dynamic conceptual model and its managerial implications. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(3), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800500283585
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, K. D., McGready, J., & Griffin, K. (2017). Career development song American biomedical postdocs. Life Sciences Education, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-03-0075
   Google Scholar
• Grant, K., Hackney, R., & Edgar, D. (2014). Postgraduate research supervision: An ‘agreed’ conceptual view of good practice through derived metaphors. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 9, 43–60. http://ijds.org/Volume9/IJDSv9p043-060Grant0403.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gube, J., Getenet, S., Satariyan, A., & Muhammad, Y. (2017). Towards “operating within” the field: Doctoral students’ views of supervisors’ discipline expertise. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.28945/3641
   Google Scholar
• Guerin, C., Kerr, H., & Green, I. (2015). Supervision pedagogies: Narratives from the field. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.957271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadwin, A., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 65–84). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halse, C. (2011). ‘Becoming a supervisor’: The impact of doctoral supervision on supervisors’ learning. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.594593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halse, C., & Malfroy, J. (2010). Retheorizing doctoral supervision as professional work. Studies in Higher Education, 35(3), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1086/603932
   Google Scholar
• Hanesova, D. & Saari, S. (2019, November 11-13). International comparative perspectives of the trends in development of PhD supervisors. In ICERI 2019: 12th international conference of education, research and innovation, Seville: Conference proceedings. Valencia: International association of technology, education and development (IATED), 1764–1773.
   Google Scholar
• Hasgall, A., Saenen, B., & Borell-Damian, L. (2019). Doctoral education in Europe today: Approaches and institutional structures. European University Association. https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/online%20eua%20cde%20survey%2016.01.2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, E. (2018). Anticipating doctoral supervision: (Not) bridging the transition from supervisee to supervisor. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(4), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1382466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huet, I., & Casanova, D. (2020). Exploring the professional development of online and distance doctoral supervisors. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1742764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huet, I., & Casanova, D. (2022). Exploring the professional development of doctoral supervisors through workplace learning: A literature review. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(3), 774–788. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1877629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ives, G., & Rowley, B. (2005). Supervisor selection or allocation and continuity of supervision: PhD students’ progress and outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 30(5), 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500249161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamler, B. (2008). Rethinking doctoral publication practices: Writing from and beyond the thesis. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiley, M. (2011). Developments in research supervisor training: Causes and responses. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 585–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.594595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korthagen, F. A. J. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teacher Education, 20(1), 77–97 doi:10.1016/j.tate.2003.10.002.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. (2018). How can we develop supervisors for the modern doctorate? Studies in Higher Education, 43(5), 878–890. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1438116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., & Seale, C. (2007). Managing criticism in PhD supervision: A qualitative case study. Studies in Higher Education, 32(4), 511–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701476225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, S., & Merga, M. (2018). A current view of the thesis by publication in the humanities and social siences. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 139–154. https://doi.org/10.28945/3983
   Google Scholar
• McCallin, A., & Nayar, S. (2012). Postgraduate research supervision: A critical review of current practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.590979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch, A., & Loeser, C. (2016). Does research degree supervisor training work? The impact of a professional development induction workshop on supervision practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(5), 968–982. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1139547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motshoane, P., & Mckenna, S. (2014). More than agency: The multiple mechanisms affecting postgraduate Education. In E. Bitzer, R. Albertyn, L. Frick, B. Grant, & F. Kelly (Eds.), Pushing boundaries in Postgraduate Supervsion (pp. 185–202). SUN MEDIA.
   Google Scholar
• Motshoane, P., & McKenna, S. (2021). Crossing the border from candidate to supervisor: The need for appropriate development. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(3), 387–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1900814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moxham, L., Dwyer, T., & Reid-Searl, K. (2013). Articulating expectations for PhD candidature upon commencement: Ensuring supervisor/student ‘Best Fit’. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(4), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2013.812030
   Google Scholar
• Olmos-López, P., & Sunderland, J. (2017). Doctoral supervisors’ and supervisees’ responses to co-supervision. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41(6), 727–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2016.1177166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, K., & Clark, C. (2009). A signature pedagogy in doctoral education: The leader-scholar community. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 216–221. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09334207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C. (2007). Redefining the doctorate. The Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Peelo, M. T. (2011). Understanding supervision and the PhD. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Pietarinen, J., Pyhältö, K., Soini, T., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2013). Reducing teacher burnout: A socio-contextual approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35(8), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.05.003
   Google Scholar
• Powell, & Green, H. (Eds.). (2007)The doctorate worldwide. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., Tikkanen, L., & Anttila, H. (2022). Summary report on doctoral and supervisory experience at University of Helsinki. (University of Helsinki Administrative Publications; No. 95). University of Helsinki. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/338695
   Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., Vekkaila, J., & Keskinen, J. (2015). Fit matters in the supervisory relationship: Doctoral students’ and supervisors’ perceptions of supervisory activities. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.981836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raffing, R., Jensen, T. B., & Tønnesen, H. (2017). Self-reported needs for improving the supervision competence of PhD supervisors from the medical sciences in Denmark. BMC Medical Education, 17(188). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1023-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robertson, M. J. (2017). Team modes and power: Supervision of doctoral students. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(2), 358–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1208157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeber, M., & Horta, H. (2021). No road is long with good company. What factors affect Ph. D. student’s satisfaction with their supervisor? Higher Education Evaluation and Development, 15(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/HEED-10-2020-0044
   Google Scholar
• Shin, J., Kim, S., Kim, E., & Lim, H. (2018). Doctoral students’ satisfaction in a research-focused Korean university: Socio-environmental and motivational factors. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9528-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (2014). Towards a framework for the professional development of doctoral supervisors. A Practitioner Journal for HE Staff Development, 2, 74–87.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., & McCulloch, A. (2017). Mapping the landscape of awards for research supervision: A comparison of Australia and the UK. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(6), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1371058
   Google Scholar
• Toom, A., Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2021). Professional agency for learning as a key for developing teachers’ competencies? Education Sciences, 11(7), 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, G. (2015). Learning to supervise: Four journeys. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(1), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.981840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK Council for Graduate Education. (2021). UK Research Supervision Survey 2021 Report. http://www.ukcge.ac.uk/uk-research-supervision-survey.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• University of Helsinki. (2022). Supervision practices and supervision plan. https://studies.helsinki.fi/instructions/article/supervision-practices-and-supervision-plan
   Google Scholar
• Vehviläinen, S., & Löfström, E. (2016). ‘I wish I had a crystal ball’: Discourses and potentials for developing academic supervising. Studies in Higher Education, 41(3), 508–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.942272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vekkaila, J., Virtanen, V., Taina, J., & Pyhältö, K. (2016). The function of social support in engaging and disengaging experiences among post PhD researchers in STEM disciplines. Studies in Higher Education, 43(8), 1–16 doi:10.1080/03075079.2016.1259307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vereijken, M., Rijst, R., Driel, J., & Dekker, F. (2018). Novice supervisors’ practices and dilemmatic space in supervision of student research projects. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(4), 522–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1414791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westera, W. (2001). Competences in education: A confusion of tongues. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270120625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wichmann-Hansen, G., Godskesen, M., & Kiley, M. (2020). Successful development programs for experienced doctoral supervisors – What does it take? International Journal for Academic Development, 25(2), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2019.1663352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisker, G., & Kiley, M. (2014). Professional learning: Lessons for supervision from doctoral examining. The International Journal for Academic Development, 19(2), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2012.727762
   Google Scholar
• Wisker, G., Robinson, G., & Shacham, M. (2007). Postgraduate research success: Communities of practice involving cohorts, guardian supervisors and online communities. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(3), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290701486720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar