A study on education quality using the Taguchi method

References

• Astin, A.W. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barone, S., & Lo Franco, E. (2009). Design of a university course quality by teaching experiments and student feedback (TESF). Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 20(7), 687–703. doi: 10.1080/14783360903036939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C.Y., Chen, P.C., & Chen, P.Y. (2014). Teaching quality in higher education: An introductory review on a process-oriented teaching-quality model. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(1–2), 36–56. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2011.637789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deslaurier, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, 332, 862–864. doi: 10.1126/science.1201783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, F., Douglas, A., & Barnes, B. (2006). Measuring student satisfaction at a UK university. Quality Assurance in Education, 14(3), 251–267. doi: 10.1108/09684880610678568
   Google Scholar
• Duque, L.C. (2014). A framework for analyzing higher education performance: Students’ satisfaction, perceived learning outcomes, and dropout intentions. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(1–2), 1–21. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2013.807677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagle, L., & Brennan, R. (2007). Are student customers? TQM and marketing perspectives. Quality Assurance in Education, 15(1), 44–60. doi: 10.1108/09684880710723025
   Google Scholar
• Jeon, M. (2002). The condition of our time best teacher, Kyosushinmum, p. 244, 11. Retrieved from http://www.kyosu.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=2968
   Google Scholar
• Kackar, R.N. (1985). Off-line quality control, parameter design, and the Taguchi method. Journal of Quality Technology, 17(4), 176–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, S. (2000). Hardware is soft, software is hard. Seoul, Korea: Yangseowon.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Caro, E., Cegarra-Navarro, J., and Cepeda-Carrion, G. (2014). An application of the performance-evaluation model for e-learning quality in higher education. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/14783363.2013.867607
   Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. & Berry, L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pignatiello, Jr. J.J., & Ramberg, J.S. (1985). Discuss about: Raghu N. Kackar's Taguchi Method. Journal of Quality Technology, 17(4), 198–206.
   Google Scholar
• Raharjo, H., Xie, M., Ngee Goh, T., & Brombacher, A.C. (2007). A methodology to improve higher education quality using the quality function deployment and analytic hierarchy process. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 18(10), 1097–1115. doi: 10.1080/14783360701595078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramseook-Munhurrun, P., Naidoo, P., & Nundlall, P. (2010). A proposed model for measuring service quality in secondary education. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 2(3), 335–351. doi: 10.1108/17566691011090062
   Google Scholar
• Ree, S. (2003). Easy Taguchi technique from foundation to the field application (3rd ed., Korean). Seoul, Korea: Sangjosa.
   Google Scholar
• Taguchi, G. (1991). Taguchi's quality engineering 1: Design phase of development. Seoul, Korea: Korean Standards Association.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, R.K., & Li, J. (2014). Beyond SERVQUAL: The competitive forces of higher education in Singapore. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(1–2), 95–123. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2011.637802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildiz, S.M. (2014). Service quality evaluation in the school of physical education and sports: An empirical investigation of students’ perceptions. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(1–2), 80–94. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2011.637804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar