Using video to support in-service teacher professional development: the state of the field, limitations and possibilities

References

• Anderson, S., Allen, P., Peckham, S., & Goodwin, N. (2008). Asking the right questions: Scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services. Health Research Policy and Systems, 6(7), 1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Aubusson, P., Schuck, S., & Burden, K. (2009). Mobile learning for teacher professional learning: Benefits, obstacles and issues. Research in Learning Technology, 17, 233–249.
   Google Scholar
• Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 10–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D., & Cohen, D. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Towards a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Baran, E. (2014). A review of research on mobile learning in teacher education. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 17–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81–109.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H., Whitcomb, J., & Liston, D. (2009). Wicked problems and other thoughts on issues of technology and teacher learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 3–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosley, H. E. (1968). Video processes in teacher education programs; Scope, techniques, and assessment. Multi-State Teacher Education Project, Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, N. (2009, April). Teacher peer coaching with digital video – Evaluation of a four-year professional development program. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, at symposium Teacher Autonomy in Using Digital Video for Professional Learning of Practicing Teachers, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Calandra, B., & Rich, P. J. (Eds.). (2014). Digital video for teacher education: Research and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. (1996). A comparison of teacher efficacy for pre and in-service teachers in Scotland and America. Education, 117, 2–11.
   Google Scholar
• Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Lamb, C. E. (2001, October). Digital video: Watch me do what I say! Paper presented at the Consortium of State Organizations for Texas Teacher Education, San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, P. Y., & Harris, R. C. (2005). Video ethnography and teachers’ cognitive activities. Advances in Research on Teaching, 11, 337–335.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2000). Seeing is understanding: Examining the merits of video and narrative cases. Journal of Staff Development, 21(4), 40–43.
   Google Scholar
• Coles, A. (2012). Using video for professional development: The role of the discussion facilitator. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16, 165–184.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Youngs, P. (2002). Defining ‘highly qualified teachers’: What does ‘scientifically-based research’ actually tell us? Educational Researcher, 31(9), 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Daudt, H. M., Van Mossel, C., & Scott, S. J. (2013, March 23). Enhancing the scoping study methodology: A large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, 48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, K., Drey, N., & Gould, D. (2009). What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46, 1386–1400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLuca, C., Shulha, J., Luhanga, U., Shulha, L. M., Christou, T. M., & Klinger, D. A. (2015). Collaborative inquiry as a professional learning structure for educators: A scoping review. Professional Development in Education, 41, 640–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, A., Insfran, E., & Abrahão, S. (2011). Usability evaluation methods for the web: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, 53, 789–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, L. E. (2002). Using video to reflect on curriculum. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 72–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, F. F., & Manning, B. A. (1973). Self-confrontation reviewed: A conceptualization for video playback in teacher education. Review of Educational Research, 43, 469–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaudin, C., & Chaliès, S. (2015). Video viewing in teacher education and professional development: A literature review. Educational Research Review, 16, 41–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyer, M., & Felske, F. (2011). Consumer toy or corporate tool: The iPad enters the workplace. Interactions, 18, 45–49.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, R., Pea, R., Barron, B., & Derry, S. J. (Eds.). (2007). Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, D. (2007). Weight of evidence: A framework for the appraisal of the quality and relevance of evidence. Research Papers in Education, 22, 213–228.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J., Collins, A., & Resnick, L. (1996). Cognition and learning: Handbook of educational psychology. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haßler, B., Major, L., & Hennessy, S. (2016). Tablet use in schools: A critical review of the evidence for learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32, 139–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haßler, B., Major, L., Warwick, P., Watson, S., Hennessy, S., & Nicholl, B. (2016, April). Perspectives on technology, resources and learning: Productive classroom practices, effective teacher professional development. Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S. (2014). Bridging between research and practice: Supporting professional development through collaborative studies of classroom teaching with technology. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S., Haßler, B., & Hofmann, R. (2015). Challenges and opportunities for teacher professional development in interactive use of technology in African schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(5), 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., Morris, A. K., & Glass, B. (2003). Learning to learn to teach: An ‘experiment’ model for teaching and teacher preparation in mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 201–222.
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 48–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, W. (2006). The 3C3R model: A conceptual framework for designing problems in PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1006
   Google Scholar
• Kitchenham, B., Budgen, D., & Brereton, P. (2015). Evidenced-based software engineering and systematic reviews. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koc, Y., Peker, D., & Osmanoglu, A. (2009). Supporting teacher professional development through online video case study discussions: An assemblage of preservice and inservice teachers and the case teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 1158–1168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, T., Comber, C., Gage, J., & Cullum-Hanshaw, A. (2010). Images of the future for education? Videoconferencing: A literature review. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19, 295–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., Kinzie, M. B., & Whittaker, J. V. (2012). Impact of online support for teachers’ open-ended questioning in pre-k science activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 568–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implement Science, 5, 1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major, L., Haßler, B., & Hennessy, S. (2017). Tablets in schools: Impact, affordances and recommendations. In A. Marcus-Quinn & T. Hourigan (Eds.), Handbook for digital learning in K–12 schools (pp. 115–128). Cham: Springer International Publishing AG.
   Google Scholar
• Major, L., Kyriacou, T., & Brereton, O. P. (2012). Systematic literature review: Teaching novices programming using robots. IET Software, 6, 502–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, B., & Mitchell, N. (2014). The role of video in teacher professional development. Teacher Development, 18, 403–417.
   Google Scholar
• McEvoy, E., MacPhail, A., & Heikinaro-Johansson, P. (2015). Physical education teacher educators: A 25-year scoping review of literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 162–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHenry, V. E. (1967). The use of video processes in teacher education. Multi-State Teacher Education Project, Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Mennin, S. (2007). Small-group problem-based learning as a complex adaptive system. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 303–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Jones, A., Cook, D. J., Jadad, A. R., Moher, M., Tugwell, P., et al. (1998). Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? The Lancet, 352(9128), 609–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neto, P. A. D. M. S., do Carmo Machado, I., McGregor, J. D., De Almeida, E. S., & de Lemos Meira, S. R., (2011). A systematic mapping study of software product lines testing. Information and Software Technology, 53, 407–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozok, A. A., Benson, D., Chakraborty, J., & Norcio, A. F. (2008). A comparative study between tablet and laptop PCs: User satisfaction and preferences. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24, 329–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., & Mattsson, M. (2008, June). Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, University of Bari, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, K., Vakkalanka, S., & Kuzniarz, L. (2015). Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update. Information and Software Technology, 64, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piwowar, V., Thiel, F., & Ophardt, D. (2013). Training in-service teachers’ competencies in classroom management. A quasi-experimental study with teachers of secondary schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 30, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savery, J. (2006). Overview of PBL: Definition and distinctions. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1, 57–75.
   Google Scholar
• Seidel, T., Stürmer, K., Blomberg, G., Kobarg, M., & Schwindt, K. (2011). Teacher learning from analysis of videotaped classroom situations: Does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that of others? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 259–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang, A., Huwiler-Müntener, K., Nartey, L., Jüni, P., Dörig, S., Sterne, J. A., et al. (2005). Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy. The Lancet, 366(9487), 726–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherin, M. G. (2004). New perspectives on the role of video in teacher education. Advances in Research on Teaching, 10, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripp, T., & Rich, P. (2012). Using video to analyze one’s own teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 678–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Es, E. A. (2009). Participants’ roles in the context of a video club. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 100–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2010). The influence of video clubs on teachers’ thinking and practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 155–176.
   Google Scholar
• Varela, F. T., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., & Hartley, K. (2003). Video technology as a support for teacher education reform. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11, 105–138.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, M. L., Tsai, C.-C., & Chang, C.-Y. (2006). Attitudes towards peer assessment: A comparison of the perspectives of pre-service and in-service teachers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43, 83–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, V. H., & Wilson, E. K. (2005). From preservice to inservice teaching: A study of technology integration. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 22(2), 49–55.
   Google Scholar