Children’s preferences for schoolyard features and understanding of ecosystem service innovations – a study in five Swedish preschools

References

• Adams, S., & Savahl, S. (2017). Children’s discourses of natural spaces: Considerations for children’s subjective well-being. Child Indicators Research, 10(2), 423–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almers, E., Askerlund, P., & Kjellström, S. (2018). Why forest gardening for children? Swedish forest garden educators’ ideas, purposes, and experiences. The Journal of Environmental Education, 49(3), 242–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Änggård, E. (2012). Att skapa platser i naturmiljöer. Om hur vardagliga praktiker i en I Ur och Skur-förskola bidrar till att ge platser identitet [The construction of places in outdoor environments: About how every day practices in an outdoor preschool contribute to places identities]. Nordisk Barnhehageforskning, 5(10), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Ärlemalm-Hagsér, A., & Sandberg, E. (2017). Early childhood education for sustainability: The relationship between young children’s participation and agency – Children and nature. In T. Waller, E. Ärlemalm-Hagsér, E. B. Hansen Sandseter, L. Libby-Hammond, K. Lekies, & S. Wyver (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of outdoor play and learning (pp. 213–228). Los Angeles: SAGE. Publications Ltd. doi:https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526402028.n14
   Google Scholar
• Askerlund, P., & Almers, E. (2016). Forest gardens – New opportunities for urban children to understand and develop relationships with other organisms. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 20, 187–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assadourian, E. (2017). EarthEd: Rethinking education on a changing planet. In E. Assadourian & L. Mastny (Eds.), EarthEd: Rethinking education on a changing planet (pp. 3–20). Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boldemann, C., Blennow, M., Dal, H., Mårtensson, F., Raustorp, A., Yuen, K., & Wester, U. (2006). Impact of preschool environment upon children’s physical activity and sun exposure. Preventive Medicine, 42(4), 301–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolund, P., & Hunhammar, S. (1999). Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics, 29, 293–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castonguay, G., & Jutras, S. (2009). Children’s appreciation of outdoor places in a poor neighborhood. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 101–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla, L. (1992). Childhood place attachments. In I. Altman & S. M. Low (Eds.), Human behavior and environment: Vol 12. Place attachment (pp. 63–86). Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chawla, L. (2015). Benefits of nature contact for children. Journal of Planning Literature, 30(4), 433–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A., & Moss, P. (2001). Listening to young children: The mosaic approach. London: National Children’s Bureau and Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Cosco, N. (2006). Motivation to move: Physical activity affordances in preschool play areas. (Doctoral thesis). Edinburgh College of Art, School of Landscape Architecture, ECA/Heriot-Watt University. Retrieved from https://era.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/5904
   Google Scholar
• Díaz, S., Settele, J., Brondízio, E., Ngo, H., Guèze, M., Agard, J., … Zayas, C. (2019). Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services Retrieved from https://ipbes.net/sites/default/files/downloads/spm_unedited_advance_for_posting_htn.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dowdell, K., Gray, T., & Malone, K. (2011). Nature and its influence on children’s outdoor play. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 15(2), 24–35.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, S. (2010). Children in the natural world. In J. M. Davis (Ed.), Young children and the environment (pp. 43–75). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fjørtoft, I. (2001). The natural environment as a playground for children: The impact of outdoor play activities in pre-primary school children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29(2), 111–117.
   Google Scholar
• Fjørtoft, I., & Sageie, J. (2000). The natural environment as a playground for children: Landscape description and analyses of a natural playscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 48, 83–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. L., Cornell, M., & Gill, T. (2017). A systematic review of research into the impact of loose parts play on children’s cognitive, social and emotional development. School Mental Health, 9(4), 295–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, T. (2014). The benefits of children’s engagement with nature: A systematic literature review. Children, Youth and Environments, 24(2), 10–34. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.24.2.0010
   Google Scholar
• Hammarsten, M., Askerlund, P., Almers, E., Avery, H., & Samuelsson, T. (2019). Developing ecological literacy in a forest garden: Children’s perspectives. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 19(3), 227–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., de Vries, S., & Frumkin, H. (2014). Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35(1), 207–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heft, H. (1988). Affordances of children’s environments: A functional approach to environmental description. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 5(3), 5–37. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41514683
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, R. M., & Procaccino, J. K. (2009). Preschool children’s outdoor play area preferences. Early Child Development and Care, 179(8), 1103–1112.
   Google Scholar
• Klerfelt, A., & Haglund, B. (2015). Walk-and-talk conversations: A way to elicit children’s perspectives and prominent discourses in school-age educare. IJREE–International Journal for Research on Extended Education, 2(2), 119–134.
   Google Scholar
• Kochanowski, L., & Carr, V. (2014). Nature playscapes as contexts for fostering self-determination. Children, Youth and Environments, 24(2), 146–167. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.24.2.0146
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, L. P., Ponte, I., & Chau, C. (2013). The impact of a natural playscape installation on young children’s play behaviors. Children, Youth and Environments, 23(2), 49–77. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.23.2.0049
   Google Scholar
• Lerstrup, I., & Refshauge, A. D. (2016). Characteristics of forest sites used by a Danish forest preschool. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 20, 387–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerstrup, I., & van den Bosch, C. K. (2017). Affordances of outdoor settings for children in preschool: Revisiting Heft’s functional taxonomy. Landscape Research, 42(1), 47–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loukaitou-sideris, A. (2003). Children’s common grounds: A study of intergroup relations among children in public settings. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(2), 130–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, A. J., & Dyment, J. E. (2010). Where do children choose to play on the school ground? The influence of green design. Education 3–13, 38(2), 177–189.
   Google Scholar
• McBride, B. B., Brewer, C. A., Berkowitz, A. R., & Borrie, W. T. (2013). Environmental literacy, ecological literacy, ecoliteracy: What do we mean and how did we get here? Ecosphere, 4(5), 67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merewether, J. (2015). Young children’s perspectives of outdoor learning spaces: What matters? Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 40(1), 99–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. C., & Wong, H. H. (1997). Natural learning: The life of an environmental schoolyard. Creating environments for rediscovering nature’s way of teaching. Berkeley: MIG Communications.
   Google Scholar
• Norðdahl, K., & Einarsdóttir, J. (2015). Children’s views and preferences regarding their outdoor environment. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 15(2), 152–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, D. W. (1992). Ecological literacy – Education and the transition to a postmodern world. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raith, A. (2017). Children on green schoolyards: Nature experience, preferences, and behaviour. Children, Youth and Environments, 27(1), 91–111. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.27.1.0091
   Google Scholar
• Rosenow, N., & Bailie, P. (2014). Introduction to the special issue: Greening early childhood. Children, Youth and Environments, 24(2), 1–9. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.24.2.0001
   Google Scholar
• Samborski, S. (2010). Biodiverse or barren school grounds: Their effects on children. Children, Youth and Environments, 20(2), 67–115. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.20.2.0067
   Google Scholar
• Sancar, F. H., & Severcan, Y. C. (2010). Children’s places: Rural-urban comparisons using participatory photography in the Bodrum Peninsula, Turkey. Journal of Urban Design, 15(3), 293–324.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma-Brymer, V., Brymer, E., Gray, T., & Davids, K. (2018). Affordances guiding forest school practice: The application of the ecological dynamics approach. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 21, 103–115.
   Google Scholar
• Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable education. Re-visioning learning and change. Totnes: Green Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. K. (2017). Ecoliteracy and schooling for sustainability. In E. Assadourian & L. Mastny (Eds.), EarthEd: Rethinking education on a changing planet (pp. 35–47). Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waller, T. (2007). The trampoline tree and the swamp monster with 18 heads: Outdoor play in the foundation stage and foundation phase. Education 3–13, 35(4), 393–407.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, K. (2018). What’s in a dream? Natural elements, risk and loose parts in children’s dream playspace drawings. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 43(1), 34–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamani, Z. (2016). The wood is a more free space for children to be creative; their imagination kind of sparks out there: Exploring young children’s cognitive play opportunities in natural, manufactured and mixed outdoor preschool zones. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 16(2), 172–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamani, Z. (2017). Young children’s preferences: What stimulates children’s cognitive play in outdoor preschools? Journal of Early Childhood Research, 15(3), 256–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamani, Z., & Moore, R. (2013). The cognitive play behavior affordances of natural and manufactured elements within outdoor preschool settings. Landscape Research, 1, 268–278.
   Google Scholar