The children-nature interrelationship in outdoor early childhood education: when children and bamboo co-construct a ‘secret hideaway’

References

• Ariès, P. (1981). História social da criança e da família [Child and family’s social history] (Vol. 2). Rio de Janeiro: Libros tecnicos e cientificos editora.
   Google Scholar
• Bento, G. (2016). Infância e espaços exteriores–perspetivas sociais e educativas na atualidade [Childhood and outdoor spaces – Social and educational perspectives today]. Investigar em educação, 2(4), 127–140.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, I. C. M. (2014). A perspectiva das pedras: Considerações sobre os novos materialismos e as epistemologias ecológicas [The perspective of stones: Considerations on the new materialisms and ecological epistemologies]. Pesquisa em Educação Ambiental, 9(1), 69–79.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, I. C. M., Steil, C. A., & Gonzaga, F. A. (2020). Learning from a more-than-human perspective. Plants as teachers. The Journal of Environmental Education, 51(2), 144–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, D. A., & Mcphie, J. (2014). Becoming animate in education: Immanent materiality and outdoor learning for sustainability. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 14(3), 198–216.
   Google Scholar
• Coelho A, Vale V, Bogotte E, Figueiredo-Ferreira A, Duque I and Pinho L. (2015). Oferta educativa outdoor como complemento da Educação Pré-Escolar: Os benefícios do contacto com a natureza. R Est Inv Psico y Educ, 111–117.
   Google Scholar
• Corsaro, W. A. (2002). A reprodução interpretativa no brincar ao “faz-de-conta” das crianças [Interpretive reproduction in children’s “make-believe” play]. Educação, Sociedade & Culturas, 17, 113–134.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, M. (2002). A gente aqui o que gosta mais é de brincar com os outros meninos!: as crianças como actores sociais e a (re)organização social do grupo de pares no quotidiano de um jardim de infância [Here we like to play with other children!: children as social actors and the social (re)organization of the peer group in the daily life of a kindergarten]. PhD Thesis. Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade do Porto, Portugal
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, M., & Tomás, C. (2018). ‘O pré-escolar faz a diferença?’ Políticas educativas na educação de infância e práticas pedagógicas [‘Does preschool make a difference?’ Educational policies in early childhood education and pedagogical practices]. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 31(2), 68–84.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2016). Sociology and the new materialism: Theory, research, action. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hackett, A., Procter, L. &., & Seymour, J. (ed.). (2015). Children’s spatialities: Embodiment, emotion, and agency. Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2016). Antropoceno, capitaloceno, plantationoceno, chthuluceno: Fazendo parentes [Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making kin]. Clima Com Cultura Científica, 3(5), 139–146.
   Google Scholar
• Hultman, K., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 525–542.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• James, A. (2007). Giving voice to children’s voices: Practices and problems, pitfalls and potentials. American Anthropologist, 109(2), 261–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen K. (2018). ‘Children’s clans’; social organisation and interpretive reconstruction as aspects on development of peer-groups in outdoor play. Ethnography and Education, 13(4), 490–507. 10.1080/17457823.2017.1348904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leather, M. (2018). A critique of “Forest School” or something lost in translation. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 21(1), 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Liese, W., & Köhl, M. (2015). Bamboo. Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lobovikov, M., Paudel, S., Ball, L., Piazza, M., Guardia, M., Ren, H., & Wu, J. (2007). World bamboo resources: A thematic study prepared in the framework of the global forest resources assessment 2005. Rome: FAO-UN.
   Google Scholar
• Mannion, G. (2020). Re-assembling environmental and sustainability education: Orientations from new materialism. Environmental Education Research, 26(9–10), 1353–1372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansinho, M. I., & Schmidt, L. (1994). A emergência do ambiente nas ciências sociais: Análise de um inventário bibliográfico [The emergence of the environment in the social sciences: Analysis of a bibliographic inventory]. Análise Social, 29(125/126), 441–481.
   Google Scholar
• Melhuus, E. (2012). Outdoor day-care centres – A culturalization of nature: How do children relate to nature as educational practice? European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 20(3), 455–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merewether, J. (2019). New materialisms and children’s outdoor environments: Murmurative diffractions. Children's Geographies, 17(1), 105–117. doi:10.1080/14733285.2018.1471449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motta, R. S. (2020). ‘Anda lá fora’: Um olhar sobre as inter-relações, crianças, natureza e educação [‘Let’s go outside’: A look at interrelationships, children, nature and education]. Portugal: Master Dissertation. Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade do Porto.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, N., Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., & Nxumalo, F. (2018). Rethinking nature-based approaches in early childhood education: Common worlding practices. Journal of Childhood Studies, 3(1), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Nxumalo, F., & Cedillo, S. (2017). Decolonizing place in early childhood studies: Thinking with indigenous onto-epistemologies and black feminist geographies. Global Studies of Childhood, 7(2), 99–112.
   Google Scholar
• Procter, L. (2015). Children, Nature, and Emotion: Exploring how children’s emotional experiences of ‘green’ spaces shape their understandings of the natural world. In M. Blazek & P. Kraftl (Eds.), Children’s emotions in policy and practice (pp. 221–241). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Prout, A. (2004). The Future of Childhood (1st ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prout, A. (2011). Taking a step away from modernity: Reconsidering the new sociology of childhood. Global Studies of Childhood, 1(1), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Queiros, M. (2012). Natural Parks in Portugal: a way to become more ecologically responsible? Environment and History, 18(4), 585–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, K. (2004). Places for children–children’s places. Childhood, 11(2), 155–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rautio, P. (2013). Being nature: Interspecies articulation as a species-specific practice of relating to environment. Environmental Education Research, 19(4), 445–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rautio, P., & Jokinen, P. (2015). Children’s relations to the more-than-human world. Beyond developmental views. In B. Evans, J. Horton, & T. Skelton (Eds.), Play, recreation, health and well being (pp. 1–15). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Rios, C., & Menezes, I. (2017). ‘I saw a magical garden with flowers that people could not damage!’: Children’s visions of nature and of learning about nature in and out of school. Environmental Education Research, 23(10), 1402–1413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, P. (2004). Ecologia e Ambiente: contribuições da ciência ecológica para a compreensão da crise ambiental. [Ecology and Environment: contributions of ecological science to understanding the environmental crisis]. Educação, Sociedade e Culturas, 73–92.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, B. D. S., & Meneses, M. P. (2010). Epistemologias do Sul [Epistemologies of the South. In B. S. Santos & M. P. Menezes (Eds.), Epistemologias do Sul (pp. 637). Coimbra: Edições Almedina S.A.
   Google Scholar
• Sarmento, M. J. (2003). Imaginário e culturas da infância [Childhood imagination and cultures]. Cadernos de Educação, 12(21), 51–69.
   Google Scholar
• Sarmento, M. J., & Gouvea, M. C. S. (2008). Apresentação: Olhares sobre a infância e a criança [Presentation: Perspectives on childhood and children]. In M. Sarmento & M. C. S. Gouveia (Eds.), Estudos da Infância, educação e práticas sociais (pp. 7–13). Petrópolis: Ed. Vozes.
   Google Scholar
• Skånfors, L., Löfdahl, A., & Hägglund, S. (2009). Hidden spaces and places in the preschool: Withdrawal strategies in preschool children’s peer cultures. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 7(1), 94–109.
   Google Scholar
• Spyrou, S. (2018). Disclosing childhoods. Research and knowledge production for a critical childhood studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Steil, C. A., & Carvalho, I. C. M. (2014). Epistemologias ecológicas: Delimitando um conceito [Ecological epistemologies: Delimiting a concept]. Mana, 20(1), 163–183.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A. (2013). Reconfiguring the natures of childhood. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2015). Learning with children, ants, and worms in the anthropocene: Towards a common world pedagogy of multispecies vulnerability. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 23(4), 507–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, A. (2017). Beyond stewardship: Common world pedagogies for the anthropocene. Environmental Education Research, 23(10), 1448–1461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiriba, L. (2018). Educação Infantil como Direito e Alegria: Em busca de pedagogias ecológicas, populares e libertárias [Childhood Education as Right and Joy: In search of ecological, popular and libertarian pedagogies]. São Paulo: Editora Paz e Terra.
   Google Scholar
• Tonucci, F. (2005). Citizen child: Play as welfare parameter for urban life. Topoi, 24(2), 183–195.
   Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos, T. (2015). Do discurso da criança “no” centro à centralidade da criança na comunidade [From the discourse of the child “in” the center to the centrality of the child in the community]. Investigar em educação, 2(4), 25–42.
   Google Scholar