Academic voices delivering intensive teaching in higher education: ‘What is really key’ for block model delivery?

References

• Ahn, M. Y., & Davis, H. H. (2019). Four domains of students’ sense of belonging to university. Studies in Higher Education, 45(3), 622–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1564902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajayan, S., & Balasubramanian, S. (2021). Block mode delivery in an andragogic environment: Challenges and strategies. International Journal of Management in Education, 15(2), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMIE.2021.113523
   Google Scholar
• Ambler, T., Solomonides, I., & Smallridge, A. (2021). Students’ experiences of a first-year block model curriculum in higher education. The Curriculum Journal, 32(3), 533–558. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, A. M., & Gustafson, L. (2006). Impact of course length on student learning. Journal of Economics and Finance Education, 5(1), 26–37.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, R., & Garner, M. (2010). Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? teachers’ reflections on their practices. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562511003620019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearman, M., Dawson, P., Boud, D., Bennett, S., Hall, M., & Molloy, E. (2016). Support for assessment practice: Developing the assessment design decisions framework. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(5), 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1160217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beudels, M. M., Damerau, K., & Preisfeld, A. (2021). Effects of an interdisciplinary course on pre-service primary teachers’ content knowledge and academic self-concepts in science and technology–a quantitative longitudinal study. Education Sciences, 11(11), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C. S. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (4th ed.). Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. (1995). Assessment and learning: Contradictory or complementary. In P. Knight (Ed.), Assessment for learning in higher education (pp. 35–48). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203062074
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Dochy, F. (2010). Assessment 2020. Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education. Australian Learning & Teaching Council. www.assessmentfutures.com
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis a practical guide. SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, E., & Tyrrell, K. (2022). ‘Block and blend: A mixed method investigation into the impact of a pilot block teaching and blended learning approach upon student outcomes and experience. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(8), 1078–1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2022.2050686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, S., & Nesbit, P. L. (2008). Block or traditional? An analysis of student choice of teaching format. Journal of Management and Organization, 14(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2008.14.1.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau, H. W., Jamei, E., & Li, M. (2023). Block mode delivery for studio design teaching in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(3), 346–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2022.2062031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE publications.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, E. L. (2000). A review of time shortened courses across disciplines. College Student Journal, 34(2), 298–309.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, W. M. (2006). Intensive teaching formats: A review. Issues in Educational Research, 16(1), 5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, L., & O’Gorman, V. (2020). ‘Block teaching’ – exploring lecturers’ perceptions of intensive modes of delivery in the context of undergraduate education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(5), 583–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1564024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, L. M. (2014). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. (2006). How assessment frames student learning. In C. Bryan & K. Clegg (Eds.), Innovative assessment in higher education (pp. 43–56). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203969670
   Google Scholar
• Gillen O’Neel, C. (2021). Sense of belonging and student engagement: A daily study of first- and continuing-generation college students. Research in Higher Education, 62(1), 45–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-019-09570-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goode, E., Roche, T., Wilson, E., & McKenzie, J. W. (2023). Implications of immersive scheduling for student achievement and feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 48(7), 1123–1136. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2184472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, D. B. (2001). Using block courses for teaching logistics. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 31(7), 574–584. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030110402987
   Google Scholar
• Gray, L. M., Wong-Wylie, G., Rempel, G. R., & Cook, K. (2020). Expanding qualitative research interviewing strategies: Zoom video communications. The Qualitative Report, 25(5), 1292–1301. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, M., Power, M., & Wilson, M. (2017). A review of intensive mode of delivery and science subjects in Australian universities. Journal of Biological Education, 51(3), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1217912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemer, S. R. (2014). Finding time for quality teaching: An ethnographic study of academic workloads in the social sciences and their impact on teaching practices. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(3), 483–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.841647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, H., & Polonsky, M. (2009). Exploring marketing students’ attitudes and performance: A comparison of traditional and intensive delivery. Marketing Education Review, 19(3), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2009.11489086
   Google Scholar
• Konjarski, L., Weldon, J., Ashley, S., Freeman, T., Shanata, J., Yamanishi, M., Lotz, E., Gilde, C., & Ganzel, A. (2023). The block: A catalyst for ongoing innovation. Journal of University Learning and Teaching Practice, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.4.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kops, W. J. (2014). Teaching compressed-format courses: Teacher-based best practices. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 40(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.21225/D5FG7M
   Google Scholar
• Loton, D., Stein, C., Parker, P., & Weaven, M. (2022). Introducing block mode to first-year university students: A natural experiment on satisfaction and performance. Studies in Higher Education, 47(6), 1097–1120. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1843150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Male, S., Baillie, C., Hancock, P., Leggoe, J., & MacNish, C. (2016). Intensive mode teaching good practice report. Proceedings: Students transitions achievement retention & success 2017 (pp. 1–9). https://unistars.org/papers/STARS2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McCluskey, T., Smallridge, A., Weldon, J., Loton, D., Samarawickrema, G., & Cleary, K. (2020). Building on the VU block foundations: Results from the inaugural first year cohort. In E. Heinrich & R. Bourke (Eds.), Research and development in higher education: Vol. 42: Next generation, higher education: Challenges, changes and opportunities (pp. 61–72). Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia. https://www.herdsa.org.au/publications/conference-proceedings/research-anddevelopment-higher-education-next-generation-6
   Google Scholar
• McCluskey, T., Weldon, J., & Smallridge, A. (2019). Rebuilding the first year experience, one block at a time. Student Success, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v10i1.1148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muscat, A., & Thomas, M. B. (2023). Teaching on the block: An exploration of university educators’ experiences of block teaching in higher education contexts. Journal of Block and Intensive Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.15209/jbilt.1301
   Google Scholar
• Norton, A., Cherastidtham, I., & Mackey, W. (2018). Mapping Australian higher education 2018. https://grattan.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/907-Mapping-Australian-higher-education-2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oraison, H., Konjarski, L., Young, J., Howe, S., & Smallridge, A. (2023). Staff experiences in the Victoria University’s first year college during the transition to block mode teaching. Journal of Block and Intensive Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.15209/jbilt.1284
   Google Scholar
• Pedler, M. L., Willis, R., & Nieuwoudt, J. E. (2021). A sense of belonging at university: Student retention, motivation and enjoyment. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(3), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1955844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabagh, Z., Hall, N. C., & Saroyan, A. (2018). Antecedents, correlates and consequences of faculty burnout. Educational Research, 60(2), 131–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2018.1461573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samarawickrema, G., & Cleary, K. (2021). Block mode study: Opportunities and challenges for a new generation of learners in an Australian university. Student Success, 12(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.1579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samarawickrema, G., Galloway, T., Raponi, K., & Everett, E. (2020). A participatory evaluation of transforming first year LLB into block mode. Legal Education Review, 30(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.22297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schellekens, L. H., Bok, H. G. J., de Jong, L. H., van der Schaaf, M. F., Kremer, W. D. J., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2021). A scoping review on the notions of Assessment as Learning (AaL), Assessment for Learning (AfL), and Assessment of Learning (AoL). Studies in Educational Evaluation, 71, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewagegn, A. A., & Diale, B. M. (2021). Modular/block teaching: Practices and challenges at higher education institutions of Ethiopia. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(6), 776–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1681391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syme, S., Roche, T., Goode, E., & Crandon, E. (2021). Transforming lives: The power of an Australian enabling education. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(7), 2426–2440. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1990222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, H. (2007). Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post-secondary education and training can come to dominate learning. Assessment in Education Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(3), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940701591867
   Google Scholar
• Winchester, M., Klein, R., & Sinnayah, P. (2021). Block teaching and active learning improves academic outcomes for disadvantaged undergraduate groups. Issues in Educational Research, 31(4), 1330–1350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar