Enablers of Six Sigma: contextual framework and its empirical validation

References

• Aboelmaged, M. G. (2010). Reconstructing Six Sigma barriers in manufacturing and service organisations – The effects of organisational parameters. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 28(5), 519–541. doi: 10.1108/02656711111132562
   Google Scholar
• Aldag, R. J., & Steams, T. M. (1988). Issues in research methodology. Journal of Management, 14(2), 253–276. doi: 10.1177/014920638801400207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, D., & Govindan, K. (2011). An analysis of the drivers affecting the implementation of green supply chain management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(6), 659–667. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand, G., Ward, P. T., & Tatikonda, M. V. (2010). Role of explicit and tacit knowledge in Six Sigma projects: An empirical examination of differential project success. Journal of Operations Management, 28(4), 303–315. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2009.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. G., & Gerbing, D. W. (1982). Some methods for re-specifying measurement models to obtain unidimensional construct measurement. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 453–460. doi: 10.2307/3151719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antony, J., & Banuelas, R. (2002). Key ingredients for the effective implementation of Six Sigma program. Measuring Business Excellence, 6(4), 20–27. doi: 10.1108/13683040210451679
   Google Scholar
• Antony, J., & Desai, D. (2009). Assessing the status of Six Sigma implementation in the Indian industry. Management Research News, 32(5), 413–423. doi: 10.1108/01409170910952921
   Google Scholar
• Antony, J., Antony, J. F., Kumar, M., & Cho, R. B. (2006). Six Sigma in service organisations benefits, challenges and difficulties, common myths, empirical observations and success factors. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 24(3), 294–311. doi: 10.1108/02656710710730889
   Google Scholar
• Antony, J., Kumar, M., & Madu, C. N. (2005). Six Sigma in small-and medium-sized UK manufacturing enterprises: Some empirical observations. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 22(8), 860–874. doi: 10.1108/02656710510617265
   Google Scholar
• Arumugam, V., Antony, J., & Kumar, M. (2013). Linking learning and knowledge creation to project success in Six Sigma projects: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Production Economics, 141(1), 388–402. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banuelas, R., & Antony, J. (2002). Critical success factors for the successful implementation of Six Sigma projects in organizations. The TQM Magazine, 14(2), 92–99. doi: 10.1108/09544780210416702
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand, J. W. M., & Fransoo, J. C. (2002). Operations management research methodologies using quantitative modeling. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(2), 241–264. doi: 10.1108/01443570210414338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braunscheidel, M. J., Hamister, J. W., Suresh, N. C., & Star, H. (2011). An institutional theory perspective on Six Sigma adoption. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(4), 423–451. doi: 10.1108/01443571111119542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braunscheidel, M. J., & Suresh, N. C. (2009). The organizational antecedents of a firm's supply chain agility for risk management and response. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 119–140. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2008.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breyfogle, F. W.III, Cupello, J. M., & Meadows, B. (2001). Managing Six Sigma: A practical guide to understanding, assessing and implementing the strategy that yields bottom-line success. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Brun, A. (2011). Critical success factors of Six Sigma implementations in Italian companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 131(1), 158–164. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buch, K., & Tolentino, A. (2006). Employee perceptions of the rewards associated with Six Sigma. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19(3), 356–364. doi: 10.1108/09534810610668355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burch, V. R. F., Strawderman, L., & Bullington, S. (2014). Global corporation rollout of ruggedised handheld devices: A Lean Six Sigma case study. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, ahead-of-print, 1–15. doi:10.1080/14783363.2014.934521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, A., & Kay Chuan, T. (2009). An exploratory qualitative and quantitative analysis of Six Sigma in service organizations in Singapore. Management Research News, 32(7), 614–632. doi: 10.1108/01409170910965224
   Google Scholar
• Chakravorty, S. S. (2009). Six Sigma programs: An implementation model. International Journal of Production Economics, 119(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, I. J., & Paulraj, A. (2004). Towards a theory of supply chain management: The constructs and measurements. Journal of Operations Management, 22(2), 119–150. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2003.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, B., Kim, J., Leem, B.-H., & Lee, C.-Y., & Hong, H.-K. (2012). Empirical analysis of the relationship between Six Sigma management activities and corporate competitiveness: Focusing on Samsung group in Korea. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(5), 528–550. doi: 10.1108/01443571211226489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choo, A. S., Linderman, K. W., & Schroeder, R. G. (2007a). Method and context perspectives on learning and knowledge creation in quality management. Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), 918–931. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2006.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choo, A. S., Linderman, K. W., & Schroeder, R. G. (2007b). Method and psychological effects on learning behaviors and knowledge creation in quality improvement projects. Management Science, 53(3), 437–450. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(2), 64–73. doi: 10.2307/3150876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/Correlation analysis for the behavioural sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2001). Business research methods. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies.
