811
Views
31
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A study of the Baldrige Award framework using the applicant scoring data

, , &

References

  • Alpert, M., & Peterson, R. (1972). On the interpretation of canonical analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 9(2), 187–192. doi: 10.2307/3149953
  • Badri, M., Selim, H., Alshare, K., Grandon, E., Younis, H., & Abdulla, M. (2006). The Baldrige education criteria for performance excellence framework: Empirical test and validation. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 23(9), 1118–1157. doi: 10.1108/02656710610704249
  • Bemowski, K. (1996). Baldrige Award celebrates its 10th birthday with a new look. Quality Progress, 29(12), 49–54.
  • Bemowski, K., & Stratton, C. (1995). How do people use the Baldrige Award criteria? Quality Progress, 28(5), 43–47.
  • Black, S., & Porter, L. (1996). Identification of the critical factors of TQM. Decision Sciences, 27(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00841.x
  • Bou-Llusar, J., Escrig-Tena, A., Roca-Puig, V., & Beltrán-Martín, I. (2005). To what extent do enablers explain results in the EFQM excellence model? An empirical study. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 22(4), 337–353. doi: 10.1108/02656710510591192
  • Bou-Llusar, J., Escrig-Tena, A., Roca-Puig, V., & Beltrán-Martín, I. (2009). An empirical assessment of the EFQM Excellence Model: Evaluation as a TQM framework relative to the MBNQA Model. Journal of Operations Management, 27(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2008.04.001
  • Boulter, L., Bendell, T., & Dahlgaard, J. (2013). Total quality beyond North America: A comparative analysis of the performance of European excellence award winners. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 33(2), 197–215. doi: 10.1108/01443571311295635
  • Corbett, L., & Angell, L. (2011). Business excellence in New Zealand: Continuous improvement, learning, and change. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 22(7), 755–772. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2011.585782
  • Curkovic, S., Melnyk, S., Calantone, R., & Handfield, R. (2000). Validating the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award framework through structural equation modelling. International Journal of Production Research, 38(4), 765–791. doi: 10.1080/002075400189149
  • Dahlgaard, J., Chen, C.-K., Jang, J.-Y., Banegas, L., & Dahlgaard-Park, S. (2013). Business excellence models: Limitations, reflections and further development. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 24(5–6), 519–538. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2012.756745
  • Dean, J., & Bowen, D. (1994). Management theory and total quality: Improving research and practice through theory development. The Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 392–418.
  • DeBaylo, P. (1999). Ten reasons why the Baldrige model works. Journal for Quality and Participation, 22(1), 24–28.
  • Dellana, S.A., & Hauser, R.D. (1999). Toward defining the quality culture. Engineering and Management Journal, 11(2), 11–15.
  • Dow, D., Samson, D., & Ford, S. (1999). Exploring the myth: Do all quality management practices contribute to superior quality performance? Production and Operations Management, 8(1), 1–27.
  • Eskildsen, J., Kristensen, K., & Juhl, H. (2001). The criterion weights of the EFQM excellence model. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 18(8), 783–795. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000006033
  • Ettorre, B. (1996). Is the Baldrige still meaningful? Management Review, 85(3), 28–31.
  • Flynn, B., & Saladin, B. (2001). Further evidence on the validity of the theoretical models underlying the Baldrige criteria. Journal of Operations Management, 19(6), 617–652. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(01)00072-9
  • Garvin, D.A. (1991). How the Baldrige award really works. Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 80–95.
  • Ghosh, S., Handfield, R., Kannan, V., & Tan, K. (2003). A structural model analysis of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award framework. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 4(4), 289–311. doi: 10.1504/IJMDM.2003.003996
  • Gregory, R. (2011, August). Baldrige 20/20: An executive’s guide to the criteria for performance excellence. Retrieved January 6, 2013, from the National Institute of Standards and Technology: http://www.nist.gov/baldrige/publications/upload/Baldrige_20_20.pdf
  • Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Jayamaha, N., Grigg, N., & Mann, R. (2009). A study of the validity of three major business excellence models in the Asia Pacific region. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 20(11), 1213–1227. doi: 10.1080/14783360903247536
  • Kanter, R.M. (2011, August). Baldrige 20/20: An executive’s guide to the criteria for performance excellence. Retrieved January 6, 2013, from the National Institute of Standards and Technology: http://www.nist.gov/baldrige/publications/upload/Baldrige_20_20.pdf
  • Keinath, B., & Gorski, B. (1999). An empirical study of the Minnesota Quality Award evaluation process. Quality Management Journal, 6(1), 29–39.
  • Lau, R., Zhao, X., & Ming, X. (2004). Assessing quality management in China with MBNQA criteria. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 21(7), 699–713. doi: 10.1108/02656710410549064
  • Lima, M., Resende, M., & Hasenclever, L. (2004). Skill enhancement efforts and firm performance in the Brazilian chemical industry: An exploratory canonical correlation analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(2), 149–155. doi: 10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00101-4
  • Macinati, M. (2008). The relationship between quality management systems and organizational performance in the Italian national health service. Health Policy, 85(2), 228–241. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.07.013
  • Mann, R., Adebanjo, D., Laosirihongthong, T., & Punnakitikashem, P. (2011). Awareness and impact of business excellence in Asia. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 22(11), 1237–1258. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2011.624772
  • Mehra, S., Hoffman, J., & Sirias, D. (2001). TQM as a management strategy for the next millennia. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(5), 855–876. doi: 10.1108/01443570110390534
  • Meyer, S., & Collier, D. (2001). An empirical test of the causal relationships in the Baldrige health care pilot criteria. Journal of Operations Management, 19(4), 403–426. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(01)00053-5
  • Moon, J.Y., Lee, S.C., Yong Seung, P., & Yung Ho, S. (2011). A study on the causal relationships in the Korean national quality award model. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 22(7), 705–726. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2011.585767
  • NIST. (2011, January 24). Blinded scoring data for Baldrige Award applicants 1990–2006. Retrieved December 13, 2012, from the National Institute of Standards and Technology: http://www.nist.gov/baldrige/data_analysis/index.cfm
  • NIST. (2012, April 26). 2006 criteria for performance excellence. Retrieved February 7, 2013, from the National Institute of Standards and Technology: http://www.nist.gov/baldrige/publications/archive/upload/2006_Business_Criteria.pdf
  • NIST. (2013a, January 5). 2011–2012 criteria for performance excellence. Retrieved January 23, 2013, from the National Institute of Standards and Technology: http://www.nist.gov/baldrige/publications/upload/2011_2012_Business_Nonprofit_Criteria.pdf
  • NIST. (2013b, June 27). Frequently asked questions about the scoring data. Retrieved June 28, 2013, from the National Institute of Standards and Technology: http://www.nist.gov/baldrige/data_analysis/upload/2011-Blinded-Data-FAQs.pdf
  • Pannirselvam, G., & Ferguson, L.A. (2001). A study of the relationships between the Baldrige categories. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 18(1), 14–37. doi: 10.1108/02656710110364468
  • Pannirselvam, G.P., Siferd, S.P., & Ruch, W.A. (1998). Validation of the Arizona Governor's quality award criteria: A test of the Baldrige criteria. Journal of Operations Management, 16(5), 529–550. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(97)00025-9
  • Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  • Prajogo, D., & McDermott, C. (2005). The relationship between total quality management practices and organizational culture. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(11), 1101–1122. doi: 10.1108/01443570510626916
  • Safari, H., Abdollahi, B., & Ghasemi, R. (2012). Canonical correlation analysis between people criterion and people results criterion in EFQM model. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 23(5–6), 541–555. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2012.669540
  • Su, C.T., Li, S.C., & Su, C.H. (2003). An empirical study of the Taiwan national quality award causal model. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 14(8), 875–893. doi: 10.1080/1478336032000090815
  • Townsend, P., & Gebhardt, J. (1996). The importance of the Baldrige to US economy. Journal of Quality and Participation, 19(4), 6–13.
  • Tutuncu, O., & Kucukusta, D. (2007). Relationship between organizational commitment and EFQM business excellence model: A study on Turkish quality award winners. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 18(10), 1083–1096. doi: 10.1080/14783360701594709
  • Tutuncu, O., & Kucukusta, D. (2010). Canonical correlation between job satisfaction and EFQM business excellence model. Quality and Quantity, 44(6), 1227–1238. doi: 10.1007/s11135-009-9269-0
  • Vokurka, R. (2001). Using the Baldrige criteria for personal quality improvement. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 101(7), 363–369. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000005824
  • Wilson, D., & Collier, D. (2000). An empirical investigation of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award causal model. Decision Sciences, 31(2), 361–390. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2000.tb01627.x
  • Wu, H., Wiebe, H., & Politi, J. (1997). Self-assessment of total quality management programs. Engineering Management Journal, 9(1), 25–31.
  • Yung, W. (1997). The values of TQM in the revised ISO 9000 quality system. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17(2), 221–230. doi: 10.1108/01443579710158078

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.