Play at work, learning and innovation

References

• Amabile, T. M., and M. Khaire. 2008. “Creativity and the Role of the Leader.” Harvard Business Review 86 (10): 100–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, M. 2000. Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. 2003. Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ardley, G. 1967. “The Role of Play in the Philosophy of Plato.” Philosophy 42 (161): 226–244. doi:10.1017/S0031819100001303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, R., and L. Devin. 2003. Artful Making – What Managers Need to Know about How Artists Work. London: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Baas, M., D. D. Ckw, and B. A. Nijstad. 2008. “A Meta-Analysis of 25 Years of Mood Creativity Research: Hedonic Tone, Activation, or Regulatory Focus?” Psychological Bulletin 134: 779–806. doi:10.1037/a0012815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. 1973. The Logical Categories of Learning and Communication, Steps to an Ecology of Mind, 2000. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, P. 2011. “Theories of Play.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Development of Play, edited by A. D. Pellegrini, 41–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, W. (1955) 1970. Illuminations, edited by H. Arendt. London: Bodley Head.
   Google Scholar
• Bodrova, E., and D. J. Leong. 1998. “Scaffolding Emergent Writing in the Zone of Proximal Development.” Literacy, Teaching and Learning 3 (2): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., A. Collins, and P. Duguid. 1989. “Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning.” Educational Researcher 18 (1): 32–42. doi:10.3102/0013189X018001032.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K., and S. P. Osborne. 2005. Managing Change and Innovation in Public Service Organizations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. 2010. Play – How It Shapes the Brain, Opens the Imagination and Invigorates the Soul. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A., and E. Bell. 2007. Business Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. 1979. Manufacturing Consent. London: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, R. 1971. “‘Work’ and ‘Play’.” Ethics 82 (1): 33–47. doi:10.1086/291827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capodagli, B., and L. Jackson. 2010. Innovate the Pixar Way: Business Lesson from the World’s Most Creative Corporate Playground. London: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, V., and E. Luken. 2014. “Playscapes: A Pedagogical Paradigm for Play and Learning.” International Journal of Play 3 (1): 69–83. doi:10.1080/21594937.2013.871965.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. 2011. Open Services Innovation: Rethinking Your Business to Grow and Compete in a New Era. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M., and K. Simpson. 2016. “A Symposium on Community- Based Research on Learning and Development.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 23 (1): 2–4. doi:10.1080/10749039.2015.1107743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contu, A., and H. Willmott. 2003. “Re-Embedding Situatedness: The Importance of Power Relations in Learning Theory.” Organization Science 14 (3): 283–296. doi:10.1287/orsc.14.3.283.15167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossley, M., and G. Vulliamy. 1984. “Case Study Research Methods and Comparative Education.” Comparative Education 20 (2): 193–207. doi:10.1080/0305006840200202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1996. Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery And Invention. NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. 1997. Narrating the Organization: Dramas of Institutional Identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. 2003. Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow and the Feeling Brain. Orlando, FL: Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, H., M. Cole, and J. V. Wertsch, eds. 2007. The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Certeau, M. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. 1970. Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of Human Sciences. http://www5.csudh.edu/ccauthen/576f13/drrdassp.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1909) 1997. How We Think. New York, NY: Houghton Miffin.
   Google Scholar
• Dodd, D. S. 2014. “Roots Radical – Place, Power and Practice in Punk Entrepreneurship.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 26: 165–205. doi:10.1080/08985626.2013.877986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, D., and H. Takacs. 2004. “Team Play: Heedful Interrelating as the Boundary for Innovation.” Long Range Planning 37 (6): 569–590. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2004.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. 1986. How Institutions Think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eberle, S. G. 2012. “The Elements of Play – Toward a Philosophy and Definition of Play.” Journal of Play 6 (2): 214–233.
   Google Scholar
• Eliot, T. S. 2015. The Poems of TS Eliot Volume II: Practical Cats and Further Verses, edited by C. Ricks and J. McCue. Harlow: Faber & Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. 2005. Using Narrative in Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 1996. “Developmental Studies of Work as a Test Bench of Activity Theory: The Case of Primary Care Medical Practice.” In Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context, edited by S. Chaiklin and J. Lave, 64–103. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., A. Sannino, and V. Virkkunen. 2014. “On the Methodological Demands of Formative Interventions.” Mind, Culture and Activity 21: 118–128. doi:10.1080/10749039.2014.891868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., R. Miettinen, and R. L. Punamäki, eds.. 1999. Perspectives on Activity Theory. Harlow: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Forabosco, G. 1992. “Cognitive Aspects of the Humour Process: The Concept of Incongruity.” Humor 5: 45–68. doi:10.1515/humr.1992.5.1-2.45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. 1982. The Economics of Industrial Innovation. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Froebel, F. (1895) 1967. Friedrich Froebel. A Selection from his Writing, edited by I. M. Lilley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. J. 1982. “The Concept of Affordances in Development: The Renascence of Functionalism.” In The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology, Volume 15: The Concept of Development, edited by W. A. Collins, Chapter 3. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. P. Schwartzman, and M. Trow. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, M. A., and J. Webster. 1992. “The Adult Playfulness Scale: An Initial Assessment.” Psychological Reports 71: 83–103. doi:10.2466/pr0.1992.71.1.83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78 (6): 1360–1380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1938) 1996. Being and Time. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Henricks, T. S. 2006. Play Reconsidered. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hjorth, D. 2005. “Organizational Entrepreneurship: With De Certeau on Creating Heterotopias (Or Spaces for Play).” Journal of Management Inquiry 14 (4): 386–398. doi:10.1177/1056492605280225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoff, E. V. 2013. “The Relationship between Pretend Play and Creativity.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Development of the Imagination, edited by M. Taylor, 403–416. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holodynski, M., and F. Falk Seeger. 2013. “Current and Impending Issues in Cultural-Historical Studies on Emotions: A Follow-Up.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 20 (3): 288–297. doi:10.1080/10749039.2013.807207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, S. 2000. “Introduction - The Competency Movement: Its Origins and Impact on the Public Sector.” The International Journal of Public Sector Management 13 (4): 306–318.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, B. 2002. A Playworker’s Taxonomy of Play Types. London: PlayLink.
   Google Scholar
• Huizinga, J. (1938) 2000. Homo Ludens. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holman, D. and L. Hall. 1996. “Competence in Management Development: Rites and Wrongs.” British Journal of Management 7: 191–202.
   Google Scholar
• Illeris, K. 2004. Learning in Working Life. Learning Lab Denmark, Copenhagen: Roskilde University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, S. G., K. J. Lauer, G. Ekvall, and A. Britz. 2001. “Perceptions of the Best and Worst Climates for Creativity.” Creativity Research Journal 13: 171–184. doi:10.1207/S15326934CRJ1302_5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsen, R., S. L. Muhr, and M. Pedersen. 2009. “The Frantic Gesture of Interpassivity.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 22 (2): 202–213. doi:10.1108/09534810910947217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. 2010. Where Good Ideas Come From. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Juul, J. 2005. Half-Real – Video Games between Real Rules and Fictional Worlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kampmann, J. 1997. Børn Som Informanter. Roskilde: Roskilde Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Kaprow, A. 2003. Essays on the Blurring of Art and Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khurana, R. 2007. From Higher Aims to Hired Hands: The Social Transformation of American Business Schools and the Unfulfilled Promise of Management as a Profession. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kinder, T., and J. Stenvall. 2017. Unlearning is the Key to Public Service Delivery Innovation. Paper presented at the Public Service Innovation Conference, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Lillehammer, Norway, November 15–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kipper, S., and D. Todt. 2005. “The Sound of Laughter: Recent Concepts and Findings in Research into Laughter Vocalizations.” In The Anatomy of Laughter, edited by T. Garfitt, E. McMorran, and J. Taylor, 24–33. London: Legenda Modern.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laitinen, I., J. Stenvall, O. Hatem, and T. Kinder. Forthcoming. “Accountability.” Financial Accountability and Management.
   Google Scholar
• Laitinen, I., J. Stenvall, and T. Kinder. 2017. “Co-Design and Action Learning in Local Public Services.” Journal of Adult & Continuing Education 24 (1): 58–80.
   Google Scholar
• Laitinen, I., J. Stenvall, and T. Kinder. 2018. “Local Public Service Productivity and Performance Measurement.” International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development 9 (1): 49–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I., and S. Llewellyn. 1995. “Real Life Constructs: The Exploration of Organizational Processes in case Studies.” Management Accounting Research 6: 223–235. doi:10.1006/mare.1995.1013.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, L. J. 2015. “Play and Space – Towards a Formal Definition of Play.” International Journal of Play 4 (2): 175–189. doi:10.1080/21594937.2015.1060567.
   Google Scholar
• Ledin, P., and R. Samuelsson. 2017. “Play and Imitation: Multimodal Interaction and Second-Language Development in Preschool.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 24 (1): 18–31. doi:10.1080/10749039.2016.1247868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibowitz, B., J. Garraway, and J. Farmer. 2015. “Influence of the past on Professional Lives: A Collective Commentary.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 22 (1): 23–36. doi:10.1080/10749039.2014.979949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leifer, R., C. M. McDermott, G. C. O’Connor, L. S. Peters, M. P. Rice, and R. W. Veryzer. 2000. Radical Innovation: How Mature Companies Can Outsmart Upstarts. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, A. J. 2011. “Neurobiology and the Therapeutic Action of Psychoanalytic Play Therapy with Children.” Clinical Social Work Journal 39 (1): 50–60. doi:10.1007/s10615-009-0229-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, J. N. 1977. Playfulness: Its Relationship to Imagination and Creativity. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linkner, J. 2011. Disciplined Dreaming. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, E. R. and J. C. Spender. 2011. Confronting Managerialism. London: ZED Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, J., and T. Redpath. 2012. “‘Smart’ Technologies in Early Years Literacy Education: A Meta-narrative of Paradigmatic Tensions in iPad Use in an Australian Preparatory Classroom.” Journal of Early Childhood Learning 14 (2): 147-174.
   Google Scholar
• Mainemelis, C., and S. Ronson. 2006. “Ideas are Born in Fields of Play: Towards a Theory of Play and Creativity in Organizational Settings.” Research in Organizational Behavior 27: 81–131. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(06)27003-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrou, H. I. 1956. A History of Education in Antiquity. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, J., L. Plowman, D. Yamada-Rice, J. C. Bishop, A. Davenport, S. Davis, P. Robinson, and M. Piras. 2015. Exploring Play and Creativity in Pre-Schoolers’ Use of Apps: Final Project Report. Sheffield: University of Sheffield.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, L. 1998. “Elites in the City of London: Some Methodological Considerations.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 30 (12): 2133–2146.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. V. 1988. “An Affair with Flutes: An Appreciation of Play.” In Philosophic Inquiry in Sport, edited by W. J. Morgan and K. V. Meier. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Memon, A., and T. Kinder. 2016. “Changing Management Roles in the Scottish NHS: Implications for Management Learning and Development.” Public Money & Management 36 (1): 47–54. doi:10.1080/09540962.2016.1103418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A., and T. Kinder. 2017. “Co-Location as a Catalyst for Service Innovation: A Study of Scottish Health and Social Care.” Public Management Review 19 (4): 381–405. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1177107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montaigne, M. 1991. The Complete Essays. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, G. A. 2005. Dealing with Darwin: How Great Companies Innovate at Every Phase of Their Evolution. NY: Portfolio.