   Google Scholar
• Converse, J. M., & Presser, S. (1986). Survey questions: Handcrafting the standardized questionnaire. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Coronado, R. B., & Antony, J. (2002). Critical success factors for the successful implementation of Six Sigma projects in organizations. The TQM Magazine, 14(2), 92–99. doi: 10.1108/09544780210416702
   Google Scholar
• Cronemyr, P., Eriksson, M., & Jakolini, S. (2014). Six Sigma diplomacy–the impact of Six Sigma on national patterns of corporate culture. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(7–8), 827–841. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2014.906108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crozier, M., & Thoenig, J. C. (1976). The regulation of complex organized systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(4), 547–570. doi: 10.2307/2391716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological methods, 1(1), 16–29. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, D. A., Antony, J., & Patel, M. B. (2011). An assessment of the critical success factors for Six Sigma implementation in Indian industries. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(4), 426–444. doi: 10.1108/17410401211212670
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (2007). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design – 2007 update. Hoboken: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. (2000). Elements of the tailored design method. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, G. S., & Rosenzweig, E. D. (2012). The role of experience in Six Sigma project success: An empirical analysis of implementation projects. Journal of Operations Management, 30(7/8), 481–493. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2012.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckes, G. (2001). The Six Sigma revolution: How general electric and others turned process into profits. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39–50. doi: 10.2307/3151312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of marketing research, 25(2), 186–192. doi: 10.2307/3172650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gijo, E. V., & Scaria, J. (2014). Process improvement through Six Sigma with Beta correction: A case study of manufacturing company. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 71(1–4), 717–730. doi: 10.1007/s00170-013-5483-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosnik, D., & Vujica-Herzog, N. (2010). Success factors for Six Sigma implementation in Slovenian manufacturing companies. Advances in Production Engineering & Management, 5(4), 205–216.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis, with readings (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Handfield, R. B., & Melnyk, S. A. (1998). The scientific theory-building process: A primer using the case of TQM. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 321–339. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00017-5
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, G. S., & Wernerfelt, B. (1989). Determinants of firm performance: The relative importance of organizational and economic factors. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 607–618.
   Google Scholar
• Harry, M. J. (1998). Six Sigma: A breakthrough strategy for profitability. Quality Progress, May, 60–64.
   Google Scholar
• Heckl, D., Moormann, J., & Rosemann, M. (2010). Uptake and success factors of Six Sigma in the financial services industry. Business Process Management Journal, 16(3), 436–472. doi: 10.1108/14637151011049449
   Google Scholar
• Jeyaraman, K., & Teo, L. K. (2010). A conceptual framework for critical success factors of lean Six Sigma: Implementation on the performance of electronic manufacturing service industry. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 1(3), 191–215. doi: 10.1108/20401461011075008
   Google Scholar
• Jin, T., Janamanchi, B., & Feng, Q. (2011). Reliability deployment in distributed manufacturing chains via closed-loop Six Sigma methodology. International Journal of Production Economics, 130(1), 97–103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.11.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E. C., Parast, M. M., & Adams, S. G. (2010). A framework for effective Six Sigma implementation. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 21(4), 415–424. doi: 10.1080/14783361003606720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushik, P., & Khanduja, D. (2009). Application of Six Sigma DMAIC methodology in thermal power plants: A case study. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 20(2), 197–207. doi: 10.1080/14783360802622995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketokivi, M., & Choi, T. (2014). Renaissance of case research as a scientific method. Journal of Operations Management, 32(5), 232–240. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2014.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D.-S. (2010). Eliciting success factors of applying Six Sigma in an academic library. Performance Measurement & Metrics, 11(1), 25–38. doi: 10.1108/14678041011026847
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, D. C., Mellat-Parast, M., & Adams, S. (2014). Six Sigma implementation: A qualitative case study using grounded theory. Production Planning & Control, 25(10), 873–889. doi: 10.1080/09537287.2013.771414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, U. D., Nowicki, D., Ramirez-Marquez, J. E., & Verma, D. (2008). On the optimal selection of process alternatives in a Six Sigma implementation. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 456–467. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak, Y. H., & Anbari, F. T. (2006). Benefits, obstacles, and future of Six Sigma approach. Technovation, 26(5), 708–715. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, D. M., & Harrington, T. C. (1990). Measuring nonresponse bias in customer service mail surveys. Journal of Business Logistics, 11(2), 5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. C., & Choi, B. (2006). Six Sigma management activities and their influence on corporate competitiveness. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 17(7), 893–911. doi: 10.1080/14783360600595351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linderman, K., Schroeder, R. G., & Choo, A. S. (2006). Six Sigma: The role of goals in improvement teams. Journal of Operations Management, 24(6), 779–790. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2005.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linderman, K., Schroeder, R. G., Zaheer, S., & Choo, A. S. (2003). Six Sigma: A goal-theoretic perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 193–203. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00087-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, M. K., & Grover, V. (1998). An assessment of survey research in POM: From constructs to theory. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 407–425. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00021-7
   Google Scholar
• Mandal, A., & Deskmukh, S. G. (1994). Vendor selection using interpretive structural modeling (ism). International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 14(6), 52–59. doi: 10.1108/01443579410062086
   Google Scholar
• Markman, G., & Krause, D. (2014). Special topic forum on theory building surrounding sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(3), i–ii. doi: 10.1111/jscm.12057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Mast, J., & Lokkerbol, J. (2012). An analysis of the Six Sigma DMAIC method from the perspective of problem solving. International Journal of Production Economics, 139(2), 604–614. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.05.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, R., & Lafferty, B. (2004). A multilevel case study critique of Six Sigma: Statistical control or strategic change? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(5), 530–549. doi: 10.1108/01443570410532579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith, J. (1998). Building operations management theory through case and field research. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 441–454. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00023-0
   Google Scholar
• Monteiro de Carvalho, M., Lee Ho, L., & Helena Boarin Pinto, S. (2014). The Six Sigma program: An empirical study of Brazilian companies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 25(5), 602–630. doi: 10.1108/JMTM-04-2012-0045
   Google Scholar
• Nair, A., Malhotra, M. K., & Ahire, S. L. (2011). Toward a theory of managing context in Six Sigma process-improvement projects: An action research investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 29(5), 529–548. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2010.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonthaleerak, P., & Hendry, L. (2008). Exploring the Six Sigma phenomenon using multiple case study evidence. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 28, 279–303. doi: 10.1108/01443570810856198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pal Pandi, A., Rajendra Sethupathi, P. V., & Jeyathilagar, D. (2014). The IEQMS model for augmenting quality in engineering institutions–an interpretive structural modelling approach. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/14783363.2014.978647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepper, M. P. J., & Spedding, T. A. (2010). The evolution of lean Six Sigma. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 27(2), 138–155. doi: 10.1108/02656711011014276
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, L. W., & Bagozzi, R. P. (1986). On measuring organizational properties of distribution channels: Methodological issues in the use of key informants. Research in Marketing, 8(1), 313–369.
   Google Scholar
• Prashar, A. (2015). Six Sigma adoption in public utilities: A case study. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/14783363.2014.978647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saghaei, A. (2012). Enhanced rolled throughput yield: A new Six Sigma-based performance measure. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 368–373. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, R. G., Linderman, K., Liedtke, C., Choo, A. S. (2008). Six Sigma: Definition and underlying theory. Journal of Operations Management, 26(4), 536–554. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2007.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenherr, T., & Mabert, V. A. (2008). The use of bundling in B2B online reverse auctions. Journal of Operations Management, 26(1), 81–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2007.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafer, S. M., & Moeller, S. B. (2012). The effects of Six Sigma on Corporate performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 30(7/8), 521–532. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2012.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soti, A., Shankar, R., & Kaushal, O. P. (2010). Modeling the enablers of Six Sigma using interpreting structural modeling. Journal of Modelling in Management, 5(2), 124–141. doi: 10.1108/17465661011060989
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sushil. (2012). Interpreting the interpretive structural model. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(2), 87–106. doi: 10.1007/s40171-012-0008-3
   Google Scholar
• Swamidass, P. M. (1991). Empirical science: New frontier in operations management research. Academy of management review, 16(4), 793–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swink, M., & Jacobs, B. W. (2012). Six Sigma adoption: Operating performance impacts and contextual drivers of success. Journal of Operations Management, 30(6), 437–453. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2012.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanik, M., & Sen, A. (2012). A six sigma case study in a large-scale automotive supplier company in Turkey. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 23(3–4), 343–358. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2011.637798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari, M. K., Antony, J., & Montgomery, D. C. (2008). Editorial note for the special issue on effective decision support to implement lean and Six Sigma methodologies in the manufacturing and service sectors. International Journal of Production Research, 46(23), 6563–6566. doi: 10.1080/00207540802230041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomkins, R. (1997, October 10). GE beats expected 13% rise, Financial Times, p. 22.
   Google Scholar
• Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of a systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.00375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Treville, S., Edelson, N. M., Kharkar, A. N., & Avanzi, B. (2008). Constructing useful theory: The case of Six Sigma. Operations Management Research, 1(1), 15–23. doi: 10.1007/s12063-008-0005-z
   Google Scholar
• Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N., & Frohlich, M. (2002). Case research in operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(2), 195–219. doi: 10.1108/01443570210414329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacker, J. G. (1998). A definition of theory: Research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00019-9
   Google Scholar
• Wacker, J. G. (2004). A theory of formal conceptual definitions: Developing theory-building measurement instruments. Journal of Operations Management, 22(6), 629–650. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2004.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warfield, J. W. (1974). Developing interconnected matrices in structural modelling. IEEE Transcript on Systems, Men and Cybernetics, 4(1), 51–81.
   Google Scholar
• Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495. doi: 10.2307/258554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., Wang, W., Goh, T. N., & He, Z. (2014). Comprehensive Six Sigma application: A case study. Production Planning & Control, ahead-of-print, 1–16. doi:10.1080/09537287.2014.891058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zu, X., Fredendall, L. D., & Douglas, T. J. (2008). The evolving theory of quality management: The role of Six Sigma. Journal of Operations Management, 26(5), 630–650. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2008.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zu, X., Robbins, T. L., & Frendendall, L. D. (2010). Mapping the critical links between organizational culture and TQM/Six Sigma practices. International Journal of Production Economics, 123(1), 86–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar