The influence of paired grouping on teacher candidates’ attitude towards technology use and integration

References

• Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality, and behavior (2nd ed.). Milton Keynes: Open University Press (McGraw-Hill).
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. E., & Maninger, R. M. (2007). Preservice teachers’ abilities, beliefs, and intentions regarding technology integration. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37, 151–172.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T., & Watkins, K. (2018). The value of peer mentorship as an educational strategy in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 57, 217–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belland, B. R. (2009). Using the theory of habitus to move beyond the study of barriers to technology integration. Computers & Education, 52, 353–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britton, L. R., & Anderson, K. A. (2010). Peer coaching and pre-service teachers: Examining and underutilized concept. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 306–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik, V., & Yesilyurt, E. (2013). Attitudes to technology, perceived computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety as predictors of computer supported education. Computers & Education, 60, 148–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, T. A., & Green, B. A. (2011). Preservice teachers’ beliefs, attitudes, and motivation about technology integration. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45, 29–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draves, T. J., & Koops, L. H. (2011). Peer mentoring: Key to new music teacher educator success. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 20(2), 67–77.
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, B. P., & Gunter, G. A. (2004). A catalyst for change: Influencing preservice teacher technology proficiency. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 41, 325–336.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbanks, C. M., Freedman, D., & Kahn, C. (2000). The role of effective mentors in learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 102–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goeke, J., Klein, E. J., Garcia-Reid, P., Birnbaum, A. S., Brown, T. L., & Degennaro, D. (2011). Deepening roots: Building a task-centered peer mentoring community. Feminist Formations, 23, 212–234.
   Google Scholar
• Goker, S. D. (2006). Impact of peer coaching on self-efficacy and instructional skills in TEFL teacher education. System, 34, 239–254.
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, G. A. (2001). Making a difference: Using emerging technologies and teaching strategies to restructure an undergraduate technology course for preservice teachers. Education Media International, 38, 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, R. X., & Carey, S. (2008). Attitude change and knowledge transformation. Polyglossia, 15, 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51, 1499–1509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horung, C. S., & Bronack, S. C. (2000). Preparing technology-based teachers. Tech Trends, 44(4), 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, S. (2010). The relationship between teacher’s technology integration ability and usage. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43, 309–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. M., Hamrick, C., & Todorovich, J. (2002). Peer coaching: Implementation and data-collection tools. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 73(4), 47–53.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1980). Improving in-service training: The message of research. Educational Leadership, 37, 379–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajs, L., Underwood, D., Coppenhaver, A., Driskell, T., & Crawford, C. (2001). The integration of technology into classroom lessons in the teacher preparation program at the University of Houston-Clear Lake. Technology and Teacher Education Annual, 2, 1984–1989.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, R. (2006). Evaluating strategies used to incorporate technology into preservice teacher education: A review of the literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38, 383–408.
   Google Scholar
• King, F. (2011). The role of leadership in developing and sustaining teachers’ professional learning. Management in Education, 25, 149–155.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, J., & Gong, Y. (2010). 21st century paradigms for pre-service teacher technology preparation. Computers in the Schools, 27, 54–70.
   Google Scholar
• Leh, A. (2000). Teachers’ comfort level, confidence, and attitude towards technology at a technology course. In D. Willis, J. Price, & J. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education international conference (pp. 343–347). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/15580/
   Google Scholar
• Lu, H. L. (2010). Research on peer coaching in preservice teacher education: A review of the literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 748–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, K. (2005). It’s time to rethink teacher supervision and evaluation. The Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 727–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack, C., & West, D. (2006). Facilitated group mentoring develops key career competencies for university women: A case study. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 14, 409–431.
   Google Scholar
• Mertler, C. A. (2006). Action research: Teachers as researchers in the classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moursund, D., & Bielefeldt, T. (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age? A national survey on information technology in teacher education (Report No. ED428072). Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Mullen, C. A. (2005). Mentorship primer. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Murphey, K. L., Mahoney, S. E., Chen, C., Mendoza-Diaz, N. V., & Yang, X. (2005). A constructivist model of mentoring, coaching, and facilitating online discussions. Distance Education, 26, 341–366.
   Google Scholar
• Naseem, N. R. (2013). Peer mentoring: Enhancing social cohesion in Pakistani universities. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 3, 130–140.
   Google Scholar
• Palak, D., & Walls, R. T. (2009). Teachers’ beliefs and technology practices: A mixed methods approach. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47, 417–441.
   Google Scholar
• Paraskeva, F., Bouta, H., & Papagianni, A. (2008). Individual characteristics and computer self-efficacy in secondary education teachers to integrate technology in educational practice. Computers & Education, 50, 1084–1091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, M., Hare, D., & Howard, E. (2002). Technology integration: Closing the gap between what teacher candidates are taught to do and what they can do. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 191–203.
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, R., & Bos, B. (2011). Mentoring approaches to create a college-going culture for at-risk secondary level students. American Secondary Education, 39(3), 86–107.
   Google Scholar
• Rehmat, A. P., & Bailey, J. M. (2014). Technology integration in a science classroom: Preservice teachers’ perceptions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23, 744–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riza, M. G. (2000). Perspectives on preservice teachers’ attitudes toward technology. The Teacher Educator, 36, 132–147.
   Google Scholar
• Ropp, M. M. (1999). Exploring individual characteristics associated with learning to use computers in preservice teacher preparation. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31, 402–424.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2007). Mentoring for experienced school principals: Professional learning in a safe place. Mentoring and Tutoring, 15, 277–291.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, M. M., Fisman, S., & Davidson, B. (2013). Mentoring and role models in recruitment and retention: A study of junior medical faculty perceptions. Medical Teacher, 35, e1130–e1138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. M., & Ribovich, J. K. (1973). Ability grouping? Stop and reconsider. Reading World, 13(2), 84–91.
   Google Scholar
• Woullard, R., & Coats, L. T. (2004). The community college role in preparing future teachers: The impact of a mentoring program for preservice teachers. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 28, 609–624.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, V. H., & Wilson, E. K. (2005–06). From preservice to inservice teaching: A study of technology integration. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 22(2), 49–55.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, N. (2012). Preschool English language learners’ vocabulary acquisition through multimedia storybook reading. In T. Amiel & B. Wilson (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2012: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 1847–1854). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p4100/
   Google Scholar