   Google Scholar
• Nardi, B., N. Gajdamaschko, and J. A. Vadeboncoeur. 2017. “Agency, Identity, and Objects in Work and Play.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 24 (3): 181–182. doi:10.1080/10749039.2017.1338047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardi, B. A., Ed. 1996. Context and Consciousness. Mass: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Normann, R. 2002. Services Management: Strategy and Management in Service Business. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Paley, G. 2009. A Child’s Work: The Importance of Fantasy Play. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. 1967. Play, Dream, and Imitations in Childhood. Translated by C. Gattegno and F.M. Hodgson. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, D., J. Riezebos, and J. O. Strandhagen. 2013. “Lean Production and ERP Systems in Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises: ERP Support for Pull Production.” International Journal of Production Research 51 (2): 395–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, P. 2011. “Playing with Ideas: The Affective Dynamics of Creative Play.” American Journal of Play Winter: 288–323.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P., and W. M. Sullivan. 1985. Interpretive Social Science. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riezler, K. 1941. “Play and Seriousness.” The Journal of Philosophy 38 (19): 505–517. doi:10.2307/2017298.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. R. 1969. Freedom to Learn. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Roos, J., B. Victor, and M. Statler. 2004. “Playing Seriously with Strategy.” Long Range Planning 37 (6): 549–568. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2004.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1989. Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russ, S. W. 2003. “Play and Creativity: Developmental Issues.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 47 (3): 291–303. doi:10.1080/00313830308594.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, M., P. Lewis, and A. Thornhill. 2007. Research Methods for Business Students. London: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, (Vol. 626). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Semler, R. 2003. The Seven-Day Weekend: A Better Way to Work in the 21st Century. London: Arrow Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 2009. Respect in an Age of Inequality. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Sicart, M. 2014. Play Matters. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siemer, M. 2005. “Moods as Multiple Object Directed and as Objectless Affective States: An Examination of the Dispositional Theory of Moods.” Cognition & Emotion 19: 815–845. doi:10.1080/02699930541000048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smallwood, J. 2013. “Distinguishing How from Why the Mind Wanders: A Process–Occurrence Framework for Self-Generated Mental Activity.” Psychological Bulletin 139 (3): 519. doi:10.1037/a0030010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, B. M., and S. Spoelstra. 2012. “Play at Work: Continuation, Intervention and Usurpation.” Organization 19 (1): 81–97. doi:10.1177/1350508411407369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standerfield, K. 2002. Intangibility Management: Tools for Solving the Accounting and Management Crisis. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steyaert, C., and D. Hjorth, eds. 2003. New Movements in Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton-Smith, B. 1997. The Ambiguity of Play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, H., L. Thomas, and A. Wilson. 2012. “The Unfulfilled Promise of Management Education (ME): The Role, Value and Purposes of ME.” Journal of Management Development 32 (5): 460–476.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. 1999. The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trimpi, W. 1983. Muses of One Mind: A Literary Analysis of Experience and Its Continuity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1934) 1997. The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 3 of Problems of the Theory and History of Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, V., R. Roy, M. Bruce, and S. Potter. 1992. Winning by Design. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. 1979. “Cognitive Processes in Organizations.” Research in Organizational Behavior 1 (1): 41–74.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. 1998. “Introductory essay—Improvisation as a Mindset for Organizational Analysis.” Organization Science 9 (5): 543–555. doi:10.1287/orsc.9.5.543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weik, E. 2012. “Introducing ‘The Creativity of Action’ into Institutionalist Theory.” M@N@Gement 15 (5): 564–581. doi:10.3917/mana.155.0564.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. W., R. McDermott, and W. M. Snyder. 2002. Cultivating Communities of Practice. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. 1985. Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. 1998. Mind as Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. R. 2010. “Space for God.” Sociology of Religion 73 (1): 257–279.
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. 2000. Conducting Interpretive Policy Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Applied Social Research Methods). 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar