1,312
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Adapting school to the twenty-first century: educators’ perspectives

ORCID Icon
Pages 287-299 | Received 30 Oct 2017, Accepted 03 Mar 2018, Published online: 25 Mar 2019

References

  • Anderson R. (2008). Implications of the information and knowledge society for education. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 5–22). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Aubusson, P., Burke, P., Schuck, S., Kearney, M., & Frischknecht, B. (2014). Teachers choosing rich tasks: The moderating impact of technology on student learning, enjoyment, and preparation. Educational Researcher, 43, 219–229.
  • Barron, B., Walter, S. E., Martin, C. K., & Schatz, C. (2010). Predictors of creative computing participation and profiles of experience in two silicon valley middle schools. Computers & Education, 54, 178–189. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.017
  • Bauerlein, M. (2008). The dumbest generation: How the digital age stupefies young Americans and jeopardises our future (or, don’t trust anyone under 30). New York, NY: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Penguin.
  • Ben-David Kolikant, Y. (2010). Digital natives, better learners? Students’ beliefs about how the Internet influenced their ability to learn. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1384–1391.
  • Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Bonk, C. J. (2009). The world is open: How web technology is revolutionising education. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Carr, N. (2008). Is Google making us stupid? What the Internet is doing to our brains. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/07/is-google-making-us-stupid/306868/
  • Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold & underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2009). Teaching and the change wars: The professionalism hypothesis. In A. Hargreaves & M. Fullan, M. (Eds.), Change wars (pp. 45–68). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Burns, D. (2017). Empowered educators: How high-performing systems shape teaching quality around the world. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Drucker, P. F. (1993). The rise of the knowledge society. Wilson Quarterly, 17(2), 52–71.
  • Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.
  • European Commission. (2013). Survey of schools: ICT in education. Benchmarking access, use and attitudes to technology in Europe’s schools ( final report). Brussels: Author. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/sites/digital-agenda/files/KK-31-13-401-EN-N.pdf
  • Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Gebhardt, E. (2014). Preparing for life in a digital age. The IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study International Report. Australia. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-14222-7.pdf
  • Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Gil-Flores, J., Rodríguez-Santero, J., & Torres-Gordillo, J. J. (2017). Factors that explain the use of ICT in secondary-education classrooms: The role of teacher characteristics and school infrastructure. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 441–449.
  • Griffin, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (2012). Assessment and teaching of twenty-first century skills. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Kozma, R. B. (Ed.). (2003). Technology, innovation, and educational change: A global perspective. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
  • Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., & Plomp, T. (2008) Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world. Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study. CERC studies in comparative education. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong, and Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2011). EU kids online II: Final report 2011. EU Kids Online. London: London School of Economics & Political Science. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/39351/
  • Luft, J. A., & Hewson, P. W. (2014). Research on teacher professional development knowledge in science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abel (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 889–909). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Magen Nagar, N., Rotem, A., Inbal Shamir, T., & Dayan, R. (2014). The effect of the national ICT plan on the changing classroom performance of teachers. In Y. Eshet-Alkalai, A. Caspi, N. Geri, Y. Kalman, V. Silber-Varod, & Y. Yair (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Chais Conference (pp. 104–111) (in Hebrew). Open University Press. Retrieved from https://www.openu.ac.il/innovation/chais2014/
  • Mama, M., & Hennessy, S. (2013). Developing a typology of teacher beliefs and practices concerning classroom use of ICT. Computers & Education, 68, 380–387.
  • Maskit, D. (2011). Teachers’ attitudes toward pedagogical changes during various stages of professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 851–860.
  • Mioduser, D., Nachmias, R., & Forkosh-Baruch, A. (2008). New literacies for the knowledge society. In J. Voogt et G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 23–42). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9, 319–342.
  • Nir, A., Ben-David, A., Bogler, R., Inbar, D., & Zohar, A. (2016). School autonomy and twenty-first century skills in the Israeli educational system: Discrepancies between the declarative and operational levels. International Journal of Educational Management, 30, 1231–1246.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2004). OECD identifies ‘disappointing’ use of ICT in upper secondary schools. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2006). Are students ready for a technology-rich world? What PISA studies tell us. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/students-computers-and-learning-9789264239555-en.htm
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2016). Supporting teacher professionalism – Insights from TALIS 2013. OECD Publishing.
  • Partnership for 21CS. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.P21.org
  • Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the twenty-first century. National Research Council. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Petko, D. (2012). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their use of digital media in classrooms: Sharpening the focus of the ‘will, skill, tool’ model and integrating teachers’ constructivist orientations. Computers & Education, 58, 1351–1359.
  • Salomon, A., & Ben-David Kolikant, Y. (2016). High-school students’ perceptions of the effects of non-academic usage of ICT on their academic achievements. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 143–151.
  • Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20(3), 2–9.
  • Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Teo, T. (2015). Becoming more specific: Measuring and modeling teachers’ perceived usefulness of ICT in the context of teaching and learning. Computers & Education, 88, 202–214.
  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (2014). What makes for powerful classrooms, and how can we support teachers in creating them? A story of research and practice, productively intertwined. Educational Researcher, 43, 404–412.
  • Somekh, B. (2008). Factors affecting teachers’ pedagogical adoption of ICT. In J. Voogt et G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 449–460). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57, 2432–2440.
  • Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65, 555–575.
  • Turkle, S. (2005). The second self: Computers and the human spirit. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Twenge, J. (2006). Generation me: Why today’s young Americans are more confident, assertive, entitled – and more miserable than ever before. New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Välimaa, J., & Hoffman, D. (2008). Knowledge society discourse and higher education. Higher Education, 56, 265–285.
  • Webb, M., & Cox, M. (2004). A review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13, 235–286. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/69619/

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.